Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • yes 85% of people think DCA's are BAILIFFS and wet themselves because they WRONGLY think they can come a knocking and take your stuff away sadly. when in all truth they never can be and have NO legal powers whatsoever. dx
    • Just circling back with a thanks and an apology.   Apologies because, I honestly thought I'd replied to thank everyone and update, but turns out I hadn't. Sorry. So first of all, a big big thanks to the Forum and all those that helped me on this thread, especially @dx100uk and @AndyOrch. The work you do is awesome and I'm sure I'm only one of many who are extremely grateful for your support. So, in terms of a belated update, Moriarty withdrew, well they said ADCB did. So that's a result. Whilst that was a few years back, I still get emails from odd 'agents' locally in UAE - usually at a weekend - or reminders from ADCB. The sums offered by the agents for a settlement are a fraction of the sums that were claimed - like 75% less - so one would presume if one wished to settle, dealing direct with ADCB may be even less. If it helps anyone, what I would say is this. 1) Listen to the advice from the trusted sources on here. They know their onions. 2) It can seem overwhelming to a layman with all this legal jargon, but don't let it scare you. Just take it a step at a time, listen and learn as much as you can from other threads, and trust the process. 3) I was surprised how shambolic Moriarty appeared to be in my case. Don't ever think the other party is above you in terms of knowledge, experience or how they will conduct themselves. Whilst it was during the pandemic, even on the remote calls with the court, in one instance Moriarty didn't even bother attending the call. In other instances, they didn't reply to certain requests I made via court process. Finally, they just give up the ghost, and a few years later I received confirmation of discontinuance. I'm not saying my experience is/was/may be typical, but what I took from it was it simply came down to brinksmanship and them playing the percentages on their part. Play the long game, take good advice, there's nothing to be scared off and if it's anything like my situation, you may well win the day. The longer things went on, the more you will feel you're on the right side. Especially once it gets into all the process, form submission and involvement of the court, stick to your guns and follow the advice.  It's nothing scientific, but if every case was like mine, it seems like these folks have the view that at some point, the defendant will crumble and give in, through fear or otherwise, so it's important to stay brave and keep pushing forward because the further you go, the more it will tilt in your favour. Play a straight bat and the long game. I've now come back to post due to another situation, different debt, and will start a new thread in due course.   So keep your chins up, fight the good fight and good luck to all, and sincere thanks for all the help.  
    • The NTK needs to be redacted, your VRN is still showing.
    • Hi, yes they swapped over after a brief period when the bank were sending something over.
    • Fair enough. But I don't understand why they send these letters. Do people really get scared and end up paying them?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Advent Computer Training (Barclays Partner Finance)Info and discussion thread


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3927 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Would anyone of you guys suggest I should stop paying them?

 

Unless you're going to get up on your soap box and declare you're above the law I would suggest you ignore what the reprobates on this site are saying and do what you feel is right (else risk being hounded out for being a 'dodgy poster' for not toeing the 'I'm not paying a penny' line).

 

Having the integrity to do the right thing when others (ie BPF) are not will be to your benefit. Could go some way to explaining why I have a refund and no one else has.

 

Good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 5.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Unless you're going to get up on your soap box and declare you're above the law I would suggest you ignore what the reprobates on this site are saying and do what you feel is right (else risk being hounded out for being a 'dodgy poster' for not toeing the 'I'm not paying a penny' line).

 

Having the integrity to do the right thing when others (ie BPF) are not will be to your benefit. Could go some way to explaining why I have a refund and no one else has.

 

Good luck

 

Bull ****!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unless you're going to get up on your soap box and declare you're above the law I would suggest you ignore what the reprobates on this site are saying and do what you feel is right (else risk being hounded out for being a 'dodgy poster' for not toeing the 'I'm not paying a penny' line).

 

Having the integrity to do the right thing when others (ie BPF) are not will be to your benefit. Could go some way to explaining why I have a refund and no one else has.

 

Good luck

 

Reprobates? That's a tad harsh is it not? Why don't you GTF mate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unless you're going to get up on your soap box and declare you're above the law I would suggest you ignore what the reprobates on this site are saying and do what you feel is right (else risk being hounded out for being a 'dodgy poster' for not toeing the 'I'm not paying a penny' line).

 

Having the integrity to do the right thing when others (ie BPF) are not will be to your benefit. Could go some way to explaining why I have a refund and no one else has.

