Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for that. I will give them till Tuesday. Thanks for your help, very much appreciated. 
    • Ok thanks for that, well spotted and all duly noted. Yes they did eventually submit those docs to me after a second letter advising them I was contacting the ICO to make a formal complaint for failing to comply with an earlier SAR that they brushed off as an "administrative error" or something. When I sent the letter telling them I was in contact with the information commissioner to lodge the complaint, the original PCN etc quickly followed along with their excuse!
    • its not about the migrants .. Barrister Helena Kennedy warns that the Conservatives will use their victory over Rwanda to dismantle the law that protects our human rights here in the UK.   Angela Rayner made fun of Rishi Sunak’s height in a fiery exchange at Prime Minister’s Questions, which prompted Joe Murphy to ask: just how low will Labour go? .. well .. not as low as sunak 
    • From #38 where you wrote the following, all in the 3rd person so we don't know which party is you. When you sy it was your family home, was that before or after? " A FH split to create 2 Leasehold adjoining houses (terrace) FH remains under original ownership and 1 Leasehold house sold on 100y+ lease. . Freeholder resides in the other Leasehold house. The property was originally resided in as one house by Freeholder"
    • The property was our family home.  A fixed low rate btl/ development loan was given (last century!). It was derelict. Did it up/ was rented out for a while.  Then moved in/out over the years (mostly around school)  It was a mix of rental and family home. The ad-hoc rents covered the loan amply.  Nowadays  banks don't allow such a mix.  (I have written this before.) Problems started when the lease was extended and needed to re-mortgage to cover the expense.  Wanted another btl.  Got a tenant in situ. Was located elsewhere (work). A broker found a btl lender, they reneged.  Broker didn't find another btl loan.  The tenant was paying enough to cover the proposed annual btl mortgage in 4 months. The broker gave up trying to find another.  I ended up on a bridge and this disastrous path.  (I have raised previous issues about the broker) Not sure what you mean by 'split'.  The property was always leasehold with a separate freeholder  The freeholder eventually sold the fh to another entity by private agreement (the trust) but it's always been separate.  That's quite normal.  One can't merge titles - unless lease runs out/ is forfeited and new one is not created/ granted. The bridge lender had a special condition in loan offer - their own lawyer had to check title first.  Check that lease wasn't onerous and there was nothing that would affect good saleability.  The lawyer (that got sacked for dishonesty) signed off the loan on the basis the lease and title was good and clean.  The same law firm then tried to complain the lease clauses were onerous and the lease too short, even though the loan was to cover a 90y lease extension!! 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

mobile money and the bailiff assulted me


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5198 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Right where do i start,ok i took a loan out with mobile money in dec 2008,6mths over couldnt afford to pay back the amount outstanding so i had to renew the loan,well oct last year i was taken ill,my payments were 236 a month but couldnt afford that so i have been paying 40 a week £160.00 per month a couple of weeks back the man from mm said if i could get £600 then they would forget the interest i told him i havent got it then he reduced it to £500 still i couldnt afford it,i put the car in a friends name too as i have the logbook for it and the only set of keys,well then he said last week can you carry on making the £40 a week i said yes he said i couldnt promise the car wouldnt be repo,then friday i came back from taking the kids to schhol and there was a tow truck just pulling up,i didnt think anything of it as next doors car had broken down and i thought it was for them,so tehn there was a knock at the door so i opened it and there was a big man standing there he asked my name and i said yes i have come for the car i said show me your papers he went to show me and then said just give me the keys i said no and shut the door in his face he shouted i will phone the police,so i was reading on here how some people have gone to their cars and driven away,well i tried to do this as i opened the door he ran at me i was in right state,i couldnt manage to close the door he grabbed me and got me out the car was holding my arms then the older man got out and said you should have made your payments i said i have while this bloke had got my arms and broke my handbag,i managed to close the door with my leg and press my fob to lock it,i ran in the house and locke dthe door rang the police 999 and told them anyway they came i had to hand over my keys and they said we will have to arresst you as he said you threatend to kill him the bloke was massive i said but what about the fact he grabbed me,anyway they took a statement and left saying they would do house to house,ive only been in the street for 6 mths,they came back and said the couple over the road saw him with his arms all over me,the police then said we have to do a peaceful declareation or something where he has to go to the police station and say sorry thats it but now i have bruising on my arms i cant go out as im stressing the police aint bothered and mm want £1756 to get the car back i must have paid them double that where do i stand i really need advice?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well for a start you get your bruises photographed and you go and see your GP first thing in the morning to get your injuries on record. Speak with your neighbors and ask if they will give a witness statement. You then report the matter to the police and firmly ask for a crime number.

 

You said the car was not reigstered to you is that correct?

Had you had a visit from the bailiff before this?

Had they been in your House?

Had they levied on the car before you transfered ownership?

 

start with answering these questions and then caggers will get a clearer picture

 

PT

Edited by ploddertom

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there thanks for the reply,i will go to my g.p in the morning and will take photos,

The car is in my boyfriends name it has been for 3 mths

This was the first time the bailiff attended last friday

I didnt let him in my house

And they didnt levy before i changed ownership

 

Thankyou

Link to post
Share on other sites

sure they WERE really bailiffs ... i bet not!

 

threat monkey overstepped the mark

they have no legal authority to do anything!

i would think you will get a nice suprise out of all this.

 

have you got the agreement to scan and post up....

