Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks, that's clear Andy! Just to check - what does hearsay mean? Is it that a layer is representing Eruidio instead of them being there themselves?
    • Your points are fine but as I am late to this topic I am not aware of the finer details. Sums in Arrears Notices must be provided if the claimant wishes to enforce an agreement and claim any interest. The relevant section of the CCA1974 is sec 86B  https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1974/39/part/VI/crossheading/sums-in-arrears-and-default-sums (2)The creditor or owner— (a)shall, within the period of 14 days beginning with the day on which the conditions mentioned in subsection (1) are satisfied, give the debtor or hirer a notice under this section; and (b)after the giving of that notice, shall give him further notices under this section at intervals of not more than six months. Regards Andy     .  
    • Hi All, PRA Group are chasing an old Barclaycard unpaid from 4 years ago. They are threatening court action - CCJ unless I respond before last Saturday. Which I did not. I'm unsure but reckon the Barclaycard was applied for about 30 years ago. What's the best next step approach ? Best, P.       
    • Can you please also have a look at points 20-27? The sent me a remediation pack with not only statements but sums of arrears they haven't sent for 2 years, so I didn't know I was in arrears. Then they defaulted me after they apologised for their cca breach. I truly didn't understand what that pack was about. I thought it was some kind of a mistake they will make right later as SLC used to do this. Genuinely I thought that but I don't know if that's an OK defence?  
    • Thank you for posting the full sar.  So they definitely did place the PCN on your vehicle only to remove it 10 minutes later apparently because of a possible problem with the driver which seems highly unlikely [the reason for the PCN removal ]. Did the driver even see the warden at all while they were photographing the car . They did take several pictures spread over 12 minutes or so using a flash so the driver would have seen the car being photographed had they been there.   Very strange. You said that you had an onboard camera -are you able to go back and see what happened? Was the warden wearing UKPC clothing? In any event that PCN has not complied with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4.  That should be a Notice to Driver and the follow up PCN should not be sent until 28 days AFTER the day the first PCN  was given were it a postal PCN. Instead the knuckleheads have issued the follow up PCN on the 28th day of their dodgy first PCN and so totally blowing all their machinations to get over the fact that  the windscreen ticket wasn't a windscreen ticket. In neither case, even if they had been sent properly, they were non compliant. neither of them showed the period of parking which is specified in the Act. Both just show a time of issue at 20.02 but no end period. Their  "mistake" in not giving 29 days  before issuing their keeper Liability notice, makes the PCN more than just non compliant. It means that the PCN was unlawful and probably deliberate as had UKPC waited until the correct time to send that Notice, it would have delayed it until the Monday. And as they probably knew that had not received the original windscreen PCN perhaps they thought it better to rewrite the Law. Part of that is conjecture but the basic fact is correct-the Notice was unlawful. And for that there should be repercussions. My first thought was the ICO but  as it isn't really a breach of data protection it goes higher than that. Perhaps the Site Team would know. I did look at the Legal Ombudsman but they are for complaints against lawyers.  I cannot imagine a decent lawyer even countenancing such a thing though were are dealing with third rate ones when involved with some parking companies.   For reference PoFA Schedule 4 S8 and S9 [2][f] f)warn the keeper that if, at the end of the period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice to keeper is given— Their PCN dated 12/04/24 states "as 28 days have now elapsed since the Notice to Keeper was given, Parking Control management [UK] Ltd. [the creditor] are now able ...........to recover the unpaid parking charge from......... the registered keeper. The original PCN was marked by them as being deemed delivered 15/03/2024 so 28 days +1 =13/04/24. Their letter was sent one day early which means they altered or ignored the law . I have never seen that "error" on any other Notice from any of the parking companies. As the Member did not receive the original PCN which was originally a Windscreen ticket but they then changed it to a postal one for some fanciful reason the whole scenario reeks of skullduggery. I am going to ask again from Hamz why their warden might have felt scared about a confrontation with the driver but even if there was a chance the PCN was placed on the windscreen and not removed for around a minute but pictures had already been taken so why remove it? And then why produce a brand new keeper Liability Notice the like of which I have not seen before.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Can they put a charge notice on my house?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5374 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

HI All,

 

This is my 1st thread so very new to this great site.

 

I have had a letter from Mercantile Data Bureau saying i owe 13K from an old Abbey dept 2+ years ago, i don't know how they found out where i live (Maybe some one can tell me how they do this?) what should be my next step they are saying they are profiling me to find out if i am a home owner etc.

 

My questions are

 

1. What sould my responce be?

2. How did they find me?

3. Can they put a charge order on my house for the dept (it was an unsecured loan)

 

Please help as this is playing on my mind

 

Nickfrombristol:sad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

first thing is to send a letter asking them to prove you owe the money

second they probably found you on the voting list

they certainly cant put a charge on your house ONLY a court can do this and you are a long long way from court yet

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.consumerforums.com/resources/templates-library/86-debt-collectors/581-cca-request-letter

link here enclose £1.00 p.o. DO NOT SIGN LETTER just print name

You could try this prove it letter first, wait for a response, then send the CCA request. Make them work to prove the debt.

