Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I had some contact with this company earlier in my working life but I'm afraid there's not a lot I can suggest that you haven't already done. During your grandfather's time  British Celanese was a subsidiary of Courtaulds. Courtaulds was subsequently (after your grandfather had stopped working there) acquired by Alzo Nobel. They in turn closed down the Spondon site and sold it. I have no idea what the number is that you are trying to call. It's a Derby (Spondon) area code but the number appears not to be allocated. From my slim knowledge of the history of the company I would have expected your grandfather's pension to be in the Alzo Nobel (CPS) Pension Scheme.  But Willis Tower Watson are the Pension Scheme Administrator of that scheme and would be the people who should know if your grandfather had contributed. Is your grandfather certain he contributed? Joining pension schemes wasn't compulsory in those days. Or might he have got his contributions returned when he left them? That happened sometimes back then. Sorry not to be of more help.      
    • I am sorry I am not aware of this report from IAS assessors? The Court will consider my application at a online hearing in June. The Court instructed me to send Bank copies of my sons condition proving he could not have been the driver I have heard nothing further. My son is not aware of any proceedings I have not involved him to avoid causing him distress, he has been sectioned a fair few times and I need to avoid this happening.
    • I am very pleased that the Court has taken the decision to allow you to  represent your son and hope that he is happy enough with that to relieve the stress he will also be feeling. I do agree that Bank parking are so insensitive, greedy, horrible etc etc to continue proceedings considering  in what it is a very minor case of a wrong number plate . Even their  own  IAS Assessors, who are normally hopelessly biased in favour of their members, went out on a limb and said  " The Operator's evidence shows no payment for the Appellant's vehicle, or anything similar. It does show two payments for the same registration in quick succession. I would take a reasonable guess, based on the circumstances described, that the person paying has paid for the registration of the person they assisted again." That is damning evidence and you must take that report with you as well as including that in your Witness Statement which we will help you with. I would expect that Bank would discontinue the case at that point.  But I am sorry to say  that you should not count on it.  
    • Evening all,   I have deliberated over this offer for two weeks and I have decided to take their offer. I do understand that some may prefer us to go to court and receive a judgement but with our personal circumstances and my current military commitment that could become an issue. I am so grateful for all the help and support you have all offered me over the last few months. I will continue to monitor this site and push all those that are being wrong to get in touch.   Thank you! what you all do is truly amazing!
    • When I first responded to the PAPLOC, and received that 29 page junk back it was accompanied with a letter saying that they had already responded to my request back on Feb 18th 2023,(I never received it). I was just clearing out some paperwork today and found a letter from Lowell, dated Feb 17th 2023, explaining that they were still waiting for the documents from PayPal, and my account was on hold  until further notice.  Does this mean they were lying and can it be used against them if this goes any further? I have now filed my defence, and have had an acknowledgement from Overdales and the court. A little threatening from Overdales , explaining that part of my defence was invalid because they have now complied with the CCA, and they were still waiting for the Default notice from PayPal.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Minor signing a holiday booking contract **SORTED**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5842 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My son signed a holiday booking form as Lead Name for a group of friends, including himself. He was 17 years old when he signed. Can anyone advise me whether the holiday company were right in allowing this and if not whether this contract is legally binding?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Could anyone advise me as to whether a booking is legally binding if it was signed by a 17 year old as Lead name for the group and the Travel Agents were aware of that fact? In addition is it correct that if you want to cancel a holiday the Travel Agents can refuse to do so?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Me and my daughter have been battling to get a holiday cancelled that was booked when she was 17. It doesn't seem to make any difference to the holiday compnay how old they are.

 

We have been trying to cancel the holiday since 4 hours after her and her friends booked it. They wanted £75 each cancellation fee from them. We tried to fight them and got no where. However 14 days ago we were told to email customer services to ask for the details where to send the cancellation fee - and we are still waiting.

 

The compnay my daughter used is rubbish, one of the worse I have ever had the pleasure to deal with.

 

Good luck!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

It very much depends on what their T&Cs will say, some will, some won't. Get a hold of a copy of the contract and find out. If there is no credit involved and their T&Cs doesn't say different, then not a lot you can do, as far as I am aware. And T/A can not refuse to cancel the holiday as such, but they can (and will) charge a cancellation fee which in some case will be equivalent to the cost of the holiday, depending on how close to the date of departure and other factors.

 

Get those T&Cs out! ;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

T&Cs state that the person making the bookings must be over 18 years old. They also state that unaccompanied passengers under the age of 18 need a letter of consent from a parent or legal guardian. They did not mention this to the group at the time of the booking nor have they requested any letters of consent to date. Several members of the group will still be 17 years old when they travel.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome to the site.

It depends on what was in the terms and conditions.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for replying Martin3030. Have now moved to Holiday Companies Forum.

 

The T&Cs do state that the person making the booking must be over 18 years old. In addition they also say that unaccompanied passengers under the age of 18 need a letter of consent from a parent or legal guardian. These letters have not been requested despite the booking being made and deposits taken.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That being the case then the agreement is not valid.

