Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Danny - point taken about the blue paragraphs.  Including them doesn't harm your case in any way.  It makes no odds.  It's just that over the years we've had judges often remarking on how concise & clear Caggers' WSs have been compared to the Encyclopaedia Britannica-length rubbish that the PPCs send, so I always have a slight preference to cut out anything necessary. Don't send off the WS straight away .. you have plenty of time ... and let's just say that LFI is the Contract King so give him a couple of days to look through it with a fine-tooth comb.
    • Do you have broadband at home? A permanent move to e.g. Sky Glass may not fit with your desire to keep your digibox,, but can you move the items you most want off the digibox? If so, Sky Glass might suit you. You might ask Sky to loan you a “puck” and provide access as an interim measure. another option might be using Sky Go, at least short term, to give you access to some of the Sky programming while awaiting the dish being sorted.
    • £85PCM to sky, what!! why are you paying so much, what did you watch on sky thats not on freeview?  
    • Between yourself and Dave you have produced a very good WS. However if you were to do a harder hitting WS it may be that VCS would be more likely to cancel prior to a hearing. The Contract . VCS [Jake Burgess?] are trying to conflate parking in a car park to driving along a road in order to defend the indefensible. It is well known that "NO Stopping " cannot form a contract as it is prohibitory. VCS know that well as they lose time and again in Court when claiming it is contractual. By mixing up parking with driving they hope to deflect from the fact trying to claim that No Stopping is contractual is tantamount to perjury. No wonder mr Burgess doesn't want to appear in Court. Conflation also disguises the fact that while parking in a car park for a period of time can be interpreted as the acceptance of the contract that is not the case while driving down a road. The Defendant was going to the airport so it is ludicrous to suggest that driving by a No Stopping  sign is tacitly accepting  the  contract -especially as no contract is even being offered. And even if a motorist did not wish to be bound by the so called contract what could they do? Forfeit their flight and still have to stop their car to turn around? Put like that the whole scenario posed by Mr Burgess that the Defendant accepted the contract by driving past the sign is absolutely absurd and indefensible. I certainly would not want to appear in Court defending that statement either. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I will do the contract itself later.
    • Yes - ignore. Because of another MET victim today I looked at all our MET cases back to June 2014 ... yes, 10 years. They have never dared take a motorist to court and argue their case before a judge.  They have started the odd court case, but as a means of trying to intimidate the motorist into coughing up, when the motorist defended and refused to give in it was MET who bottled it and discontinued.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Are overdrafts covered by cca's


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5051 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Update .... on this ...

 

With all the confusion, I wrote to experian to ask why they have registered a current account on my credit record, with a payment profile. As I thought that only regulated debts were shown on an individuals credit profile.

 

Perhaps they could explain ?

 

This is the response I received today ...

 

"Our Ref: xxxxxxxxxxx

 

Dear xxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

Thank you for your email, which we received on 22 June 2010.

 

RE: Your credit report

 

SUMMARY:

 

- I am not qualified to offer you legal advice, but as I understand it, overdrafts are covered by sections of the Consumer Credit Act, since they are a form of credit.

 

- This is why your credit report only shows information about overdraft balances and not the amount you are in credit.

 

 

FURTHER INFORMATION:

 

If you have a question about your creditworthiness, your CreditExpert membership includes a free ?Frequently Asked Questions? feature.

 

If you would like to look at this, you will need to log in at Free Credit Report, Credit Rating Check & Fraud Alerts from Experian Credit Expert and go to the FAQ?s tab at the top of the page.

 

Kind regards

 

Howard I Taylor

Customer Service Officer

 

Customer Support Centre

Experian Interactive

 

 

Finally, did you know that our website can answer questions and queries about your credit report? Simply go to Experian - Most commonly asked questions for help and advice about your credit report, including how to understand it and improve it.

 

Experian Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with registered number 653331 and whose registered office is at Landmark House, Experian Way, NG2 Business Park, Nottingham, NG80 1ZZ"

 

End of the arguement .... maybe ????

 

Edited by robinredbreast
typo
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 188
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

RR

 

I would look at the letter on the GLC web site (after the SC ruling) and see if there are any points in it worth incorporating in your suggested letter.

 

Good luck!

 

BD

 

 

Can someone post the letter on here might be useful and save folk time.

We live in an unmoderated country why should the net be any different?

Bring back free speech we miss it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting ....especially in the light of the defence that the bank has put up in the Sharp case that ''the banking contract was not covered by CCA 1974'' and that therfore overdrafts are not covered...if not covered then why report to Experian...it's all so hypocritical and could that letter not be used as some form of evidence presentable in the Sharp case....

 

m2ae

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting ....especially in the light of the defence that the bank has put up in the Sharp case that ''the banking contract was not covered by CCA 1974'' and that therfore overdrafts are not covered...if not covered then why report to Experian...it's all so hypocritical and could that letter not be used as some form of evidence presentable in the Sharp case....

