Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You will probably get a couple more reminders followed by further demands fro unregulated debt collectors with even increasing amounts to pay. They are all designed to scare you into paying.  Don't. It's a scam site and they do not know who was driving and they know the keeper is not liable to pay the PCN. Also the shop was closed so they have no legitimate interest in keeping the car park clear. So to charge £100 is a penalty as there is no legitimate interest which means that the case would be thrown out if it went to Court.  Keep your money in your wallet and be prepared to ignore all their letters and threats. Doubtful they would go to Court since a lot more people would not pay when they heard  MET lost in Court. However they may just send you a Letter of Claim to test your resolve.  If yoy get one of those, come back to us and we will advise a snotty letter to send them.  You probably already have, but take a look through some of our past Met PCNs to see how they are doing.
    • Hello, been a while since I posted on here, really hoping for the same support an advice I received last time :-) Long, long story for us, but basically through bad choices, bad luck and bad advice ended up in an IVA in 2016. The accounts involved all defaulted, to be expected. In 2018, I got contacted by an 'independent advisor' advising me that I shouldn't be in an IVA, that it wasn't the solution for our circumstances and that they would guide us through the process of leaving the IVA and finding a better solution. I feel very stupid for taking this persons advice, and feel they prey on vulnerable people for their own financial gain (it ended with us paying our IVA monthly contribution to them)-long and short of it our IVA failed in 2018. At the same time the IVA failed we also had our shared ownership property voluntarily repossessed (to say this was an incredibly stressful time would be an understatement!) When we moved to our new (rented) property in August 2018, I was aware that creditors would start contacting us from the IVA failure. I got advice from another help website and started sending off SARs and CCAs request letters. I was advised not to bury my head and update our address etc and tackle each company as they came along. Initially there was quite a lot of correspondence, and I still get a daily missed call from PRA group (and the occasional letter from them), but not much else. However, yesterday i had a letter through from Lowell (and one from Capital One) advising that they had bought my debt and would like to speak with me regarding the account. There will be several.of these through our door i suspect, as we did have several accounts with Capital One. Capital One have written to us with regular statements over the last 5 years, and my last communication with them was to advise of of our new address (June 2019), I also note that all of these accounts received a small payment in Jan2019 (i'm assuming the funds from the failed IVA pot). Really sorry for the long long post, but just thought id give (some of) the background for context.... I guess my question at the moment is.....how do I respond to Lowell...do I wait for the inevitable other letters to arrive then deal with them all together or individually...? Do I send them a CCA?  Many thanks
    • hi all just got the reminder letter, I have attached it and also the 2nd side of the original 1st pcn (i just saw the edit above) Look forward to your advice Thanks   PCN final reminder.pdf pcn original side 2.pdf
    • The airline said it was offering to pay $10,000 to those who sustained minor injuries.View the full article
    • The Senate Finance Committee wants answers from BMW over its use of banned Chinese components by 21 June.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help with Council Tax Bailiff needed urgently...


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4430 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

Thanks for your help in advance everyone. To cut a very long story short I've had problems being able to pay by my Council Tax for about 6 years now (since a divorce funnily enough!), I've explained my situation to the council, informed them of a low self-employed income of approximately £10 K, etc. but they've got liability orders & still sent Bailiffs to me each year (Rossendales). Each year I've had to write to Rossendales explaining my situation, write & visit the council, etc & tell them I just can't pay. To be positive about a Bailiff for a change, although they have been quite 'forceful' in asking for money they have listened to me & handed the debt back to the council to sort out (eventually).

 

This afternoon I went out to my car to find it clamped with a notice from a different firm on my side window, asking me to pay nearly 8 K in full, in the next few hours, or my car will be "taken & sold at public auction".

 

It was just an A4 piece of paper with a 5 digit reference number on, no other documentation, no court reference etc. I've phoned & spoken to their representative, informing him that I'm self employed & I need my car for work. He said as it's not a van I don't & I can use public transport - I told him I need to carry up to 6 PC's & tools etc & this would be impossible on public transport - "well hire a vehicle" was his reply. He then questioned whether or not I was self employed (I'm a sole trader) & wanted me to be able to produce company accounts. He told me the only way he would release the clamp was if I paid over £600, the amount of one of the liability orders and wasn't prepared to enter any sort of payment plan.

 

I then phoned the council collections department who said they would speak to the bailiff & get back to me. He phoned back to say it was with the Bailiff & the council were not prepared to do anything & 'that was his last word on the matter'.

 

If anyone could help with this at all I'd be incredibly grateful, I've got 2 young children, work I need to be able to transport large bulky machines to & from & I'm already on medication for a stress related illness, I need my car! Thanks.

