Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • dont go near them bunch of scammers! ive removed ref. dx  
    • I used to post regularly in order to provide factual information (rather than advice) but got fed up with banging my head against a brick wall in so many cases when posters insisted black was white and I was writing rubbish. I have never posted anything which was untrue or indeed biased in any way.  I have never given 'advice' but have sought to correct erroneous statements which were unhelpful. The only username I have ever used is blf1uk. I have never gone under any other username and have no connection to 'bailiff advice'.  I am not a High Court Enforcement Officer but obtained my first 'bailiff' certificate in 1982. I'm not sure what records you have accessed but I was certainly not born in 1977 - at that time I was serving in the Armed Forces in Hereford, Germany (4th Division HQ) and my wife gave birth to our eldest.   Going back to the original point, the fact is that employees of an Approved Enforcement Agency contracted by the Ministry of Justice can and do execute warrants of arrest (with and without bail), warrants of detention and warrants of commitment. In many cases, the employee is also an enforcement agent [but not acting as one]. Here is a fact.  I recently submitted an FOI request to HMCTS and they advised me (for example) that in 2022/23 Jacobs (the AEA for Wales) was issued with 4,750 financial arrest warrants (without bail) and 473 'breach' warrants.  A breach warrant is a community penalty breach warrant (CPBW) whereby the defendant has breached the terms of either their release from prison or the terms of an order [such as community service].  While the defendant may pay the sum [fine] due to avoid arrest on a financial arrest warrant, a breach warrant always results in their transportation to either a police station [for holding] or directly to the magistrates' court to go before the bench as is the case on financial arrest warrants without bail when they don't pay.  Wales has the lowest number of arrest warrants issued of the seven regions with South East exceeding 50,000.  Overall, the figure for arrest warrants issued to the three AEAs exceeds 200,000.  Many of these were previously dealt with directly by HMCTS using their employed Civilian Enforcement Officers but they were subject to TUPE in 2019 and either left the service or transferred to the three AEAs. In England, a local authority may take committal proceedings against an individual who has not paid their council tax and the court will issue a committal summons.  If the person does not attend the committal hearing, the court will issue a warrant of arrest usually with bail but occasionally without bail (certainly without bail if when bailed on their own recognizance the defendant still fails to appear).   A warrant of arrest to bring the debtor before the court is issued under regulation 48(5) of The Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992 and can be executed by "any person to whom it is directed or by any constable....." (Reg 48(6).  These, although much [much] lower in number compared to HMCTS, are also dealt with by the enforcement agencies contracted by the local authorities. Feel free to do your own research using FOI enquiries!  
    • 3rd one seems the best option, let 'em default, don't pay a penny, nothing will happen, forget about all of this. As for Payplan don't touch them with a bargepole, nothing they can do that you can't, and they will pocket fees. A do it yourself DMP is pointless as it will just string out the statute barred date to infinity.
    • Because that’s what the email said. Anyway it’s done now. Posted and image emailed.    im doing some reading in preparation for defence but I will need my hand holding quite tightly by you good people.  I’m a little bit clueless
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Are you a victim of deceptive pricing? - Shrinking Groceries


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5470 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

In Tesco's again.....

 

Loose white potatoes were £1.28 / kilo (I think). Bagged white potatos were priced per potato - I think it was 17p per potato. However, weighing the pre-bagged ones worked out at twice as much as the loose ones per kilo!

 

I have said it before but NEVER be embarrased about using the weighing equipment in store. I have done it and attracted the attention some uppity who was quite surprised at the price difference and started doing it herself.

 

There doesn't seem to be any scales in my local tescos or sainsburys:(

 

General thought: Eggs have rocketed in price "because of the increased cost of grain to feed the hens". So isn't it strange that the cost of an oven-ready chicken hasn't increased - these birds need feeding too.

 

Depends what you're buying really. Free range/Organic have gone up considerably, but battery hasn't. They die sooner so need less food, so we're not charged for it.I guess because the battery ones are so pumped full of water they can start off as a much smaller bird but be made to look bigger with 'additions' When you think about it logically, we all know the battery birds have a much shorter lifespan than the Free Range etc, and unless they hit full grown in a matter of a month or two must be killed when they are smaller, yet they are always as big as the more natural birds...

