Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you. You contacted directly with the parcel broker so your best option is to proceed directly against them for breach of contract. I hope you have read enough to understand that you will not be able to rely on the Consumer Rights Act 2015. Do you understand why? Have Parcel to Go giving you a reason for declining reimbursement? Do you have anything in writing from your customer which shows that they did not refuse delivery and which identifies the actual circumstances of the situation?
    • Which Court have you received the claim from?  CIVIL NATIONAL BUSINESS CENTRE, NORTHAMPTON Name of the Claimant?  LOWELL PORTFOLIO LTD How many defendant's joint or self?  SELF Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to.  03 MAY 2024 Particulars of Claim What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim?  THE CLAIM IS FOR THE SUM OF £6000 DUE TO THE DEFENDANT UNDER AN AGREEMENT REGULATED BY THE CONSUMER ACT 1974 FOR A LLOYDS BANKING GROUP PLC ACCOUNT WITH AN ACCOUNT REFERENCE OF (ACCOUNT NO. 16 DIGITS LONG). THE DEFENDANT FAILED TO MAINTAIN CONTRACTUAL PAYMENTS REQUIRED BY THE AGREEMENT AND A DEFAULT NOTICE WAS SERVED UNDER S.87(1) OF THE CONSUMER ACT 1974 WHICH HAS NOT BEEN COMPLIED WITH. THE DEBT WAS LEGALLY ASSIGNED TO THE CLAIMANT ON (DATE) NOVEEMBER 2016 NOTICE OF WHICH HAS BEEN GIVEN TO THE DEFENDANT. THE CLAIM INCLUDES STATUORY INTEREST UNDER S.69 OF THE COUNTY COURTS ACT 1984 AT A RATE OF 8% PER ANNUM FOR THE DATE PF ASSIGNMENT TO THE DATE OF ISSUE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS IN THE SUMBE OF £0.00. THE CLAIMANT CLAIMS THE SUM OF £6000. What is the total value of the claim? £6500 Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? YES, NOTICES OF CLAIM.  Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred?  YES  Did you inform the claimant of your change of address?  NO Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account?  CREDIT CARD When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007?  BEFORE   Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post?  I DONT RECALL   Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ?  NO   Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim.  DEBT PURCHASER.   Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? THE FIRST I RECALL WAS A LETTER FROM LOWELL SAYING THEY NOW OWNED THE DEBT.  Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor?  NOT THAT I RECALL OR BEEN PROVIDED WITH THROUGH CCA REQUESTS.AT LAST REQUEST THEY SAID THEY WERE AWAITING THE DEFAULT NOTICE AND NO ACTION WOULD BE TAKEN UNTIL RESPONDED WHICH TO DATE I'VE NOT HAD OR SEEN.  Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ?  NO, I RECEIEVED LETTERS OF CLAIMS   Why did you cease payments?  I WAS UNDER MEDICAL CARE WHICH CAUSED ME NOT TO WORK. AROUND THAT TIME LOWELL HAD WANTED ME TO INCREASE MY PAYMENTS AS IT WOULD TAKE TOO LONG TO CLEAR THE DEBT. I HAD BEEN PAYING THEM WHAT I WAS PAYING THE BANK. I EXPLAINED MY THEN HEALTH & FINANCIAL POSITION AND THAT I WAS UNABLE TO DO SO. THEY PUT A HOLD ON MY ACCOUNT FOR A FEW MONTHS SO I CANCELLED MY DIRECT DEBIT. I MADE A FULL AND FINAL OFFER WHICH WAS REJECTED. WHEN THEY WANTED PAYMENTS TO RESUME I EXPLAINED I WAS IN A WORSE FINANCIAL POSITION, STILL UNDERTAKING TREATMENT AND NOW UNEMPLOYED SO COULD NOT START PAYMENTS AS THEY WANTED. AFTER SENDING MY FINANCIAL SPREADSHEET THEY KEPT SENDING LETTERS ASKING WHAT I WAS GOING TO DO. I COULDN’T SEE A WAY FORWARD I FELT STREESSED AND UNDER PRESSURE SO WROTE THAT I WOULD NOT BE CORRESPONDING WITH THEM ANYMORE.    What was the date of your last payment? NOVEMBER / DECEMBER 2018   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? NO   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? I COMMUNICATED MY FINANCIAL PROBLEMS WITH THE CREDIT CARD COMPANY, WE MADE A MONTHLY PAYMENT AGREEMENT WHICH WAS KEPT FOR SEVERAL YEARS UNTIL DEBT WAS SOLD.  
    • Perhaps you would care to read this and reflect on your continuing comparison of Israel to Nazi Germany Jugg    ALEX BRUMMER: How grotesque of pro-Palestine protesters to besmirch Auschwitz, the place where my grandparents died WWW.DAILYMAIL.CO.UK As the son of a refugee from the horrors of the Holocaust, I can feel nothing but contempt for the ignorance, gross... My elderly aunt Sussie and cousin Sheindy had been teenagers at Auschwitz and Belsen but survived and are alive to this day. What they will make of the protesters who waved flags, heckled and chanted as Israelis took part in the March Of The Living – the annual walk from Auschwitz to Birkenau – I cannot imagine. The images now circulating of the protesters are indescribably disturbing. They can only bring back memories of those final moments Sheindy shared with my grandparents when my grandmother Fanya squeezed her hand and told her to lie about her age to avoid the gas chambers. Claiming she was older, and could work, meant that Sheindy lived, not died. The outrage perpetrated by Hamas on October 7 has brought back the most terrifying memories for these two women – memories of pillage, mutilation and starvation. The Holocaust, or Shoah to use the Hebrew word, was the deliberate, industrial-scale killing of Jews.  