Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Your PCN does not comply with the Protection of freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9[2][a] (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; The only time on the PCN is 17.14. That is only  a time for there to be a period there would have to be a start and and end time mentioned. of course they do show the ANPR arrival and departures  times but that is not the parking period and their times are on the photographs not on the PCN. They also failed to comply with S.9[2][f] as they omitted to say that they could only pursue the keeper if they complied with the Act. That means that they can only pursue the driver as the keeper cannot be held liable for the charge. As they do not know who was driving and Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person they will struggle to win. Especially as so many people are able to legally drive your car and you haven't appealed giving them no indication therefore of who was driving. Small nitpicking point-the date of Infringement was 22/04/2024. They appear to be saying that they can charge an extra amount [up to £70 ] if they have to use a debt collector. You do not have a contract with a debt collector so they cannot add that cost. You paid for four hours so it can only be the 15 minutes they are complaining about. You are entitled to a ten minute minimum grace period at the end of the parking period which would be easier to explain if the car park had been bigger. However if you allow for two minutes to park and two minutes to leave that gives you one minute to account for. Things like being held on the way out by cars in front waiting to get on to Northgate or even your own car being held up trying to get on to Northgate at a busy time. then other considerations like having to stop to allow pedestrians to walk in front of you or being held up by another car doing a u turn in front of your car. you would have to check with the driver and see if they could account for an extra one minute things like a disabled passenger or having to strap in a child . I am not advocating lying since that could lead to serious problems [like jail time] but there can be an awful lot of minor things that can cause a hold up of a minute even the engine not starting straight away or another car being badly parked as examples. Sadly you cannot include the 5 minute Consideration period as both IPC and BPA fail to comply with the convention that you can include that time with the Grace period.  
    • Defence struck out not case struck out...you have judgment  Well done topic title updated Regard's Please consider making a donation if not already to support us to help others.   Andy.   .
    • Hi all, I wanted to update you and thank you all for your help. I am delighted announce that after the case was struck out due to no response from Evri, judgement was issued after I submitted the forms and I was just about to take it to warrent. Then today I received an email from the claims department requesting my bank details to make payment for my full award. The process has been long since the initial proceedings  in January i must say your help and guidance has been greatly appreciated.  
    • Quote of the century "Farage pops up when the country’s at a low ebb; like a kind of political herpes" - Frankie Boyle Updates
    • its from a DCA...what were you told or should have already read about about DCA's and Fake PCN speculative invoices? dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

statute barred: how to tell?


drees5761
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5010 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Send a SAR request to the OC (NOT any DCA chasing you). It will cost 10 GBP.

 

DO NOT ACKNOWLEDGE THE DEBT EVEN IF YOU HAVE MADE PAYMENTS IN THE PAST as this starts the clock ticking again.

 

Once the debt is SB'd then thats it -- 100% defence at law FOR EVER.

 

SCREW the CRA's -- I HATE them almost as much as the DCA's -- or in fact EVEN MORE since there is TOTALLY NO TRANSPARENCY over what happens when people refer to your CRA and there appears to be no limit to the amount of data they can supply to 3rd parties.

 

I'd LOVE to get one of these bozos on breaking something in the Data Protection acts -- but I suppose as they collude with the Banks there will always be some reason why THEY get away with it but we would be stung with a prosecution and / or a heavy fine.

 

Cheers

jimbo

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

If you check you credit file and something is not there that doesn't mean that no debt exists - it may just be that it has never been recorded with that credit agency.

Are you saying you've checked your file and this debt has dropped off or are you not sure.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is six years since the last PAYMENT has been made on your account, not the last contact, if that was true then no debt would EVER become statute barred as all the creditor would have to do is write to you....

