Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Post #415 you said you were unable to sell it yourself. Earlier I believe you said there had been expressions of interest, but only if the buyer could acquire the freehold title. I wonder if the situation with the existing freeholders is such that the property is really unattractive, in ways possibly not obvious to someone who also has an interest in and acts for the freeholders.
    • i dont think the reason why the defendant lost the case means anything at all in that case. it was a classic judge lottery example.
    • Hello, I will try to outline everything clearly. I am a British citizen and I live in Luxembourg (I think this may be relevant for potential claims). I hired a car from Heathrow in March for a 3-day visit to family in the UK. I was "upgraded" to an EV (Polestar 2). I had a 250-mile journey to my family's address. Upon attempting to charge the vehicle, there was a red error message on the dashboard, saying "Charging error". I attempted to charge at roughly 10 different locations and got the same error message. Sometimes there was also an error message on the charging station screen. The Hertz 0800 assistance/breakdown number provided on the set of keys did not work with non-UK mobiles. I googled and found a bunch of other numbers, none of which were normal geographical ones, and none of which worked from my Luxembourg mobile. It was getting late and I was very short on charge. Also, there was no USB socket in the car, so my phone ran out of battery, so I was unable to look for further help online. It became clear that I would not reach my destination (rural Devon), so I had no choice but to find a roadside hotel in Exeter and then go to the nearest Hertz branch the following day on my remaining 10 miles of charge. Of course, as soon as the Hertz employee in Exeter plugged it into their own charger, the charging worked immediately. I have driven EVs before, I know how to charge them, and it definitely did not work at about 10 different chargers between London and Exeter. I took photos on each occasion. Luckily they had another vehicle available and transferred me onto it. It was an identical Polestar 2 to the original car. 2 minutes down the road, to test it, I went to a charger and it worked immediately. I also charged with zero issues at 2 other chargers before returning the vehicle. I think this shows that it was a charging fault with the first car and not my inability to do it properly. I wrote to Hertz, sending the hotel, dinner, breakfast and hotel parking receipt and asking for a refund of these expenses caused by the charging failure in the original car. They replied saying they "could not issue a refund" and they issued me with a voucher for 50 US dollars to use within the next year. Obviously I have no real proof that the charging didn't work. My guess is they will say that the photos don't prove that I was charging correctly, just that it shows an error message and a picture of a charger plugged into a car, without being able to see the detail. Could you advise whether I have a case to go further? I am not after a refund or compensation, I just want my £200 back that I had to spend on expenses. I think I have two possibilities (or maybe one - see below). It looks like the UK is still part of the European Consumer Centre scheme:  File a complaint with ECC Luxembourg | ECC-Net digital forms ECCWEBFORMS.EU   Would this be a good point to start from? Alternatively, the gov.uk money claims service. But the big caveat is you need a "postal address in the UK". In practice, do I have to have my primary residence in the UK, or can I use e.g. a family member's address, presumably just as an address for service, where they can forward me any relevant mail? Do they check that the claimant genuinely lives in the UK? "Postal address" is not the same as "Residence" - anyone can get a postal address in the UK without living there. But I don't want to cheat the system or have a claim denied because of it. TIA for any help!  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Charges from old council property after moving into another


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4619 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

Can anyone offer any information or ideas to put into a response letter on the below?

 

We were given a new council house as we had a baby and were living in a maisonette that wasn't suitable for our circumstances anymore.

 

A council guy came round and told us what decorating/repairs we needed to do when we applied to move. Then when we'd done them, we were only told we had to repaint a couple of walls and a ceiling. The house was signed off as ok and we went onto the housing register. About 1 1/2 years later we eventually got told we made the top of the list for a property and so they went through the same proocedure. Making sure the house we was in was adequate and were told nothing else needed to be done and was signed off and we could proceed to go through procedures to move house. We were only told we'd have to empty house and rip up the carpets when we moved.

 

Just as a side note, this house was our first house and the house was a state when we moved in, we did what decorating we could to make it liveable for us and they even signed off on it when we applied to move, but we were never happy in the state of the property.

 

4 months down the line now after moving into our new house which has had so many problems itself being a new house that i've been sick with stress sorting it out and the council still said somethings need to be done out of our own money we have had a letter from the council telling us we have to pay nearly £700 charges on the repairs and cleaning of the house we moved out off. £200 of that fee is admin and vat.

 

In their charges list they've included replacing kitchen cupboards, counters etc which some were falling apart when we'd moved in there years ago and they never came to fix them.

Replacing floor tiles in the toilet which were already a state when we moved in that to live with it we'd always had carpet down. the other is a says cleaning throughout the whole property, shed etc. All we'd left in the bin shed was the rubbish bins which did need to be emptied, but as the collections are fourtnightly and we were given 7 days to move, we couldn't put them out. There were a few boxes in there too which were there when we moved in and i never wanted to touch them so i'd thought we would get a small charge for that but not £700.

 

In their letter they've said we have 14 days to send a written response if we don't agree, but don't know what to say except that we dont want to pay, and can't even afford to pay (why we are council tenants to start with) £700 for replacing kitchen cupboards, floorboards and even cleaning throughout when it was signed off as ok. The house was disgusting when we moved in with stuff all down the toilet walls that someone had hastily put paper over to hide so we'd cleaned it up as much as we could to make it liveable, but it was never ideal. we shouldn't have to gut a council house.

 

please can anyone help in what to say in a response?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does anyone have any info on this? Can the council bill us because they've finally decided to upgrade the kitchen units, floorboards in the property that we've been waiting years for them to do while we were living there?

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is probably a load of ifs & buts about this. If the Council thought the property was good before you moved in and when you moved out it was not then yes I would say you would have to pay, in the present climate the Council will be trying anything to claw back cash. You will need the property reports that say otherwise. Probably time to involve your Councillor(s) & put your point forward direct as a Formal Complaint to the CEO.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah we've managed to get in touch with our local councillor and he's taking a look at it. I'm also submitting letter to say I don't agree with the charges which gives us more time as after 14 days they'll pass it to the debt collection team. It was already 7 days by the time we received the letter.

However on a side note, the property was signed off as ok twice, once when we went on the housing register and again before we moved. So these are new charges they have put on.

 

If anyone else has any suggestions to put to the council, i'll be happy to hear them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

well we've received a reply to our letter from the council. This also took 8 days to arrive, even though i posted the original query by written note and e-mail and they said they would get back to me by e-mail. but they didnt.

 

They've reduced the charges now to £260 for cleaning and clearing property. The repairs they must have taken off. Plus another £100 tax and admin charges so £360 they want now. So its a lot less.

 

In the letter they wrote to us, they said please see attached pictures taken after we left the property and the prelim letter we had. However these weren't attached to the letter.

 

Am I able to request these again as we didnt get any pictures to prove the charges even though they said they attached them. We don't believe that cleaning the property and emptying the bin shed would come to £260 without VAT as the council themselves only charge £22 for taking away up to 10 bulk items from us which we couldn't request at the time and had to move things ourselves as we were only given a week to move.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you should definitely request copies of the photos that were not included

 

it is difficult to say whether the cleaning and clearing charge is reasonable as i do not know how much work was actually involved

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...