I will merge these posts with the moved thread.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is all too easy for minors even children to book certain things on line, at the time of booking, the company involved doesnt know whether it is a child/minor or adult making the said booking, with people been able to pre-buy credit cards to use on the web, this is becoming even harder for companies to detect, when a booking is made, the person has to tick a box stating there are over the required age to make such a booking, hence making a false declaration, to that company...If this box was ticked, then the company acted as if a adult had made the booking, and would have requested information relating to the other travlers in due course, if the box wasn't ticked the system wouldnt have allowed the booking to proceed.

I'm not in favour of these so called pre-pay credit cards, as under age people can obtain them and use them to obtain adult only purchases, which more than ever has occurred above. The blame doesnt always lay with the companies, but also for the minors for attempting to use such cards to buy things there are clearly under age to purchase.

  • Haha 1

!2 years Tesco distribution supervisor

7 years Sainsburys Transport Manager

 

4 Years housing officer ( Lettings )

Partner... 23 Years social services depts

 

All advice is given through own opition, also by seeking/searching info on behalf of poster, and own personnel dealings.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sey,

 

I agree. If the T & C's say that the person acting as the lead booking must be 18 then you should be able to cancel. Did your lad book in a travel agent, over the phone direct or what?

 

 

laineynic,

 

I have searched high and low on Sun4u website for the same T & C's re age of lead passenger and I can't find it. I had a look on First Choice' website to get an idea of how it would be worded and they make it very clear so yes, some TO's don't allow bookings to under 18's without guardians consent. Unfortunatley, I just can't find it on Sun4u.

This has been going on a while now, have you thought of contacting Trading Standards or your local CAB?

Loubychew

 

I am not a travel lawyer. All info is based on my own experience of working in the travel industry in resort.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for everyone's help.

 

My son did book the holiday through a travel agent and after writing to them as suggested by Bookworm, and sending copies to ABTA, the company have agreed to refund all monies on seeing my son's birth certificate.

 

My son and his friends were offered the 'low deposit' deal which in hindsight they clearly did not understand. They did attempt several times to cancel their holiday a month after booking because they were misled about the type of accommodation - they wanted self-catering (with facilities) but were booked in for 'room only' which was construed by the travel agent to be self-catering. However the travel agent told them that they could not cancel their holiday. They decided then not to pay any more money owing and eventually the travel agents cancelled the booking and submitted to them the bill for the rest of the deposit owing.

 

Just for information in the Ts&Cs it did state that under 18s can only travel unaccompanied by providing a letter of consent from their parents/guardians. However, if they are travelling with a friend who is 18 years old then they are (obviously) accompanied by an adult!

 

This has definitely been a learning experience for this group of naive teenagers.

 

I wish you good luck Iaineynic.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Glad you got your case sorted Sey.

 

My post does not directly concern your situation, as it seems that your son and his friends were deliberately misled by the description; but I have read through the thread with interest and felt compelled to comment on the general assumption by travel companies that young adults (16-18 year-olds) are some sort of baboons with no rights who are too stupid to be able to board a plane and then check into a hotel etc. on their own. It's not rocket science and they are quite capable of doing that. As to behaving responsibly while on holiday and being able to deal with unforeseen situations and/or emergencies - that depends on the person in question: some are unruly when alone or with their friends and cause distress to others with their behaviour, but I believe the majority are perfectly capable of enjoying a holiday responsibly, maturely and with no problems.

 

Sorry for the slight deviation but I just couldn't resist bringing this up. 16 and 17 year-olds may not legally be adults but they are not children either and should be given a certain amount of leeway I feel, and I think, as I said, most of them could easily go on holiday without any problems. How mature someone is on the day after their 18th birthday is no different from how they would be on the day before their 18th birthday, i.e. aged 17. This must be taken into consideration. All I'm trying to say is that boundaries of course need to be drawn somewhere, and at the moment the 18th birthday is where they happen to be in this situation; but they should not be so 'blanket' and severe, if you get what I mean.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Glad you got your case sorted Sey.

 

My post does not directly concern your situation, as it seems that your son and his friends were deliberately misled by the description; but I have read through the thread with interest and felt compelled to comment on the general assumption by travel companies that young adults (16-18 year-olds) are some sort of baboons with no rights who are too stupid to be able to board a plane and then check into a hotel etc. on their own. It's not rocket science and they are quite capable of doing that. As to behaving responsibly while on holiday and being able to deal with unforeseen situations and/or emergencies - that depends on the person in question: some are unruly when alone or with their friends and cause distress to others with their behaviour, but I believe the majority are perfectly capable of enjoying a holiday responsibly, maturely and with no problems.

 

Sorry for the slight deviation but I just couldn't resist bringing this up. 16 and 17 year-olds may not legally be adults but they are not children either and should be given a certain amount of leeway I feel, and I think, as I said, most of them could easily go on holiday without any problems. How mature someone is on the day after their 18th birthday is no different from how they would be on the day before their 18th birthday, i.e. aged 17. This must be taken into consideration. All I'm trying to say is that boundaries of course need to be drawn somewhere, and at the moment the 18th birthday is where they happen to be in this situation; but they should not be so 'blanket' and severe, if you get what I mean.

 

It's nothing to do with behaviour or maturity; it's a matter of a minor not being able to enter a binding contract in law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...