  • Haha 1

Time flies like an arrow...

Fruit flies like a banana.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 151
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Razor blades full stop are evil - one thing to look out for is often you get a full sized 'holder' for blades in a new razor, but only 1/2 blades actually in it. Can often seem like a new razor is the cheaper option when in reality you're getting half (or less!) the cutting-power for well more than half the price!

 

 

I recently had to switch to the old face shredders (disposables) because the price of blades rocketed so much :(

 

Oh yeah, the other one - often you'll find identical blades with vastly different prices. If a certain un-named brand has a regular razor and, say, one that vibrates you'll find the blades for the vibrator (ohh err missus) are invariably priced higher even though they're EXACTLY the same thing!

 

 

Some time ago I switched to an old-fashioned safety razor (though a modern version), and have not looked back. A far closer shave than with multi-bladed contraptions, and the replacement blades are very cheap. I also use a brush and shaving soap - a tub of Trumpers soap lasts over a year and is cheaper than using aerosol gels and creams.

 

I also echo the recommendation of Lidl. I used them regularly when I lived in Germany, and use them now here. Their fruit and veg is usually excellent, and their fresh meat is all locally sourced.

 

As a further economy measure, I have spent some of the morning chopping logs for the woodburner - we have a dual system, and using the woodburner will save on oil. All the logs came from fallen boughs around our yard. I have half a dozen chickens on order, so we'll be self-sufficient in eggs soon.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Mine is a Merkur, but you can get much cheaper razors. I've had mine a year now, so it's cost me less than £3/month including blades, and it'll last for years, so I saw it as a good investment. Blades are about £4 for 10, and they're double-sided. One edge of a blade gives me a good shave for 5 days minimum.

 

Amazon sell both razors and blades, but there are lots of places to buy on the internet.

 

It does take a few days to get used to using a safety razor, but it's worth perservering - you'll feel the difference.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fruit Pastilles lollies:

dsc00058sz1.th.jpg

 

dsc00059dx8.th.jpgthpix.gif

 

Naughty.

Post by me are intended as a discussion of the issues involved, as these are of general interest to me and others on the forum. Although it is hoped such discussion will be of use to readers, before exposing yourself to risk of loss you should not rely on any principles discussed without confirming the situation with a qualified person.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd like to know what blades are compatible with otehr razors - I read somewhere that tesco's own brand razors (the mind shudders) are made to fit gilette M3 power?

 

I don't know whether the Tesco own brand fits anything else and if so what but I do know that the Tesco own brand razors are the nastiest things that I have had the misfortune to use. My advice to you is don't go there - unless you want one of the world's most uncomfortable shaves!

My posts are offered informally, without prejudice and without liability. You should seek the advice of a qualified insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tesco's own brand Tuna chunks in veg/sunflower oil;

 

4 single cans 185g @ £0.65 each = £2.60

multi-pack 4 x 185g = £2.99

Please note: I have no qualifications in this area and any advice offered is given in good faith.

 

 

http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/publications/Ombudsman-news/40/40_setoff.htm

Link to post
Share on other sites

What gets me with Tescos now is the launching of "new" brands and all the claims by Tesco and other supermarkets that they are all cheaper than each other. Wouldn't it be nice if there was some website that compared best prices, ordered from them and delivered without incurring some huge fee? Or better still, for the supermarkets to put their money where there mouth is and offer price matches for the same (or equivalent) brands in other stores.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Along the same lines of your irritation with new brands gyzmo, my pet hate is that Tesco (they seem to be hugely into this in the last couple of years) will bring out a new brand, and if it sells well, discontinue it and bring out their own take on it but at about the same price.

 

I'm also noticing in my two local T's - one of which is huge - they seem to just generally be replacing branded goods with their own ones. This wouldn't worry me so much if they were cheaper and the same quality as the branded ones, but frequently they aren't either.