Edited by Jimbo512
Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you remove the wheel , put the spare on and move the car a few streets away. -I would out of desperation but

 

 

I dont know if it is liiegal or not so I may be giving you wrong idea!! Depends on the notice left. I believe there are some baillif experts on this site and I am not one of them

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Thorntondog but I don't want to do anything that could be deemed illegal. Apart from the Bailiffs own A4 letter asking for payment in full, with 'URGENT' in big black type on a red background stuck to my car & another similar notice posted through my door asking for £7, 841 immediately (that I've only just found) that's the only paperwork - nothing 'official'.

 

Is it legal to turn up & on a first visit do this on a vehicle without giving any option to pay or with no official paperwork? Also there is no Liability Order for £7, 841, as stated on their letter, but different Liability Orders which I doubt even when added together comes to this sum, is that legal?

Edited by Jimbo512
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks PT, if I phone the Bailiff in the morning & ask him to produce this am I within my rights to ask him to come & remove the clamp until he can produce this? Or will he just go & get a clamping order & bring it when he takes my car? From looking through some of the other threads it would seem that the bailiff should have left me a copy of the relevent legislation - section 5 is that right? If so then all I received was the paperwork mentioned in my initial thread. Also, has my car been lawfully 'levied against', whatever that means? Thanks very much in advance for your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The use of a clamp for Council Tax is highly questionable - no doubt the Bailiff will say it is perfectly lawful. If the Bailiff has the relevant clamping order issued by the Court then no problem, if not it could be that he has caused a trespass against the vehicle and could be sued for damages in the County Court. Alternatively you could release the vehicle from the clamp but to do so must be done without any damage to the device, you must then inform the clown his clamp is available for collection. One thing you have to watch out for when a vehicle is clamped is that sometimes the local toerags think it a good idea to saw the clamp off then go & toss it in the nearest river!

 

When he attended he should have left you the relevant Notice of Seizure (Form 7) listing the items seized - it should list vehicle make & model, VRM and should note the details from the tax disc. This should also have on it the charges he has made for this action.

 

You mention you owe a lot of money for CT, I therefore imagine he has levied on a Rolls Royce or similar. You also say you are self employed, is the vehicle insured for business use and are you the only insured driver. Doesn't matter if it is a van or a car or indeed a motor bike if you can demonstrate it is needed in the pursuit of your business particularly if carrying tools & spares etc.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your help PT, it is much appreciated! No I wasn't left any 'notice of seizure' or anything about charges, only the 'URGENT' notice on my car window & a 'Bailiffs Execution Notice' letter that was similar. Yes the vehicle is insured for business use, I'm the sole driver & I'd say it's only worth £5/6 grand. Please find below the email I'm just about to send to the collections agency, I though better to get it 'on paper' so to speak & send it rather than to try & speak to their representative again. Any further advice PT would be great, or anyone else out there please feel welcome to help!

 

Hello There,

 

I hope you can help me with a very urgent matter. One of your representatives (a Mr ****) called at my house yesterday and clamped my car, in relation to your reference number above. I was not aware of his doing this until I came out to my car in the afternoon to find it clamped & a A4 piece of paper marked “URGENT” (blackletters on red background) informing me I had to pay £7,841 in full within the next few hours or my vehicle would be removed & sold at public auction. I also found an A4 letter that had been put through my letterbox, titled 'Bailiffs Execution Notice' for the sumof £7, 831, stating your representative had attended 'with a liability order from the Magistrates Court to remove goods...' and if 'immediate contact is not forthcoming I will re-attend at myconvenience and may be forced to remove goods even in your absence'.

 

I phoned the number on the letter marked 'URGENT' and spoke to Mr ****. I informed him who I was & told him I had been trying to sort this out with the council for a very long time. I went on to tell him that I was self-employed (a sole trader) & that it was my understanding that a bailiff was not allowed to clamp my work vehicle & asked that he please attend my property to release the clamp. Mr **** informed me that he would not do so as 'my car was not a van' and so unsuitable as a work vehicle. I informed him that in my work as an ICT Technician my vehicle was an ideally sized, economical vehicle (I often have to transport 6-8, & sometimes more P.C.'s between sites, as well as boxes of tools, etc). He then questioned me as to whether my vehicle was insured for business use, I informed him it was but he argued that I would need motor insurance specific to my business – something not needed with my insurance company. He then asked if I had company accounts I could show him. I informed him I could show him invoices, paying in books, bank statements, etc. but he insisted that I should be able to show him my company accounts, signed off by an accountant, even though I informed him that as a sole trader I was able to file my tax returns to HMRC myself. He informed me that he did not think I was self-employed, which being self-employed I obviously dispute! He went on to say I could get by using public transport (difficult to transport P.C.s & tools on a bus) or I could hire a vehicle – I informed him that I could not afford to do that & that if my car is not released I will be unable to work. He was unmoved.

