Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • its not about the migrants .. Barrister Helena Kennedy warns that the Conservatives will use their victory over Rwanda to dismantle the law that protects our human rights here in the UK.   Angela Rayner made fun of Rishi Sunak’s height in a fiery exchange at Prime Minister’s Questions, which prompted Joe Murphy to ask: just how low will Labour go? .. well .. not as low as sunak 
    • From #38 where you wrote the following, all in the 3rd person so we don't know which party is you. When you sy it was your family home, was that before or after? " A FH split to create 2 Leasehold adjoining houses (terrace) FH remains under original ownership and 1 Leasehold house sold on 100y+ lease. . Freeholder resides in the other Leasehold house. The property was originally resided in as one house by Freeholder"
    • The property was our family home.  A fixed low rate btl/ development loan was given (last century!). It was derelict. Did it up/ was rented out for a while.  Then moved in/out over the years (mostly around school)  It was a mix of rental and family home. The ad-hoc rents covered the loan amply.  Nowadays  banks don't allow such a mix.  (I have written this before.) Problems started when the lease was extended and needed to re-mortgage to cover the expense.  Wanted another btl.  Got a tenant in situ. Was located elsewhere (work). A broker found a btl lender, they reneged.  Broker didn't find another btl loan.  The tenant was paying enough to cover the proposed annual btl mortgage in 4 months. The broker gave up trying to find another.  I ended up on a bridge and this disastrous path.  (I have raised previous issues about the broker) Not sure what you mean by 'split'.  The property was always leasehold with a separate freeholder  The freeholder eventually sold the fh to another entity by private agreement (the trust) but it's always been separate.  That's quite normal.  One can't merge titles - unless lease runs out/ is forfeited and new one is not created/ granted. The bridge lender had a special condition in loan offer - their own lawyer had to check title first.  Check that lease wasn't onerous and there was nothing that would affect good saleability.  The lawyer (that got sacked for dishonesty) signed off the loan on the basis the lease and title was good and clean.  The same law firm then tried to complain the lease clauses were onerous and the lease too short, even though the loan was to cover a 90y lease extension!! 
    • Northmonk forget what I said about your Notice to Hirer being the best I have seen . Though it  still may be  it is not good enough to comply with PoFA. Before looking at the NTH, we can look at the original Notice to Keeper. That is not compliant. First the period of parking as sated on their PCN is not actually the period of parking but a misstatement  since it is only the arrival and departure times of your vehicle. The parking period  is exactly that -ie the time youwere actually parked in a parking spot.  If you have to drive around to find a place to park the act of driving means that you couldn't have been parked at the same time. Likewise when you left the parking place and drove to the exit that could not be describes as parking either. So the first fail is  failing to specify the parking period. Section9 [2][a] In S9[2][f] the Act states  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN fails to mention the words in parentheses despite Section 9 [2]starting by saying "The notice must—..." As the Notice to Keeper fails to comply with the Act,  it follows that the Notice to Hirer cannot be pursued as they couldn't get the NTH compliant. Even if the the NTH was adjudged  as not  being affected by the non compliance of the NTK, the Notice to Hirer is itself not compliant with the Act. Once again the PCN fails to get the parking period correct. That alone is enough to have the claim dismissed as the PCN fails to comply with PoFA. Second S14 [5] states " (5)The notice to Hirer must— (a)inform the hirer that by virtue of this paragraph any unpaid parking charges (being parking charges specified in the notice to keeper) may be recovered from the hirer; ON their NTH , NPE claim "The driver of the above vehicle is liable ........" when the driver is not liable at all, only the hirer is liable. The driver and the hirer may be different people, but with a NTH, only the hirer is liable so to demand the driver pay the charge  fails to comply with PoFA and so the NPE claim must fail. I seem to remember that you have confirmed you received a copy of the original PCN sent to  the Hire company plus copies of the contract you have with the Hire company and the agreement that you are responsible for breaches of the Law etc. If not then you can add those fails too.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

IVA Administrator wants to run an IVA for an extra year


Recommended Posts

My sister in law took out an IVA almost five years ago and it now has about three months left to run.

My SIL has forwarded an email she received from the Insolvency practioner which says (in part):

...following the Variation meeting to remove the obligation to look into releasing equity I understand that you are unable to approach your husband regarding the property, so they are happy to remove the obligation however they want an additional 12 months contributions to compensate creditors therefore the IVA will run for a further twelve months.

They are seeking her agreement to this.

As I understand it whilst they are married the house is only in my brother's name as he had it prior to the marriage (20 plus years go) the debts are card debts that she has in her name.   It would seem the IVA is trying to get a charging order on the house and not succeeding because my brother wont have it.

