Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I did as soon as i received the grade, i was on annual leave over December and my line manager was due to leave on the 15th December, i did not receive the review until i returned to work. SO i never had the opportunity to have a review. I challenged it straight away and raised a complaint to HR, who never responded to me,
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
    • 2 foot of sea level rise   The Thwaites Glacier — dubbed the “Doomsday” glacier because of the grave impacts for global sea level rise if it melts — is breaking down “much faster” than expected, according to a peer-reviewed study published on Monday in the academic journal, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Using satellite imagery, scientists determined that widespread contact between the glacier and warm ocean water is speeding up the melting process. The climate crisis is interrupting natural processes across large parts of the continent, according to the Antarctic and Southern Ocean Coalition. The glacier, roughly the size of the United Kingdom, could cause global sea levels to rise more than two feet if it melts completely, according to the study. “Thwaites is the most unstable place in the Antarctic and contains the equivalent of 60 centimeters of sea level rise,” study co-author Christine Dow said in a statement. “The worry is that we are underestimating the speed that the glacier is changing, which would be devastating for coastal communities around the world,” she continued. Read the full story here.       or here ... from the India civil service currents affairs exam Doomsday glacier Antarctica‘s Thwaites Glacier, roughly the size of Britain, is a fast-moving glacier in West Antarctica. Because of the risk it faces — and poses — Thwaites is often called the Doomsday Glacier. Because of its size (1.9 lakh square km), it contains enough water to raise the sea level by more than half a metre. Thwaites’s melting already contributes 4% to global sea level rise each year. Thwaites are important for Antarctica as it slows the ice behind it from freely flowing into the ocean. Credits: BBC Vigorous melting Salty and relatively warm ocean water is infiltrating beneath Thwaites Glacier, leading to significantly speedy melting. This process, termed as “vigorous melting“, is eroding its stability. However, its potential collapse could lead to a staggering 10-foot rise in sea levels, posing a dire threat to coastal communities worldwide. Previous studies discovered a deep connection to the east through which deep water flows from Pine Island Bay. That study also attributed the melting to the heat transport caused by channels bringing warm water towards the glacier from the north. With melting, glaciers become light and float off the land where they used to be situated. The resulting retreating grounding line exposes more of a glacier’s base to seawater, increasing the risk of melting. Since the late 1990s, the glacier has seen a 14km retreat of its “grounding line.” The grounding line is the point where the ice flowing off the land and along the seabed floats up to form a huge platform.   https://www.pmfias.com/current-affairs-for-upsc-civil-services-exam-may-28-2024/   or here Satellite data reveals Antarctica's Thwaites Glacier is melting faster than we thought | Space WWW.SPACE.COM Seawater rushing miles beneath the glacier makes the ice more vulnerable to melting.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CCA, DCAs and the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4432 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

apologies if this could be construed as a double post, but don't think I've mentioned it in my thread about Ruthbridge

 

received their letter re an outstanding debt they claim I owe cabot, never heard of them, ruthbridge or the debt. This was dated 4th june. CCA'd them with no response after the 12 days, their 30 days was up on saturday, and now I'm hugely confused cos if I understand what I've been reading correctly I needn't have waited the 30 days? :confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 425
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Just for clarity the rule that said they commit an offence after 30 days no longer applies, they are still in default of your request, but im afraid it no longer makes them criminals, as of may 2008

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the response, is it worth me sending them the template that contains the following?

 

"As you have Failed to comply with a lawful request for a true, signed copy of the said agreement and other relevant documents mentioned in it, Failed to send a full statement of the account and Failed to provide any of the documentation requested, consequentially any legal action you pursue will be averred as both UNLAWFUL and VEXATIOUS"

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the response, is it worth me sending them the template that contains the following?

 

"As you have Failed to comply with a lawful request for a true, signed copy of the said agreement and other relevant documents mentioned in it, Failed to send a full statement of the account and Failed to provide any of the documentation requested, consequentially any legal action you pursue will be averred as both UNLAWFUL and VEXATIOUS"

 

Yes its a perfectly valid point , send it to em

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

apologies if this could be construed as a double post, but don't think I've mentioned it in my thread about Ruthbridge

 

received their letter re an outstanding debt they claim I owe cabot, never heard of them, ruthbridge or the debt. This was dated 4th june. CCA'd them with no response after the 12 days, their 30 days was up on saturday, and now I'm hugely confused cos if I understand what I've been reading correctly I needn't have waited the 30 days? :confused:

 

What all this new legislation actually means is that after the 12 + 2 working days you can complain to Trading Standards and the OFT if the persuer requests payment without supplying your CCA.