 

As Mr **** was not willing to release my vehicle, even though I'm self-employed, I went on to ask him what was the minimum fee I could pay to have my car released so that I could at least work & then hopefully sort this out with the council. He informed me that the smallest liability order he had was for £600 + & he would accept this as a payment. I informed him I did not have anywhere near that amount of money, or the ability to get it – my credit is maxed out. I told him that Iwould be able to pay him a tenth of that (& that would be stretching my finances) which I thought reasonable but he refused,informing me I would have to pay it all to have my vehicle released. He told me he would give me 'a couple of days' to come up with the £600 + before towing my car. As I was getting nowhere the conversation ended.

 

I then phoned thedistrict council & spoke to a Mr ******. I informed him of the discussion Mr **** & I had, that I had offered to pay a percentage of the money owed but that Mr. **** would only except a full payment of the liability order. Mr ****** said he would speakto Mr **** & get back to me.

 

When Mr ****** phonedback he was very short with me, that I would have to deal with the Bailiffs '& that was his last word on the matter'.

 

I've phoned my local councillor today to find out if he can help me at all with the council, in the meantime can I ask if you have a 'Clamping Order' from the court for my vehicle? If so, would it be possible for you to email me a scan of it back please? If you do not have a 'ClampingOrder' has Mr **** clamped my vehicle legally? In addition to this, is the paperwork that Mr **** left for me all that was needed & there should be nothing else?

 

If you do not have a'Clamping Order', just out of the goodness of your heart or you find that I am in fact self-employed can I ask once again that you please release your clamp ASAP? I look forward to your reply at your earliest convenience & thanks in advance for your help.

Edited by Jimbo512
Link to post
Share on other sites

You most certainly do not have to give them copies of Invoices or Accounts etc. You only need to provide a copy of your Insurance docs highlighting the sole driver and business use sections. I would also point out that as they are now denying you the opportunity to work you will be invoicing them for lost work or submitting a claim against them for the hire of a suitable vehicle on a daily basis.

 

You send a copy of whatever you end up with to the Council as well - they are 100% liable for the actions of their contractor - and advise them you will name them as co-defendant in any action you may take to retrieve your losses.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry Ploddertom but can I please correct you. A "Clamping Order" is a provision under the Courts Act 2003 and is one of remedies available to magistrate courts if a FINE remains unpaid. It is not applicable to the collection of council tax.

 

Also, if accounts are requested, I would personally send copies to the COUNCIL and NOT the bailiff company.

 

The regulations provide that a vehicle can be considered "exempt" if it is "for use personally in the course of business or employment".

 

How much is the car worth (auction value)

Link to post
Share on other sites

So for clarity is clamping permitted for council tax collection,?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guys, thanks for all of your help. Tomtubby, am I right in saying that even if they did not need a 'clamping order' they fact they left no 'notice of seizure' still makes their actions illegal? I'd say it's wortjh less than £5000 at auction. Seanamarts, no they seem to have passed it on to a different collection agency. Thanks everyone, much appreciated, I email the council yesterday & am waiting to see if I hear anything from them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bailiffs are commonly clamping cars for unpaid council tax. There is a legal requirement to provide a Notice of Seizure at the time that goods had been levied.

 

As to whether the action is illegal if the Notice had not been left......this is a very difficult claim to make to the council because, the bailiff will then simply supply a copy of the notice and claim that one had been left with you. The council will of course believe their agent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201011/cmpublic/protection/memo/pf5.htm

 

Read para 5

 

Also for those that have it para 8.4.6 on p169 Law of Seizure of Goods makes interesting reading.or alternatively p.70 Bailiffs; The Law& Your Rights.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for helping everyone. The bailiffs office replied to my email yesterday, telling me if I didn't pay £600+ by 10AM Friday they would take my car. I emailed them back with copies of my car insurance cover, self assesment statement from HMRC and a picture of my car tax disk (in their email they stated that my tax disk expired 1/12/11 so I could not be using my car for work - it actually expired 31/1/12 so not sure where they got that from! (I'd already ordered the new one online which I have now).

 

They've emailed me back this morning asking me to send them a copy of my V5 document. Is this normal, why would they want to see that as well? Thanks for your continuing help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't send them any copys of anything, deal with the council direct. I've recently challenged a council with regards to council tax and bailiff enforcement (A company called Equita) and it's now out of the bailiffs hands, so no more dealing with them.

 

I would advise making duplicate copys of everything that you have, with regards to the car being clamped, your insurance documents detailing the "Business Use" and anything else that you can use to prove that the car is used for the sole purpose of business. You then also need to write a letter to the council stating, that the car is used for the purpose of business and that you attach the necessary documents to prove this, also inform the council that continual non use of the car for your business as required to run your business, that you will fall into hardship and that you would then be classed as a venerable person and include the following statement also - and under the National Standards For Enforcement may 2002, where a vulnerable person/s is identified for the purpose of enforcement, that enforcement is ceased and the account/s retained back to the council.

