Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well we can't predict what the judge will believe. PE will say that they responded in the deadline and you will say they don't. Nobody can tell what a random DJ will decide. However if you go for an OOC settlement you should still be able to get some money
    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Tax Credits O/P - trying to prove their error - Help please


anxious!!
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4690 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

To try and cut a long story short in the hope that someone can offer me some advice (as cant get to the Citizens Advice until next week)

 

In 2009 I had a joint claim with my partner, we only recvd the bare minimum of £10 a week as my partner earnt approx £40k

I rang them and advised them that I was now self employed (I was selling my handmade crafts and wanted it to be legal) and that I would earn approx £100 at the end of the tax year, this was an estimate that I gave them

A new tax credit letter came through that said my credits would go up to over £100 a week!!

I questioned this by calling them up as I couldnt understand the increase, I was confirmed this was all okay and the figures were right

 

To my dismay, I rang at the end of the tax year to confirm I had in fact had a minus in my self employed earnings to be told that by looking at the records I had been overpaid

The initial call I made and the girl who took it, actually took my partner off the system and said that it was a joint claim as we now only earned £100 a year!!!! between us!!!!

The shock was unbelievable and I broke down and explained everything to her

I went through the dispute and the answer I got back was that no calls could be found to prove that I had rang and questioned it so therefore I had to pay the amount back!

Again the shock was too much and I broke down

At this time I remember ringing from my mobile phone so knew it would be itemised somewhere so I applied for copies of all statements (which never arrived)

By this time the new tax credits came through and I like an idiot admitted defeat and they agreed to take the new £10 a week tax credit as payment towards my overpayment!

 

My overpayment is £7000...............

 

Today I recvd a letter with a paying slip saying I need to pay £6800...........

Again the shock hit me and I rang them up in tears and explained this whole sorry mess again, to be told there was nothing he could do but offer me £191 monthly payments to reduce and pay the bill off!

I am beside myself

*The reason this all came about is because of the girl on the phone deleting my partners details, this isnt enough and tax credits said I should have read and reread the new tax form that came to me, which I believe I did, doesnt everyone just look at the figures! To be honest I just didnt see that they had reduced my partners details to nothing amid all the numbers on the form

 

*They are saying that because they cant find my phone calls I have no proof that I didnt enquire about it!!

 

Please help, I've contacted vodafone again to send ALL statements for this particular phone number (which I now dont have and hope they can still help me)

I'm going to see the citizens advice next week

 

Is there anything else I can do, can I not state that from the initial phonecall the error is in their hands!

I seriously cannot pay this money back, my partner works away a month at a time and I am left at home with two young boys. Struggling to make ends meet now.

Please help with advice, it would be appreciated so much

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there. What a tough time for you.

 

I expect someone in the know will be along soon, but not everyone here understands tax credit, me for a start, sorry.

 

If you need speak to them again, make sure you ask for the person's name and make a note of that and the date and time of your call and details of what was said. Hopefully, your phone records will help them track down your previous calls.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

AFAIK if there was an error and they send you paperwork that contained the error, then the onus is on you to inform them of that error if it is reasonable to spot.

 

If they sent paperwork saying your partner was earning nothing, then I would expect that would be classed as reasonable to spot.

 

When you rung up to confirm it was right, did you state that your partner was earning £40k

(Would help if you could prove that phone call)

 

EDIT

Unless you pointed out the error, to them the calculation would have been correct.

Edited by Life-Goes-On
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies so far

in answer to 'life goes on' - after my initial conversation with them i was then sent a new tax credits form with all the details on, to which I couldnt see or pick out the fact that my partners wage had been reduced to nothing! as it was still also showing the £40k amount on different lines on the form

when i rang up to query the increased amount of credits and said surely it was wrong they confirmed it was correct on the phone obviously going by the fact the lady previously had deleted his income

 

I'm in a no win situation really arent i, they made the error initially, the forms are difficult to understand as it is, i queried it, they've won!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a very similar experience myself in 2003/2004 when they removed my partners income when he chages jobs and only took my maternity pay into consideration. On receipt of the award notice I called to advise them that they had got the award wrong and we were hit by an overpaynent, they wouldn't allow me to repay it there and then and was told not to touch the money they had overpaid as it would be neede in the April on renewal, long story short we had to live for a period of 6 months on 680pcm with outgoings of £600pcm leaving £80 for general living expenses, food and petrol. My parner walked 10 miles a day to and from work as we were too scared to touch this money due to the information we were given. Our overpayment was then calculated and took 2 1/2 years to clear haviong our awards reduced by 25%. Believe me I made an appeal and was told the original decision stood as I knew the award was incorrect and called to rectify the mistake. So I asked if /I had just assumed the details were correct it would have been different and was told no I should have realised (as I did). I think practically every overpayment is fair game for them to recover sorry :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Please help, I've contacted vodafone again to send ALL statements for this particular phone number (which I now dont have and hope they can still help me)

I'm going to see the citizens advice next week

 

Hi anxious!!,

 

I hope you've now received what you needed from us.

 

However, in the event that you didn't you're welcome to email the details of the account in question over to the Web Relations Team by following the contact information in our pinned thread here http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?213340-Vodafone-Webteam-for-Customers-With-Problems

 

Once you've sent it you'll receive an automated reply with a reference number. To make sure it reaches us could you update the thread with this and we'll get back to you as soon as possible?

 

Kind regards,

 

Lee

 

Web Relations Team

 

Vodafone UK

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...