Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Shocking costs created by Tory led Government in 2012. Taxpayers brace for £100bn money-printing bill – as George Osborne says it’s ‘not my responsibility’ MSN WWW.MSN.COM  
    • Sorry, I may have forgot to get back on this. Please monitor for a reply tomorrow
    • Yes, now its just about getting the WS / Court bundle finalised to send to the court / Evri. I've attached the most recent version of the WS / Court bundle to save having to scroll back up to the previous post (#204) where it was also shared. If you, @BankFodder or anyone else has any feedback on this, i'd be grateful for your thoughts. In my previous post #204, i'd also attached an invoice from Packlink which shows that I was charged by Packlink for these services: "drop-off at Her mes - Next day delivery" and "Proof of Delivery". It also has the payer's address and there are "Origin" and "Destination" fields which have the postcode of the sender [origin] and the recipient [destination] - I have redacted personal details in the attached invoice.  I am already including this in my evidence bundle (without the redaction) but wanted to share this redacted version so that other people can consider this as example in their bundle of Packlink and Evri's contract being instigated by the sender of the parcel who has paid for the service, and further shows that there is information in the invoice to identify that a third party beneficiary (the sender / recipient) is involved in this transaction. I have also attached this redacted invoice in this post to save having to scroll back up. Happy to get any thoughts and if this invoice is no good, then please let me know.   Draft - Witness Statement and Court Bundle redacted.pdf Packlink invoice - REDACTED.pdf
    • Does anyone know if I would be allowed to record conversations with health professionals for my own use on my phone without them knowing. I know that we are allowed to record phone calls. I do record some of my phone calls for my own use due to my disability and if anything is said then I am covered. I would only record audio in private area's of myself and the professional dealing with me. I know I could not get and other persons audio in it and I don't intend to. my only other option is to buy a body cam but I am not sure the rules regarding this.I never thought i would have to but things are getting worse Thanks for any guidance 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Torn in two


benidorm60
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4256 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Well many people on here and on other sites are very clearly upset when they find they are being investigated after being reported erroneously so I think it does do damage and can ruin friendships. I know this is the OPs call but even if I knew a person was doing what she is saying I still don't think I could report them it's just how I personally feel about it. Its not that I condone it, I really don't but the full facts are not just the material or financial facts. Perhaps this woman is in a transitional phase in her life where she is now in this relationship, trying to go back to work I don't know what her situation with her boyfriend is perhaps he is staying there but regards his money as his own and never contributes a penny. And God forgive me but I don't think a person on benefits doing the odd bit of cash in hand work is the biggest crime of the century, In the 80's we had a neighbour who was out of work long term as were many men. He had three kids and a wife and to for a bit of extra cash he cleaned the windows of a local pub once a week for a few quid until someone reported him leaving him and his family in crisis. It's not ideal but I don't think it's so terrible I really don't, peope do what they have to do to get by sometimes.

 

good post, one should think about the impact of what reporting would do, she works part time not full time, and her partner could easily leave her, so a report could turn her life into a suicidal situation quite easily.

Link to post
Share on other sites

what do you mean by cant get a swap.

 

it sounds like you jealous.

 

I dont know if she is claiming anything she shouldnt be but I think reporting fraudsters unless its large scale isnt something worth bothering with especially when its friends.

 

What would the OP be jealous of?

Link to post
Share on other sites

what do you mean by cant get a swap.

 

it sounds like you jealous.

 

I dont know if she is claiming anything she shouldnt be but I think reporting fraudsters unless its large scale isnt something worth bothering with especially when its friends.

 

I am not jealous why would I be, my friends daughter is now in trouble I was asking what may happen now.

I didnt report her but some other do gooder did.

I had my swap and am moving to my new house to be near my job and trying to help my friend but dont know what to say to her.

Her daughter has four children one with DlA so they need their mum

Link to post
Share on other sites

To be honest, it is probably best for her that somebody has informed the authorities of her fraud now rather than later

 

I regularly deal with people who have been in same situation as your friend's daughter, many of them have been committing fraud for a number of years, and when they get caught, they end up with a criminal record and a debt of £30k + which will be with them for years

 

Would they not have been better if someone had reported them years before?

