Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi With the Section 21 Notice I do hope the Landlord issued you with: Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) for the Property How to Rent Guide A current Gas Safety Certificate (if gas in the Property) If above have not been provided to the Tenant by the Landlord then they can't use a Section 21 Notice until the above have been provided (note you don't warn the Landlord of this until but put it in your defence) Have a good read of this link: Evicting tenants in England: Section 21 and Section 8 notices - GOV.UK WWW.GOV.UK Information for landlords in England on tenant eviction: assured shorthold tenancies, including eviction notices, Section 21, Section 8, accelerated possession, possession orders, bailiffs  
    • good idea take some pix and put them in a PDF read UPLOAD dx
    • thread title updated moved to overseas debt forum. sadly as they are outside any UK jurisdiction upon DCA rules which state in the UK they must not call employers, there not alot you can do to stop these scammers. make sure you totally make private ALL social media twitter/facebook/linked in etc etc as there no-way for them to findout where you work otherwise so you must have a leak somewhere. find it. your employer details arent even legally available to UK DCA's so how have they found it out to date???  simply write to the BANK informing them of your correct and current address ALWAYS!!. if you want to arrange payment or not TO THE BANK ONLY thats upto you. never ever ignore a Statutory Demand a Letter Of Claim a Court Claimform. if if if any of those ever happen. till then ignore and rewash. dx    
    • Date of issue –   13 may 2024 AOS date 31st may defence filing date 14th june plenty of lowell card claimform threads here use our enhanced google searchbox Lowell card claimform id be reading at least 5-10 threads a day. do NOT MISS your defence filing whatever happens.  
    • Hello All,  I’m hoping someone can help me urgently here. Firstly, I’d like to say I have read multiple other threads and have some what an idea of what I should be doing, however my case might be slightly different so coming with my own questions here.    my situation is I lived in Dubai and had a credit card and a loan, loan with HSBC and credit card with Emirates (or the other way round), I lost my job and was forced to leave the country as I was staying in the country on my companies visa.    since coming back, after a few years 2 different debt collections agencies have been approaching me (one being IDRW and the other J&P). I’ve never answered IDRWW and they constantly chase me by calling and messaging me and my employer. My current company is ok with this as I explained the situation but I’m soon to be joining a new company who definitely won’t be ok with being messaged and called. I’m afraid to continue to ignore them as they may message and calm the new employer as they have before and I’ll lose my job. However, it seems clear from these forums that dealing with the debt collection agencies is never a good idea. You shouldn’t agree to the amount or pay anything.    j&p caught me on my phone but I still haven't sent them any money or confirmed the amount they’re saying is owed, they keep pushing to pay off the “principal” amount by making monthly payments, from reading these forums it seems like if I make one of those payments (they have provided bank details for ENBD), then it’ll just be paying off interest and not actually clearing the principle debt and the bank won’t even approve receipt of payment or that it’s coming off principle.    this is my predicament as ignoring them might not be an option if they chase my new employer. Maybe there’s a way to ensure the debt collection agency don’t contact my new employer?? I don’t know? Massively appreciate peoples help here. Thanks, 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

OH HSBC credit card debt


benjibutton
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4039 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Cerberus Alert

Sorry, I didn't make clear in my posting that in my bletter I stated full disclosure under CPR part 31.16(3) © & (D) would be rquired if no resolution was forthcoming - so I presume that I should now formally request this info as per template letters - ps HSBC hate template letters !!Cheers

Benjibutton

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 223
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi Cerberus Alert

Sorry, I didn't make clear in my posting that in my bletter I stated full disclosure under CPR part 31.16(3) © & (D) would be rquired if no resolution was forthcoming - so I presume that I should now formally request this info as per template letters - ps HSBC hate template letters !!Cheers

Benjibutton

 

Yep stick to the timetables in PT's thread and send the two template letters.

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Hi Guys/Gals

Latest news on battle with HSBC . Having inolved metropolitan after stating in letter "no further value in continued correspondence on this matter".I quoted this as being reason for no reply

They are now using Central Debt at Worthng to state doorstep collection- dated one week earlier than letter received-Also HSBC offered settlement figure on debt

Questions are

Have I got them running? Seems theyare just sending one rubbish letter a month

Saw newspaper article recently about older debts being unenforceable without signed agreement. O/H took out card in 70's

Thank you

Benjibutton

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they are offering settlement figures and the more pointless forms of enforcement ie home visitors, It would tend to lend credence to them not having too much to go on. But don't take that as gospel and there is a chance that they may possibly provide a copy of something enforceable at a later date,

 

but as a rule of thumb, the longer it takes them, the less likely that it actually exists and if it's from the 70's there is even likelihood of an agreement appearing.