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Account no:

 

You have contacted me/us regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself/ourselves.

 

I/we would point out that I/we have no knowledge of any such debt being owed to (insert company name).

 

I am/we are familiar with the Office of Fair Trading Debt Collection Guidance which states that it unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question.

 

I/we would also point out that the OFT say under the Guidance that it is unfair to pursue third parties for payment when they are not liable. In not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using deceptive/and or unfair methods.

 

Furthermore ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment amounts to physical/psychological harassment.

 

I/we would ask that no further contact be made concerning the above account unless you can provide evidence as to my/our liability for the debt in question.

 

I/we await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed. Otherwise I will have no option but to make a complaint to the trading standards department and consider informing the OFT of your actions.

 

I/we look forward to your reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just got a letter saying i owe 13k from 2yrs back, the dept is to the Abbey and the collection agency is Mercantile Data Bureau.

This is the first letter i have got after 2yrs from anyone regarding this dept.

 

Are they just sending letters out on the off chance i will respond or are they certain i live there, i am on the voting register but have been at past properties aswell.

 

Do i just phone and say not known at this address or what do i do?

 

nickfrombristol

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I take it the letter was addressed to you, what was the debt.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Two threads merged.

 

nickfrombristol,

 

Please stick to this thread on this subject.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

In short yes!

 

They can put a charge on your house, they would need to take you to court first of all to do so. For a debt of 13K I would be very carefull because this is the kind of balance a Debt Collector would want to get secured upon your home.

 

Many Debt Collectors will enforce Judgement via a charging order regardless of whether you are paying or not. This secures their interest, also because the debt was taken out after 2006 they are within their rights to apply post judgement interest.

 

You could CCA them, however because the debit is only two years old there is a good chance they will be able to provide an agreement and enforce the debt.

 

They will have tracked your adress using your Experian file most likely which will link from your old address to your new one. They are entitled to trace you provided they do not break the law in doing so.

 

It is a simple matter to see if you own your own home, they will simply do a land registry search of your address which will say who the proprietor of the property is.

 

My advice to you would be to acknowledge the debt and come to an affordable monthly payment plan with them. You may be lucky and they may not have the agreement but this will antigonise them. You have admitted to the debt in your first posting.

 

On the same subject do not take any **** from them, make sure you pay what you can afford and provide them with an income and expenditure form. If they reject your offer of payment then they will most likely get a charging order against you.

 

I know this is not what you were wanting to hear, but I am just being honest. There are far to many people on this forum who have ended up with Bailiffs at their door because they boycotted their debts on the advice of somebody in this forum.

 

It would be foolhardy for you to defend any claim on the advice of a total stranger in a web forum. If you know you owe them the money fpay it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just got a letter saying i owe 13k from 2yrs back, the dept is to the Abbey and the collection agency is Mercantile Data Bureau.

This is the first letter i have got after 2yrs from anyone regarding this dept.

 

Are they just sending letters out on the off chance i will respond or are they certain i live there, i am on the voting register but have been at past properties aswell.

 

Do i just phone and say not known at this address or what do i do?

 

nickfrombristol

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you owe this money?

Have you ever had an account with abbey?

If not, then they are on a fishing trip sending out threatogrammes to every one with the same name as you.

If you don't owe them this debt, then I would simply file the letter for future reference and simply ignore it, NEVER PHONE THEM, if you do not owe them this money and you make contact disputing it they will bombard you with empty threats, thinking they have got the right person.

 

Ignore it and wait to see if they send anything else, then we can go from there.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Think I'd just wait and see what I got next from them.

Have you checked your credit file with someone like experian if not I certainly would just to make sure they've not put anything on your file?

DG

I have no legal training my knowledge comes from my personal life experiences

Please help keep the forum alive by making a donation

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with f dcas as he says ignore bigkacker asking for a cca is your right and whether or not this antagonises them is irrelevant, mostly they will supply you with a copy. whether or not it is enforceable is the next step in take. you can roll over, pay and every month they will ask for more and more until they are bleeding you dry, you are better fighting them at this stage than later.

as bigkacker says Many Debt Collectors will enforce Judgement via a charging order regardless of whether you are paying or not. This secures their interest, also because the debt was taken out after 2006 they are within their rights to apply post judgement interest.

and yes post judgement interest is sometimes allowed but not before judgement...if you read around these threads many people here have taken the advice of site and have come out much better off than just acknowledging and paying

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you scan and post the letter they sent, removing all of your details and anything that will Id you to them, Ref. No's, bar codes etc

This lot are well known for phishing for information.

Was it signed by a 'Mark Davies'??

 

According to companies house, this company was called Mercantile Debt Management Ltd but dissolved in 2006.

 

If you think you owe the debt, then as DG says, have a look at your CRF, but be warned, doing this may start a barrage of other DCA's jumping on the bandwagon. However it will tell you whether or not this outfit has placed a mark on your CRF.

 

If your CRF isn't important to you, and lets be honest why would it be? Then checking it will be of no real benefit, just file their letter and wait their next move..

 

 

Boo;)

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...