It is bad enough that pro-Palestinian and pro-Hamas sympathisers have chosen to steal the language of the Holocaust.  Any comparison between Israel's retaliation and the monstrous genocide of the 1940s is odious and anti-Semitic
    • Thank you JK2054 and BankFodder for your replies. The information requested is as follows:   My wife and I are sole traders supplying bespoke, handmade wedding trays and other items through our website. We do not sell on ebay. We had an order for two trays (invoice value £370) that were shipped on Monday 25th March. We used P2G as the broker and Evri as the shipper. We declared the value but did not take out insurance. As the trays were a present for a wedding on Saturday 30th March we checked the progress of delivery on the Thursday to see that there had been an attempt to deliver on the 27th but the driver failed to deliver as the customer’s gate was shut (customer informs us that the gates are open between 7am-7pm. We contacted the customer who informed us she had been waiting in all week and there had been no attempt of a delivery. Evri allege they attempted to deliver on the 28th & 29th. On the P2G web site on the 4th April at 14.17 it stated that the customer refused delivery. At 14.28 it updated to say there was a problem with the address and at 14.32 updated to say the customer had refused delivery. At 14.35 updated again to say it was being returned. Last entry was on the 7th April that it was being processed at the depot. We never received it. I have had six web chats with P2G between the 4th-30th April. On the 26th April, I had an offer of £20 plus cost of delivery (£6.72) from P2G which I rejected. During this time, I also contacted Evri that resulted in an email from Evri Customer Services (20th April) stating that they had lost the parcel. I replied requesting details of the attempted delivery but received no reply. After emailing Evri again on the 23rd asking again for the information I received a phone call from someone called Haleemah on the 25th who apologised and promised to send an email with a link to submit a claim form. I subsequently received an email with the link which only took me to a page that stated “Page not found”. After informing Evri customer services of the problem (to which no reply was forthcoming) a couple of days later I retried the link but it only took me to the Evri website. I believe that I have a good case against both companies but would appreciate guidance on which path to go down. I have read most of the information on this site, which has been very helpful and much appreciated, particularly the various court transcripts. I appreciate that this process is a marathon and not a sprint and am fully aware that I need to get everything in the correct order before starting on the legal road. I am sure this covers the current position but if further info is needed please let me know.  
    • Everything at small claims revolves around informality and common sense, there are no "special" ways to have to do things. The site manager's WS will be like yours and the one I linked to - just much shorter.  There need to be the introductory hearings about the case, the parties, etc., and the concluding Statement of Truth. In the middle just a couple of paragraphs where they say who they are, how they know you, and about permission being given by the landowner to use the car park. Superb.  I've added another section about the signage to the suggested WS sections three posts above. Yes, it's perfectly possible.  It'd be a good idea to phone the court on the 18th to see if they have paid.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Parking eye charge notice - reply or ignore it?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4566 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 114
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I have now had 35 of these speculative invoices, 16 from Parking Eye (Hi guys:wave:) Rather sad to say nothing more than silly threatening letters, on the plus side the hamster has enough bedding for the next 12 months.