 

As my local Trading Standards kindly pointed out, and after many hours reading the legislation, the OFT now has a duty to enforce the law via it's enforcement officers ie. Trading Standards. It's not just guidlines anymore guys, its LAW :D

 

If your local trading Standards are a bit reluctant or unhelpful point out the fact that the UCPD and the CPUTR 2008 are LAW which must be enforced ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are these regs retrospective? I ask because i have been defaulted earlier this year and there is no CCA. Can I use this legislation now to report them\?

I have reported in the past, but TS said they could not do anything

Odio los bancos con una venganza

Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand that the CPTUR 2008 is not retrospective; however if you applied again, now, for a copy of your CCA & it wasn't supplied & the DCA continued to chase, suspect the CPTUR 2008 would then apply & you could report to TS etc. However this thread/research is Babybear's baby & I'm sure she'll come along with the definitive answer to that one.

Any knowledge I possess or advice I proffer is based solely on my experiences in the University of Life. Please make your own assessment of legality, risks & costs before taking any action.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand that the CPTUR 2008 is not retrospective; however if you applied again, now, for a copy of your CCA & it wasn't supplied & the DCA continued to chase, suspect the CPTUR 2008 would then apply & you could report to TS etc. However this thread/research is Babybear's baby & I'm sure she'll come along with the definitive answer to that one.

 

You are quite correct FG :)

 

Many have mentioned CCAing again to use the new legislation :cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are quite correct FG :)

 

Many have mentioned CCAing again to use the new legislation :cool:

 

Would I have to CCA again, or could I use the fact that I requested this item in with my S.A.R letter after these new regulations became law and the company didnt provide a copy ?

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would I have to CCA again, or could I use the fact that I requested this item in with my S.A.R letter after these new regulations became law and the company didnt provide a copy ?

 

I would assume that not supplying your CCA as part of your SAR would fall under the new legislation, but you should check with a legal bod ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would assume that not supplying your CCA as part of your S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) would fall under the new legislation, but you should check with a legal bod ;)

 

Thanks BB, hopefully a legal bod will pop in later on and advise. :)

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Confusing! Is it retrospective or not? Different threads are saying different things.

 

If it's retrospective, doesn't that mean that a CCA isn't required as long as it can be proved you had the money and made payments?

 

See robinalexander's thread, first posted today at 00.27

*** NOT an offence after 12+2 & 30 days for CCA ***

Link to post
Share on other sites

I haven't researched the retrospective bit, so can't answer that but the only bit of s77-79 that has been repealed is the bit about 'after 30 days an offence is committed'. The rest still stands, so they do need an agreement which complies with all the regs and they do need to produce it within 12 working days of your request.

  • Haha 1

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with Babybear's interpretation as being not retrospective.

 

The answer is in CPUTR 2008, Part 5 - Supplementary, Schedule 2 clearly marked AMENDMENTS.

'Consumer Credit Act 1974

 

17. The Consumer Credit Act 1974(23) is amended as follows.

18. Section 46 (false or misleading advertisements) shall cease to have effect.

19. In section 77 (duty to give information to debtor under fixed-sum credit agreement), in subsection (4), omit paragraph (b) and the “and” preceding it.

20. In section 78 (duty to give information to debtor under running-account credit agreement), in subsection (6), omit paragraph (b) and the “and” preceding it.

21. In section 79 (duty to give hirer information), in subsection (3), omit paragraph (b) and the “and” preceding it.'

 

 

ie. Sections 77, 78 & 79 have not been replaced by CPUTR merely amended.

Schedule 4 deals with Repeals & Revocations i.e. Acts/clauses etc. no longer applicable. See below - RH table headed 'Extent of Repeal'

 

 

 

Consumer Credit Act 1974 c.39 Section 46.

In section 47, the words “or 46”.

Section 77(4)(b) and the word “and” preceding it.

Section 78(6)(b) and the word “and” preceding it.

Section 79(3)(b) and the word “and” preceding it.

  • Haha 1

Any knowledge I possess or advice I proffer is based solely on my experiences in the University of Life. Please make your own assessment of legality, risks & costs before taking any action.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with Babybear's interpretation as being not retrospective.

 

It may be an idea to invest another £1 and re-CCA any bankers who failed to comply with your original s77-79 Request.

 

Just to plonk them firmly into the CPUTR 2008 Zone!

 

I'm thinking of doing this myself for any that are arguing about what they sent originally.

 

Cheers,

BRW

Link to post
Share on other sites

Exactly BRW! :D

 

see posts 136 & 137

Any knowledge I possess or advice I proffer is based solely on my experiences in the University of Life. Please make your own assessment of legality, risks & costs before taking any action.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems like swings and round about but over all I would say we are better off. We lose the criminal offense, but gain that it is now law. As they were never prosecuted for the offense anyway it works out better as they can now be hounded by the relivant authorities.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...