Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Northmonk forget what I said about your Notice to Hirer being the best I have seen . Though it  still may be  it is not good enough to comply with PoFA. Before looking at the NTH, we can look at the original Notice to Keeper. That is not compliant. First the period of parking as sated on their PCN is not actually the period of parking but a misstatement  since it is only the arrival and departure times of your vehicle. The parking period  is exactly that -ie the time youwere actually parked in a parking spot.  If you have to drive around to find a place to park the act of driving means that you couldn't have been parked at the same time. Likewise when you left the parking place and drove to the exit that could not be describes as parking either. So the first fail is  failing to specify the parking period. Section9 [2][a] In S9[2][f] the Act states  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN fails to mention the words in parentheses despite Section 9 [2]starting by saying "The notice must—..." As the Notice to Keeper fails to comply with the Act,  it follows that the Notice to Hirer cannot be pursued as they couldn't get the NTH compliant. Even if the the NTH was adjudged  as not  being affected by the non compliance of the NTK, the Notice to Hirer is itself not compliant with the Act. Once again the PCN fails to get the parking period correct. That alone is enough to have the claim dismissed as the PCN fails to comply with PoFA. Second S14 [5] states " (5)The notice to Hirer must— (a)inform the hirer that by virtue of this paragraph any unpaid parking charges (being parking charges specified in the notice to keeper) may be recovered from the hirer; ON their NTH , NPE claim "The driver of the above vehicle is liable ........" when the driver is not liable at all, only the hirer is liable. The driver and the hirer may be different people, but with a NTH, only the hirer is liable so to demand the driver pay the charge  fails to comply with PoFA and so the NPE claim must fail. I seem to remember that you have confirmed you received a copy of the original PCN sent to  the Hire company plus copies of the contract you have with the Hire company and the agreement that you are responsible for breaches of the Law etc. If not then you can add those fails too.
    • Weaknesses in some banks' security measures for online and mobile banking could leave customers more exposed to scammers, new data from Which? reveals.View the full article
    • I understand what you mean. But consider that part of the problem, and the frustration of those trying to help, is the way that questions are asked without context and without straight facts. A lot of effort was wasted discussing as a consumer issue before it was mentioned that the property was BTL. I don't think we have your history with this property. Were you the freehold owner prior to this split? Did you buy the leasehold of one half? From a family member? How was that funded (earlier loan?). How long ago was it split? Have either of the leasehold halves changed hands since? I'm wondering if the split and the leashold/freehold arrangements were set up in a way that was OK when everyone was everyone was connected. But a way that makes the leasehold virtually unsaleable to an unrelated party.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Amazon/UPS £1200 Macbook lost by UPS when i used My Own Returns postage label


Recommended Posts

Hello,

I recently sent a return via UPS to amazon and amazon say they never record it arriving. UPS opened an investigation, sent claim docs and said they paid the claim, and have now turned around and say they’re not paying the claim as it was delivered.

I’ve issued UPS with a notice to pay and they have failed to obide by this. 

 

What would my next steps be? I assume I’d be suing UPS not amazon given UPS have originally said they lost it and paid a claim? 

 

Will donate after resolution - TIA

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you today?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Could you set out the story in a chronological bullet pointed form please.

It is difficult to understand the story so far particularly because you have said at 1 point that UPS paid and then later on they didn't pay.

Start from the beginning

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, its super confusing, please see a timed bullet point list of events below:

13 june - claim docs issued, UPS unable to prove delivery, UPS accept that shipment was lost

Tue 20 june - told that payment of £1007.49 will be processed within 10-12 days

20 June - payment amount adjustment was accepted (my shipment was £1200 but UPS max declarable value is £1,000 so I had to accept £1,007.49 which I did)

20 june - paperwork processing - query as to when payment will be made is raised

20 june - told waiting for system to update to the adjusted amount, then payment will be made

22 june - UPS mark claim as paid without paying

5 July - UPS change their position to say goods delivered no payment will be made.

Amazon remain of the position that they do not have any record of the shipment at their facility

The label was purchased privately, it was NOT an amazon return label, so they have no liability (which I believe is correct since UPS have previously admitted losing it)

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you today?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you. Have you got the message from UPS saying that they will pay?

Also send an sar to UPS.

You haven't told us what the item was .

Was it properly declared?