regards

Please remember our troops, fighting and dying in our name. God protect them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have received a parking penalty from Parking Eye. The sign reads Monday 8AM to Saturday 8PM which I interpreted as Monday to Saturday 8AM to 8PM. I paid for 1 hour (7:30PM to 8:30PM). Now they (Parking Eye, NOT the council) have sent me a parking fine saying Total Time in Car Park is 1 hr and 50 mins, Time Allowed is 0 hrs 0 mins, which is not true since I purchased a ticket for 1 hour.I dont know whether to appeal, or to write complaint (if you look at it, they got the time allowed in car park section wrong)Common sense tells me to not bother appealing with "I intended to pay but there was a misunderstanding, etc etc) as i will fall into deaf ears. However I am worried that they might link this to my car and wmay show up on DVLA records.Does anyone know if:i)Parking Eye have successfully sued anyone or sent collectors or have successfully managed to extract moneyii) What is the Worst Case Scenario for me if I ignore all letters?iii) What are Parking Eye capable of?iv) Can Parking Eye affect my DVLA records?I will be really grateful if someone can answer my questions. I am really worried as this will set me back by £120 (£90 fine + £30 admin fees) which I cannot afford. But I do not want to end up paying more PLEASE HELP.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is not a "fine" it's an invoice you can ignore. They won't send in "collectors" (whatever they are are) and they won't take you to court.

 

 

 

cheers guys. my main concern (and what i meant by DVLA records) what that the car reg maybe linked to the unpaid charges. however i think i'll take your advices and ignore the letters.

 

i am amazed that they issue such letters when then cant take us to court. just for clarity, can they not take us to court or they tend not to?

Link to post
Share on other sites

They won't take you to court because legally they can only claim for the actual loss suffered by the landowner. In your case this amounts to a couple of pounds. If they claimed anything above that that would be classed as an unfair penalty. Unfortunately it's estimated that about two thirds of motorists just pay up (even though they don't have to). This is because they look at the official looking but meaningless paperwork, get frightened or scared. and pay up without question. So spread the word to everyone you know and tell them that they don't have to pay these private parking invoices.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there. The guys here know what they're doing, you can trust them.

 

Just to add a little to what's been said, you will get a series of letters that are dressed up to look ever more scary and threatening, called threatograms here. If you get spooked by them, and people do, come back here for a pep talk. There's a link somewhere here to another thread that shows the letter trail in advance, although I'm not sure they're Parking Eye ones.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does anyone know if: i)Parking Eye have successfully sued anyone or sent collectors or have successfully managed to extract money

Impossible. They can't sue you for this because they made up their own rules - you've not done anything illegal and you haven't hurt them in any way so you've nothing to answer. As for sending "collectors" if anyone claiming to be a "collector" ever turned up, just tell them that they are wasting their time and ask them to go and take a walk in the local pond. What are they going to do then? sulk!

 

ii) What is the Worst Case Scenario for me if I ignore all letters?

Legally, they could sue you for breaching a contract, and claim about a pound from you - which you can then give them. Realistically, nothing will happen because it's a complete waste of everyone's time, including the court's.

 

iii) What are Parking Eye capable of?

Irritating people. Tricking them into paying with scary letters.

 

iv) Can Parking Eye affect my DVLA records?

No way. DVLA records are subject to the data protection act. Parking eye can pay to see them (which is to say, your name and address) but that's all. They are of course wasting their own money!

 

- so in a nutshell, as said above, you should completely ignore the issue. One day you will realise they haven't posted you a letter for months, and then you'll know they've given up. Meantime, don't worry.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am new to this forum... so i hope you all would bear with me

 

I just passed my driving test and took my husbands car to drop my mum at the national express in chorley road Manchester. I parked in a parking eye car park and on the board it clearly stated weekday parking and this was a Sunday---- so i assumed parking was free since it was a weekend.

 

About 6 days later, we got a letter from parking eye to my husband noting that he parked in their car park for xx mins(less than 30mins) so he has to pay £60 or it would increase to £90 after 14days. I have been worried sick because first of all it was not my husband driving the car but me and secondly the board stated tariffs for weekdays very boldly and i didn't know that was for all week.

 

I have been reading this thread and most people suggest that they are ignored as they are private. I don't know what to do, should i pay a little like £10 or ignore completely. £60 is just too much, i cannot pay that at all.....

