Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Wait until you get a refund from the purchaser before accepting anything else. Please will you post up the text of the email that you received.  Make sure that you look after the text that you received from the purchaser
    • I’ve just received a letter from a debt collection agency called Intrum about an old Halifax credit card debt, they have never been in touch before and the letter says that because I have failed to contact them they are passing on to a company called Resolvecall who specialise in home visits. This debt is from about 14 years ago when I got into some financial trouble, I had a default on file but that dropped off around 4 years ago. Is there anything I can do with this as I don’t really want people coming to my house, thanks in advance? 
    • Just wanted to check if anyone knows, I'm in the process of retrieving the transcript. There was no time frame given in the appeal judges directions, does this mean none applies or is there an unwritten timeframe that applies as a default for these things? 
    • I left a trustpilot review and P2g have emailed me with the obligatory apology and have refunded the postage costs and are will to give £10 extra pre pay as a good will gesture. However,  as i wrote this the Buyer has just txt.me.to say they have received the parcel !  So obviously im now going.to suggest that she pays via Paypal ... I rang her this morning to see if it had arrived but she said she was on holiday and there was someone in her house she would have to contact to see if it had arrived which she obviously has ... So now i know its been delivered i cant go for P2g But i Can accept the exta £10 ...
    • The defendant in this case is Parcel2Go.com Limited The claimant sent a parcel using Parcel2Go Ltd as a broker and Evri as the shipper via the Defendant's service containing which contained two handmade bespoke wedding trays to a customer with  under  tracking number P2Gxxxxxxxx. The parcel was never delivered although the defendant stated that three attempts had been made to deliver the parcel.  The claimants customer waited in for four days to receive the delivery but no delivery was attempted. There was no communication with the claimants customer.  Despite many web chats and emails the parcel was not delivered and on the Parcel2Go website it stated that the customer had refused delivery. This was not true as no delivery had been attempted.  I was The Defendant informed me that the parcel was being returned to me but after waiting three weeks I was informed by the courier that the parcel was lost. I was offered compensation of £20 + shipping fee which I refused and after sending Parcel2Go a Letter of claim this was increased to £75 which I also refused. The Claimant did not purchase the Defendant's insurance policy as requiring people to pay extra for rights already guaranteed under the consumer rights act 2015 is contrary to section 57 and 72 and therefore unenforceable. The Claimant rejected the Defendant's standard compensation offer. It is clear that the defendant is responsible for the loss of the parcel as they did not act with reasonable care and skill when handling the claimants parcel, contrary to section 49 of the Consumer Rights Act 2015.   By failing to ensure the safe delivery of the Claimant's parcel the Defendant breached section 49 of the CRA 2015.   AND THE CLAIMANT CLAIMS £370.00 being the value of the lost goods £xx.xx being the price of shipping and interest pursuant to s69 cca 1984.   See what BF thinks but I think something like this is better. Remember you are suing P2G not evri.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Philips dca chasing debt of previous house owner


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4839 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

This goes back quite a while now, we first had a letter for a lady who we have never heard of (wasn't even the person that lived in this address before us) demanding money. After a phone call they stopped sending letters.

 

January this year we received a letter demanding we pay £224.82 regarding a consumer express gifts 2nd placement (haven't got a clue what that is), another phonecall and the lady on the end of the phone says she'll delete us from the system.

 

February 4th we get anothet letter demanding payment that reads as follows.

 

--------------------

Despite our previous demand for payment you have failed to clear your arrears (as stated above) or make suitable repayment proposals.

 

The amounts which remain outstanding to above named client (who we never heard of but has our address) must be paid in full within seven days of this demand by contacting TEL:0844 800 4588 (24hr) or by visiting .philips.org.uk. Should you be unable to pay the amounts outstanding, within seven days you MUST contact one of out customer service operators on TEL: 0844 800 4588 to arrange a suitable repayment plan.

 

If you ignore this demand for repayment or fail to arrange a suitable repayment plan within seven days, we will issue this case to one of our debt recovery agents to attend your premises to arrange payment with you.

 

Yours faithfully

 

Amanda Middleton

----------------------------------

 

We have phoned philips again and they asked us to send a council tax form, when queried why we have to send this, the person on the phone simple said "as you are not willing to cooperate i will not deal with you" and simply hung up (this was after 30mins on the phone being passed around person to person. We simple asked why they want us to send the tax form. The other worry is if we send the consil tax form they will also have our correct details and simply change the details of the debt.

