Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well we can't predict what the judge will believe. PE will say that they responded in the deadline and you will say they don't. Nobody can tell what a random DJ will decide. However if you go for an OOC settlement you should still be able to get some money
    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Premier Man / Reliable Collections / Fredrickson International.


TheV5
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4502 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello everybody. I am new to this forum although I have looked at it in the past.

 

I have a problem and wonder if anyone can help me out.

 

The first half of this story is on Money Saving Expert site http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showthread.html?t=1699647&highlight=

And it was suggested that I ask you guys on this forum as you are better suited to this sort of situation.

 

My last correspondence with them is as follows:

 

“I have written to you a number of times stating that this account is not mine. I have had one letter back from a Ms. Sue Worley which told me nothing. I keep getting what appear to be standard letters from yourselves stating that you have escalated the matter further and you can prove items have been delivered to my address etc. You have yet to present this proof to me, or any other documentation despite many requests.

 

I have now had another letter stating that the debt has been passed on to a debt recovery company. I had a phone call from one of your representatives about 2 or 3 weeks ago assuring me that all letters of this nature would stop while the matter was passed onto your investigation department. I have yet to hear from them!”

 

The letter above was dated the 17th July and one below was dated 29th June which goes as follows:

 

“I have now had a very threatening letter (dated 24th June) stating the following:

 

Quote:

“Your conduct in this matter is unacceptable and will not be tolerated. Our client has delivered goods to your address and little effort has been made to pay for them. We are currently considering further steps to recover this debt.

 

Take notice that a payment needs to be paid within the next 48 hours to prevent further action.”

Unquote

 

As stated before, I have not made any orders from your company and have had no correspondence since 2002 when I closed the account. Also, no items from your company have ever been delivered to my address, this is pure fabrication.

 

I would at the very least like to see proof of contract between myself and Premier Man with my address and my signature etc. I dispute that this debt is mine and would need to see concrete proof that this debt is in fact mine and that items have been ordered by myself and delivered to my address i.e. I need all details of items delivered, dates of delivery, address that items have been delivered to, proof of contract with my address, payment details and method of payment.

 

Would you also kindly inform other people at Reliable Collections to cease sending me threatening letters and demands for monies and that all contact is to be made in writing with yourself.”

 

I have now had a letter from Fredrickson International Limited who have now taken the debt on stating that I owe them £832.83. I still dispute that the account is mine and Premier Man / Reliable Collections have sent me nothing in way of proof of contract between myself and them or provide any proof of delivery which they state they can prove. In fact they have sent me one letter and that told me nothing. The only other correspondence I have had with them is mentioned in the letter dated 17th July.

 

Can anyone tell me where I stand with this and what maybe the best course of action.

 

Many thanks, Tim

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi and welcome

 

Hello everybody. I am new to this forum although I have looked at it in the past.

 

I have a problem and wonder if anyone can help me out.

 

The first half of this story is on Money Saving Expert site http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showthread.html?t=1699647&highlight=

And it was suggested that I ask you guys on this forum as you are better suited to this sort of situation.

 

My last correspondence with them is as follows:

 

 

“I have written to you a number of times stating that this account is not mine. I have had one letter back from a Ms. Sue Worley which told me nothing. I keep getting what appear to be standard letters from yourselves stating that you have escalated the matter further and you can prove items have been delivered to my address etc. You have yet to present this proof to me, or any other documentation despite many requests.

 

I have now had another letter stating that the debt has been passed on to a debt recovery company. I had a phone call from one of your representatives about 2 or 3 weeks ago assuring me that all letters of this nature would stop while the matter was passed onto your investigation department. I have yet to hear from them!”

 

The letter above was dated the 17th July and one below was dated 29th June which goes as follows:

 

“I have now had a very threatening letter (dated 24th June) stating the following:

 

Quote:

“Your conduct in this matter is unacceptable and will not be tolerated. Our client has delivered goods to your address and little effort has been made to pay for them. We are currently considering further steps to recover this debt.

 

Take notice that a payment needs to be paid within the next 48 hours to prevent further action.”

Unquote

 

As stated before, I have not made any orders from your company and have had no correspondence since 2002 when I closed the account. Also, no items from your company have ever been delivered to my address, this is pure fabrication.

 

I would at the very least like to see proof of contract between myself and Premier Man with my address and my signature etc. I dispute that this debt is mine and would need to see concrete proof that this debt is in fact mine and that items have been ordered by myself and delivered to my address i.e. I need all details of items delivered, dates of delivery, address that items have been delivered to, proof of contract with my address, payment details and method of payment.

 

Would you also kindly inform other people at Reliable Collections to cease sending me threatening letters and demands for monies and that all contact is to be made in writing with yourself.”

 

 

 

I have now had a letter from Fredrickson International Limited who have now taken the debt on stating that I owe them £832.83. I still dispute that the account is mine and Premier Man / Reliable Collections have sent me nothing in way of proof of contract between myself and them or provide any proof of delivery which they state they can prove. In fact they have sent me one letter and that told me nothing. The only other correspondence I have had with them is mentioned in the letter dated 17th July.