 

Good luck

 

Interesting how the use of the word 'dodgy' brings feedme crawling out from under his stone. Some of us have long memories. This character talked a lot of nonsense before. Read the comments again feedme. No-one is encouraging the guy not to pay. We're just saying ' everyone has to make their own decision'. Congratulations on your refund by the way!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting how the use of the word 'dodgy' brings feedme crawling out from under his stone. Some of us have long memories. This character talked a lot of nonsense before. Read the comments again feedme. No-one is encouraging the guy not to pay. We're just saying ' everyone has to make their own decision'. Congratulations on your refund by the way!!

 

I dont believe he had a refund.. he would have been on this site to tell "how" he got it.. at least that is what many of us would have done.

 

I tried really hard to be reasonable with BPF.. for many months.. even when they issued us with the letter telling us about computeach.. I still tried to communicate with BPF.. each time I had a refusel and told I must pay.. even refused to allow me to talk with their customer services manager.. could only talk to the reps who answer the phones and they.. know nothing.. see nothing.. hear nothing.. and they work there aparently?? just tell you that you must pay.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unless you're going to get up on your soap box and declare you're above the law I would suggest you ignore what the reprobates on this site are saying and do what you feel is right (else risk being hounded out for being a 'dodgy poster' for not toeing the 'I'm not paying a penny' line).

 

Having the integrity to do the right thing when others (ie BPF) are not will be to your benefit. Could go some way to explaining why I have a refund and no one else has.

 

Good luck

 

@Feedme..If u really had a refund from BPF, Do u really need to sneak into this site posts? I dont think so!! Be happy with ur refund, we all r still struggling to sort out this s**t. So please dont try to create useless arguments here!! Instead why can't u post some info about how did u manage to get refund. Couple of people here are still paying for BPF coz of their personal circumstances, but no one had posted here about refund. Myself paid untill August, what i got back..lots of stress n complete waste of money. Lots of us check this thread everyday to get something back. No offence, Just wasting time for others.

Edited by raj4u
Link to post
Share on other sites

Feedme if you have nothing positive to say say nothing, what do they say about empty vessels making the loudest noise. Many of us post messeages of encouragement on this site and try to share information to help each other out. Not one person has said that Arlee should not pay? what they have said is that he has to make up his own mind.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all. My case is now being dealt with by the adjudicator from FOS. Looking through paperwork to send to them, and I have a few interesting documents. One stating jobs (letter is headed with Advent logo) I could get if MCSE qualified, although they even say you need experience on them! Yet was told I could walk into these with the MCSE. Also have another one of their documents saying "860" hours to become MCSE qualified (miss selling hmmm?). Looking through so will let you know of anything else I find... 8-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Our lawyer has heard of NO ONE who has had a refund from BPF (or else she would have signed the case off by now and we'd all be richer again!) and nor have I in the hundreds of emails I've had to Fuzzbutt, except one.The only person who HAS had a successful refund that I'm aware of was a lady that took out a BPF loan just before Advent folded, and was luckily still within the 30 day cancellation zone - but even she had to get that via complaints to Trading Standards and FOS. She contacted me to tell me and gave permission for details to be passed to our lawyer in case it could help others.

 

Maybe Feedme would like to post his/her correspondence from BPF, explaining what circumstances his refund was returned in, if that was the case?

Or perhaps Feedme is just a wind-up merchant troll. In which case ignore is the best tactic until they get bored and go away again. :yawn:

Edited by Fuzzbutt
Link to post
Share on other sites

Our lawyer has heard of NO ONE who has had a refund from BPF (or else she would have signed the case off by now and we'd all be richer again!) and nor have I in the hundreds of emails I've had to Fuzzbutt, except one.The only person who HAS had a successful refund that I'm aware of was a lady that took out a BPF loan just before Advent folded, and was luckily still within the 30 day cancellation zone - but even she had to get that via complaints to Trading Standards and FOS. She contacted me to tell me and gave permission for details to be passed to our lawyer in case it could help others.

 

Maybe Feedme would like to post his/her correspondence from BPF, explaining what circumstances his refund was returned in, if that was the case?

Or perhaps Feedme is just a wind-up merchant troll. In which case ignore is the best tactic until they get bored and go away again. :yawn:

 

Actually Fuzz I signed up just before advent went bust.. my loan details state I started on 15/12/2009, my first payment went out to BPF on 15/01/2010 just days before we had that email from Advent, I was not even in the country until 18/01/2010 had been away over the Christmas and new year (so no training for me).

and another thing I was aproved for this loan despite being out of work for the past six months prior (and I still am not in work) how could that be possible? BPF have not bothered at all to look into any of it.