 

You also need to include a budget sheet of expenditures, you should have had one of these when the court order was obtained. Fill it out and attach this also to the letter, once all that is done, you will need to go directly to your main council office and deliver it by hand and make sure that it is obtained by someone in the council tax enforcement office. You should also be able to explain your situation to them and also offer a payment plan to sort it out, the minimum acceptable offer is £1, but don't be checky and offer them something like either £5 or £10 per week. This would be classed as a reasonable offer by the courts and the council should advise you that they will retain the enforcement.

 

If they don't, you will then need to apply to the court for a stay of execution, but during that process the council should have contacted the enforcement company and had the clamp removed, as they have received evidential documents proving the provision of the car and it's use.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

National Standards For Enforcement may 2002, were updated January 2012

 

http://www.justice.gov.uk/downloads/guidance/courts-and-tribunals/courts/enforcement-officers/national-standards-enforcement-agents.pdf

 

 

If they don't, you will then need to apply to the court for a stay of execution, but during that process the council should have contacted the enforcement company and had the clamp removed, as they have received evidential documents proving the provision of the car and it's use.

 

you cant get a stay of execution for council tax

 

PS I'm not knocking your post apart form this i think its a good post and have added to your rep :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

National Standards For Enforcement may 2002, were updated January 2012

 

http://www.justice.gov.uk/downloads/guidance/courts-and-tribunals/courts/enforcement-officers/national-standards-enforcement-agents.pdf

 

 

If they don't, you will then need to apply to the court for a stay of execution, but during that process the council should have contacted the enforcement company and had the clamp removed, as they have received evidential documents proving the provision of the car and it's use.

 

you cant get a stay of execution for council tax

 

PS I'm not knocking your post apart form this i think its a good post and have added to your rep :-)

Any form of court warrant can be given a stay of execution if applied to the court for a re-hearing of the case, unless the date of the warrant has passed, which would mean a new warrant would have to be applied for and notification given the the defendant

 

As for the amedment of the National Standards for Enforcement may 2002, the article on "Vulnerable Person/s" is still the same and both the enforcement agency and the council have a duty of care, which would still fall into this category "unemployed people" by the enforcement of the clamp on the car, as no means of working.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any form of court warrant can be given a stay of execution if applied to the court for a re-hearing of the case, unless the date of the warrant has passed, which would mean a new warrant would have to be applied for and notification given the the defendant

 

As for the amedment of the National Standards for Enforcement may 2002, the article on "Vulnerable Person/s" is still the same and both the enforcement agency and the council have a duty of care, which would still fall into this category "unemployed people" by the enforcement of the clamp on the car, as no means of working.

 

Good reasoning but won't wash with Capquita.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Jimbo512 , I fully understand what you are going through, we are having the same problem only with Marstons instead. We are applying for A stay of execution tomorrow at the magistrates court. This is our last hope other wise we will have to invite the bailiffs in! Scary times but after numerous phone calls to the council and Marstons to allow us deposit and pay installments to clear this debt, this is our only option left.

Like most people we got into this debt due to lack of income over the years but now with a good income coming in, due to my husbands new job, (but still not capable of paying off in one foul swoop) they still wont listen!

i hope you get things worked out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Baileys, I would be interested to hear how your case has occurred, if you post it up we may be able to help.

 

However it would help if you started a new thread in here, If you are unable to manage that then please let me or one of the other site team know and we will do it for you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Baliffs are chancing it when they tr and levie on vehicles for council tax, this means of collection was afforded to them for the collection of unpaid motoring fines.. in reality the bailiff ha to enter your property to levie and the walking possesion dcument must be sign by you or the person allowing them entry, theycant for examplelook through your letter box and levi your TV etc.. so it follows the should not do so for your car... anyway they cannot levie on tools of your trade which yr car was.... however you cant keep ignoring your council tax demands so make sure yo are claiming every benifitts you can on your low income this should include help with your council tax.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Baliffs are chancing it when they tr and levie on vehicles for council tax, this means of collection was afforded to them for the collection of unpaid motoring fines.. in reality the bailiff ha to enter your property to levie and the walking possesion dcument must be sign by you or the person allowing them entry, theycant for examplelook through your letter box and levi your TV etc.. so it follows the should not do so for your car... anyway they cannot levie on tools of your trade which yr car was.... however you cant keep ignoring your council tax demands so make sure yo are claiming every benifitts you can on your low income this should include help with your council tax.

I would be interested to know where you obtained your information.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...