 

Can anyone tell me where I stand with this and what maybe the best course of action.

 

Many thanks, Tim

 

You now need to demand their complaints procedure and report them to the OFT if you are sure the debt is not yours,

 

You have told them often enough, so no more mr nice guy, if they do not send you their complaints procedure then report them to the OFT and let them deal with it, I would also let your local/national newspaper know about this harrassment - look up Mrs Beryl brazier, and quote that in y

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the info. Should I ask Premier Man / Reliable Collections for the Complaints Procedure or Fredrickson International Ltd? Also, are there any good template CCA's on this site or elsewhere? Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

send the cca to freds, they are the one now chasing

 

request premiermans complaints procedure

 

The Consumer Forums - Debt collectors

 

letter 8 for the cca

 

send recorded do not sign costs £1 postal order

 

or use letter 18 if you do not know about the debt, costs nothing again send recorded do not sign it.

 

some say that photoshop is a tool in the dca's armoury:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi all,

 

I have sent letter template 18 to Fred's and a request for a Complaints Procedure from Premier Man / JD Williams. I sent these recorded last Tuesday lunchtime, but still haven't had anything back as of yet. However, Fred's have sent me a letter today stating that if I don't pay within 7 days they will get a court order to enter the premises and size goods to the value of the debt plus costs; somewhere in the region of £1200! Shall I just wait for them to reply to me reference the request for the CCA or do I need to write to them further?

 

Thanks everybody.

 

PS - I may take a while to get back on to the forum as I stupidly dropped my laptop on Sunday and the thing won't power up now! The joys...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

 

I have sent letter template 18 to Fred's and a request for a Complaints Procedure from Premier Man / JD Williams. I sent these recorded last Tuesday lunchtime, but still haven't had anything back as of yet. However, Fred's have sent me a letter today stating that if I don't pay within 7 days they will get a court order to enter the premises and size goods to the value of the debt plus costs; somewhere in the region of £1200! Shall I just wait for them to reply to me reference the request for the CCA or do I need to write to them further?

 

Thanks everybody.

 

PS - I may take a while to get back on to the forum as I stupidly dropped my laptop on Sunday and the thing won't power up now! The joys...

 

Did they really put that in writing? They can't do that without first getting a judgment, and you then failing to pay it. If they did write that, you can take them to the cleaners.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fraud by false representation

 

(1) A person is in breach of this section if he—

(a) dishonestly makes a false representation, and

(b) intends, by making the representation—

(i) to make a gain for himself or another, or

(ii) to cause loss to another or to expose another to a risk of loss.

(2) A representation is false if—

(a) it is untrue or misleading, and

(b) the person making it knows that it is, or might be, untrue or misleading.

(3) “Representation” means any representation as to fact or law, including a representation as to the state of mind of—

(a) the person making the representation, or

(b) any other person.

(4) A representation may be express or implied.

(5) For the purposes of this section a representation may be regarded as made if it (or anything implying it) is submitted in any form to any system or device designed to receive, convey or respond to communications (with or without human intervention).

 

 

Fraud Act 2006 (c. 35)

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have sent letter template 18 to Fred's and a request for a Complaints Procedure from Premier Man / JD Williams.

 

Heard their legal dept have been very busy lately as they've just bought out another catalogue firm ... don't know which one but no doubt we'll find out when the complaints start appearing on here...

 

Might explain why they're so late in replying to people, or then again, maybe they always are.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi. Again thanks for all the replies. The letter in question is as follows:

 

LETTRE BEFORE ACTION

 

THIS DEBT MUST BE PAID IN FULL TO THESE OFFICES WITHIN THE NEXT 7 DAYS OTHERWISE WE WILL TAKE IMMEDIATE ACTION.

 

If a judgement or decree remains unsatisfied a bailiff or sheriff's officer may be instructed to recover assets to discharge the outstanding debt. Judgement debts are registered by the Court. A judgement debt or decree against you would seriously affect your ability to obtain credit in the future.

 

 

 

This is only the second letter they have sent to me. The first being on the 16th or 17th September. Shall I stand by my original letter (Letter 18) or do I need to write to them again?

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Stand by ur dates. Its 12 WORKING days after they have recieved the cca.

 

working days are monday to friday not including any bank or public holidays.

 

Also with freds they normally break the law with court claims. they split the claim which is illegal under the county courts act 1984. They go for there costs first. They also put on the claim form they reserve the right to claim for further amounts at later times.

 

Then when u file a defence which u will do they tend to discontinue the claim.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

no working days are monday to friday and always have been.

 

When the law was originally passed noone worked weekends.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We dont stoop to there level remember.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

no it does not but remember were the adults not them.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

there down when they cant find a cca and have just lost in court or discontinued. ;)

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should be requesting a copy of Freds complaints procedure if there is a dispute or you are awaiting info then they are required to provide a copy.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

 

Well the latest is, they have sent a card through my letter box stating I'm a confirmed resident and that if I am not in contact with them, they will forward the matter to a solicitor who may take legal action without further notice to myself. This Wednesday is their deadline to get a copy of the CCA to me, i.e. their 12 working days plus 2 are up. What would be my situation from that point onwards?

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...