 

Sainsburys were bad for only supplying own label stuff a good few years ago, but they seem to be much better now and offer a decent variety. The difference is their own label stuff is often pretty good!

 

And one I've just thought of - Tescos Stars cereal. I really like this (I buy it for my children, honestly:oops:), but they've put the price up by about a third recently. The reason? They've added a picture of Tigger to the box and called it a Disney cereal!

Time flies like an arrow...

Fruit flies like a banana.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hope Disney were consulted (and Kellogs)!

 

On these now "discount" brands they seem to be introducing, I'm going to avoid like the plague in the future.

 

My flatmate bought two bottles of wine (Carte Noir Malbec) at £2.99 a bottle and it tastes like, well, heavily watered down vodka with one ml of vimto in it. (and before anyone has a go at me for buying cheap wine there are some good ones. Tesco's Gran Tezoro at £3.29 is one of my favourites and I have had far worse wines costing 5 times that price - and it has also featured in the Times recommendations, so :p).

 

Then there is the "creamfields" (awww how quaint!) cheese described as mature. Again, no taste whatsoever.

 

I'm considering class action under s.13 of SoGA and under the Food Safety Act ss 14, 15 (selling food not as described and not of nature, substance or quality demanded)

Link to post
Share on other sites

snip...

My flatmate bought two bottles of wine (Carte Noir Malbec) at £2.99 a bottle and it tastes like, well, heavily watered down vodka with one ml of vimto in it. (and before anyone has a go at me for buying cheap wine there are some good ones. Tesco's Gran Tezoro at £3.29 is one of my favourites and I have had far worse wines costing 5 times that price - and it has also featured in the Times recommendations, so :p).

 

 

Tesco own Valpolicella, Montipulciano and Chianti are all £3.19 and quite drinkable, hic (certainly by the second bottle anyway). There also currently doing a Chasse Du Pape Reserve Cotes Du Rhone for £4.68 which is very drinakable indeed, hih hic :p

 

skb

Victory over Lloyds £890

Click!

Victory over Vodafone: default removal

click!

Victory over Lloyds PPI claim £2606 click!

Barclaycard lazygoing - £580 + £398 contractual int at 17.7 % click! (Received partial payment £110 21/11/06)

The GF's battle against RBS click! stayed awaiting the end of the world

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've also noted that both sainburys and waitrose both stock home brand Valpolicella and Montipulciano at the same price. So, purely in the name of science, I purchased them with a view to comparing them with their competitors. After drinking a bottle of each in rapid succession I came to the conclusion that not only do they get you nicely trollyed but they were also all exactly the same wine.

 

skb

Victory over Lloyds £890

Click!

Victory over Vodafone: default removal

click!

Victory over Lloyds PPI claim £2606 click!

Barclaycard lazygoing - £580 + £398 contractual int at 17.7 % click! (Received partial payment £110 21/11/06)

The GF's battle against RBS click! stayed awaiting the end of the world

Link to post
Share on other sites

After drinking a bottle of each in rapid succession I came to the conclusion that not only do they get you nicely trollyed but they were also all exactly the same wine.

 

skb

 

:lol::lol::lol: Didn't think anyone else used 'trolleyed' anymore:-D

Time flies like an arrow...

Fruit flies like a banana.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd like to know how long HMV think a "sale" should last for.

 

This may no longer be true but a few years ago the higher price quoted for comparison with the "sale" price had to have been the selling price of the item for at least 28 consecutive days in the last six months. Unfortunately, in chain stores it did not have to be in the same branch.

Halifax (current accounts, credit card, old mortgage, secured loan)

thread here

 

MBNA (three credit cards)

thread here

firstdirect (a current account, two mortgage accounts, old loans, old credit card)

they've sold my current account. thread here.

 

Royal Mail

Claim issued by former employer Royal Mail, thread here.

I counterclaimed and won. They paid in full.

Link to post
Share on other sites

General thought: Eggs have rocketed in price "because of the increased cost of grain to feed the hens".