Why were you returning it to Amazon

 

 

Did you buy the insurance policy for it

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your response.

I do,

I have one message where they say "According our terms and conditions section 9-9.4 UPS it could be only liable for the maximum liability of your parcel (£1000.00). 

We will include also the shipping charges according the Invoice (XXXXXXXX)*£7.49 (Excluding the declared value charge £5.00). Making a total payment amount of £1007.49 and you should receive the credit on an estimate timeframe of 5-12 working days. "

and another message where it says

" Hi, the status of your claim has been updated. We have paid the claim for this parcel. UPS Next steps - the claim has been paid. 

The item was a macbook and was returned because I selected the wrong keyboard layout by accident. 

I declared the value fully and paid for their extra cover.

 

SAR done .

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you today?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay.

My view is that despite their terms and conditions which purport to limit their liability, if you have properly declared the value of the item and they have accepted on that basis then that overrides the terms and conditions. Of course this needs to be tested in court.

You have paid them an insurance premium – and of course this is unnecessary and unenforceable. However the most important thing here is that they now say that the item was delivered.

Have they given you any evidence of the delivery? Have you asked for anything?

It is certainly UPS that you will be suing that you need to get your ducks in a row so that you are fully prepared.

Have you done a substantial amount a reading of the stories on this sub- forum?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,

For your first sentence, can you elaborate - UPS maximum liability for a UK shipment is £1,000. Surely I can't challenge that, because its not an insurance related thing, its their terms for all parcels? 

For the proof of delivery, I have asked, and they have simply provided a document earlier today that says "delivered and received by amazon", however they have stated that each parcel isnt scanned at the point of delivery and is only scanned at the depot, and prior to this they have sent numerous documents to show that the parcel wasn't delivered such as the initial claims form, the claim paid message, and various emails in which they accept the claim.  

 

I have done my reading, especially with the EVRi cases, and I'm assuming I can pretty much apply the same principle but I'm just making sure I do everything correctly before I make an error that makes my claim harder as I've never done one before . I've sent them a LBA and they've completely ignored it.

 

I assume my next step is to issue a claim against them - for my brief details im planning to explain that the shipment wasn't received, UPS investigation failed to find it, and they declared it lost, and despite saying they paid the claim UPS never did this and that for remedy I seek the £1,007 or the full value of the laptop (I'm still not sure on which one of these I can do, so if you can let me know I'd appreciate that).

 

Then for my POC I'd assume I'd just go more into detail on the timeline, as well as my proof from amazon where they say they haven't received it. Focus on UPS accepting the claim originally, as well as admitting that they didnt scan the physical parcel at the time of delivery. Should I bring up UPS saying they paid when they didn't or is that irrelevant given the main part of the dispute is now whether they should pay or not rather than them agreeing they should have paid but then not paying?

 

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you today?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

What value did you declare? You are limited by that in any claim.

You have sent them a letter of claim. Please will you post it up here.

Also, it would be a good idea if you post up your particulars of claim here before you click it off

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well UPS don't let you "Declare" the value, they simply give you the option to add insurance up to £1,000. I was never asked to imput the value of the goods when sending the parcel.

I have attached the letter of claim to this in PDF format.

Please advise if you think anything's missing I think its slightly different to the other ones I've seen on this forum, but unfortunately I already sent it by the time i came across this, but I've largely copied the template from Citizens advice website. If you think I should send another please let me know.

Thanks

 

 

_UPS letter 1Z2T99K36800001615.pdf

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you today?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly, what date did you send a letter of claim?

Secondly, was it really Citizens Advice that advise you any to give seven days? The minimum is 14 days. I have seen letters from CA giving 28 days – but never seven.

Thirdly, you refer simply to the payment of the money – but not to the loss of the item which actually is the principal issue – the breach of contract.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, I sent multiple, In total they've had over 28 anyway. CA gave me the template for the letter, I just inserted 7 days because they already had another letter prior, and various emails which they acknowledged.

I'm aware of that, which is why I asked you if you think I should send another since they're refusal to pay? (my previous letter before claim was before they decided to now say they're not paying - I sent the letter above after they said claim paid, but when I still hadn't received it.)

Please let me know your thoughts, I do appreciate your help.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you today?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Amazon/UPS £1200 Macbook lost by UPS when i used My Own Returns postage label

just type

no need to keep hitting quote!!