 

If the payment was made under duress (ie they kept phoning up and you paid to get statements which didn't arrive) or they CANNOT prove that the payment DID come from you or your representative then it is the preceeding payment which counts (had this in a case recently, DCA had used a strange payment of £3.75 and claimed it was from the alleged debtor, alleged debtor was able to prove without question of doubt their whereabouts the day the DCA claimed they contacted and got the payment!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's the last payment on the account to whoever, but if the debt was stat barred then it makes no odds if who or when you pay after that, it's still stat barred.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

The thing about payment under duress... how would this work? I've noted that that there was a payment to DLC made after being threatened that goods would be removed from my parents house

 

There you go, you've just answered your own question, that would be a prime example of getting payment by duress, plus, exploiting the debtors lack of knowledge, obtaining money by deception, psychological harassment & intimidation to name a few!

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Defaults are usually entered one month after the last payment or activity on the account in question, so it will be a safe bet that 6 years (5 in Scotland) from the default date the debt will be SB, any activity on the account, either by payment or acknowledgement that the account is in fact owed blah blah blah, resets the limitation period to zero and the time starts again. However once the limitation period has run it's course, nothing niet nadda can ever restart the clock.

:behindsofa: hello BB..

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If a payment is made after the default date does this reset the clock on the six years? Or is it still six years from the default date?

Yes it will reset the limitation clock, BUT if there has been a clear period of 6 years (5 in Scotland) and a payment is made after this period, then it does NOT reset the clock.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

in a bid to clear up my credit file ive recently emailed Hilsden to say my debt was SB and they replied that according to their records it isnt and that "Due to your recent contact I confirm the new date for ‘statute barred’ is now September 2016."

i.e they took my email to be acknowledgement of the debt !

Link to post
Share on other sites

Default dates do not count for statute barring, so I have been told by a legal bod.... it is definately the last payment that counts more than any other date, and the payment has to come from the original debtor to the original creditor or its collecting agent, it CANNOT be a payment from a collecting agent to a creditor which does not identify the originating source.... he was quite specific on this.

 

Apparently DCAs are now trying to get the Statute of Limitations changed to six years after the Default date and have the default date moved every time the debt is passed onto collections teams or sold... totally defeats the object of the Statute of Limitations!

Link to post
Share on other sites

in a bid to clear up my credit file ive recently emailed Hilsden to say my debt was SB and they replied that according to their records it isnt and that "Due to your recent contact I confirm the new date for ‘statute barred’ is now September 2016."

i.e they took my email to be acknowledgement of the debt !

 

Once it is statute-barred NOTHING can make it un-statute-barred.

 

A written acknowledgement CAN reset the clock , if not already statute-barred. I don't believe that emails can count as such although I may be wrong.

 

One thing I have learnt, both from these forums and from personal experience. There are no absolute truths as far as the law goes. The law can say one thing, but it seems that a contrary judge or lawyer can pretend it says something else. The main principle seems, for them, to be "what is legal is whatever they can get away with", and a good lawyer seems to be one who can bend the interpretation of the law to suit his own purposes, and who is able to convince others to accept that interpretation. So much of our social contract is based on smoke and mirrors.

Link to post
Share on other sites

contents of email was "I am writing to inform you that this so called "outstanding debt" is statute barred as it is over 6 years has passed since any payment was made to the account . Please see the attched screenshot of my credit file"

 

screenshot showed last payment was july 2004

Link to post
Share on other sites

Defaults are usually entered one month after the last payment or activity on the account in question, so it will be a safe bet that 6 years (5 in Scotland) from the default date the debt will be SB, any activity on the account, either by payment or acknowledgement that the account is in fact owed blah blah blah, resets the limitation period to zero and the time starts again. However once the limitation period has run it's course, nothing niet nadda can ever restart the clock.

 

I have just sent a statute barred letter to lowells re barclycard this afternoon, whats puzzling me is having checked my credit file with experian & equifax lowells are saying that my default date is 06/08. now I had the card in 2000, on experian it shows 36 months activity but nothing showing on equifax. Now I cant say exactly when I defaulted but took out a capital one card in 2007 to repair my credit rating so it was way before then I think probably around 2003/2004. strangely no mention of this debt on either file from barclaycard only lowells. how do i find out when the last payment was made?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Sending a Subject Access Request to the Origional Creditor should let you know the score regarding payments made on the account.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...