Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Interesting question regarding what Government accounts opposition parties have access to, before an General Election. From what I understand, Government department accounts that are published are always lagging behind and would not include some amounts which are classified as 'commercially sensitive'.  Therefore opposition parties and Parliamentrary select committees would not have access to accounts which contain real time up to date information. If a new Government have found £20 billion of spending liabilities they did not know about, this could be true, as £20 billion is not that much when you look at total Government expenditure. Government department are making decisions on spending all of the time and it could be the previous Government were planning tax changes and/or spending cuts to balance the books.  Jeremy Hunt has recently said that if the Tories had stayed in Government and held an Autumn budget, it would have been very difficult to cut taxes as some had wanted.
    • Everyone knows the tories were hiding the costs - and even added 4 billion quid to the taxpayers high interest credit card to fund a chunk of the NI tax reduction - prime example - look at how much cost was hidden re the Rwanda dogwhistle -10 Billion quid     and re the handful of rebels on the benefit limit If the disasters (like the Rwanda rubbish) of Tory dogs being wagged by the extremist minority ERG tail doesn't highlight the issues .. Enlighten yourself here .. (fat chance) Sir Keir Starmer is right to show Labour rebels the door WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Editorial: Suspending seven MPs following their rebellion over the two-child benefit cap is more than a prime minister flexing his political muscle. It is a...  
    • Trump instigated that didnt he @theoldrouge despite losing the election - and Biden mitigated as much as he could within his boundaries?   "President Donald Trump ordered a rapid withdrawal of all U.S. troops from Afghanistan and Somalia in the wake of his 2020 election loss"   “The order was for an immediate withdrawal, and it would have been catastrophic,” said Rep. Adam Kinzinger, R-Ill., one of two Republican members of the special panel. “And yet President Trump signed the order.”   Trump ordered rapid withdrawal from Afghanistan after election loss WWW.MILITARYTIMES.COM The memo was among the latest revelations from the congressional committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol building.   Although i agree that Biden should have done more to mitigate Trump driven disasters
    • ok your WS is wrong. Paragraph 16 and 17 says  you did not contract with evri but this is not true - see below  Furthermore to the eBay Powered By Packlink T&Cs that Evri is referring to, Clauses 3b and c of the T&Cs states:  (b)   Packlink is a package dispatch search engine that acts as an intermediary between its Users and Transport Agencies. Through the Website, Users can check the prices that different Transport Agencies offer for shipments and contract with the Transport Agency that best suits their needs on-line. (c)  Each User shall then enter into its own contract with the chosen Transport Agency. Packlink does not have any control over, and disclaims all liability that may arise in contracts between a User and a Transport Agency post 251 of occy thread - £844 lost    you should also add a paragraph on donough v Stevenson talking about the fact that even without contract there is still duty of care to goods and by failing to deliver this duty has been breached.   Make those changes and post it back up here and I'll check over things again
    • no we cant add the occy thing because leicster are being difficult people so we're just going to go without it for now
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 127 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Ok , this is the position

My daughter lives in a property i own -

I purchased the property in November 2022 and had to refurbish due to flooding so the property was not inhabitable until March 2023

My daughter was living elsewhere at the time and moved into my property after it was renovated.( she has lived there since march 2023)

she has applied for ctax exemption due to SMI

CT office have all the medical forms, proofs of benefits, and bank statements to prove this is an ongoing permanent condition, 

The council have confirmed receipt of all the forms and even asked which addresses the SMI applies to - Both the previous address and current address were provided for the SMI exemption .

the council have bailiffs chasing her for a small amount of CTAX from a previous property where she was also Exempt .

i have written to the council explaining the position - they agreed to put 2 week hold on this account .

we assumed the council tax was covered by the SMI Claim being back dated to 2022 and cover current years.

( the council requested proofs of benefit payments for the previous years which was provided and acknowledged)

My daughter was hospitalised due to her illness from November last year to Mid February this year.

I have a proper tenancy agreement with my daughter and all the bills etc are in her name .

I do not reside at the property.

I visit almost daily to check on my daughter, make sure she is eating, do a little washing  and help with keeping the property tidy etc.

The council have issued bailiff recovery action to recover CT for 2022 ( when the house was uninhabitable) and for the 2023 year.

The bills have been raised in My name ( Not my daughters) .

I do not live there, i have no personal clothing or belongings there and have never stayed overnight.

However - i use the address as my accommodation address,

When i contacted the council via email regarding the bills and action , they have asked me to provide my current address for Audit purposes ?? .

