Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Post #415 you said you were unable to sell it yourself. Earlier I believe you said there had been expressions of interest, but only if the buyer could acquire the freehold title. I wonder if the situation with the existing freeholders is such that the property is really unattractive, in ways possibly not obvious to someone who also has an interest in and acts for the freeholders.
    • i dont think the reason why the defendant lost the case means anything at all in that case. it was a classic judge lottery example.
    • Hello, I will try to outline everything clearly. I am a British citizen and I live in Luxembourg (I think this may be relevant for potential claims). I hired a car from Heathrow in March for a 3-day visit to family in the UK. I was "upgraded" to an EV (Polestar 2). I had a 250-mile journey to my family's address. Upon attempting to charge the vehicle, there was a red error message on the dashboard, saying "Charging error". I attempted to charge at roughly 10 different locations and got the same error message. Sometimes there was also an error message on the charging station screen. The Hertz 0800 assistance/breakdown number provided on the set of keys did not work with non-UK mobiles. I googled and found a bunch of other numbers, none of which were normal geographical ones, and none of which worked from my Luxembourg mobile. It was getting late and I was very short on charge. Also, there was no USB socket in the car, so my phone ran out of battery, so I was unable to look for further help online. It became clear that I would not reach my destination (rural Devon), so I had no choice but to find a roadside hotel in Exeter and then go to the nearest Hertz branch the following day on my remaining 10 miles of charge. Of course, as soon as the Hertz employee in Exeter plugged it into their own charger, the charging worked immediately. I have driven EVs before, I know how to charge them, and it definitely did not work at about 10 different chargers between London and Exeter. I took photos on each occasion. Luckily they had another vehicle available and transferred me onto it. It was an identical Polestar 2 to the original car. 2 minutes down the road, to test it, I went to a charger and it worked immediately. I also charged with zero issues at 2 other chargers before returning the vehicle. I think this shows that it was a charging fault with the first car and not my inability to do it properly. I wrote to Hertz, sending the hotel, dinner, breakfast and hotel parking receipt and asking for a refund of these expenses caused by the charging failure in the original car. They replied saying they "could not issue a refund" and they issued me with a voucher for 50 US dollars to use within the next year. Obviously I have no real proof that the charging didn't work. My guess is they will say that the photos don't prove that I was charging correctly, just that it shows an error message and a picture of a charger plugged into a car, without being able to see the detail. Could you advise whether I have a case to go further? I am not after a refund or compensation, I just want my £200 back that I had to spend on expenses. I think I have two possibilities (or maybe one - see below). It looks like the UK is still part of the European Consumer Centre scheme:  File a complaint with ECC Luxembourg | ECC-Net digital forms ECCWEBFORMS.EU   Would this be a good point to start from? Alternatively, the gov.uk money claims service. But the big caveat is you need a "postal address in the UK". In practice, do I have to have my primary residence in the UK, or can I use e.g. a family member's address, presumably just as an address for service, where they can forward me any relevant mail? Do they check that the claimant genuinely lives in the UK? "Postal address" is not the same as "Residence" - anyone can get a postal address in the UK without living there. But I don't want to cheat the system or have a claim denied because of it. TIA for any help!  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CSA deducted earnings not paid


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5798 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have just had an order from the CSA for money they say is owed.

According to their records I havn't paid anything. The money was

deducted from my earnings when I was working for a company that has

gone out of business, this was in the mid 1990s. I still have pay slips showing CSA deductions but the CSA say that I am still liable for all that is owed. Is this correct?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have proof of payment then it should be enough for them. The thing is that they may say that even though you were paying it was not the correct amount. This happened to my partner. He didnt pay through the CSA but had kept all his bank slips showing payments to her account. It was a long tedious process as they never seem to know which dept is dealing with you but the upshot of it was that he disputed he owed the money and sent them all the reciepts. They finally came to the conclusion that he had underpaid £140 at some stage of the previous 7 years. He had to pay it again directly to the csa. Strangly enough his ex didnt get a pennt of that £140, nor did she dispute that she had always been paid.