 

What to you all think? Thanks in advance....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just ignore them. It's as simple as that.

 

Thank you very much for the quick reply. Do you think i will get into trouble since i didn't pay at all? I am also very concerned for my husband who was not really driving the car...... if you understand where i am coming from.... thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you very much for the quick reply. Do you think i will get into trouble since i didn't pay at all? I am also very concerned for my husband who was not really driving the car...... if you understand where i am coming from.... thanks

 

 

Parking Eye just send a series of letters from them and then a pet debt collectors, they then cease and go worry someone else. I personally have invited Parking eye to take me to court, they never accepted my challenge! [before the ignore approach]

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just wanted to say thank you to you people for saving me £40

 

I've just received a Parking Charge Notice from Parking Eye for outstaying my welcome in Aldi by 16 mins. I cursed myself and prepared to write out a cheque, but thought I'd have a scout round tinternet first, and learned that I don't have to pay this at all !

Brilliant, thanks again.

 

I've spread the word on Facebook and written a cross letter to Aldi saying I'll now be doing all my shopping at the nearby Asda

 

(I'm now going to brace myself for the increasingly-threatening letters).

Link to post
Share on other sites

No probs splargoth since my daughter got her first one several yrs ago and is well into 400 now the family always park for free where ever we go. If its council run then buy a ticket for the time your there, but if its a private firm on private land, and parking eye are one of these park for free and ignore their letters. If yr up to 3 letters well done :) only 3 more to come and the threats get worse but trust me they amount to nothing. Once you get to 6 letters ( solicitor ) then you have made it, after that they all go in the bin because you ignored them. Look at the address even the debt collectors are in the same building and guess what so is the solicitor. Pls dont worry and save yr money there are better things you need than lining the pockets of these thieves. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

If its council run then buy a ticket for the time your there, but if its a private firm on private land, and parking eye are one of these park for free and ignore their letters.

 

spikes, I trust you are not advocating that people should park without paying in a "pay and display" car park just because it is run by a PPC? CAG does not support failing to pay for parking (when a charge is clearly shown) just because it is not council run.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think for one minute that the majority of subscribers would suggest non payment at pay and display car parks. What needs to be seriously questioned is the methods of enforcement by the private companies who assume the right to impose penalties, they then supposedly conduct their own appeals procedure or fishing exercise as I would prefer to call it. Furthermore, they try and justify their existance by quoting the British Parking Association who in my opinion are nothing more than a front for this [problem] industry.

 

AGAINST THIS BACKGROUND, I WOULD NEVER GIVE CONSIDERATION TO PAYING ONE OF THESE INVOICES.

 

From experience if the recipient ignores all THIRD PARTY AGENTS and raises the controversial points surrounding these penalties with the landowners and suggest that they want the issue clarified by a court, they drop them like a stone.

Edited by Crocdoc
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys

 

I totally agree with croc; their rapacious business model is more 'display and pay' rather than the converse, with the 'pay' being done by a minority of punters, some of whom are recidivist miscreants but the vast majority of whom, ie me, encountered a queue at Aldi checkout. The ethics of the situation are nicely resolved in the voluntary nature of any payment to these bandits; as Father Ted put it, 'This would be an ecumenical question.'

 

love

 

vic

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh so what yr saying crem is that they can sting, big money, some poor un educated folks, ie this forum, for overstaying FREE periods in a car park run by them, but I should not get away with not paying my £1 or two in a car park run by cowboys ????? think not :whoo::whoo::cheer2: My daughter has far exceed my expectations by collecting over 400 now and she is in the Police..... Nice to see she takes after Daddy :peace:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh so what yr saying crem is that they can sting, big money, some poor un educated folks, ie this forum, for overstaying FREE periods in a car park run by them, but I should not get away with not paying my £1 or two in a car park run by cowboys

 

No, what I am saying, as I am sure do all the morally upstanding members of CAG, is that where a parking service is offered, and a reasonable charge rate set for that service (eg £1.00 per hour, pay and display ticket) then that fee should be paid to remain in the car park for an agreed and paid for length of time. If you intentionally park your car in in the carpark and subsequentlly don't pay the fee, then that is theft and would not be condoned by CAG site team nor most of CAG members.

 

What we as members do support and help fight is where an innocent person is being unfairly victimised for "having one wheel over a white line", or "staying 2 minutes beyond a 2 hour limit in a free car park" etc , etc

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4566 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...