Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I've had to hide two of your posts.  Anyone clicking on your links gets sent to external sites.  On top of that your real name is showing on one screenshot.  Fellow Site Team member dx100uk has already politely asked - Anyway, jk2054 wants to see the communication you got from your local court which will have told you about the hearing date of 17 June, and will have mentioned a deadline for filing your Witness Statement.
    • I believe it is helpful to seek guidance from a range of places and decide on the validity of the sources and frequency of responses which are most helpful. A single voice can be a dangerous thing. As, of course, can groupthink. Scott, it feels like £4k on a solicitor for a £1.5k bill is overkill. Were we back in time I'd suggest small claims court as your claim sounds like it may be straightforward? By all means add that phrase on. I also suggest you contact the court and go and sit in on a couple of similar cases to get a better understanding before you shell out.
    • a card should be 16 digits...urm... note your dates above please. do not miss them no matter what happens  ......................... pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’. Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time. You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID. You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .. get a CCA Request running to the claimant . https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332502-cca-request-consumer-credit-act-1974-updated-january-2015/ .. Leave the £1 PO unsigned and uncrossed . get a CPR  31:14  request running to the solicitors [if one is not listed send to the claimant] ... https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ . .use our other CPR letter if the claim is for an OD or Telecom Debt or Util debt]  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ on BOTH type your name ONLY Do Not sign anything .do not ever use or give an email . you DO NOT await the return of ANY paperwork  you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count] ..............  
    • Which Court have you received the claim from ? Northamton, civil national business centre Name of the Claimant ? PRA Group Uk Portfolios ltd. How many defendant's  joint or self ? self Date of issue –  21 May 24 date of AOS - 07-06-2024 date for filing defence by - 21-06-2024 Particulars of Claim 1. The claimant claims the sum of £5600 for an outstanding debt owed. 2. On Mar 2000 the Defendant entered into an agreement with Barclays Bank Uk PLC for a credit card under reference ( 11 digit ref ). 3. on Mar 21 the defendant defaulted on the agreement  with an outstanding balance of £5600. 4. On Aug 21 the debt £5600 was assigned to PRA Group (UK) Limited, who itself assigned the debt to PRA Group UK Portfolios Ltd on Dec 23. 5. Notices of assignment were sent to the defendant in accordance with S136 Law of Property act 1925. 6. The claimant has instructed PRA Group (UK) Limited to act on its behalf in the recovery of the outstanding debt and to pursue litigation on its behalf. AND THE CLAIMANT CLAIMS 1. The sum of £5600 What is the total value of the claim? £6100  Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? No - just emails threatening action   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? Yes   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? no Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? credit card   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? before - in 2000   Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? I don't recall - I suspect post / online   Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? am awaiting access - but I suspect it is    Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. assigned - debt purchaser has issued the claim   Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Pretty certain - Yes   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? pretty certain - Yes   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? there's been gaps - they went very quiet  Why did you cease payments? Covid lockdowns  What was the date of your last payment? i thought it was 2020 - they say 2021 Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? no Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? no
    • no go to OCMC and download the transfer order and post it here.   be quick we dont have a lot of time
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5134 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Just got both messages from you Rae and PT - excellent advice and have already got some concrete ideas.

I will get back on it first thing in the morning.

Thank you. I really am overwhelmed why ppl would go to such lengths to help someone you don't really even know.

Am truly humbled. You are great ppl - wish I had more friends like you.

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, VJ, glad you're not so disappointed with the forum.

Most of the regular posters here have suffered at the hands of bailiffs before. Myself included. So we use our experiences to turn the tables and take pride back for ourselves.

I naturally veer towards anyone in the vulnerable category because I'm vulnerable myself. I have a severe lung disease. I'm no longer able to work and survive on benefits. So another way I look at things is this: I can't do 'meaningfull' work and pay my way in life anymore. The taxpayer - you - pay for me. But I can still write and I can still type. So this is my way of giving back to society, I'm not just 'taking'. :)

Best wishes

Rae

 

[oh, and thanks, I love my avatar too!]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, VJ, glad you're not so disappointed with the forum.

Most of the regular posters here have suffered at the hands of bailiffs before. Myself included. So we use our experiences to turn the tables and take pride back for ourselves.

I naturally veer towards anyone in the vulnerable category because I'm vulnerable myself. I have a severe lung disease. I'm no longer able to work and survive on benefits. So another way I look at things is this: I can't do 'meaningfull' work and pay my way in life anymore. The taxpayer - you - pay for me. But I can still write and I can still type. So this is my way of giving back to society, I'm not just 'taking'. :)

Best wishes

Rae

 

[oh, and thanks, I love my avatar too!]

 

Most perfectly said.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, VJ, glad you're not so disappointed with the forum.

Most of the regular posters here have suffered at the hands of bailiffs before. Myself included. So we use our experiences to turn the tables and take pride back for ourselves.

I naturally veer towards anyone in the vulnerable category because I'm vulnerable myself. I have a severe lung disease. I'm no longer able to work and survive on benefits. So another way I look at things is this: I can't do 'meaningfull' work and pay my way in life anymore. The taxpayer - you - pay for me. But I can still write and I can still type. So this is my way of giving back to society, I'm not just 'taking'. :)

Best wishes

Rae

 

[oh, and thanks, I love my avatar too!]

