Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • It is already trespass, nothing further needed to make out trespass. Not sure where ‘interference with goods’ helps you / how you’d bring a claim for that that stops them parking there.
    • Thanks Dx,    For some further information, the holiday was booked as a package holiday for 2. One of the 2 had to be changed, and changing costs £700 for a new flight as "tickets had been issued and they cant do a name change". I cant quite figure out how compensation works for things when it comes to package holidays.    From what I can tell  - The plane was due to land in Turks and Caicos to drop off passengers, something happened during descent, resulting in technical fault.  - The rest of the original flight from Turks & Caicos -> Montego Bay was cancelled  - A New flight was put on today, which was then delayed by 1.5hrs aswell  - Hotel was provided for the night after much hassle.  - 1.5 days, 2 evenings of holiday lost  If I understand correctly, since the original flight (LHR -> Turks -> Montego Bay) was cancelled, they are both entitled to a refund on that full flight? I can't quite work out if they are only entitled to a refund for the equivalent of Turks -> Montego Bay, or for the full LHR->Turks->Montego Bay, since it was issued as one ticket/all Virgin, and they should have arrived yesterday..?)  I can't work out how to get the cost of that compensation, or whether its a set figure, and how the loss of days of holiday is factored in   I am aware:  If you received less than 14 days’ notice of the cancellation, you are generally due compensation, awarded in pounds or euros depending on where your flight was due to depart from, according to the following scale: £220 / €250 for all flights of 1,500km or less (e.g. Glasgow to Amsterdam); £350 / €400 for all flights between 1,500km and 3,500km (e.g. East Midlands to Marrakech); £520 / €600 for all other flights (e.g. London to New York). Compensation will be reduced by 50% if the arrival time of the replacement flight doesn’t exceed the arrival time of the original flight by: two hours for flights of 1,500km or less; three hours for flights between 1,500km and 3,500km; four hours for all other flights. So I "think" its £520pp for the flight part as compensation (7500km)... but some sites say its a full refund for the flight... is it both?  Thanks,  Ryan  
    • Our business was only transacted digitally as I was not in England at that time.  
    • Funny. But not sure I should ! Wondering if I could place pots and plants - which a) would look nice and b) would it then be trespass and interference of goods?
    • probably this buy out everyone goes on about. well just make sure they do properly sanitise your credit file. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cap1 & CCA return


tamadus
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4981 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

2002211106485034420_fs.jpg

 

the above is the first terms and conditions that was sent to me when i joined with this credit card issuer . please note that they also imply that the terms and conditions are also a "copy of your agreement for you to keep . It includes a notice about your cancellation rights which you should read "

 

it appears to my goodself that right at the beginning when i had the pleasure of joining they sent me this instead of the executed agreement -

 

do you not agree so i honestly think the contract is inenforceable.

=====================================

 

this does seem rather important the terms and conditions also being formally stated as the agreement ( ADMITTING no executed agreement was send when one joined)

Tam Wing Chuen -v- Bank of Credit and Commerce Hong Kong Ltd [1996] 2 BCLC 69

 

1996

PC

Lord Mustill Commonwealth,

 

Lord Mustill discussed the need to construe a contract contra preferentem: "the basis of the contra proferentem principle is that the person who puts forward the wording of a proposed agreement may be assumed to have looked after his own interests, so that if words leave room for doubt about whether he is intended to have a particular benefit there is reason to suppose that he is not."

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 17.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

These institutions are so rich and powerful. They truly do not accept that legislation applies to them as well. The staff must work of a flow chart;

 

If a do x

If b do y

If c do z

 

If not on flow chart ignore.

 

:D Time to update or create new flow charts to work from me thinks!!

 

Lots of deptartments do use flow charts to work from as you say - and this is why we still get these silly automated replies!!

 

The Human Resources people need to start thinking now to allow for us CAGers - reckon we need a flowchart of our own!!!:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

:D Time to update or create new flow charts to work from me thinks!!

 

Lots of deptartments do use flow charts to work from as you say - and this is why we still get these silly automated replies!!

 

The Human Resources people need to start thinking now to allow for us CAGers - reckon we need a flowchart of our own!!!:D

 

How about:

 

Identify target!

Take aim!

 

FIRE!!

VITAL - IF YOU HAVE AN ISSUE ABOUT THE INCREASED BAILIFFS' POWERS TO BREAK INTO YOUR HOME AND USE FORCE IN ORDER TO GET YOUR GOODS THEN JOIN THE PETITION HERE:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.c o....l#post53879 9

 

Anyone seeing this who wants to help by copying it to their signature please do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

:D Time to update or create new flow charts to work from me thinks!!

 

Lots of deptartments do use flow charts to work from as you say - and this is why we still get these silly automated replies!!