 

i know someone who might like to eat these for breakfast!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the car is no longer yours and you have proof of this then the bailiffs have to return the car. They cannot take what is not yours to take. If I am correct, and some one please correct me if I am wrong, your boyfriend has to get in touch with the bailiff company and ask for HIS property back. I think he has to do this with in 5/7 days of the car being taken. I would also get in touch with the creditor about this explaining what you have explained here. No one has the right to assault you especially a bailiff. I would certainly get the police back involved and demand that you wish to press charges of assault. This is totally disgraceful behavior. Some one more knowledgeable will give you more advice on this.. and dont worry there are people on here who will help you through and will tell you the right steps to take to get this sorted. keep us updated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou for your reply,the police were useless,they were more interested about the fact that this bloke had been attacked with a weapon not so long back and that when i said ? i would kill him they said tehy could arrest me i didnt even say that to him i mean he was a big bloke im only small,i just havent a clue what to do next im already suffering from deppression this has knocked me right back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If these were certified bailiffs then I would not hesitate to get a form 4 done here,

 

How do i find out if they were certified bailiffs?i did ask him for proof and he couldnt give me the proof.

Link to post
Share on other sites

is mobile money a similar type of company to log book loans?

if the debt is secured on the vehicle can you legally alter the v5 docs etc to have it changed? surely that would defeat the object of the loan aggreement.

also i wouldnt be surprised if they werent bailiffs, probably just debt collectors or repo men with no power other than to take/remove the vehicle.

None of the beliefs held by "Freemen on the land" have ever been supported by any judgments or verdicts in any criminal or civil court cases.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nat33, as has been said already, are you SURE these were bailiffs???? It sounds very bizarre behaviour even for them!

Do go to your GP, get things documented and report the assault and - possibly - theft.

I'd be surprised if they weren't anything more than glorified debt collectors. [but I have been surprised before!].

Take it easy, hunni, keep us updated and you will have plenty of advice and support here.

Rae.

Link to post
Share on other sites

is mobile money a similar type of company to log book loans?

if the debt is secured on the vehicle can you legally alter the v5 docs etc to have it changed? surely that would defeat the object of the loan aggreement.

also i wouldnt be surprised if they werent bailiffs, probably just debt collectors or repo men with no power other than to take/remove the vehicle.

 

Hi yes they are the same type of company,as for the v5 doc i changed it as i was going to pay the loan off,this was until i got ill and my boyfriend was having the car as the police advised me to sell it due to my ex husband harrasing me i would have felt safer in a different car.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nat33, as has been said already, are you SURE these were bailiffs???? It sounds very bizarre behaviour even for them!

Do go to your GP, get things documented and report the assault and - possibly - theft.

I'd be surprised if they weren't anything more than glorified debt collectors. [but I have been surprised before!].

Take it easy, hunni, keep us updated and you will have plenty of advice and support here.

Rae.

Well the police rang me and said they have done some talking to his boss and he shouldnt have touched me he should have let me drive the car away,but still the police didnt want to know about the assult even though there were the couple who witnessed it,teh police said he might get the sack but that doesnt help what he put me through,and thanks for your kindness!

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, if I understand it, the loan was secured against the car? I know nothing about these things - never had a car worth taking a loan on! Don't they take the log book as security or something?

Rae.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well the police rang me and said they have done some talking to his boss and he shouldnt have touched me he should have let me drive the car away,but still the police didnt want to know about the assult even though there were the couple who witnessed it,teh police said he might get the sack but that doesnt help what he put me through,and thanks for your kindness!

 

Press it further, threaten to go to the IPCC, threaten to name the Chief Constable as co-defendant in any action you may take as he is aiding and abetting.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, if I understand it, the loan was secured against the car? I know nothing about these things - never had a car worth taking a loan on! Don't they take the log book as security or something?

Rae.

yes they did have the log book,but i needed it back to tax my car i went to the office and collected it myself,they never asked for it back then i had personal problems and had to get the car signed over to my boyfriend,they didnt mention about changing the name on the logbook.

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Press it further, threaten to go to the IPCC, threaten to name the Chief Constable as co-defendant in any action you may take as he is aiding and abetting.

 

PT

Im thinking of going to the police station and saying i want to have him charged with assult but then im risking myself getting arressted for something i never said,is the police i press with it further or the company that took the car,ive tried in vain to find their phone number but to no avail,all i have is the name of the company.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's interesting Nat. As I said, I know nothing [and that's been professionally confirmed] but there is another forum dealing with logbook loans. It may be worth chatting about the loans legality there vis a vis the logbook itself.

Interesting that the police called you. So you know they are aware of the assault but have chosen not to think too much about it. That's a question they'll need to answer should you press for a crime report and complain.

best wishes.

Rae.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no proof you threatened to 'kill' him. It is one word against another - and physique would stand you in good stead.

You have witnesses that the guy assaulted you. If your neighbours are a little unwilling to volunteer statements they may choose to change their mind if the police interview them.

Rae.

Edited by RaeUK
type o
Link to post
Share on other sites

That's interesting Nat. As I said, I know nothing [and that's been professionally confirmed] but there is another forum dealing with logbook loans. It may be worth chatting about the loans legality there vis a vis the logbook itself.

Interesting that the police called you. So you know they are aware of the assault but have chosen not to think too much about it. That's a question they'll need to answer should you press for a crime report and complain.

best wishes.

Rae.

Yes will post tomorrow re this,im going to persue it but just dont know how really,it just gets so difficult when you havent been there before.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no proof you threatened to 'kill' him. It is one word against another - and physique would stand you in good stead.

You have witnesses that the guy assaulted you. If your neighbours are a little unwilling to volunteer statements they may choose to change their mind if the police interview them.

Rae.

This is what i mean they have witnesses but dont want to take it any further,but i cant let it rest as he might do it again to another person.

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Let your witnesses know your concerns that they may act this way to someone else. Introduce them to this forum - there are plenty of example of systematic and institutionalised bullying recorded around here. I'm sure you can win them over.

As for the mobile money website, I've not read it but I bet theres a phone number somewhere in the contact info...

Best wishes.

Rae.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...