Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks, dx. Yes, I may need to turn my attention into some other things.
    • no they wont  can you PLEASE stop panicking about a nothing burger   dx  
    • Where a person who owns or partially owns a property enters into an IVA, it's usual practice that in the fifth year, the person has to attempt to re-mortgage the property to release equity. It's extremely rare that a homeowner will be successful in re-mortgaging due to having a poor credit rating. Where the owner is unable to re-mortgage, the IVA is extended for a further year. This is absolutely normal practice in an IVA, and if your sister cancels payments to the IVA, the IVA is at risk of failing and she could be made bankrupt, therefore losing any equity she has in the property. 
    • Right. So I think it would be  good idea to give a brief description of the property, for example detached house, or flat or terraced. And some sort of identifier so we can distinguish from other properties you handle. An incomplete street address eg "No.14" would do so while preserving your privacy. Is the freehold title discrete for the property, or does it cover other leasehold properties? And a bit about your history, how current ownership came about. At one stage you said it used to be your family home, elsewhere you wrote that you'd bought the leasehold. Did those comments refer to this property? Did you acquire it on the open market, or from your family? Is this the house with the garages, where you own the freehold? Trying to understand whether there are underlying reasons that might account for problems with valuation, eligibility for finance, and the fact that neither you nor Lender found it possible to sell. Finally (for the moment) you refer to existing litigation. Does that relate to this property? If so it would be good to give a brief overview. Civil or criminal? What role do play .. claimant, defendant, appellant, respondent?  Charge, or cause of action. You don't want to go off on separate path that would better joined to the current proceedings. 
    • Can you confirm the client on the letter please? Is it The Original Energy Provider or PRAC Energy? 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

AK Claimform - MBNA card 'debt'


MeeBroke
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3340 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

The hilarious thing is that they know that no one will ever speak to them. Almost everyone now knows you must never speak to DCAs and only have comms in writing. So why bother with the calls?

 

Even still, they either don't leave a message or leave a message saying 'Ring (Experto Phone Monkey Name) and quote ref xxxxxxx'. Never saying what it's about or who they're with.

 

Who on Earth would ever return a call like that??

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 964
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Regulation should be made for these cretons i.e.: -

 

1. They must be able to write their name more than once.

2. They must be able to dial a phone Number, not use auto diallers.

3. They must pay 95% Tax & 5% N.I. on all income.

ist2_1269590-giraffe-cartoon.jpg

:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I've certainly rotated to the top of their list. Minimum of 2 calls a day-including the Bank Holiday.

 

 

Do they leave any message Meebroke or is it just a number that you have come to recognise?

 

That's assuming you don't answer them!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do they leave any message Meebroke or is it just a number that you have come to recognise?

 

That's assuming you don't answer them!

 

The first two times they rang, they left messages for me to call them but did not say who they were. I Googled the numbers (they used two different ones) and both came up as Experto. Since then they have called a minimum of twice a day on my mobile and home number. However, they never leave any message at all. Just straight harassment.

 

And no, I never answer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just love google, and who calls me :) I dont get calls from these people so the only way they can get me is by letter :):)

There is no such thing as a 0% credit card....... someone out there is paying for it, and for once its not going to be me.:razz:

Link to post
Share on other sites

They ring at 9:03am like clock work. Must be an auto dialer program? Never leave any message.

 

I can't believe it but I'm actually going to change my home phone number. Through no fault of my own I am now changing my telephone number.

 

I wish there was some way I could take these b@st@rds to court to end all of this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Might be for the best. At least you will stop the harrassment. Also when requesting a new number as for ex-directory. That way they really cant find your new number

There is no such thing as a 0% credit card....... someone out there is paying for it, and for once its not going to be me.:razz:

Link to post
Share on other sites

My landline provider says that I need a Police reference number to expedite the change in number. So as of just now, I have reported Experto Credite to the Police for harassment, not that EC will care in the slightest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you with BT? If so I got mine changed, but it was a few years ago ( about 15). I used to have odd phone calls and they started to be in the middle of the night where it would be silent then the person would hang up. BT changed my number and made it ex directory.

There is no such thing as a 0% credit card....... someone out there is paying for it, and for once its not going to be me.:razz:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Phonecalls stopped! As if by magic a letter appears from HL legal erroneously accusing me of ignoring their attempts to contact me- I have replied to ever letter from Exp Cred.

 

This letter tells me they 'may take action'. It's the first I've had from these people. It also for the first time mentions 'Varde'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

gone past end of month target, HL sol letter for hire 75p telling you to reply to Experto not them? side of letter may have experto ref no?

 

 

Yep. Tells me to reply to Exp Cred via email or phone only. Now, why would they not want to communicate in writring? Hmmmm.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi MeeBroke

 

We all deal in different ways but I always email a reply: noted, date of lettre and date received, reported to regulatory authorities, request for NoA re EU Credit Directive etc etc. It's all an audit trail and counters the 'failed to repond'.

 

x

 

v

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi MeeBroke

 

We all deal in different ways but I always email a reply: noted, date of lettre and date received, reported to regulatory authorities, request for NoA re EU Credit Directive etc etc. It's all an audit trail and counters the 'failed to repond'.

 

x

 

v

 

Hi V

 

can you flesh this out for me a bit? I think I'll send something to this effect. Particularely the part about ' regulatory authorities, request for NoA re EU Credit Directive etc etc'

 

Very much appreciated.

 

MB

Link to post
Share on other sites

O.H. recent letter, 50% reduction, amicable conclusion of matter, pay xxxx per month, final oportunity to avoid futher escalation, ring xxxxxxxxx to confirm.! Comments? once 50% paid off, 50% written off. (next letter maybe 75% offer???),

 

Are they real?

:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Right, after letter from HL Legal I wrote back to Experto as letter instructed reminding them of the Unlawful Recision etc. Experto wrote back a dismissive letter saying basically 'don't contact us, it's in the hands of HL Legal'-and avoided mentioning the UR at all.

 

Today I received a letter from HL saying to "Take Notice: You should accept this letter as formal notification that unless payment in full of the amount outstanding is made within 7 days then legal action may be taken against you in the County Court"

 

Is this and actual LBA? It still contains the word 'may'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...