 

The Human Resources people need to start thinking now to allow for us CAGers - reckon we need a flowchart of our own!!!:D

 

Yeah, but the danger of that is another AVR system to get through before talking to a peanut in a call centre...

 

'If you are a customer who has not heard of CAG, please press 1'

'If you are a CAGer, please press 2'.....;)

 

Stay safe

Firemagi

------------------------------------------------------------

Screw unto others as they screw unto you.

Screw unto others as they screw unto you.

 

Active Cases:

HSBC Current Account - £3068.00 - Prelim Sent 27/03/07 - LBA Sent 12/04/07

Halifax Credit Card - DPA SAR Sent 27/03/07

MBNA Credit Card - DPA and CCA SARs sent 27/03/07

 

Pending Cases:

HSBC Joint Account

Lloyds TSB Current Account

Lloyds TSB Credit Card

Creation Financial Store Card

GE Capital Store Card x 2

Link to post
Share on other sites

snicker.gif

Please note: I give advice, in good faith, based on my reading and experience. Please satisfy yourself, that any advice given is accurate in content before acting upon it.

A to Z index

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/site-questions-suggestions/53182-cant-find-what-youre.html

 

...........................................................................

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please note: I give advice, in good faith, based on my reading and experience. Please satisfy yourself, that any advice given is accurate in content before acting upon it.

A to Z index

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/site-questions-suggestions/53182-cant-find-what-youre.html

 

...........................................................................

Link to post
Share on other sites

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Read throught the

FAQ's and when your ready, start a thread in your banks forum to keep us all updated!

If the information I have provided is useful, please click the scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest The Terminator
Hi

 

Wow!! What a fiasco!

 

Have TS actually confirmed that a prosecution has been commenced or are they just considering it at this stage?

 

Regards, Pam

 

The word incompetent comes to mind , so doe's the phrase "bunch of cowboys" or obviously the people that work in that supermarket come bank are a hamburger short of a happy meal.:lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who provides the card for Sainsbury's? I thought it was GE, then someone said it was RBS (ooooh the name of RBS Advanta still makes my blood boil and it has been 6 years!).

 

I was under the impression from someones earlier post (weeks ago) that sainsburys were one of the better ones with regards to holding agreements.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fantasy

 

There are specialised data bureaux who hold working machines for pretty much anything stored on magnetic media. The banks and all other interested parties can employ their services, maybe not for one or two but as soon as a significant number of these come along, the bureaux will dust off the machine and run the reverse process.

 

We had tape machines out of the ark in storage to read tapes last used in the seventies and very early eighties, just in case they we're needed. It's alot cheaper to do this than re-jig all of your archives every 5 to 10 years.

 

errrr yes, I go back a little earlier m... processing papertape and punch cards for insurance policies produced in the 50s - readers used to eat a deck of cards (5000) in about 5 minutes unless of course they were really really old and even after hoovering the cards to get the dust off and air conditioning them for days.... it still averaged 20-25 minutes a deck and we had zillions to process....

point is old technology... slow processes... biodegradeable = > 12 days + 30 days (maybe 60 days? if ever) to respond to s78 multiply by avalanche of requests = mountain as high as moon to climb in :D:D:D

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sainsbury's Bank is a fifty/fifty between HBOS plc and Sainsbury's plc. Their call center often tell me I have a Halifax account!

 

THE ICO DATABASE SAYS ABOUT SAINSBURYS BANK

Purpose 13

 

Provision of Financial Services & Advice

Purpose Description:

The provision of services as an
intermediary
(NOW FC SAW SOMETHING INTERSTING ABOUT INTERMEDIARIES THE OTHER DAY- CAN'T REMEMBER WHAT IT WAS !!!)
in respect of any financial transactions including mortgage and insurance broking.

Data subjects are:

Staff including volunteers, agents, temporary and casual workers

Customers and clients

Suppliers

Relatives, guardians and associates of the data subject

Advisers, consultants and other professional experts

Data classes are:

Personal Details

Family, Lifestyle and Social Circumstances

Education and Training Details

Employment Details

Financial Details

Goods or Services Provided

Sources (S) and Disclosures (D)(1984 Act). Recipients (1998 Act):

Data subjects themselves

Relatives, guardians or other persons associated with the data subject

Current, past or prospective employers of the data subject

Education, training establishments and examining bodies

Business associates and other professional advisers

Employees and agents of the data controller

Suppliers, providers of goods or services

Financial organisations and advisers

Credit reference agencies

Traders in personal data

Trade, employer associations and professional bodies

Ombudsmen and regulatory authorities

Data processors

Transfers:

Worldwide
NAUGHTY NAUGHTY

:cool: sunbathing in juan les pins de temps en temps

Link to post
Share on other sites

Regards, Pam

 

Also, in a couunty court the judge has to consider the balance of probability, not "proff beyond resonable doubt" .....