 

Do you normally make payments through the CSA? Why have they only just got in touch about arrears from over 10 years ago?

In our case it was because his ex had started to claim a benefit and so the csa had to be involved even though neither of them wanted to involve them. They had an agreement which worked perfectly for years for both of them. The only good thing was that they told him he was paying too much a month from his current wage.

getting it sorted was a nightmare. Hope it goes well for you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your response

The CSA are sure I havn't paid a penny. I sent them copies of some of my pay slips but its made no difference. Its strange they have got in touch with me after all these years, the only conclusion I can come to is that their records are upside down. I suggested this and of course they said they were perfect, its like talking to a brick wall. I have been to the citizens advice and they said there is nothing I can do except maybe take them to court, but there has been no other case of this action brought against them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Gertie100

I would have thought that you would need to wait for them to take you to court and defend...rather than instigate the case.

 

I can't see it getting very far as long as you are 100% that the payments have been taken - by the way are the deductions noted on your payslips as being taken from the CSA? (Sorry if thats a stupid question but I haven't actually seen one first hand...)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Gertie

 

It says on the payslips the deductions from the CSA. I thought that maybe my employer had kept the money but in the history of the payments you can see that they deducted a large payment over a period of months at the start to cover the past nonpayment, then they decided that they had taken to much so the weekly amounts went down. After a couple of months the payments became larger and stablized. There seems to be a close involvement with CSA.

But why!! after all these years come back to me and say I havn't paid at all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your response

The CSA are sure I havn't paid a penny. I sent them copies of some of my pay slips but its made no difference. Its strange they have got in touch with me after all these years, the only conclusion I can come to is that their records are upside down. I suggested this and of course they said they were perfect, its like talking to a brick wall. I have been to the citizens advice and they said there is nothing I can do except maybe take them to court, but there has been no other case of this action brought against them.

 

Have they actually admitted reading and discarding the proof? Only deal with them under their official complaints procedure, once that is exhausted you can take it up with higher levels outside the CSA itself.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for you advice aktiv

 

This has all been said over the phone so I have just sent them a letter with all the info that I have (contribution dates and company address) plus more copies of my payslips and asked them to send me a letter stating if they reject or confirm the info I have given and to inform me by letter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

I have just had a written reply back from the CSA. I sent them some copies of my payslips which show CSA deductions.

 

They agree that my payslips say there are CSA deductions but after looking through their payment screens they confirm that they have not recieved any of the amounts specified.

 

They also advise me that when a Deduction from Earnings is in place it is my responsibility to ensure that payments have been recieved to the agency therefore the payment amount specified remains payable.

 

My son is 24 years old now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had this problem with my ex. He has maintenance taken from his wages but his employer wouldn't pass it on to the CSA. Eventually the CSA took the employer to court and they were issued with a £2,000 fine for every time they didn't send the money in.

 

I get it on time now! (However, it did take 12 and a half years to sort it out!)

Spotnot v MBNA and their nasty solicitors (on behalf of my friend)

 

If I have helped in any way, click my scales.

 

Remember, we were all newbies once!!

 

When you win, donate!!!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats a big fine!!!

I can't decide if the CSA has lost my records on their system or if my old boss has done a runner. The last anyone heard of him was that he moved to Holland in 2001. He does seem to have dissapeared off the face of the earth. I have contacted 9 old work collegues and nobody has a contact number.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Without knowing the exact workings of the CSA (which they obviously don't either), the payments were taken from your pay because the CSA instructed the 'employer' to do so and their beef is with him not you.

 

They are being their usual self, totally incompetant.

 

You now need to be snotty with them and tell them you have proof of payment and the responsibility is with them to recover it from the employer if it was not received and not you.

 

Remember, 'they' instructed your employer, not you.