 

Which is a consignment of geriatric shoe manufacturers, as we all know. Two or three years ago, half a dozen eggs cost 28p in our local Tesco. The price had roughly tripled before there was any word of increasing grain prices. (-;

Halifax (current accounts, credit card, old mortgage, secured loan)

thread here

 

MBNA (three credit cards)

thread here

firstdirect (a current account, two mortgage accounts, old loans, old credit card)

they've sold my current account. thread here.

 

Royal Mail

Claim issued by former employer Royal Mail, thread here.

I counterclaimed and won. They paid in full.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This may no longer be true but a few years ago the higher price quoted for comparison with the "sale" price had to have been the selling price of the item for at least 28 consecutive days in the last six months. Unfortunately, in chain stores it did not have to be in the same branch.

 

My understanding now is that a pre-sale price has to be at that price for a reasonable length of time. Would love the legislators to work that one out. Why we brought in the CPUT regs I do not know. There are some benefits, mainly the banned practices in the appendices, but the rest is a nightmare. We had previously prescriptive measures covering specific areas. Now we have a load of subjective drivel. But anyway....

 

I remember this particular wine in m local tesco - was always priced at £3.99 and it seemed hardly anyone bought it. Then they put a sale sign up saying it was reduced to half price. Needless to say, it was still £3.99 but they were sold out the day after!

 

I always thought that the law should have been changed so that a sale item had to be sold at the higher price in that particular store to prevent customers being fleeced. But nooooo

Link to post
Share on other sites

Specifically Vodafone (others may apply) - spend £2.50 before 18:00 on Friday, and you qualify for free texts from 18:00 Friday to Midnight Sunday.

 

They recently moved the goalposts so that the qualifying parameters were Midnight Friday to Midnight Sunday...a reduction of 11% in the free text mode, and an increase of 5% in the non free text mode (i.e. when you are paying for usage)

 

It was subtlely done, and took a couple of weeks to realise that my texts between 18:00 and Midnight on Friday were costing money...

 

Vodaphone once started charging me more (for 0845 numbers, I think) than was printed in the contract. Had to make a small claim for the ₤12 overcharging in the end - they paid up because, they said, it "wouldn't be cost effective to defend the claim".

 

 

I would advise anybody in a similar situation to demand their money back, and make a small claim if they have to.

Edited by samsmoot
Reformat
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I was bored last Monday, so I thought I would send a few emails to pass the time. I thought I would go through the entire list and see what would be said about these shrinkages - not that I thought I'd get any truths, rather to see what spin they would put on it. The generic letter I produced, turned out not to be so easily tweaked for each one, so gave up after 3. :D

 

I started with the beans in post one, then onto Cadbury's in post two. By then I jumped straight to Ginsters as it was annoying me as to who was being so darned cheeky, the retailer or the manufacturer. As it turns out I emailed, or used the on line feedback, only for manufacturers. I've had a reply of Ginsters.

 

I wrote, and no my name is not Pedro, nor am I an editor!

 

To: Ginsters Reception

Subject: 'Shrinking Groceries'

 

 

Hello,

 

My name is Pedro Rodriguez, I am a 3rd year student preparing an essay regarding 'Shrinking Groceries', and also the editor of my universities thrice yearly 'almanac'.

 

For reasons pertaining to my essay, and a feature in our forthcoming publication, I wondered if I could acquire Ginsters response to the following facts. I would be extremely grateful to publish your viewpoint on the matter and of course your express permission to do so.

 

Amongst other evident shrinkages to maintain profit margins for the manufacturer, rather than play fair with the consumer, the misleading offer surrounding the sale of your products is alarming and thus must be dealt with, if for no other reason than alerting the general public. Could you please verify if promotions such as the following are the marketing whizz of your company, or are that of the retailer? A local ‘Spar’ close to our university is selling your product (standard pasty) at £1.69 BOGOF (buy one, get one free) Sceptics amongst my fellow students/reporters believe this is to mislead the consumer.