 

How far is the debt off being statute barred? A debt is deemed to be statute barred when no acknowledgement of the debt is made, nor payment made against the debt for a period of at least 6 years,

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they are offering settlement figures and the more pointless forms of enforcement ie home visitors, It would tend to lend credence to them not having too much to go on. But don't take that as gospel and there is a chance that they may possibly provide a copy of something enforceable at a later date,

 

but as a rule of thumb, the longer it takes them, the less likely that it actually exists and if it's from the 70's there is even likelihood of an agreement appearing.

 

How far is the debt off being statute barred? A debt is deemed to be statute barred when no acknowledgement of the debt is made, nor payment made against the debt for a period of at least 6 years,

 

1970s must of been Midland Bank ? it was in the 70s that credit cards were sent out to all and sundry with no agreements, only excuse if you used it that was the agreemnet, they were issued under name "ACCESS" for Mastercard/visa, Interesting situation I would say, CCA them with a £1 fee, see what happens, if not satisfied SAR them cost £10 they have to respond then. Hope this helps.??????????????????? indication is that is what they are trying to settle with you, i.e. to get some monies out of you as so called settlement as they may not have a leg to stand on,(NO AGREEMENT) signed.???? But in the end settle for the least amount possible as Full & Final Settlement and all files recorded marked satisfied.???

:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Hi Guys/Gals

Ongoing saga - Wifes' HSBC card approx 12K.Have followed advice on here up to and including sending serious dispute letter to HSBC inDecemer 2008.

Many letters have passed including sending demands via Central Debt Unit and Dg solicitors nad Metropolitan Credit Services - all part of HSBC - all backed offf when letter regarding seriousv dispute quotedand also another letter from HSBC quoted "there is little value in continued correspondence in this matter",- which I of course agree with!

Now passed to Moorcroft above items quoted to them

Response is HSBC say No record of previous request. Also due to age of account no agreement is availoable. Account opened over 20 years ago.

What should my next action be?

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have to understand that HSBC tell lies. Whether this is deliberate or from stupidity I know not. But they do.

  • Haha 1

I really do appreciate all those 'thank you' emails - I'm glad I've been able to help. Apologies if I haven't acknowledged all of them.

You can also ding my gong if you prefer. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there

 

Once it's gone to Moor@crap then it's GAME OVER (for the OC).

 

Moor@crap is usually the lowest or last in the Pond life chain.

 

Those muppets wouldn't even know which end of their body their as----e is at.

 

Expect a letter from some "New division" such as "Pre School Division" -- That's what caggers refer to their "Pre Court Division".

 

Send a typical Prove it letter to those muppets.

 

You'll probably get about 3 or 4 more threatograms from their "Automated Processing Division" and then blissful silence.

 

No valid CCA -- no debt.

 

Cheers

jimbo

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Jimbo45 &palomino

Thank you for you responses I feel good.

It's not been easy as I am disabled and also have been suffering from depression through all this but now light at the end of the tunnel is NOT another b....y train!

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

Hi

Have gone route with HSBC to the "as you can't produce signed CC agreement you cannot prove debt or pass it on" stage. Been quiet for 6 months since they tried DCA route.

Now received letter from HSBC stating assigned rights,title to debt to Lowells.Interestingly HSBC letter doesn't have correspondence address on it. Am I right that this just needs a serious dispute" letter or what? Is Lowells just another DCA?All advice appreciated

Thank You

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Benji,

Lowells do also buy debt, what you received sounds like a notice of assignment.

As above, do nothing till they write, usually very politely at first, to introduce themselves.

Then you can equally politely inform them that the account is still in dispute.

What precise response did you have to your CCA request?

 

kind regards,

Elsa x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Elsa

HSBC couldn,t produce signed agreement etc and stated they had complied with all my request, and that "we have reached impasse and they could see no benefit in entering into further correspondence on this matter and stated I could refer to Finan. Ombudsman or Courts " Since then they have tried inhouse and external CA where I have used serious dispute letter.

Thank You

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Benji,

When they say they fully complied...was this because they sent a reconstructed agreement (without signature)?

Did they state at any point that they do not hold a copy of a signed agreement?

 

Just trying to establish the precise state of play as it affects what to say to Lowells.

 

Elsa x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok Benji, thanks.

As you may know, recent developments mean that they can send recons and don't HAVE to supply a signed agreement in response to a CCA request.

However the recon must be accurate, with your address at time of opening and correct inception T&C's, interest rates and prescribed terms and T&C's as varied.

Here's the latest OFT full guidance:

http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/business_leaflets/consumer_credit/OFT1272.pdf

So it depends whether their response was in line with this as to whether they are right or not.

 

 

However Lowells aren't that sharp, so lets wait and see what they have to say. :roll:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...