Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • all DYL's are subject to a TRO. looking at this newish, ever increasing as old ind units have gotten removed, estate, there are only lines on one side, on the other there is a parking lane with traffic calming through which you mention. i seriously doubt your mate has any clue what he is talking about.!! its not a private housing assoc estate. so its a public council owned road. no construction co can just decide to draw their graffiti on a road. the DYLs are certainly there pre 2016 even before his home was built. now ive had a quick look to see if the main access to royal park road has signs. there is no royle park road even on your map but there is a royal barn road which leads to where you are parked royal road has a restriction sign on the pole by the fence of the electric substation jnc with gipsy lane there does not appear to be one leading in from the other end - tesco petrol station
    • Hi All. I was driving in Stevenage down a 40 road.  After coming off the motor way i noticed my car felt a little "weird" so i accelerated, then slowed the car down.  Shortly after i got stopped by a manned police car with a laser. During the stop the officer stated i was doing 54 in a 40, the conversation was short, but he said i would unlikely get a awareness course and it was most likely 3 points and a fine.  Mrs thought it was a good idea to have dairy when she is lactose intollerant on date night, so we just got on our way.  At the time, i didnt admit to the offence, but did say i didnt realise and had slowed down in any case. The officers chest camera was recording and on. At the stop, he asked where to send the fine to, as i knew i would be travelling to visit family up north, i provided my temporary details at that location in Yorkshire. It is now 05/05 and i havent recieved anything at either my home address in Stevenage or the temporary address. 1. Is there a time limit in which paperwork needs to be sent to me. 2. SHould i query the ticket as i dont want to miss any deadlines (if so who do i check with?) OR should i keep queit. 3. Given nothing has arrived in 20 days, is there a chance of appeal if and when it comes through? Many thanks CrazeUK
    • Hi All. A family friends car was having issues when she was on a trip visiting family up north at the begining of January.  She ended up leaving it at my friends garage in the same location, who parked it on his forecourt to investigate the issue, howver he said most likely it is beyond economical repair as its a serious gearbox fault. In the meantime i replaced her car with one of my spare cars. The insurance on the car then expired in at the end of January.  When the insurance expired, I sent a paper V890 paper as i didnt have her V5 Reference number in hand to do it online (i have a copy of this).  She didnt mention she hadnt recieved any confirmation as she didnt know if she would get one.  She then cancelled her road tax at the end of March (i think) as she was paying by DD. She then was travelling up north so didnt get her ,ail until last week. She recievd a letter dated 09/04/2024 stating she had failed to insure the vehcile and there was a £100 fine which could be reduced to £50 if she respons by 11/05/2024.  As soon as we noticed, i got her to dig  out the V5 and SORN'd the vehicle.   My friend has been a bit slow in checking the fault, however i suspect it will still be scrapped and is still on his forecourt. Is this possible to appeal?
    • worthy to not forget Just to let you know this bunch Kensington have been fined £1.225m by the financial regulator for treating borrowers who were in arrears unfairly. Claim those charges back plus the interest and tell them not to add any more to the account. There are a few news stories here you can get the info for a letter to send to them. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8615870.stm  
    • Hi All. I went to visit a family friend in Rochdale on a new housing estate opposite a old row of houses. The location is Royle Road, Postcode OL11 3PE. I was originally parked in parking bays outside the old houses, then moved the car, when I noticed my tyre was flat, so parked on what looked like double yellows to use his air pump to check and inflate the tyres before we left the house.   In the time i went inside to sort the pump and power supply i got a PCN.  The tyre then got changed (has a puncture) and we left. PCN Number:         RE######## Date:             04/05/2024 Time:             20:36 Observation:         20:34 to 20:36 Reported location:     Royle Park Road Reason:        Parked in a restricted street during prescribed hours (Code: 01) I believe this PCN is not correct and has grounds to appeal: 1. My friend who moved into the property around 6 months ago, swears that even though it has old double yellows marked, they are not current or council marked.   He said the property development company had said they had marked them for ease of access during development. 2. The road i was parked on was Royle Road.  The PCN was issued for Royle Park Road, which is about 400 yards up the road. 3. There are no sign posts or marking showing parking  restriction hours in the entire area (there maybe on Royle park Road). I have attached a map of the Location where i parked as a red dot. I have 2 questions: a.  Is there a way to check where double yellow lines are marked on some register to check if they are current? b. Can my grounds of appeal simply be, wrong location, wrong offence? Thanks in advance. Map_20240505.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Is This Legal


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5055 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

MSE has just amended most of its posts and closed it.

Another illegal thread has just been removed from the net on another forum.

 

This one, we wish to be deleted as well as it invariably ends up with data protection being broken somewhere along the lines.

 

Wow, that has to be the most defensive post I've ever seen to a perfectly logical question :eek:

PLEASE DONATE ANYTHING THAT YOU CAN

 

 

A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul.

