Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well I sent them the letter of claim, the only responses so far was a few emails reopening the claims on the parcels where they asked for information such as proof of value (which I get) but other things like photos of the parcels, which I haven't got as I never took photos of them. It's been well over the 14 days since I sent the letter now anyway, so what do you think I should do now?
    • Know it has already been answered, but? Does not explain why JCI has registered a different default date when they get the information from the original creditor, Virgin
    • Since you were stopped at the time there is no requirement for the police give you anything there and then or to send you anything before they have decided how to deal with the offence.  They have three choices: Offer you a course Offer you a fixed penalty (£100 and three points) Prosecute you in court  The only option that has a formal time limit is (3). They must begin court proceedings within six months of the date of the alleged offence. Options (1) and (2) have no time limit but since the only alternative the police have if you decline those offers is (3) they will not usually offer a course beyond three months from the date of the offence and will not usually offer a fixed penalty beyond four months from that date. This is so as to allow time for the driver to accept and comply with their offer and to give them the time to go to option (3) if he declines or ignores it.  Unless there is a good reason to do otherwise, the action they take will usually be in accordance with the National Police Chiefs' Council's guidance on speeding enforcement. In a 40mph limit this is as follows Up to 45mph - no action. Between 46mph and 53mph - offer a course Between 54mph and 65mph - offer a fixed penalty Over 65mph - prosecution in court So you can see that 54mph should see you offered a fixed penalty. Three weeks is not overly long for a fixed penalty offer to arrive. As well as that, there has been Easter in that period which will have slowed things down a bit. However, I would suggest that if it gets to about two months from the offence date and you have still heard nohing, I would contact the ticket office for the area where you were stopped to see if anything has been sent to you. Of course this raises the danger that you might be "stirring the hornets' nest". But in all honesty, if the police have decided to take no action, you jogging their memory should not really influence them. The bigger danger, IMHO, is that your fixed penalty offer may have been sent but lost and if you do not respond it will lapse. This will see the police revert to option (3) above. Whilst there is a mechanism in these circumstances  to persuade the court to sentence you at the fixed penalty level (rather than in accordance with the normal guidelines which will see a harsher penalty), it relies on them believing you when you say you did not received an offer. In any case it is aggravation you could well do without so for the sake of a phone call, I'd enquire if it was me.  I think I've answered all your questions but if I can help further just let me know. Just a tip - if you are offered a fixed penalty be sure to submit your driving licence details as instructed. I've seen lots of instances where a driver has not done this. There will be no reminder and no second chance; your £100 will be refunded and the police will prosecute you through the courts.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

FiL - Silvermans threatening bk despite CO Payment compliance


morgan8080
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5269 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My father in law needs help.

 

 

He was taken to court by someone he did some work for and in the end it was agreed that he would have a charge on the property worth 10k and my father would pay the court £40 a month as he is pretty broke.

 

 

The creditor ( a nasty man) has now taken it upon himself hes not happy with the court arrangment and has employed services of a debt recovery company and want 14k off him now and

 

 

have sent collectors round threatening to take his goods and threatening bankruptcy on the 4th december.

 

Can they do this???? Please tell me what steps we should take next

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are people not allowed to try to recover their money and costs once it has been decided with the court that he should pay a set ammount and have a charging order?

 

 

i didnt think so either but am sure my father in law had been advised he could be taken for bankruptcy to recover these costs from him or would that be before the court decided on it

Link to post
Share on other sites

As long as he's keeping to the court order they cannot do anything without the permission of the court. They could apply to the court for a variation but it would be unlikely that they would succeed unless his circumstances had changed significantly.

 

Who is the debt collector?

Link to post
Share on other sites

So long as he has maintained the £40 a month payments as ordered by the court, then whoever this man is attempting to make up his own laws, should be told to go play on the motorway.

 

It would also be wise to get in touch with the court to inform them what this clown is attempting to do.

 

Any correspondence you get from any debt collector he might employ will drop it like a ton of bricks as soon as they know there is a charging order already in place, as they will not want to end up in the dock themselves for being in contempt of court.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Daniels Silverman » Legal Recovery

 

Key features of our Litigation service are:-

 

Says it all!

Here is a previous thread about this company;

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/207371-worst-experience-daniels-silverman.html

 

Here is even more unsatisfied customers;

http://www.blagger.com/db4/company_id/5749/companyname/Daniels-Silverman.html

 

I would make a formal complaint to them, and report them to the court, aswell as the Financial Services Authority, the OFT, and the Solicitors Regulation Authority, about tim daniel silvermans bucked their Ideas up, and as they are known for trolling this site, you will undoubtedly get quite a swift explation as to why they act above the law.

Edited by Bazooka Boo

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Email Carole Hughes MD of that company, remind her of the consequences of harrassing your FiL., quote the Administration Of Justice Act 1970 section 40, and The Protection from Harrassment Act 1997 if they continue to pursue him. [email protected]

 

Then make a complaint to your local trading standards & the OFT with regards to their harassment and threats, they are in clear breach of OFT guidelines & CPUT ;

 

Consumer Direct - Contact us

 

OFT Complaint form

http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/business_leaflets/consumer_credit/DebtCollectionComplaintForm.DOC

 

The Office of Fair Trading: Contact us

 

[email protected]

 

 

tel: 020 7211 5823

 

The Office of Fair Trading: Debt collection practices

 

http://oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/business_leaflets/consumer_credit/oft664.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting.This is the third story this week I have heard about Silvermans.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just poking me nose in a little, notwithstandinng the other excellent advice given in this thread it may also be worth ensuring that you do not give Silvermans an inch in regards to the payments made to them, your pops pays £40 as directed by the court... make sure that his payments are made each and every month, I would make them so they're a few days early so as to make sure it reaches them.... don't give them any excuse at all to haul you back to the court and in doing so you're reducing the risk of any further valid action from Silvemans to pretty much zero.

I reside in Dawlish Warren but am not a rabbit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cebrusalert has given good means of address.

Having done a little digging,it does appear that CH is not alone in coming here to their defence.

I found some interesting observations,and will be personally monitoring closely.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think Deb T is right.

 

Make sure the payments go out early.

 

Use some method of tracking the payments so it can be produced in court if necessary.

 

A standing order should do the job as this will be an automated process and the tracking will be on the bank statements.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to FiL - Silvermans threatening bk despite CO Payment compliance
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...