 

We havent taken any legal action as of yet, what should be do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lets get this straight.

 

As i understand it,

 

1) you don't owe the money?

 

2)The demand isn't even in your name.

 

It sounds as though there isn't even a ccj against the actual debtor.

 

In which case they are NOT bailiffs, but a Debt Collection Agency.(Philips operate as both) They have no more powers than say someone who knocks on your door asking for charity donations, or if you want to buy some sponges.

 

These people make me really angry. I've seen their website, and it's clear they try to blur the distinction between the bailiff business and the DCA.

 

There is a forum for dealing with debt collection agencies and what to do when they harass you or as in this case wrongly target you for someone else's debt.

 

You have nothing to fear.

 

I've not done it before, but i'll press the 'triangle' button and see if you get moved to the correct area.

 

Personally, i wouldn't send them anything (well i would, but it would originate from my dog! (just joking of course!!)).

Link to post
Share on other sites

just send the letter back saying not at this address

 

end of

 

dx

moved to dca forum

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is absolutely nothing they can do to you and absolutely nothing for you to worry about. They are wasting their own time and money. You do not need to comply with any of their requests and as DX states, send their letters back.

 

If they persist, come back and we will sort out a letter for you and point you in the direction of making official complaints, but for now I wouldn't waste your time and effort on them

My advice is given through personal experience and is given without prejudice

 

 

If I Have helped please feel free to click the star

:smile:

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are in breach of OFT guidelines, they should not be chasing anyone for payment unless they are 100% sure they are the debtor. You should make a complaint to your local Trading Standards via Consumer Direct http://www.consumerdirect.gov.uk/contact

 

The more people that complain about these companies the better, particularly ones like this who wear two hats and insinuate they are acting as bailiffs when in fact they have no more powers than the local paper-boy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are in breach of OFT guidelines, they should not be chasing anyone for payment unless they are 100% sure they are the debtor. You should make a complaint to your local Trading Standards via Consumer Direct http://www.consumerdirect.gov.uk/contact

 

The more people that complain about these companies the better, particularly ones like this who wear two hats and insinuate they are acting as bailiffs when in fact they have no more powers than the local paper-boy.

 

You have a point, we should complain about everything otherwise they continue to do so. Request a copy of their complaints procedure

My advice is given through personal experience and is given without prejudice

 

 

If I Have helped please feel free to click the star

:smile:

Link to post
Share on other sites

What you will find is that if you manage to get rid of Phillips, in a few month times another debt collection will start contacting your address. I have had this with other DCA's and it is a pain in the *ss. You just have to keep on complaining and hope that they give up, which they will do eventually.

 

The problem is that the debtor concerned still has the address registered on a credit record, so when a new DCA picks up the debt, they will contact your address. I was told by a DCA that if I contacted the CRA's they would remove the address, but that advice turned out to be nonsense, as I could not personally change or make a note on somebody elses credit record, without their permission.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Thought it was best to offer this advice to everyone concerned as my husband has also been through exactly the same thing:

 

1. Contact your local magistrate office, and go and make a statutory declaration (it's free!!!). Be very nice to whoever you speak to. They are usually sympathetic and can give you a little more information about what the fine is for.

 

2. Send a letter of complaint to the named person below:

 

Vicky Savage Philips Collection Services (Bailiffs)

Faverdale industrial estate

Darlington Co Durham

DL3 0PH

3. Make copies of the statutory declaration & complaint letter in 2 above, as well as the letter received from the bailiffs and send it to the Central Accounting Office of the court in question, along with a letter explaining the situation.

 

4. You can search on google for the name of the court by typing in south west london magistrate court, or north east london magistrate court etc. We found more details of south west london magistrate by visiting the 'lawontheweb' website.

Hope this helps?

 

PS: I REALLY DON'T UNDERSTAND WHY THIS COMPANY ARE STILL IN OPERATION, GIVEN THAT THEIR PROCESSES ARE 'DODGY'. WE NEED A CAMPAIGN TO STOP THIS AND CLEAR PEOPLE'S RECORDS OF ILLEGAL CONVICTIONS

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...