 

So that poster feedme if he really got his refund?.. instead of slagging us off on here, maybe he should be informing us of how he got his refund.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all. I've noticed my little question casued a little disagreement. I still haven't decided what I'm going to do, mostly because of very little knowledge of what may or would happen if I stopped paying. That's why I tried to find some answers. I keep visiting this forum on a daily basis.

Just one more thing for Feedme: Why won't you post the whole story of how you've managed to get the refund from BFP? C'mon man... We're not naive...

Link to post
Share on other sites

I still haven't decided what I'm going to do, mostly because of very little knowledge of what may or would happen if I stopped paying.

Well, if the treatment I'm getting is any indication, you'll get Barclays Partner Finance ignoring your dispute letters, 4 harassment calls a day, everyday from Mercers for 2 months nonstop and then threatening letters from Mercers with "You must pay" in capital letters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, if the treatment I'm getting is any indication, you'll get Barclays Partner Finance ignoring your dispute letters, 4 harassment calls a day, everyday from Mercers for 2 months nonstop and then threatening letters from Mercers with "You must pay" in capital letters.

 

Yes BPf do have a habit of ignoring my letters disputing.. and even when they did give me 8 weeks to answer a compalint letter.. with the other hand they set the second debt collecting agency onto me.. two faced or what?

 

I set trading standards onto Mercers.. no more letters from them they even did not answer trading standards

The second debt collector when I did a google on the company and found thet the director was an ex-Barclays boss.. I ignored them also.

Moorcroft wrote and did the usual with bold lettering and threat .. threat.. court.. threat all over it, I sent the standard form letter asking them can I have a copy of the dead of assignment also pointing out its a criminal offence to demand money without it, the wrote back and said they will apply for it from BPF.. and while I was at it could I tell them what I was planning to do to fight BPF in court.. what a joke!!

 

so this is 11 months down the line, Barclays partner finance cant or wont talk with the customers and all they know is to hit you with a stick.. thats good customer relations for you.

 

What I want to know is why is nothing being flagged on the Ombudsman organisation.. they must have seen the hugh amount of complaints about all this never mind read about it on the news on the internet.. yet they stick their head in the ground and say.. its all ok Barclays told us they are looking after you so nothing to worry about.. shirt's stuffed full of ****.. to quote a phrase.. (anyone know where from??)

Edited by 10pack
Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually Fuzz I signed up just before advent went bust.. my loan details state I started on 15/12/2009, my first payment went out to BPF on 15/01/2010 just days before we had that email from Advent, I was not even in the country until 18/01/2010 had been away over the Christmas and new year (so no training for me).

and another thing I was aproved for this loan despite being out of work for the past six months prior (and I still am not in work) how could that be possible? BPF have not bothered at all to look into any of it.

 

So that poster feedme if he really got his refund?.. instead of slagging us off on here, maybe he should be informing us of how he got his refund.

 

One of the issues that a majority of people seem to be raising is mis-selling, which is stronger now than the like-for-like argument now Computeach has re-designed it's courses to match Advent's.

Hausfeld have raised this with BPF. Mis-selling seems to have been a key thing with a large number of people, with loans to inappropriate people (part-time/unemployed) as well as bad advice to guarantors from Advent salespeople, plus the promises of guaranteed job placements.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all. I've noticed my little question casued a little disagreement. I still haven't decided what I'm going to do, mostly because of very little knowledge of what may or would happen if I stopped paying. That's why I tried to find some answers. I keep visiting this forum on a daily basis.

Just one more thing for Feedme: Why won't you post the whole story of how you've managed to get the refund from BFP? C'mon man... We're not naive...

 

As 10pack and Roadie said, Arlee, you'll get constant harrassment from debt collectors if you don't pay and probably a bad credit rating BUT be mindful that...

  • the harrassment is unlawful and against the Office of Fair Trade Guidelines of good practice.
  • demanding a Deed of Assignment letter (which the debt collection agency is required by law to produce as proof the debt has been passed to them by Barclays) has not been offered in any case I'm aware of!
  • BPF should not be chasing a debt if the account is in dispute and part of a legal investigation and challenge.

 

If you do go ahead and continue paying then you won't have that hassle, but your choice of course. You'll then have to take legal action to get your money back from Barclays. Technically you are breaching the contract with BPF if you refuse to pay but so far no one doing that has been taken to court, despite Barclays huffing and puffing and threatening some people with court action (see the Facebook group 'Advent scammed Us' for some of the horror stories there).

 

Many of us have joined a group action to do this and get our money back and challenge Computeach as an enforced provider we didn't choose and don't want.

Edited by Fuzzbutt
Link to post
Share on other sites

As 10pack and Roadie said, Arlee, you'll get constant harrassment from debt collectors if you don't pay and probably a bad credit rating BUT be mindful that...

