Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Now that is an interesting article which adds afew perspective that I hadn't thought significant - but on reflection of the perspectives offered ... Now Starmer is no Blair, however 'blairite he may be perceived, but the Tories aren't tories and aren't even remotely liberal   The fast 'unannounced and unexpected election call from sunack may well be explained by the opinion linked that he hoped reform would be unprepared and effectively call a chunk of Farages largely empty bluster - making him look even more of a prat, leave scope for attacks on shabby reform candidates and mimimise core vote losses to reform - while throwing the 'middle ground' (relative) tories TO THE DOGS - and with the added bonus of likely pacifying his missu' desire to jogg off to sunny cal tout suite somewhat   thumb in the air - I expect about 140ish tory seats, but can hope for under a hundred Reform - got to admit the outside possibility of 1, maybe 2 seats with about 8% of the vote - but unlikely. I think projections of over 10% of the vote for reform is nudged and paid for speculation - but possible with the expected massive drives from Russian, Chinese and far right social media bot and troll prods targeting the gullible.
    • Commentary June 2024 WWW.ELECTORALCALCULUS.CO.UK Interesting article about just how bad it could be for the Tories.  Also Tories could be hoping on Reform not having candidates in many seats, as they were not ready.  
    • Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
    • when did they (who) inform you there was a 'police case' and when was this attained? i will guess the debt is now SB'd as it's UAE 15yrs. have you informed the bsnk ever by email/letter of your correct and current address? you can always ignore anyone else accept the bank,  Block and bounce back all emails. Block any text messages  Ignore any letters unless it's: - a Statutory Demand - a Letter Of Claim - a Court Claimform via Northants bulk.  
    • I left Dubai 8 years ago and intended to return. However a job prospect fell through. I’d been there for 15 years. I decided to pay my credit card and the bank had frozen my account. There is no means to pay the CC so completely unable to pay when I wanted to other than the bank advising me to ask a friend in the UAE to pay it on my behalf!  fast forward bank informs there is a police case against me for non payment. Years later IDR chased me and after months/ years they stopped. Now Judge & Priestley are trying their luck. Now I have received an email in English and Arabic from JP saying the bank has authorised them to collect debts. Is this the same as IDR although I didn’t receive anything like this from them. Just says they are authorised?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4776 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, I havent posted in a while but will start with saying, i was in alot of debt and had various bailiffs visits, but i have been working hard on paying them off and they were all cleared in the last month apart from this one.

 

The only debt remaining was an unpaid council tax bill of £170. Bailiffs are bristow & sutor, i sent them a letter last month via recorded delivery stating (used a template letter) that i was a vulnerable person and a payment and offer to pay the debt off via monthly direct debit. Previous to this I have had two visits by bailiffs who were actually very reasonable and told me to contact head office (which i did)

 

Well at 7pm this evening, there was a very loud knock at my window...a rather erm well, a woman (i think) saying she was from b&s (bull &**** possibly??) and that i owed £380 and if they were here to seize my car (apparently it already had a levy on it but i have no paperwork for this) i dont know what the need for the van was as she had no intention of coming into the house, she said she was there to seize the car and that if i didnt pay the full amount in 5 minutes then they would call for recovery and add another £170 on.

 

At that point i said im sorry but i have a disabled son and its not a case of wanting my car, but i NEED it, i offered to pay an amount off it until i could gather the funds but she said no way is that a possibility.

I think it was when i said i had a disabled child and she came out with "i dont care who's f***ing disabled" I then got a bit arsey and went to sit in my car and told her she is not taking it.

 

Well she then said "its just gone up to £550, you have 5 minutes to get someone to pay it before i call recovery at £170 and for every half an hour we are here you get an extra £50 added on"

 

To cut a long story short, a family member has paid it over the phone (with them only mentioning the 4% charge AFTER accepting payment!)

 

So ok, thats another debt paid off, but surely they cannot do this, im so upset/angry and embarassed about this. And it has also landed me in a huge financial mess (have to pay family member back on fri)

 

Oh one last thing...she gave me a receipt for payment, but i asked for info on the charges and why they were charged and she refused to tell me or give me any paperwork- just told me to ring head office.

 

Thankyou in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

£550

 

 

no way even with a levy this debt cant be £550

 

is the car

on HP/finance/mobility

what did you write in your letter to B&S did you send a copy to the council what date did you send it (did you keep a copy of it)

 

I take it you didn't receive a reply

Link to post
Share on other sites

Get this sent off ASAP. Adapt to your own needs and send initially by email tonight and a copy in the post tomorro.