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

*If what I have told you in this post has helped, please press the star at the bottom left and tell me!!*

 

My charges claims:

un1boy vs egg *SETTLED* | Un1boy vs LTSB-SETTLED | un1boy vs Black Horse-SETTLED | Un1boy v Smile *WON* | un1boy v HSBC - SETTLED! | Un1boy's HSBC CC - SETTLED! | Un1boy vs Co-Op *SETTLED* |un1boy vs Co-Op CC *SETTLED*

 

Default removals:

un1boy v Equifax - Default removal

un1boy vs Experian - Default removal

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tradign Standards may be so powerful, but y local TS guy said that he contacted the bank, who said they were in the right and so he has ruled that they are!!! (What tha fa?)

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

*If what I have told you in this post has helped, please press the star at the bottom left and tell me!!*

 

My charges claims:

un1boy vs egg *SETTLED* | Un1boy vs LTSB-SETTLED | un1boy vs Black Horse-SETTLED | Un1boy v Smile *WON* | un1boy v HSBC - SETTLED! | Un1boy's HSBC CC - SETTLED! | Un1boy vs Co-Op *SETTLED* |un1boy vs Co-Op CC *SETTLED*

 

Default removals:

un1boy v Equifax - Default removal

un1boy vs Experian - Default removal

Link to post
Share on other sites

FC - Just looked up some of my targets on the ICO site.

 

HSBC, GE Capital and Halifax all state 'Worldwide' for their transfers.

 

The only difference was MBNA, they list 'Worldwide, India, Republic of Ireland, Spain and USA', with the exception of Purpose 3 which states 'Not outside of the European Economic Area', swiftly followed by India, RoI, Spain and USA'...

 

Go figure..

 

Stay safe

Firemagi

--------------------------------------------------------------

Screw unto others as they screw unto you.

Screw unto others as they screw unto you.

 

Active Cases:

HSBC Current Account - £3068.00 - Prelim Sent 27/03/07 - LBA Sent 12/04/07

Halifax Credit Card - DPA SAR Sent 27/03/07

MBNA Credit Card - DPA and CCA SARs sent 27/03/07

 

Pending Cases:

HSBC Joint Account

Lloyds TSB Current Account

Lloyds TSB Credit Card

Creation Financial Store Card

GE Capital Store Card x 2

Link to post
Share on other sites

Got a reply from co-op today (finally)

 

It's an agreement with the following:

 

1.my sig

2.my date

3. their sig

4.their date

5.illegible "regulated by" statement

6.illegible other data processing terms

 

That's it.....no prescribed terms or anything, no terms and conditiond, no statement of account.

 

Now, I am very tempted to write back telling them this and offering a reduced settlement of the balance being cleared and something for my trouble......

 

However, I claimed my charges back from my smile account before xmas and they sent me a notice that they wanted me to terminate my account. I appealed this and they wrote back to saying that they ahve retracted the notice, but if I breach my terms again, they will close my account.

 

Now, I am scared that if I chase this they will make a "commercial decision" to close my acounts....and i really can't afford for that to happen. I don't know whether to just wait and chase it in a few months.

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

*If what I have told you in this post has helped, please press the star at the bottom left and tell me!!*

 

My charges claims:

un1boy vs egg *SETTLED* | Un1boy vs LTSB-SETTLED | un1boy vs Black Horse-SETTLED | Un1boy v Smile *WON* | un1boy v HSBC - SETTLED! | Un1boy's HSBC CC - SETTLED! | Un1boy vs Co-Op *SETTLED* |un1boy vs Co-Op CC *SETTLED*

 

Default removals:

un1boy v Equifax - Default removal

un1boy vs Experian - Default removal

Link to post
Share on other sites

One more thing, I was told that if they satisfy your request after the statutory time by producing the agreement then they can pursue the agreement, without a court order.

 

Am i right in thinking thought that they have to sennd the T&C's and statement of account as well, otherwise they can't enforce it?

 

So, if they send the agreement a week after the timeframe allowed, they still can't enforce it unless they provide everyhting else (0r, get a court order?)

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

*If what I have told you in this post has helped, please press the star at the bottom left and tell me!!*

 

My charges claims:

un1boy vs egg *SETTLED* | Un1boy vs LTSB-SETTLED | un1boy vs Black Horse-SETTLED | Un1boy v Smile *WON* | un1boy v HSBC - SETTLED! | Un1boy's HSBC CC - SETTLED! | Un1boy vs Co-Op *SETTLED* |un1boy vs Co-Op CC *SETTLED*

 

Default removals:

un1boy v Equifax - Default removal

un1boy vs Experian - Default removal

Link to post
Share on other sites

Got a reply from co-op today (finally)

 

It's an agreement with the following:

 

1.my sig

2.my date

3. their sig

4.their date

5.illegible "regulated by" statement

6.illegible other data processing terms

 

That's it.....no prescribed terms or anything, no terms and conditiond, no statement of account.