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is unfortunately only one person to blame for this, and that is the person who has not informed the DWP and LA of their change in circumstances, no one else is to blame for the embarrassing and stressful situation this girl is now in. It's no good placing the blame at anyone else's door. Hopefully, if it has not been for long repayments can be set up for the amount overpaid and they won't take court action. She will get through this. Hopefully she will now realise the seriousness of incorrectly claiming benefits or not declaring income and will not do it again, and others who know her who might have behaved the same won't also do it. The more people are aware of people claiming and not declaring or claiming incorrectly and getting away with it the more others will do the same. I do however feel sorry for her and hope she is ok and treated kindly and that no court action is taken, but I place the blame entirely with her unfortunately and no one else.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The LA or JCP must have been looking in to this for some time, they will have been gathering evidence on this ready for their case

All she can do is be honest with them it would be for the best she and all she can do now.

The mother seemed to encourage her in my opinion and that not good either

I dont know how long it has been going on for but may result in an overpayment of both I.S and HB

Link to post
Share on other sites

The lengths to which the authorities will go in gathering evidence on suspected benefits cheats cannot be underestimated, as I said before. That said, if she confesses now and doesn't try to hide anything, offers to repay, and if it's not been going on for too long, they will treat the case with some leniency.

 

For those who question whether benefit fraud is worth investigating, I always ask whether they'd accept a £1000 theft from the Post Office as normal. Still a 'drop in the ocean' of public money, but many drops make an ocean and in case anyone hadn't noticed, money is a bit short right now. What I do have sympathy for is those in genuine need who can't get the support they need, or faced with mountains of bureaucracy, as being experienced by disabled people undergoing 'reassessment'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What would the OP be jealous of?

 

the OP said she is financially struggling?

 

then she mentioned a holiday and so on suggesting that the other person in question is financially better off when doing less work.

 

This is the mindset of many anti benefit people in that they dont recognise the real reason people get benefits and think they just getting free money for nothing and having a luxury lifestyle. So they then happy to report at the first chance they get made much easier by a silly idea of keeping it anonymous.

 

This may not be the case with the OP, but it was the impression I got.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know, although I dont know her personal circumstances.

 

What I do know is I knew someone who was sort of similiar circumstances.

 

When I first moved out of my parents I moved in with a good friend of mine. Eventually he found someone and started dating her, this women he found was a single mum she didnt work had DLA, housing benefit, council tax benefit, not sure if she claimed anything else on top of that. After a while he was living with her full time and I had the house to myself. They would rotate between the 2 properties every couple of weeks.

 

During this time she kept all her benefits going when I believe technically she shouldnt have but I fully understand why she did, becaue the relationship could break down at any given moment and it would be a battle to reclaim everything.

 

Eventually they decided to progress the relationship and my friend was selling the house, he said he was going to change her life, she would be off housing benefit and council tax benefit as he would fully support her, I assume at that point she would be technically legal on what she is claiming so it was only a temporary situation.

 

The potential repurcussions if she got reported before they got too attached to each other would be my friend may have decided having a partner been investigated for benefit fraud would be too much and split up but by that point she would be in trouble for what she is doing so would be on her own going through the fraud procedures with no income (as I assume benefits stopped for the duration) with her life likely wrecked. To me these sort of situations are sensitive and its usually vulnerable people involved, I expect doing things like occasional cash in hands jobs is not too uncommon, and I put it alongside self employed people not delcaring all their income to pay less taxes in terms of seriousness.

 

Now I should be very angry at fraudsters as it can be argued the fact they exist is why benefits are so tough to get, but my view is they make very little difference and they are a conveniant excuse for benefit cuts.

 

3 days ago I read a post on the bbc website comment section. The guy posted he was on a 6 figure salary, he was angry at paying 50% instead of 45% tax on top part of his earnings so he deliberatly made his wage min wage and put rest of his income in dividends. He did an extreme measure to pay the least tax possible, to me thats far worse than what this lady is doing. But what this guy did I believe is legal.

Edited by worried33
Link to post
Share on other sites

He has been living in the houshold for four years, she has been working for a year.

Nothing more to say unrill the interviiew.

They have a car for the little one will they lose it. My friend is mad and I thank God I didnt report them

I dont agree with it all but am not judge and jury.

My friends daughter is worried and has said when she finds out who has done it to them. God help them.

My friend has said the daughter is on £705 a week in total boyfriend only £300 so how the dickens is he gong to support them if found living over the brush.

What can they claim??

Have told my friend am posting her and she is happy for suggetions, but I am stuck to be honest

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it's a car funded by Motability, they won't lose it. DLA has nothing to do with income and is based on care and /or mobility needs.

 

Thank you for that, they need the car to get him around

If she closed her claim and said they he had just moved in would they be ok. I dont think so but my friend thinks it is a good idea.

None of his bills are at her daughters address he put his mums address down.

My friend isnt on the internet so thats why I am asking for her

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...