 I currently stay at a friends house on an informal arrangement , They  pay full council tax and do not claim benefits, I do not use their address because i do not want financial links  or ties to that person, hence the accommodation address being my house which i visit almost daily due to my daughters condition 

There is no offence or deception involved here -  i do not see any legal reason as to why i need to provide my details in this instance.

Any advice on how i proceed / get the council to cancel the action .

Thanks 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • timewarp3 changed the title to Council tax ( daughter sole occupant and has exemption due to SMI) - i use the address as an accomodation address but do not reside there, council have issued CT bills in my name and i have bailiffs trying for recovery
  • dx100uk changed the title to CTAX Bailiffs.

are you on voters there too?

you are to all effect and purpose the landlord in this situation.

if your daughter was in hosp for sev months does this not negate the SMI?

 

thread title truncated.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, i am the Landlord.

Yes I believe I am on the electoral role at the address

In my daughters case, the smi is almost certain to a life long illness , I would surmise that  smi patients in general are more likely to be hospitalised due to their illness.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes it appears SMI means zero ctax liability,

3 hours ago, timewarp3 said:

The council have issued bailiff recovery action to recover CT for 2022 ( when the house was uninhabitable) and for the 2023 year.

The bills have been raised in My name ( Not my daughters) .

what do you mean by bailiff recovery?

what letters have you received, please scan them up and the bills to one mass pdf after reading our upload guide.

this property in 2022, are you the owner of that too, where your daughter was residing?

it appears that the 2022 period will be covered covered by her SMI backdate, but that doesn't explain why you name is now on bills or you are being held liable.

on the 2022- 2023 period, you get only 1 yrs exemption from ctax because it was uninhabitable by the flooding.

there must of course have been liability orders issued too by the council.

have you got copies of those too?

it may well be that because you are the property owner/landlord, they deem at present there are periods whereby say your daughters SMI was not inplace and in hospital for longer that 2mts is it? i forget, but thus you become liable.

i think it will sort itself out once paperwork and smi backdating is implemented.

lets see these letters etc.

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

the earlier one, why its now in your name is a mystery, but i suppose it will sort itself out when the SMI does get backdated. 

the later more recent one, is almost a full years ctax? which could default to your name as the landlord i suppose because it remains unpaid.

i wonder if some office junior has ticked a wrong name here at some point. though the 2 LO's being in your name? mystifies me somewhat.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have telephoned the council

they refuse to put a hold on bailifs ,

or to change the property into my daughters name and implement the smi

they are insisting i provide my current address details.

surely there is no legal requirement for me to do this .

is there anything i can do other than submit to their bully tactics.

How do i deal with the bailiff situation ,

The LO's are in my name, the bailiffs are seeking recovery from me at that address - but i do not reside there.

so they cannot enforce or take anything

my only concern is that my daughter is vulnerable , she has SMI, The pressure of the bailiffs attending will overwhelm her , i am concerned that they may trick entry or worse, they make take her belongings or misrepresent their intentions.

i have spoken to bailiff company , explained that my daughter is a Vulnerable person and they say they have noted it, It has been passed to their welfare team, but they will will still attend and seek recovery. very rude and abrupt.

how do i protect her from this  / prevent attendance

Link to post
Share on other sites

whats the problem with giving correct address then?

22 minutes ago, timewarp3 said:

i am concerned that they may trick entry or worse, they make take her belongings or misrepresent their intentions.

they can't do that.

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd prefer not to provide my current address to prevent financial or other ties to the people i live with.

I also want to avoid the hassle of bailiffs turning up at this address 

the address i live at - pays full council tax .

 

bailiffs turning up and threatening to take goods at my daughters address , would be detrimental to my daughters current condition.  My daughter would not cope .

its ok saying they cant  do that,  but we all know that these bailiffs do not follow guidelines and prefer to intimidate,, 

 

is there a poster or notice i can attach to the door - to stop them calling 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well seems like most of your issues then are of your own choosing, which no advice can change or is needed upon.

21 minutes ago, timewarp3 said:

is there a poster or notice i can attach to the door - to stop them calling 

 

nope stupid Freeman of the land twaddle.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The best way of stopping them in their tracks is far easier and more effective than sticking a silly poster on the door, send an email to her local councillor, should be easy to find on Google.

Explain the situation and that you are happy to provide a medical note from her GP / Consultant, then I'd give them a call on their mobile and explain things. It should take about 15 minutes to stop the Bailiffs.

PS I'd also copy in the head of the council and Council tax revenue team into the email also.

PPS  I know this because I had the same problem

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...