 

m2ae

 

I'm not sure it could be used at this stage but i'll cut and paste in this afternoons recess, unless someone beats me to it, or its been taken down.

We live in an unmoderated country why should the net be any different?

Bring back free speech we miss it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

A thought occured to me ....

 

Don't creditors require your written authority to process your data with CRAs .... without exception ... ?????

 

What about demanding a copy from your bank as part of your complaint, together with a copy of the agreement as reqd under the CCA ?

 

Don't CRAs only record information regarding regulated agreements ... ? (correct me anyone if I'm wrong ... as I'm not 100% sure on that .. but thought I'd throw it in .. :p).

 

What with confirmation from the CRAs that ODs are partially regulated, your written authority required for processing data, and throw in a dodgy DN too (if you have one) ... may make them think twice with any court action ....

 

Worth a punt ? :rolleyes:

 

TB

Link to post
Share on other sites

A thought occured to me ....

 

Don't creditors require your written authority to process your data with CRAs .... without exception ... ?????

 

TB

Not true, bullit point 6 of Data protection act schedule 2 allows unathorised processing of your data because:

it is for the pursuit of the legitimate interests of the data controller

 

By all means have a 30 minute free session with a lawyer to check if it`s a runner, only then threaten Court action.

 

Best of luck with your situation:-(

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi

 

sorry for hijacking thread, but am getting harrased by barclays re a current account that hasn't been used for reciving a salary for well over 6 years..it had a £900 overdraft and they contacted me at an address to say charges had taken this to over £1000. I arranged to pay £20 a month and then received this

 

http://i297.photobucket.com/albums/mm223/sussex1/140710-1.jpg

 

the payments had hardly reduced debt but they did statte overdraft now agreed at £1030. I couldn't make any payemtns and now have had this termination notice

 

http://i297.photobucket.com/albums/mm223/sussex1/1-1.jpg

 

http://i297.photobucket.com/albums/mm223/sussex1/2-1.jpg

 

letter dated 6th July giving till 20th to rectify.

 

My first question is as to whether this is properly executed as there seems no allowance for postage as with CCA's on credit cards?

 

secondly I am now gettin bombarded with calls the last of which was offering me a loan to pay it (which I can't afford to pay). Isn't this sgainst the usual guidlines?

 

I would appreciate anyones thoughts on the above as well as to how best to proceed here.

 

apologies again for posting on someone elses thread

 

thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi David. I am in a similar with HSBC. You need to write to Barclays pointing out that whether your agreement is covered by the CCA 1974 or not, you request a true copy of the executed customer retail agreement, a true copy of the original overdraft agreement and a true copy of the facility letter.

 

I have been learning quite a bit about this just recently. The issue, for an overdraft, is if Barclays can evidence proof that they have complied with the OFT's Determination exempting overdrafts from the CCA 1974. If they can't prove this (ie your agreements and a copy of the Determination they signed) then the overdraft is technically invalid.

 

Of course, Barcrap will have signed the Determination but you are within your rights to put them to proof and to get the info you require about the agreements. Try an SAR as well.

 

Finally, report them to the Lending Standards Board if they persist in not sending you a true copy of the agreements. Also the FOS, who deal with individual issues (the LSB just investigate banks internally, but if enough mud sticks...!)

Mozzone

_______________

Taking on the bloodsuckers

Link to post
Share on other sites

from reading this thread i understand that overdrafts are only partially covered by the CCA.

 

In a 'nutshell' can somebody please advise the following,

 

If a creditor cannot produce a copy of an overdraft agreement, can payment be enforced in a court of law?

 

thanks BAB

Link to post
Share on other sites

from reading this thread i understand that overdrafts are only partially covered by the CCA.

 

In a 'nutshell' can somebody please advise the following,

 

If a creditor cannot produce a copy of an overdraft agreement, can payment be enforced in a court of law?

 

thanks BAB

 

There are no certainties in the british justice system (just read around a few of the threads on here!) but if argued correctly a lack of "facilitation letter" alongside other key docs being missed from the evidence "should" be enough to stop enforcement subject to the "judge lottery" etc etc.

 

(Think thats enough use of quote marks :-))

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Banks must provide a customer with something in writing at the time the agreement is concluded details of the credit limit if any, the annual rate of interest and any charges available and the process for terminating the agreement. Typically banks make such information readily available via a variety of media on an ongoing basis, and therein lies the problem. They send out 6 monthly facility letters.

Advice and comments posted by The Debt Star reflect only my personal opinion and it is up to you alone to decide what action you should take. You should always seek independent legal advice from your own qualified legal advisor.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Banks must provide a customer with something in writing at the time the agreement is concluded details of the credit limit if any, the annual rate of interest and any charges available and the process for terminating the agreement. Typically banks make such information readily available via a variety of media on an ongoing basis, and therein lies the problem. They send out 6 monthly facility letters.

 

well I would argue that if we apply carey vs hsbc to that then all variations to that original facilitation letter must be provided in response to the s78 as well.