You could also mention that if they continue to harass you, then you will apply for an injunction against them. Go on the attack and don't grovel to them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advice.

 

I have written a letter to the local MP explaining the situation. But I don't hold much hope for this, the last time I got in touch with an MP about the CSA the reply was a cold shoulder and advised to swallow the bitter pill. I will keep you posted if I get a reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately, under CSA law, it is your responsiblity to pay. The deduction from your wages would have been put on as you were not paying, even though they would have given you ample opportunity to do so.

 

It is up to the customer to ensure that the payments are being made to the CSA, even though your employer is/was deducting them from your wages. The CSA say that you are liable for all payments, the fact that your employer deducted the money and then failed to forward them on is irrelevant to the CSA.

 

Advice in the past has been to take your employer to the small claims court, or report them to the police for theft, cause that's exactly what they have done - taken YOUR money. Unfortunately, in your case, you do not know were your employer is. From your original post, it would seem that your employer was in financial difficulties (company closed), so was probably keeping hold of your money in the hope of keeping the company afloat.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Bearmaggie sorry dissagree, I am the partner of the organisor of deadbeatdadsassociation.co.uk fighting against the CSA and we are in the clasps of the CSA The CSA are abusing the payment system of deduction of earnings order (DEO) because they are trying to reach targets and up their bonuses.

It has now come to light that fathers who have been paying child support maintenance and paying the correct amount from day one through either direct debit standing order or cheque, the CSA are now not in favour of doing this so in order to get fathers to pay by DEO they are now issuing fathers with imaginary arrears which the CSA cannot back up nor explain where they have come from and when you ring up the CSA to query the matter they just say pay the arrears if you do not pay then we will put you down as being non compliant and then issue the DEO onto your wages. This in turns means you are paying arrears that don,t exist plus another stunt the CSA are pulling is that they are informing fathers that arrears have to be paid back in two years and trying to enforce this through the DEO and sometimes if your self employed through a liability order through court. This in fact is just a CSA guideline and NOT law my partner has acted as a mackenzie friend for a couple of people in court when the CSA have tried to issue a LO but when he asked the CSA to provide proof it was law to pay back arrears in two years they could not do it because it was not law, the case was kicked out and the CSA got their backsides kicked.

As for the details being on your wage slip that the CSA has been paid, well that is proof in itself and it is NOT up to the father to ensure the company pay his child maintenance it is up to the company and the CSA to sort out. I would suspect that the CSA have received your money because if they did not get the money from your employer then the CSA by law have to take your company NOT the father but the company to court because if the CSA do not receive any money from the company once the DEO has been served then the CSA have to take the company to court and the company would have been fined £1000 for every month the company failed to pay the CSA. Its the CSAs way of making more money illegally. your company will have paid them do NOT beleive a word the CSA say to you. If you require any more info check out his web site Home or you can email me at [email protected]. Also if the CSA persist on chasing you for the money or stick a DEO on any more of your wages then you must take them to court for fraud, you have the evidence it has been paid, there is no reason why you should have to pay it twice

T

Edited by Tigstheterror
spelling terrible
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Tigstheterror

I suspected things were not quite right, the whole issue just made me very angry. The fact that they said they had no record of any conributions and secondly they got in touch with me about this matter 12 years later. They tried to dissmiss the fact that I still had payslips with deductions and it was only by getting in touch with my local MP that they considered my payments. I try to think how the situation would be if I didn't have my wage slips and it scares the hell out of me. The money they asked for was way below the amount I actually paid so I owe nothing and they have closed my account down. But be sure I have asked for it writing so if they contact me again I can show them the letter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

they will not reply they very rarely do because it is a fraudulent act that they are trying to do and they are preying on the ignorance of the client or the service users. Would you mind passing your case over to my fiances web site Home so that I can do a case file against these draconian idiots who act fraudulently

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sorry but they persisted very hard to get me to pay, they sent nasty threatning letters, even when I had a representative from citizens advice confronting them with my case it made no difference. Citizens Advice could only advice me to take it to court or declair myself bankrupt as a last resort. It was only when I contacted the Ombudsman that they advised me to complain to my local MP.