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have a look at the proposed letter of claim below.

I think it's about time to stop mucking around. This is serious and this court claim is not a bluff. That means that the expiry of the 14 day limit – day 15 – you will click of your claim which you will already have fully prepared and ready to go.
By sending a series of letters of claim setting out deadlines which then you never follow up, you lose credibility and you undermine your position.

If you aren't sure whether you want to do this then you may as well stop now

 

Quote

Dear XXX

Letter of Claimreference number XXX



On XXX date I contracted with you to deliver a parcel containing a MacBook computer to an address in the UK.

The parcel was not delivered and in fact in correspondence dated XXX and XXX you admitted that you had lost the parcel and at one point offered to reimburse me the insured value of £XXX.

Since then you have reneged on your promise and furthermore, you have now tried to say that the MacBook was delivered even though you have not provided any evidence and Amazon themselves say that nothing has been received.

I note your own comments that you only scan items at your depot and you do not scan them at the point of delivery. The evidence is fairly clear that you did in fact dispatch the MacBook to its destination but it was stolen en route because as you know, it never arrived.

You have now changed your position and you have declined to reimburse me.

If I do not receive full reimbursement of £XXX within 14 days I shall begin a court claim against you in order to recover my money plus interest plus court costs, and without any further notice.

Yours

 

See if there is anything in the above letter which is wrong or if there is something you want to add then let us know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah see about deadlines. I sent the first letter they said they'd pay within 10 days. That passed, so I sent them another letter saying to pay as they had overriden their time frame, that letter arrived and they said paid even though it now transpires they didn't

 

Is there a particular point I went wrong with the above or not?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you today?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, the fact that you set a timescale and a deadline for action – and then you didn't follow it up. No point in making a threat if you aren't going to go ahead with it.

I'll huff and I'll puff and then… err ....

 


As it happens, your 10 day deadline didn't conform to the pre-action protocol for this kind of thing although you would probably have found that you are dealing with unqualified paralegal drones who probably  wouldn't have even spotted that and wouldn't have leveraged it against you.

 

Do you have written confirmation from Amazon that they didn't receive the parcel?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I’ll take what you said on board thanks for the advice. I’ll update it later and send it off.

 

I do have written confirmation from amazon yes

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you today?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just noticed that you are running this thread under two different usernames. I'm going to merge them – which one you want to keep

Link to post
Share on other sites

This one please, didnt even notice they were seperate sorry about that

Please let me know what you think of this.

Dear XXX
Letter of Claim – reference number XXX
On XXX date I contracted you to deliver a parcel containing a MacBook computer to an address
in the UK.


The parcel was not delivered and in fact in correspondence dated XXX and XXX you admitted that you had lost the parcel and at one point offered to reimburse me the insured value of £XXX.


Since then you have reneged on your promise and furthermore, you have now tried to say that the MacBook was delivered even though you have not provided any evidence and Amazon themselves say that nothing has been received.


I note your own comments that you only scan items at your depot and you do not scan them at the point of delivery.

The evidence is fairly clear that you did in fact dispatch the MacBook to its destination but it was lost/stolen en route because as you know, it never arrived.


You have now changed your position and you have declined to reimburse me.


If I do not receive full reimbursement of £XXX within 14 days I shall begin a court claim against you in order to recover my money plus interest plus court costs, and without any further notice.

Yours

 

I've just changed a few small things so it should be good, but please do let me know if you think I've missed something.

 

Sorry I can't tell if im Judging too early but given the reaction would that claim letter be good to send?

TIA 

  • Like 1

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you today?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

We already gave you a like for it

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had imagined that it would already have been posted yesterday

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey,

 

I'm working on my POC.

 

Would I base that I want to claim the full value of the macbook of the consumer rights act 2015 meaning they were double selling me insurance or would I base it on UPS's terms and conditions where it says it must not exceed the value of USD 50,000 and me selecting the highest level of cover I could, and as such since my value was below USD 50,000 I am entitled to claim the full value?

 

If I did It based on the latter, what would I claim in regards to the maximum I declared being up to £1,000. Would I claim that I was unable to declare the actual value of the package since this option was never available and instead I selected and paid for the maxium cover I could, and since I did not exceed UPS maximum value, I can claim up to the actual value of my goods, since the value falls below the maximum UPS liability value of USD 50,000?

 

TIA

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you today?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...