Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I see that at the start of your thread you said they hadn't sent a Letter of Claim.  And in fact in all the uploaded material there is no LoC.  This is great news.  Even were you to lose - you won't - the judge would chop off a chunk of the money for their non-respect of PAPLOC. However, I'm a bit confused as you've named the file name as a SAR.  Are you sure about this?  Did you send any other letters apart from the one dx advised which was a CPR request (not a SAR) to DCBL (not Group Nexus).  I'm not being pernickety, this will be important for your Witness Statement further down the line.
    • I didn’t say it wouldn’t. That is not the issue here. To continue driving after the licence has expired (under s88), the driver must have submitted a “qualifying application”.  An application disclosing a relevant medical condition (of which sleep apnoea is one) is not a “qualifying application”, This means the driver cannot take advantage of s88 and must wait for the DVLA to make its decision before resuming driving. The driver’s belief is irrelevant. The fact that a licence was eventually granted may mitigate the offence, but  does it does not provide a defence. But this driver didn’t meet the conditions. I explained why in my earlier post. He only meets the conditions if his application does not declare a relevant medical condition. His did. As I explained, after his birthday he did not hold a licence that could be revoked. In my view it doesn’t matter what it says. The offence is committed because his application declared a medical condition. Meanwhile his licence expired and s88 is not available to him. The GP letter would form part of the material the DVLA would use to complete their investigations. But until those enquiries are completed he could not drive. The offence does not carry points or a disqualification (because a licence could have been held by your father). It only carries a fine and the guideline is half a week’s net income. If he pleads guilty that fine will be reduced by a third. He will also pay a surcharge of 40% of that fine. But the big difference is prosecution costs: a guilty plea will see costs of about £90 ordered whilst being convicted following a trial will see costs in the region of £600.
    • I'd recommend getting a new thread started about this. Let us help!
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Are Aktiv Kapital a bit thick or what?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5134 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

I have CCA'd AK and had this response. Is this a normal response, or have they just admitted they legally cannot chase this debt?

 

"Dear Mr ********

 

RE: Agreement Number blah de blah, Barclaycard

 

We write further to the above matter, and your request for documentation/further information regarding your agreement with the above named Creditor under Sections 77 to 79 of the Consumer Credit Act.

 

Although we purchased the right to recover the outstanding balance due under the agreement, as we are not the original creditor we do not hold the original documentation in this matter.

 

In order to obtain this, we will contact the original creditor, as we do wish to provide the information you require, in accordance with the Consumer Credit Act 1974, in an effort to resolve this matter.

 

Whilst we endeavour to obtain documents within the prescribed time scales, due to the fact that we have to try to obtain documents from the original creditor we may be unable to do so, your account is on hold and has been removed from the collection process whilst we await the requested information.

 

Yours sincerely

 

T Clarke

Complaint Dept"

 

So, they haven't got the CCA? Need to ask for it? I thought they needed it in order to pursue me? Anyway, I have yet to tell them it's SB'd. Bless em!

 

Any thoughts?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is a normal response and quite in order. Just sit tight and wait. Crediters do no normally pass on paperwork when they sell a debt, that's why the DCA has to request it from them. Sometimes they can get one and other times they can't. They are not allowed to chase the debt whilst waiting for the cca hence your account will be on hold till they come up with the cca.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

**** UPDATE ****

 

Had a letter from AK today, almost a carbon copy of the one above, with the addition of an extra paragraph, which is:

 

"Please now find attached the agreement pertaining to the account.

 

We shall forward further information upon receipt."

 

Ok this is the attached. It's a Barclaycard Application form. It's a photocopy. On the edge of the "photocopy" is written, by hand, CCA 31BC***** (the AK account number) and in a red circle, stamped, it says COPY.

 

I know this is just an app form, but in the box where I signed my scrawl, it states, "This is a Credit Agreement regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974. Sign it only if you want to be legally bound by its terms.

 

Signature of Customer (Me)

Date of Signature 28/08/97

 

So is this a true copy of the CCA?

 

Regardless, do I still send them "this debt is statute barred" letter, and see how they respond?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, I forgot to mention, AK received the CCA request on 14th Oct (signed for). The deadline for the request expired on the 3rd Nov. I gave them an extra week for postal strikes.

 

Am I correct in sending them this:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/resources/templates-library/86-debt-collectors/571-failiure-to-provide-a-copy-of-the-agreement-within-the-prescribed-timescale

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the debt is indeed Statute Barred (6 years with no acknowledgement in writing or payment) then send them the Statute Barred letter.

 

They were making my mum pay for a Statute Barred debt but they closed the file once i sent them the Statute Barred letter.

:cool::cool: Blondmusic :cool::cool:
Link to post
Share on other sites

Or if you want to amuse yourself, you can argue with them for a while about their laughable excuse for a CCA. Then when you feel that you've wasted enough of their time you can hit hem with the Stat Barred letter :D

 

A person after my own heart!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know this is just an app form, but in the box where I signed my scrawl, it states, "This is a Credit Agreement regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974. Sign it only if you want to be legally bound by its terms.

 

you see,this is where I have a major problem with your data being processed by companies who have nothing but an unsigned application form.....

 

this has to be unlawful

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I have had one too. No mention of a deed of assignment, no letter of assignment, no letter from original creditor (if indeed one existed) and the statute bared issue. 7 years ago I seem to remember receiving the same nonsense from a Thames Credit and amazingly enough, the scrawlled signature (abdullan?) seems to be the same. Can someone please remind me of to whom complaints need to be registered? This is the first communication I have had from these fiends ever.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Andie i love the reply will borrow that one. LOL

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having slept on the matter I feel inclined to go straightto the OFT and Trading Standards since I have all the paperwork over the last 7 years and they have not once produced anything of value. I have challenged them to issue court proceedings and they backed off twice when using the banner 'Thames Credit'. Well the 'signature' appears to be from the same weezle.

 

I will commence with reference to my last letter 3 years ago which demanded they produce evidence under CPR rules as the same would be required in court.

 

What gets to me is how these t**ds are allowed to operate in this way and not be barred or something.

 

Just for the record, NO I do not have a conscience. I do however have a good memory and I well remember the threats and bullying and the 8 phone calls a day (until I had the phone removed) right after I had had surgery.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Hey guys!

 

Could somebody do me the honour of supplying a link to the Statute Barred letter template, I can't find it! :(

 

I have looked through here

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt-issues/20758-creditors-dcas-letter-templates.html

 

but to no avail. Thanks.

 

Oh btw it IS for AK, thought they had left me for good, but no, like an annoying hemorrhoid they are BACK!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just out of interest, could someone tell me what if a creditor supplies a copy of the CCA AFTER the deadline set out in the request letter, is it still enforceable?

 

Thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

AK seem to specialise in buying debts which are or soon will be SB. They also seem to get caught out by the 5 year SB limit in Scotland. :D

 

I think that DOES mean they are a bit thick - but probably not as thick as Moorcroft. ;)

 

BD

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...