George Bernard Shaw

 

 

 

 

Go on, click me scales (if I have helped) :grin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 180
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Lol, just read the rest of the thread in between washing up, I love this line

 

Maybe we should host a dating site for sad, reclusive, virgins who sit on consumer forums all day? What do we all think???

 

I must say though, this guy has some balls, not that I would know mind, being a sad reclusive virgin :p

PLEASE DONATE ANYTHING THAT YOU CAN

 

 

A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul.

George Bernard Shaw

 

 

 

 

Go on, click me scales (if I have helped) :grin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your email.

We shall be contacting XL Trading for relevant licensing.

Many thanks,

Darren

 

How much is a PRS License to sell music and run a Music TV station?

 

 

And this Sad, Reclusive Virgin is off to talk to his Fiancee!

 

H

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Funny, Mr. Shaw is the guy on the XLTrading.net domain registration...

 

H

 

What's also funny is that someone else called Tim Shaw is a Sheffield born DJ, and was recently controversially sacked from Sheffield-based radio station Hallam FM.....

......concluding the name on the domain reg is fake.

 

As an internet trader, XL must display a geographical address on the website to abide by the DSR's. XL has previously informed my they are fully aware they must do this, but are happy to omit the required information until they get caught.

 

XL have failed to provide proof that their geographical address is NOT 2*0 E*m L*n*, Sh*ffi*ld. Xl claim on their own website that these details are fake. I absolutely challenge XL Trading to prove that the above address is not the geographical location of XL. The simplest way to do this is to adhere to the DSR's and publish your true geographical address.

 

But again, this falls on deaf ears, because XL are fully aware that they are conducting extremely iffy activity and do not want a knock on the door from the local fuzz. XL know they are exploiting an incredibly small loophole in the law which allows them to sell pirated software (but they are never going to admit this on a forum, are they?)

Edited by underlay_guru
Link to post
Share on other sites

Lol, just read the rest of the thread in between washing up, I love this line

 

 

 

I must say though, this guy has some balls, not that I would know mind, being a sad reclusive virgin :p

 

I'd best tell my wife that i'm a sad reclusive virgin ....and my kids

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lastly....

 

It gets funnier and funnier by the day how the guy running this tinpot illegal copied software website from his shed in the Parsons Cross area of Sheffield sneers at the likes of Sony/Microsoft/Nintendo/EMI, thinking they are allowing him to continue running this operation for ever. do you honestly think they are turning a blind eye? Do you honestly think they are spitting feathers because they cannot get you prosecuted? Do you honestly think they have viewed you website and thought: "Oh well, we can't do anything about that...Lets just leave him to it". Do you honestly think that they are to leave you alone because you are a crafty del-boy type fella, selling hooky CD's for a bit of beer money? You thought wrong, young man!

 

These are amongst some of the largest grossing companies in the World, and do not take kindly to blokes on council estates stealing their work and reselling at a profit. They employ the best legal representatives in the World to protect their products, and trust me - they will have offices collecting evidence as we speak, and when all that juicy evidence is collated...the first people they target will be QUOTE: "The Worlds No1 Backup Service Provider".

 

XL also claim they will around long after 'The Pirate Bay has perished'.......pull the other one. Sites like the pirate bay thought they were above the law simply because they provided links and torrent files, but not the actual copyrighted material....they were still sent to jail. XL is selling copyrighted software at a profit, which is even worse!

 

See you on the front page of the Sheffield Star very soon!

Edited by underlay_guru
Link to post
Share on other sites

What's also funny is that someone else called Tim Shaw is a Sheffield born DJ, and was recently controversially sacked from Sheffield-based radio station Hallam FM.....

......concluding the name on the domain reg is fake.

 

 

I wondered when someone would notice that.

 

Its Adam Bristow.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What's also funny is that someone else called Tim Shaw is a Sheffield born DJ, and was recently controversially sacked from Sheffield-based radio station Hallam FM.....

......concluding the name on the domain reg is fake.

 

That Tim Shaw now presents a popular show on Absolute FM (formally Virgin Radio). Very funny indeed!:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well this thread has certainly brought out the lynch mob. It seems to have been decided that, after consideration, XL are carrying out an illegal operation. That must be worth a £50,000 fine. They also messed up their domain name registration, so that’s now a £50,000 fine and a years imprisonment. Finally, horrors of horror, they didn’t put a VAT number on their web site so that’s a hanging then. Let’s name names…..

What this thread seems to have achieved is to close their site down for just a couple of days. However, several thousand CAGGERS now know about this company and no doubt a few will use their services. (I don’t see CAGGERS as being any more honest/dishonest as the rest of the public.) XLs new web site has been moved to a new ISP and, because of this and other forums, is now far easier to find on a search engine. So more hits for XL and more business for them. Not quite the result that was required me thinks.