 

Your a star Rae :):) (and your late night sarnies are just the bestest ever););)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Congrats on the pregnancy

 

I really dont know much on baliff law and can only tell you my experience mine was for council tax.After unsucessfully trying to plead my case with the baliffs i went to my local councillor who was fantastic within a few days I received a letter from the council stating what i owed in detail breakdown of court cost etc and i paid them directly as for the baliffs i never heard from again,

 

Good luck with everything

 

and congrats again

 

Kymmie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah, kymmie, you clearly have a decent council. Unfortunately there doesn't appear to be any uniform way of handling things across all the councils. But they do sometimes do what they should as you found out! :)

Best wishes

Rae

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah, kymmie, you clearly have a decent council. Unfortunately there doesn't appear to be any uniform way of handling things across all the councils. But they do sometimes do what they should as you found out! :)

Best wishes

Rae

 

I got to admit I cant fault em but do acknowledge that not all are as accommadating unfortunatly

 

Kymmie

Link to post
Share on other sites

I rang the council today. I sent the template letter from Kelcou.

I have made a 75% payment against the debt - i dispute the full amount as I have proof from when I moved to my present house and the council is sending me a letter with the dates to back up my version of events.

I believe as PT advised I am now in a position of strength.

However, I imagine the bailiffs will be ****ed off and pursue their own costs.

I will happily pay £42.50 to them but I anticipate they will fight for more.

I have sent them a recorded delivery letter asking for a full breakdown of costs.

I am hopeful that they will back off in the medium term and leave me and my pregnant wife alone in the short term.

But, I do believe I have achieved my main aim of protecting my wife from undue stress and also protecting our cars which are not a luxury but a means of allowing us to earn a decent living and paying our taxes.

Again, thanks to Kelcou and PT for your excellent advice and help in this matter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update - esp. for Kelcou and PT

 

Sent the pregnancy letter - no replay as yet.

 

Did recieve the breakdown on costs from bailiffs and a Notice of seizure of goods. Intersetingly the Notice is from Sept 2009 and they have the WRONG car. It is owned by my sis in law who lives miles away. The cars of my wife and I were parked on street and went unnoticed.

Don't know if this affects anything?

 

The GOOD thing is about £350 worth of charges seem to have disappeared!!!

 

I have made a lions share payment of original bill to the council.

 

At the foot of the letter they have said re-commencement of enforcement starts on 5/5/10.

They don't know yet I have made part payment to council.

 

Obviously, I will make them aware of this.

 

Anthing I have missed?

 

Ta everyone :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

You're more than welcome.

Some people try to argue that the pregnant mother has to be at a certain stage of pregnancy. The Standards do not differentiate and - as far as I'm concerned - the first trimester is just as important as the third.

I have a template for early pregnancy so will post shortly.

Best wishes

Rae

 

Thanks for all your well wishes.

 

Update, no reply to pregnancy letter as yet.

 

Have received reply for breakdown of charges; Notice of seizure of goods relates to sept '09 - BUT it is on the WRONG car - that car belongs to my sis in law who lives 90 mins away.

Good news is about £350 of charges have disappeared!!!

 

Also paid lions share of amount owed direct to council.

 

But, at the bottom of letter, they say enforcement action will start on 5/5/10.

 

I will let them know what I have paid to council obviously.

 

Have I missed anything?

 

Ta everyone.

 

Vinny Jones

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Did recieve the breakdown on costs from bailiffs and a Notice of seizure of goods. Intersetingly the Notice is from Sept 2009 and they have the WRONG car. It is owned by my sis in law who lives miles away. The cars of my wife and I were parked on street and went unnoticed.

Don't know if this affects anything?

 

This now proves the levy is invalid - have you told them it is not your vehicle - you don't have to tell them who it belongs to but you should suggest a DVLA check will reveal it belongs to someone who doesn't even live locally. Keep your own cars out of the way for now as if they return they will look again.

 

The GOOD thing is about £350 worth of charges seem to have disappeared!!!

 

Goodness me how did that happen :-| don't tell me they made a mistake!! Is it possible you can post the charges as you never know there may be others you can challenge.

 

I have made a lions share payment of original bill to the council.

 

At the foot of the letter they have said re-commencement of enforcement starts on 5/5/10.

They don't know yet I have made part payment to council.

 

Obviously, I will make them aware of this.

 

Anthing I have missed?

 

Under NO circumstances allow them into your home or give them an opportunity to levy upon anything outside, that then keeps the charges down.

 

Ta everyone :-)

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

@PT - the breakdown is awful in its presentation.

Bailiffs apologised about the quality of the scanned document!

Its hard to make it out but the sum total of their charges on top of the debt is only £49 and about 42 of that is on the incorrect levy. Rest on letters/admin.

No mention of costs for the 2 payable visits to my home.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you had confirmation from the council that they have recalled this from bailiffs?

 

Which council is it?

 

 

Am awaiting confirmation from the council.

 

Not sure its a good idea to name the council (no reason just following what other posters do)......:|

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...