I am not knowledgeable regarding IVA's so would welcome any advice here but can she refuse to go another year?  I suspect some fleacing attempt is going on here by the IVA practioner.

I am tempted to advise (and assist) that she asks for copies of the original agreements and if , as seems usual, they cannot supply those documents then the debts are unenforceable and she could stop paying anyway.

any thoughts gratefully received.

Link to post
Share on other sites

99% of what she has been paying goes to the IVA provider as their fees anyway.

and as you say, not a lot they can do to her, the IVA company (who are?) most certainly can't.

shame she got taken in to starting it (by whom?) as i bet most debts are unenforceable and historic anyway.

stop paying and ignore them IMHO.

but lets see the players first.

dxc

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Forest King insolvency Ltd.

Waiting to get the names of the creditors but it will be people like Lowell, debt buyers, and the original creditors will be credit cards like Tesco bank, HSBC, Lloyds etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, dx100uk said:

stop paying and ignore them IMHO.

or say no to the extension but don't give them any more money beyond the £sum of the 3 mts to go...esp 'fees' for 'closing it down. see what they do....

how much £PCM i she paying now.

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Thanks for the various replies.

She is currently paying £100 per month.

Last week they contacted her again and said that if she did not agree to the one year extension by Tuesday April 2nd then the IVA might fail.  She was a little alarmed by this.

I asked her how it was possible for it to fail on Tuesday if the payments were up to date and the initial term of five years still had two months to go .   I told her they were putting unfair pressure on her.

I have advised her to write to them asking for  a copy of the original agreement and to ask which part of the agreement allowed them to add a year and why it would fail on Tuesday in particiular if she did not agree to an extension.  I also told her to tell them that future communications had to be in writing.  (I bet they would not have said it would fail in writing!).

Further to an above question her creditors are as follows:

PRA Group   £12912

PRA Tesco Bank:  £6732

LC assett: £5365

PRA Tesco Bank £3022

Paypal Credit: £922

Link to post
Share on other sites

all are dca's and don't ever need paying as you already know.

sorry shes been had blind by everyone. esp the IVa provider

pers i'd not bother writing , pay the remaining months then STOP.

then ignore them.

so what if the IVA fails...tough luck on the dca's, it can't hurt her at all.

dx

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

There has been a couple of events as follows:

My Sister in Law had sent an email requesting a copy of the agreement,  an indication of where in the agreement there were terms indicating it would fail and an insistence that future communications would be by written means only.

This may have rattled them or not but the following letter was received:

A virtual meeting of the creditors was convened for 2nd April to consider a variation to your IVA.  The variation meeting has been withdrawn and the IVA will continue as per the original proposal.   Should you have any queries......etc.

And then the following:

 
You may recall speaking to my colleague last week about the meeting we held with your creditors.  This meeting has now been withdrawn, however to prevent the IVA from failing we do need to resolve the issue with the property.
 
When the IVA was accepted, the property wasn't included - however creditors added a modification to your proposal to ensure that they obtained some monies as you have an equitable interest.  
As you have agreed to the modification (verbally and then electronically signed - see attached) - the arrangement was confirmed. 
 
There are 2 months left of your original IVA, but it will not be able to complete unless an agreement is made with your creditors.  I note from your the call that your husband advised that no further monies were to be forthcoming.  When we last reviewed your case in November 2023 - the information we received demonstrated that the payments to the IVA were affordable.  
 
I have attached the workings used for your payments, and would like to invite you to update anything that you feel has changed.  Please note, that I am unable to change anything without evidence, therefore I would require the last 3 months of bank statements along with your tax return to show proof of earnings.
 
Where possible, we can then look to approach creditors with another offer.  
 
I have advised her to do nothing.   I am no expert at IVA's but I get the sense they are thrashing around trying to get something out of it.
 
What do they mean by the phrase "will not be able to complete" (which they underlined in their correspondence)?
 
The current plan remains which is to make the last two payments of the original five years and then not pay any more. 
 
I am suggesting that after she had made the last payment she notify them in writing that she will not be paying any more and withdrawing authorisation for them to debit her bank card also suggesting she advise her bank to stop any future payments to them.
Link to post
Share on other sites

good work.

dont respond no. never respond.

get her to ring her bank and CANCEL the Continuous Payment Authority (exact term only!!) to the named IVA company.

CANCELLING THE CARD ALONE DOES NOT WORK.!!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you cancel the CPA now just remember to pay your final 2 payments online by card or by bank transfer (dependant on the IVA)

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the comments.

I have already suggested to her that she make the last two payments at the usual time (when they debit her card) and only thrn to both cancel their authorisation by writing to them but also advising her bank .

I am already aware from seeing other posts on this site that sometimes it is necessary to be very clear with the bank about cancelling a particular CPA.

Thanks everyone for your help.

I will put any updates on here.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...