 

"From:

My Name

My Address

 

To:

Acme Bailiff Co

Bailiff House

 

Ref: Account No: 123456

 

Dear Sir

 

With reference to the above account, Can you please provide me with a breakdown of the charges.

 

This includes:

a - the time & date of any Bailiff action that incurred a Fee.

b - the reason for the fee.

c - the name(s) of the Bailiff(s) that attended on each occasion a Fee was charged.

d - the name(s) of the Court(s) the Bailiff(s) was/were Certificated at.

e - the date of the Certification.

 

This is not a Subject Access Request under the Data Protection Act S7 1998 so does not incur a fee of £10. You are obliged to provide this information.

 

I require this information within 14 days.

 

Yours faithfully

 

Ripped off customer"

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sent by recorded delivery and a copy sent to the council too.

 

It basically was the template from this site i think, it read along the lines of "I write further to your visit....i confirm i am classed as a vulnerable person for the purposes of civil enforcement agents directives...etc etc."

 

She said the debt was £380 when she first arrived...it seems because i annoyed her she then put it up to £550 in a matter of 5 minutes. Is there any way she could possibly do this? I pleaded with her to take the original £380 (even reduced to tears) but she would not budge.

 

Oh and she also said she would have the police come and remove me from my vehicle if i didnt get out (my OH is a police officer but unable to get hold of him at the mo as he's working, to find out whether this is true or not)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Get this sent off ASAP. Adapt to your own needs and send initially by email tonight and a copy in the post tomorro.

 

"From:

My Name

My Address

 

To:

Acme Bailiff Co

Bailiff House

 

Ref: Account No: 123456

 

Dear Sir

 

With reference to the above account, Can you please provide me with a breakdown of the charges.

 

This includes:

a - the time & date of any Bailiff action that incurred a Fee.

b - the reason for the fee.

c - the name(s) of the Bailiff(s) that attended on each occasion a Fee was charged.

d - the name(s) of the Court(s) the Bailiff(s) was/were Certificated at.

e - the date of the Certification.

 

This is not a Subject Access Request under the Data Protection Act S7 1998 so does not incur a fee of £10. You are obliged to provide this information.

 

I require this information within 14 days.

 

Yours faithfully

 

Ripped off customer"

 

PT

 

Thankyou, i will do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a quick question your car is it tax as a disabled vechile?

 

My understanding is baliffs can not takes cars or property that you do not own. So if the debt is your and the car ownd by HP / loan or another person or lease hold (such as motability) they cant touch it. I also belive that the registered keeper and the owner do not need to be the same thing. So if i own the car and my other half uses it most it maybe registered in there name, they are olnly the keeper not owner.

 

I also belive that if its taxed as deisabled it cant be towed, clamped or taken by a baillif without a court order? Not sure how correct that is ... can any one clarifiy?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its not a motability car, its my own, its also an old banger so they would not have got much at auction!...i dont know anything about disabled tax...its in my name, but i use it mainly to get my disabled son around as he cant travel on public transport.

 

I am now pretty much debt free, but i feel they have taken double the amount they should have.

 

Would they need to have put a levy on my car at a previous visit? (thats what she said) but i have no paperwork supporting this (recieved a letter through the door - well- stuck to the outside of my door not even in an envelope a while back but nothing about a levy)

Is there a governing body i can complain to? ... i want my money back that i was overcharged!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Qwerty, I'm so so sorry but you weren't overcharged at all. You were damned well conned! The one 'good' thing is this debt is paid. Cool. That means you have all the time in the world to deal with this. Please take your time, believe me, you have so much on your side! I would like to help and any help I offer is alongside what others suggest. Can you tell me about your disabled son? What's wrong? How old is he? Does he get DLA? Or ESA? Or both? If you feel some information may be too personal for a public forum then please PM me as this is important info. Also, do you have a Blue Badge?

What you will need to do is compile a pretty damning Formal Complaint to the CEO of the Council and, from what I have read thus far, you have pretty good ammo.

My personal view, and I appreciate others may differ, I don't like 'template letters'. I think their day has gone. Can you imagine how many copies of the same letter a bailiff or council must receive? Probably with the unhelpfull view of 'oh, here's another one pulled from the internet'. I think you need to heavily re-write them in your own style.