On a recent field trip to Lancaster, we, by chance, had Ginsters pasties for lunch. The cost, or RRP (please advise as to this), was 90 pence. So, you see, pricing at £1.69 can not be tolerated as a price for the sake of pulling the wool over the consumers eyes via a ‘BOGOF’. All it does is ensure the retailer sells two, rather than one, as the price is nearly double. In these harsh economic times it appears the retailer, or yourselves, not only tries to salvage sales, but double them at the same time.

This report will also conclude on BOGOF offers and the truth behind the inflated price which makes this ‘deal’ viable only to the manufacturer/retailer.

 

Whilst I will go ahead and print our opinion, backed up with photographic evidence, I would very much like to print your response in the spirit of fairness. I have a statement of the local retailer that alleges this mater is wholly to do with the manufacturer.

 

Regards

 

Pedro

 

 

Dear Pedro

Thank you for your email.

We would like to make a few points which we hope you will find helpful.

We sell our products to the stores at a wholesale price, but we do not decide the retail price on shelf. (Competition law forbids manufacturers from dictating the price at which their products are sold to the consumer.) So the retailer is free to set whatever retail price they think is suitable for their business. As a result you will see some wide variation in the prices at which our products are sold when compared across the different types of retailer.

When it comes to price promotions, again there are laws in place that prevent anyone suddenly putting up the retail price in order to then run a price promotion. The law states that a product has to be on sale at a particular price for a minimum period of 28 days before a store can run a promotion based on that price.

I hope this will reassure you that there is a framework in place that protects the consumer.

From our perspective, we aim to produce good quality foods from locally sourced fresh ingredients, and always do our best to ensure our range offers good value for money for our consumers.

Kind regards,

Larry File

Brand Communications Manager

So my local Spar is the culprit, the cheek of them....I bet when the BOGOF is finished they won't stay at £1.69. :rolleyes:

 

I'll post up what HP (Heinz) and Cadbury's say if they can be bothered to get back to me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone else getting brassed off about LARD - we used to buy 500g - now we can only get it in 250g blocks for 31p - which is just about what 500g used to cost a few months back - chiselling swivvelers - if any one knows where we can get 500g please reply!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone else getting brassed off about LARD - we used to buy 500g - now we can only get it in 250g blocks for 31p - which is just about what 500g used to cost a few months back - chiselling swivvelers - if any one knows where we can get 500g please reply!

 

I think you'll find this price change is more to do with the Catering industry now buying larger quantities of Lards and Dripping for deep fat frying foods more recently. Maybe the manufacturers realise they can achieve a higher price?

 

Couple of reasons I read about were -

 

1) the price of cooking oils (rapeseed, veggie oils etc..) shot through the ceiling with the Gov'ts bid to stop car drivers using cooking oil to run their cars on cause it was cheaper than diesel/petrol. So Oil prices were raised to meet petrol prices kind of things - this resulted in lots of catering industry switching to use Lards and Drippings for cooking etc.. as it was more affordable. (To accomodate vegetarians most places just keep one oil fryer for their foods)

 

2) there was something to do with obesity & cholestrol = Lards and Dripping have different properties that were supposed to be healthier than these oils for cooking foods (saturates, mono saturates, polyunsaturates etc..) the switch in usage was meant to be beneficial to health etc..

 

I don't think retalers are going to miss any opportunity to gain higher price margins for goods if they can help it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone noticed the offers that are not offers at all if you look at the individual price i.e 2 for £2 but look at the individual price and they are £1 each.

 

I noticed this last friday while at asda walmart in Havant i forget what it was for now but ill look again this saturday and post again.

 

Regards

 

Leon

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A pint of semi-skimmed has been 42p for several months in my local M&S, Coop, Tesco and Sainsbury. Last Wednesday in M&S it was suddenly 45p, an increase of over seven percent! Not yet seen if the rest of them have increased too.

 

Still cheaper than Boots, Superdrug and Spar, who are all 54p.

Halifax (current accounts, credit card, old mortgage, secured loan)

thread here

 

MBNA (three credit cards)

thread here

firstdirect (a current account, two mortgage accounts, old loans, old credit card)

they've sold my current account. thread here.

 

Royal Mail

Claim issued by former employer Royal Mail, thread here.

I counterclaimed and won. They paid in full.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...