I do not know if XLs actions are legal or not but I have a thought. Let us imagine that there is in fact a small loophole, a minute one but a loophole nevertheless, which does actually mean that XL are perhaps acting within the law. The very last thing that FAST or any software manufacturer would want would be to take XL to court and to loose. Such a decision would have very serious implications on software producers. So they threaten ISPs and corporate lawyers send threatening letters but that’s as far as they can go. FAST and/or Microsoft could crush XL in a moment if they wished. So why haven’t they?

A few final points:

1.thanks to the guy from XL who came on line one night to put his point over.

2. Pirate Bay is a totally different kettle of fish. File sharing of that type is illegal, software copying well……..

Link to post
Share on other sites

1.thanks to the guy from XL who came on line one night to put his point over.

 

 

Which night was that?

 

I ask because if you have been following events you will have seen XL admitted they have broke the law in at least 3 ways.

 

& which person was it? Adam, Tim or Peter?

 

Were they based at one of the 2 locations in Sheffield when they posted or the London HQin Harley Street?

Edited by 1984ReturnsForReal
Link to post
Share on other sites

What is Software Piracy ?

 

Software piracy is the unauthorised copying or distribution of copyrighted software. This can be done by copying, downloading, sharing, selling, or installing multiple copies onto personal or work computers. What a lot of people don't realise or don't think about is that when you purchase software, you are actually purchasing a license to use it, not the actual software. It is that license that tells you how many times you can install the software, so it's important to read it. If you make more copies of the software than the license permits, you are pirating.

Business Software Alliance
Link to post
Share on other sites

I repeat

"FAST and/or Microsoft could crush XL in a moment if they wished. So why haven’t they?"

Any suggestions?

 

Because court action costs them money. So they'll look at cheaper ways of solving the problem first. Such as approaching ISPs to have the site shut down. Or having their solicitors make threatening telephone calls (it appears Tom-Tom did this and were successful).

 

In fact, the High Court nowadays has what are called "pre-action protocols", which say that claimants are supposed to try to settle the matter in other ways before they take court action. Litigation should always be the last resort.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I repeat

"FAST and/or Microsoft could crush XL in a moment if they wished. So why haven’t they?"

Any suggestions?

 

 

Because they need to gather evidence, including test purchases. They then have to have their lawyers examine the evidence and put together a case for legal action. In very large corporations such as Microsoft, this takes time.

 

You just cannot shut down a company because you think they may be breaking copyright laws. You have to prove it, and that takes time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

PRS have taken an interest in XL. To sell, distribute or Play music to the public, a PRS license is required. As XL are selling music (legally or not) they require a distributers license. For their online Music TV station, they also require a Broadcaster license.

 

And we all know how gung hoe PRS can be (Think TV licensing people)

 

H

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, Consumer Direct/Trading Standards have also taken an interest:

Thank you for your enquiry to Consumer Direct dated 16th October. Your reference number for this case is SE XXXXXXX and should be quoted in all further correspondence regarding this case.

With reference to your enquiry, a company who is using their website to take payments should display a geographical address to consumers. As a result, I have passed the details of your complaint to the appropriate Trading Standards Authority for their information. Whilst they may not contact you directly, they will take any action they feel is appropriate.

 

I would also suggest you report the potential data protection breach to the Information Commissioners Office. They look into breaches of the Data Protection Act. Their website is www.ico.gov.uk.

I trust the above information is of some assistance to you. If you require any further information or clarification on this case please do not hesitate to contact Consumer Direct quoting your above reference number on Tel No: 08454 04 05 06 our offices are opened Monday to Friday 8am - 6.30pm and Saturday 9am - 1pm. If this is not convenient please feel free to contact me at the email address below.

 

Thank you for your enquiry.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

Alan Dix

Consumer Direct South East

 

 

H

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Re PRS. Licence, I don't know if any of you have been approached by another company PPL asking for money for playing music. We have never been approached by these people directly so I assume that PRS have passed on our details. We currently have a licence for playing local radio, we are a very small beauty salon and only have one work station, but we just received an invoice from PPL for £130.00 to cover 2 years fee. I have duly sent the invoice back after speaking to Trading standards.

 

We only play local radio and we assumed that the PRS would cover this, comments appreciated !!!!!!!!!.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a big con. A musician or record label has to join PPL, if they have not joined then they get nothing, so if we say Sony is a member and none of Sony records are played, where then does the money go.

 

This company is only representing the members who have asked to join, so they can't put a blanket over all and every piece of music that is played.

 

I can't see how any action can be taken by them unless they have sat in your shop, factory or office and noted station, time and content. They would also have to make you aware of the members they represent and that would give you a chance to mute the radio if any of those records were played.

 

I would say they are just working their way through Yellow Pages and live on those who respond with a cheque.

 

All the above goes for PRS as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...