Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well we can't predict what the judge will believe. PE will say that they responded in the deadline and you will say they don't. Nobody can tell what a random DJ will decide. However if you go for an OOC settlement you should still be able to get some money
    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

1st Credit Have Employed Judge & Priestly * NEW TACTICS*


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5525 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Reputable members have already received the letter, and advice has been given to me, at present there is no need for me to continue with this thread, not unless something comes up.

then please feel free not to continue on this thread ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 112
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

received LOUD AND CLEAR LOL

** Credentials **

 

10 Years Finance Fraud Investigator

 

5 Year High Court Sheriffs

 

2 Years Tip Staff Royal Courts

 

Currently : HMCS Enforcement Officer

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could always write to your best pal *** ******* as I'm sure if he's replaced the mighty LCS with some new outfit he would be happy to oblige. Obviously the OP does not regard you as "reputable" or you would have got a copy in your inbox

Link to post
Share on other sites

Even if this "letter" does exist..it will just be a standard solicitor threatogram anyway...it wont be anything out of the norm in terms of its contents.

If it were to be...then the authorities would be down on them like a ton of bricks :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a copy of my letter received from J&P as the OP seems not to have posted theirs.

 

But it is just the standard drivel and I have posted this letter previously on my other thread, but they name both 1st Credit and Connaughts on the letter, so all in cohoots with each other,

 

JPSolicitorsConnought.jpg

  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

I got my post deleted for saying give him a chance as if you have to rely on a friend you can't expect them to scan something for you after 11pm at night.

 

I tried that one, My cousin threw sharp objects at me through the window. I thought she was better than that. When I didn't turn up with a tray of gingerbread men on her birthday, she went mad. ;)

 

Problem here is, when a DCA or ex bank employee posts here now, everyone fears the worst and goes on the defensive. Even though some of them post useful and helpful info and are still sent packing because of the stigma of who they used to work for.

 

Now I have a chance to work for DCA. Don't really want to, but I'm so skint I don't have much choice. But I can earn enough to pay the bills and my internet access, and give some inside info to how a DCA works. And most of you know from my video's how I will dish the dirt and be honest about it.

 

So, are you going to view me with suspicion and accuse me of selling out and not give me a fair chance? Hopefully not. So why not give someone else a chance who provides inside info and not kick them down without giving them a chance first?

These are video links to show how I deal with Debt Collectors.

 

Fly fishing for C.A.R.S

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=zPtzK8FqE6k&feature=related

 

Frederickson International don't accept my card type

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=eiZBULlWW6Q&feature=related

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a copy of my letter received from J&P as the OP seems not to have posted theirs.

 

But it is just the standard drivel and I have posted this letter previously on my other thread, but they name both 1st Credit and Connaughts on the letter, so all in cohoots with each other,

 

JPSolicitorsConnought.jpg

 

YAY !!! at last

 

Now we know 1st Credit are passing the buck so someone else is to blame for the breches of OFT guidelines that they are guilty of.

 

ALF

These are video links to show how I deal with Debt Collectors.

 

Fly fishing for C.A.R.S

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=zPtzK8FqE6k&feature=related

 

Frederickson International don't accept my card type

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=eiZBULlWW6Q&feature=related

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now I have a chance to work for DCA. Don't really want to, but I'm so skint I don't have much choice. But I can earn enough to pay the bills and my internet access, and give some inside info to how a DCA works. And most of you know from my video's how I will dish the dirt and be honest about it.

So, are you going to view me with suspicion and accuse me of selling out and not give me a fair chance? Hopefully not. So why not give someone else a chance who provides inside info and not kick them down without giving them a chance first?

 

Dont worry FB...we wont accuse you of selling out if you do go to work for a DCA.

But you or the DCA can expect to be treated the same as any other DCA/DCA employee does on here, if need be ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont worry FB...we wont accuse you of selling out if you do go to work for a DCA.

But you or the DCA can expect to be treated the same as any other DCA/DCA employee does on here, if need be ;)

 

If need be I'll make a video of it when they sack me because I don't meet the vunerable debtor harassment targets.

 

When you have nothing left to lose in life, make it count and make a difference if you can. :D

 

That goes for me and any other ex DCA peeps here. Don't judge because we have to earn a roof over our heads and work for the other side for a while.

 

It doesn't make you a bad person because you worked for the enemy but used that knowledge against them later on. If I have to work for a DCA then I get to keep my internet access, and use the info later on to help future new CAG members.

 

The French Resistance in World War 2. They sacrificed a hell of a lot more to do their bit that enabled us to win in the long run. A member of my family gave his life in the RAF and another her life in the French Resitance doing their little bit to make a difference. That little bit cost them their lives. Our little bit costs nothing but a small risk and a bit of time.

 

We owe them a favour, that we won't give up fighting for what is right and decent in this world. Even if we think what we do is only a small amount.

 

That's what makes us British/ English/Irish/Welsh/Scottish. A little group of countries that somehow do better than a lot of larger ones. Why? Because we stick up for what is right and what we believe in. TOGETHER.

Edited by fuzzybobble

These are video links to show how I deal with Debt Collectors.

 

Fly fishing for C.A.R.S

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=zPtzK8FqE6k&feature=related

 

Frederickson International don't accept my card type

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=eiZBULlWW6Q&feature=related

Link to post
Share on other sites

I dread the day if & when the Caggers on here who know & adore you so much FB have to start treating you as one of the enemy effectivley.

None of us would get out any pleasure out of that.

But im sure you of all people would understand that it would have to be done if required ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now we know 1st Credit are passing the buck so someone else is to blame for the breches of OFT guidelines that they are guilty of.
Unfortunately for them they have not passed the buck and if they think they have they are misguided. The solicitors are acting under instruction. The breach remains.

 

Problem here is, when a DCA or ex bank employee posts here now, everyone fears the worst and goes on the defensive. Even though some of them post useful and helpful info and are still sent packing because of the stigma of who they used to work for.
Very few of them offer anything useful or insightful but I do agree that often they are jumped on and shouldn't be. I am usually quite happy to help anyone (dependant on their attitude rather than who they have worked for).

 

Having said that the last time I read an insight into how DCA's operate and the 'law' posted and stickied I might add on CAG it was a complete pile of ....

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5525 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...