  • the harrassment is unlawful and against the Office of Fair Trade Guidelines of good practice.
  • demanding a Deed of Assignment letter (which the debt collection agency is required by law to produce as proof the debt has been passed to them by Barclays) has not been offered in any case I'm aware of!
  • BPF should not be chasing a debt if the account is in dispute and part of a legal investigation and challenge.

 

If you do go ahead and continue paying then you won't have that hassle, but your choice of course. You'll then have to take legal action to get your money back from Barclays. Technically you are breaching the contract with BPF if you refuse to pay but so far no one doing that has been taken to court, despite Barclays huffing and puffing and threatening some people with court action (see the Facebook group 'Advent [problem]med Us' for some of the horror stories there).

 

Many of us have joined a group action to do this and get our money back and challenge Computeach as an enforced provider we didn't choose and don't want.

 

The problem DCA's have in getting a DOA from the original credit supplier is that this is only legally passed over with the original signed contract/agreement when the debt is sold on.

Now debt's are usually sold on in bulk, not one at a time [usually between 8-12 pence in the pound] This is in effect writing off the debt's.A DCA will not really be able to get hold of the DOA and agreement unless they have purchased the debt.So really this makes the likes of Moorcroft etc just bounty hunters, collecting for BPF [illegally] if they can on a commission basis.

One thing to remember, if the agreement/contract has not been signed by BPF [ as is in my situation, and possibly many others] it's not enforcable in a court of law.Thus a stand off. One argument BPF would have is that once a person started paying back the loan, they infact had recognised the debt, but they [bPF] would have to take you to court, then you can start throwing your argument at them about the whole fiasco - in the court.....

are they going to take the chance and possibily open the flood gates? who know's.

Edited by lowdown
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just popped into BBC Watchdog website. Thought it'd b a good idea to send them an email regarding this whole crap. Fuzz - has anyone tried cotacting them? It's a good story, everyone's has got it's own epxeriences dealing with it and it would draw public's attention. Also, Barclay's wouldn't be happy with such a "publicity" :) They are stealing the money from us and then build very nice offices and branches for it. 10pack knows what I mean... (i.e NEW CityCentre Branch??)

Edited by arlee
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just popped into BBC Watchdog website. Thought it'd b a good idea to send them an email regarding this whole crap. Fuzz - has anyone tried cotacting them? It's a good story, everyone's has got it's own epxeriences dealing with it and it would draw public's attention. Also, Barclay's wouldn't be happy with such a "publicity" :) They are stealing the money from us and then build very nice offices and branches for it. 10pack knows what I mean... (i.e NEW CityCentre Branch??)

 

They have been already, search Barclays partner finance on youtube, I would post the link but I can't because I haven't posted enough yet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, they had a lot of documentation from me a long time ago. The 'One Show' also interviwed me and Ingrid, and Duane (another student) and made a rather disappointing 3 min feature which didn't really highlight much so far as the protest and unfairness of Barclays behaviour went (that's also on YouTube).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys

I have posted about my dealings with the debts collectors moorcroft and that i sent them the standard letter asking them for deed of assignment.

They answered that they would apply for it from barclays..Have not heard anything from them since that time but..

 

this morning in the post a strange thing arrived from barclays.. a copy of my agreement , and the letter with it saying "please find enclosed your requested copy of agreement".

 

I did not request this and wondering what new tactic barclays are up to now?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Might be worth taking it to your local CAB for their legal advisor to look over maybe, 10pack. Odd, as you say, when so far when asked for a Deed letter people are reporting that the debt collector falls silent or says they are passsing the debt 'back to Barclays'!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Might be worth taking it to your local CAB for their legal advisor to look over maybe, 10pack. Odd, as you say, when so far when asked for a Deed letter people are reporting that the debt collector falls silent or says they are passsing the debt 'back to Barclays'!

 

Some of these DCA's, Moorcroft being one of them, Allied and Cabot amongst others being used - have all had problems trying to get their licence's renewded of late.

So all walking tightropes, and can not really have a ton of complaints going to goverening bodies about their behaviour - otherwise it's curtains on the licence.

This information is all available on this Consumer Action group website.

I just like to point out that DCA probing is not a hobby of mine.:smile:

Edited by lowdown
Link to post
Share on other sites

HI there,

Just found this thread. I was a student at Advent and took out a Career Development loan. Am looking in to what I can do to get my loan cancelled/repaid. Is this the right place for info or is there another thread for people with CDLs?

James Thomas

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3927 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...