If you bear with me - I have an ESA Tribunal on Thursday that I'm trying to brush up for - I'd happily write you a letter to adapt. If, for some reason, this thread slips passed me then do not hesitate to PM me and draw my attention back. I reply to a lot of threads and it's often difficult to keep track of where I've wanted to help!

Best wishes

Rae

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, thanks for the reply. My son is severely autistic and suffers from hypermobility, he gets DLA at the highest rate care and we are currently appealing the mobility component. I dont have a blue badge at the moment.

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just spoken to the council that the laibility order was from. I was slightly wrong about the original debt...the liability order was for £224.

I have also emailed B&S asking them for a breakdown of fees charged. In the meantime i looked online at my account with them and it is showing i paid £50 in october and a further £21 in march, which would take the original balance down to £153. Meaning that they have charged me £397 in bailiff fees.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Meaning that they have charged me £397

 

1st visit fee £24.50

2nd visit fee £18

 

levy fee £29.50

van fee approx £150

total bailiff fees £220

 

Although they came in a van they had no intention of using it to seize my goods from my house...i offered her the chance to come in and take belongings from inside the house but she declined...said they were specifically here to take the car. She also said that to call for the recovery of the car would be an extra £170 for the tow truck.

 

So what was the van needed for??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Although they came in a van they had no intention of using it to seize my goods from my house...i offered her the chance to come in and take belongings from inside the house but she declined...said they were specifically here to take the car. She also said that to call for the recovery of the car would be an extra £170 for the tow truck.

 

So what was the van needed for??

 

 

you will find when you receive a reply to your breakdown of fees that a van will have been charged a week or two after the alleged levy took place

 

once a van/attendance to remove fee has been added there can be no other fees unless goods are removed

Link to post
Share on other sites

you will find when you receive a reply to your breakdown of fees that a van will have been charged a week or two after the alleged levy took place

 

once a van/attendance to remove fee has been added there can be no other fees unless goods are removed

Ok, so just to be clear the only amount they are allowed to charge is what you said in an earlier post...

1st visit fee £24.50

2nd visit fee £18

 

levy fee £29.50

van fee approx £150

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, so just to be clear the only amount they are allowed to charge is what you said in an earlier post...

1st visit fee £24.50

2nd visit fee £18

 

levy fee £29.50

van fee approx £150

 

yes legislation does not allow for further fees to be charged unless goods are removed

 

http://www.herefordshire.gov.uk/docs/Enforcement_Agent_Charges.pdf

 

 

Make a freedom of information request to your council (you can do this on line through the council web site)ask them for a copy of there service level agreement /code of conduct between them and rossendales for the enforcement of council tax

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi just catching up on your thread

 

If you get DLA for mobility at the highest rate you are entittled to free road tax which changes you cars tax class to 'disabled' .

 

This is what I was hinting at ealier in post # 10. You also qualify for a blue badge.

 

If you have both a disabled tax classed vhecle then a baliff can't take it, is my understanding ... can any one confirm?

Edited by morsy
Link to post
Share on other sites

hi just catching up on your thread

 

If you get DLA for mobility at the higest rate you are entitkled to free road tax which changes you cars tax class to 'disabled' .

 

This is what I was hinting at ealier in post # 10. You also qualify for a blue badge.

 

If you have both a disabled tax classed vhecle then a baliff can't take it, is my understanding ... can any one confirm?

If I read correctly the OP only gets care component, however the household is classed as vulnerable so the bailiff should back off and the council should in hindsight take the debt back.

As for mobility cars, no they cannot take them. I am almost 100% sure that they cannot take cars that are taxed as disabled.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi just catching up on your thread

 

If you get DLA for mobility at the higest rate you are entitkled to free road tax which changes you cars tax class to 'disabled' .

 

This is what I was hinting at ealier in post # 10. You also qualify for a blue badge.

 

If you have both a disabled tax classed vhecle then a baliff can't take it, is my understanding ... can any one confirm?

 

I think as long as the car is on the Motability scheme, either leased or being bought on HP through the scheme, then the bailiff cannot take it, if it is owned outright even with a disabled zero rate tax disc, which means it is in the disabled taxation class,I think they would be able to levy, technically, but in practice the adverse publicity that may well result if the press got wind of it, and a complaint to the council CEO, Councillors and MP, regarding the bailiff, their agent who the council are joint and severally liable with for their actions, would not go down well. if they are exposed ignoring obvious vulnerability. Others may know more but contacting the council stressing the vulnerability of one member makes the whole family vulnerable would be a good option

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...