I will put my case on your site.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice one Tigs the Terror. Just what this site needs.

 

I am a grandad now, married to the same lovely woman and was never put on the spot that people are today, but will be over to your site to offer support if it's required, this is an emotive subject with me.

 

Good luck with your new found friend isthislegal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Glad to have anyone on board who wishes to have any sort of input,, these people,or as i like to call them "" robots for the government" are horrible,immoral, and terrible. The stories we have heard since my finace' has become involved with this agency are absolutely horrific especially the deaths at the hands of this agency.

A lot of people are not fully aware of laws that CAN in most cases, offer some recompence and protection, this was another reason the site was set up. My fiance' has researched the laws, regulations etc and always checks out up dates and new guidelines which they invariably think up as they go along. We are currently trying to get a sound backing for the association from our MP and will keep updates of progress on the site.

I really feel for anyone who has to deal with this side of the government,beleive it or not politics etc never interested me in the slightest but of late i have been looking at the net for articles and MP's blogs etc!!!!!

If we can help anyone ease their worries and predicaments and offer at least, a portion of support then it is better than having yet another suicide to the growing list of those already at their wits end enough to end their lives with this cruel agency. Feel free to pass on the web details to anyone you know who may need advice,support or even someone in their same predicament to moan at!!!

We have to try and make a change,no matter how small in this world, and it costs nothing to offer help and advice.

Thanx for your coments and keep up the good work in fighting for the little people :D cheers for the support guys

Hugs Tigs x :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately, under CSA law, it is your responsiblity to pay. The deduction from your wages would have been put on as you were not paying, even though they would have given you ample opportunity to do so.

 

It is up to the customer to ensure that the payments are being made to the CSA, even though your employer is/was deducting them from your wages. The CSA say that you are liable for all payments, the fact that your employer deducted the money and then failed to forward them on is irrelevant to the CSA.

 

Advice in the past has been to take your employer to the small claims court, or report them to the police for theft, cause that's exactly what they have done - taken YOUR money. Unfortunately, in your case, you do not know were your employer is. From your original post, it would seem that your employer was in financial difficulties (company closed), so was probably keeping hold of your money in the hope of keeping the company afloat.

 

Sorry but this can't br right. My employer like everyone else's deducts tax and NI, if they fail to pass them on is it my fault?

 

Should i be phoning my tax office to ensure that my employer has paid my tax?

 

The CSA has entered into an agreement with the employer, they need to take it up with the employer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Have you done a S.A.R. (Subject access request) to them? they have 40 days to produce the information when asked.

 

Have you put your complaint in writing to them?

 

If you have done and you are still not happy then I usually refer my case to I.C.E. (independent case examiner) their website is The Independent Case Examiner Website - Home Page they will then sort out things for you and can order the CSA to pay compensation.

 

Hope this helps.

If my posts have helped you please use the scales at the top of my posts :)

 

Any opinions from Jannercobbler are strictly my own and I have no affiliation with any group or services.

 

The two most beautiful words in the English Language are "Cheque Enclosed" - Dorothy Parker

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/abbey-bank/399-abbey-letter-sent.html

 

Me v Abbey - £3000 + Int + Costs + Credit File Cleaned.

 

LBA Sent 12/3/06

Court Claim started - 31/5/2006

Allocation Questionnaire Filed - 24/7/06

Court Date allocated 31/10/2006

 

Me v Citi-Cards - CCA Sent 27/07/06

Me v Citi-Cards - Data Protection Act Sent 03/08/06

Me v Capital One - Data Protection Act Sent 03/08/06

Me v Hillesden Securities - CCA Sent 03/08/06

Me v Hillesden Securities - DPA Sent 03/08/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...