 

Now, I am very tempted to write back telling them this and offering a reduced settlement of the balance being cleared and something for my trouble......

 

However, I claimed my charges back from my smile account before xmas and they sent me a notice that they wanted me to terminate my account. I appealed this and they wrote back to saying that they ahve retracted the notice, but if I breach my terms again, they will close my account.

 

Now, I am scared that if I chase this they will make a "commercial decision" to close my acounts....and i really can't afford for that to happen. I don't know whether to just wait and chase it in a few months.

 

 

https://www.co-operative.co.uk/en/membership/

 

WELL ON THE LINK ABOVE WE CAN ALL BECOME A MEMBER OF THE COOP

DIDN'T THEY FOUND THE COOP ON CERTAIN PRINCIPLES !!!

 

WOULDN'T BE VERY GOOD PUBLICITY IF THEY WERE

EFFECTIVELY EXPELLING THE WORKING MAN

EXERCISING HIS NATURAL RIGHTS

 

BETTER HAVE A WORD WITH ARFUR SCARGILL !!!

 

----------------

Being a member

 

 

Our members are our owners

 

They are the sort of people who like to know that their hard-earned cash is being used honestly and that a percentage of it goes back into your community.

 

 

 

Anyone can become a member as long as they believe in what we stand for and shop with at least one of our businesses. All you have to do is invest £1, which we’ll collect from your first share of the profits.

:cool: sunbathing in juan les pins de temps en temps

Link to post
Share on other sites

https://www.co-operative.co.uk/en/membership/

 

WELL ON THE LINK ABOVE WE CAN ALL BECOME A MEMBER OF THE COOP

DIDN'T THEY FOUND THE COOP ON CERTAIN PRINCIPLES !!!

 

WOULDN'T BE VERY GOOD PUBLICITY IF THEY WERE

EFFECTIVELY EXPELLING THE WORKING MAN

EXERCISING HIS NATURAL RIGHTS

 

BETTER HAVE A WORD WITH ARFUR SCARGILL !!!

 

----------------

Being a member

 

 

Our members are our owners

 

They are the sort of people who like to know that their hard-earned cash is being used honestly and that a percentage of it goes back into your community.

 

 

 

 

Anyone can become a member as long as they believe in what we stand for and shop with at least one of our businesses. All you have to do is invest £1, which we’ll collect from your first share of the profits.

 

I forgot about the ethical side of it (and I used to work for them! - they are FAR from ethical!)

 

Another of their values is:

Honesty – we are honest about what we do and the way we do it.

Self-responsibility – we take responsibility and answer for our actions.

 

I think I'll write to them, mentioning their values and say I am a member and see what they say - if they try to close my accounts I will get the medis invovled - I'll tell the watchdog reporter that contacted me and she can take it further!!

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

*If what I have told you in this post has helped, please press the star at the bottom left and tell me!!*

 

My charges claims:

un1boy vs egg *SETTLED* | Un1boy vs LTSB-SETTLED | un1boy vs Black Horse-SETTLED | Un1boy v Smile *WON* | un1boy v HSBC - SETTLED! | Un1boy's HSBC CC - SETTLED! | Un1boy vs Co-Op *SETTLED* |un1boy vs Co-Op CC *SETTLED*

 

Default removals:

un1boy v Equifax - Default removal

un1boy vs Experian - Default removal

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wrote to Halifax Visa on the 14th February 2007 requesting credit agreement. It was received (Recorded Delivery) 15th February 2007.

 

This morning (8th March 2007) I have received a default notice dated the 1st March 2007, envelope kept and franked 8MAR07 by post office.

 

Now by my count 15FEB07 to 2MAR07 is 12 working days and I haven't recieved my CCA original agreement. So they shouldn't have issued the default.

 

Anyone have a template I can use to write back and tell them they are in breach of whichever clause of the CCA.?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, in a couunty court the judge has to consider the balance of probability, not "proff beyond resonable doubt" .....

 

Hi

 

Yes, but that's the test for all civil claims, be it at county court level or at COP or HOL. It's only in criminal cases that the verdict has to be 'beyond all reasonable doubt'.

 

Regards, Pam

VITAL - IF YOU HAVE AN ISSUE ABOUT THE INCREASED BAILIFFS' POWERS TO BREAK INTO YOUR HOME AND USE FORCE IN ORDER TO GET YOUR GOODS THEN JOIN THE PETITION HERE:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.c o....l#post53879 9

 

Anyone seeing this who wants to help by copying it to their signature please do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4981 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...