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well I would argue that if we apply carey vs hsbc to that then all variations to that original facilitation letter must be provided in response to the s78 as well.

 

S.

 

Totally, yeah.

Advice and comments posted by The Debt Star reflect only my personal opinion and it is up to you alone to decide what action you should take. You should always seek independent legal advice from your own qualified legal advisor.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone:)

 

Sorry to jump on board here, but I'm about to send the CCA request under s78 to LTSB for an o/d and wondered if anyone could advise which address I should use please?

 

I was thinking either the registered office or 125 Colmore Row, Birmingham?

 

Many thanks for this very useful thread, btw ;)

 

Landy x

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks shadow.

 

can you or anyone tell me of any legal cases won by creditors or debtors so i can read up on the cases. i feel i may be taken to court soon over a 28k barclays overdraft and need all the advice to fight my corner i can get. in short, i cca'd them, no response, then defaulted them, now i got their dca chasing me. thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks shadow.

 

can you or anyone tell me of any legal cases won by creditors or debtors so i can read up on the cases. i feel i may be taken to court soon over a 28k barclays overdraft and need all the advice to fight my corner i can get. in short, i cca'd them, no response, then defaulted them, now i got their dca chasing me. thanks

 

There are a few cases on here where the banks just back down when challanged but thats for small amounts (less than 1k etc), your amount would normally mean a multi-track case which would be very very expensive to lose due to court costs. If you are going to challenge you may want to seek legal advice.

 

Either way start a thread in the legal section for others to advise.

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well had an update today on one off the acc's, after a bit of letter tennis. Barclays can't provide DLC/hillesdean with the required paperwork, so the acc's on hold with nothing else going to happen unless the correct doc's appear. (never gonna happen)

 

and the default fell off the credit file last month as well :D

 

 

just had the same letter as above re our other account,

 

thats 2 OD debts with hillesdean/DLC, they were to dense to even look at what the actual debt was for,(even referred to it as a loan acc at one point ) so they have given up for now as they can't get any paperwork :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

so....

1. They wont give an agreement as they say its not covered by the CCA 1974

 

2. They issue a DN which says its covered by the CCA 1974 via sections 76[1] 98[1]

 

THEY ARE SO TWISTED those banks

Link to post
Share on other sites

“PART VA CURRENT ACCOUNT OVERDRAFTS

 

Information to be provided on a current account agreement

 

74A.—(1) This section applies to a current account agreement where there is the possibility that the account-holder may be allowed to overdraw on the current account without a pre-arranged overdraft or exceed a pre-arranged overdraft limit.

(2) The current account agreement must include the following information at the time it is made—

(a) the rate of interest charged on the amount by which an account-holder overdraws on the current account or exceeds the pre-arranged overdraft limit,

(b) any conditions applicable to that rate,

© any reference rate on which that rate is based,

(d) information on any changes to the rate of interest (including the periods that the rate applies and any conditions or procedure applicable to changing that rate), and

(e) any other charges payable by the debtor under the agreement (and the conditions under which those charges may be varied).

(3) The account-holder must be informed at least annually of the information in subsection (2).

(4) For the purposes of subsections (2) and (3) where different rates of interest are charged in different circumstances, the creditor must provide the information in subsection (2)(a) to (d) in respect of each rate.

(5) Subsection (3) does not apply where the overdraft or excess would be secured on land. ”.

22. After section 74A (information to be provided on a current account agreement), as inserted by regulation 19, insert—

“Information to be provided on significant overdrawing without prior arrangement

 

74B.—(1) Where—

(a) the holder of a current account overdraws on the account without a pre-arranged overdraft, or exceeds a pre-arranged overdraft limit, for a period exceeding one month,

(b) the amount of that overdraft or excess is significant throughout that period, and

© the account-holder has not been informed in writing of the matters mentioned in subsection (2) within that period,

the account-holder must be informed in writing of those matters without delay.

(2) The matters referred to in subsection (1) are—

(a) the fact that the current account is overdrawn or the overdraft limit has been exceeded,

(b) the amount of that overdraft or excess,

© the rate of interest charged on it, and

(d) any other charges payable by the debtor in relation to it (including any penalties and any interest on those charges).

(3) For the purposes of subsection (1)(b) the amount of the overdraft or excess is to be treated as significant if—

(a) the account-holder is liable to pay a charge for which he would not otherwise be liable,

(b) the overdraft or excess is likely to have an adverse effect on the debtor’s ability to receive further credit (including any effect on the information about the debtor held by a credit reference agency), or

© it otherwise appears significant, having regard to all the circumstances.

(4) Where the overdraft or excess is secured on land, subsection (1)(a) is to be read as if the reference to one month were a reference to three months.”.

23. In section 77A (statements to be provided in relation to fixed-sum credit agreements) after subsection (8) insert—

“(9) This section does not apply where the holder of a current account overdraws on the account without a pre-arranged overdraft or exceeds a pre-arranged overdraft limit.”.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...