Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Post #415 you said you were unable to sell it yourself. Earlier I believe you said there had been expressions of interest, but only if the buyer could acquire the freehold title. I wonder if the situation with the existing freeholders is such that the property is really unattractive, in ways possibly not obvious to someone who also has an interest in and acts for the freeholders.
    • i dont think the reason why the defendant lost the case means anything at all in that case. it was a classic judge lottery example.
    • Hello, I will try to outline everything clearly. I am a British citizen and I live in Luxembourg (I think this may be relevant for potential claims). I hired a car from Heathrow in March for a 3-day visit to family in the UK. I was "upgraded" to an EV (Polestar 2). I had a 250-mile journey to my family's address. Upon attempting to charge the vehicle, there was a red error message on the dashboard, saying "Charging error". I attempted to charge at roughly 10 different locations and got the same error message. Sometimes there was also an error message on the charging station screen. The Hertz 0800 assistance/breakdown number provided on the set of keys did not work with non-UK mobiles. I googled and found a bunch of other numbers, none of which were normal geographical ones, and none of which worked from my Luxembourg mobile. It was getting late and I was very short on charge. Also, there was no USB socket in the car, so my phone ran out of battery, so I was unable to look for further help online. It became clear that I would not reach my destination (rural Devon), so I had no choice but to find a roadside hotel in Exeter and then go to the nearest Hertz branch the following day on my remaining 10 miles of charge. Of course, as soon as the Hertz employee in Exeter plugged it into their own charger, the charging worked immediately. I have driven EVs before, I know how to charge them, and it definitely did not work at about 10 different chargers between London and Exeter. I took photos on each occasion. Luckily they had another vehicle available and transferred me onto it. It was an identical Polestar 2 to the original car. 2 minutes down the road, to test it, I went to a charger and it worked immediately. I also charged with zero issues at 2 other chargers before returning the vehicle. I think this shows that it was a charging fault with the first car and not my inability to do it properly. I wrote to Hertz, sending the hotel, dinner, breakfast and hotel parking receipt and asking for a refund of these expenses caused by the charging failure in the original car. They replied saying they "could not issue a refund" and they issued me with a voucher for 50 US dollars to use within the next year. Obviously I have no real proof that the charging didn't work. My guess is they will say that the photos don't prove that I was charging correctly, just that it shows an error message and a picture of a charger plugged into a car, without being able to see the detail. Could you advise whether I have a case to go further? I am not after a refund or compensation, I just want my £200 back that I had to spend on expenses. I think I have two possibilities (or maybe one - see below). It looks like the UK is still part of the European Consumer Centre scheme:  File a complaint with ECC Luxembourg | ECC-Net digital forms ECCWEBFORMS.EU   Would this be a good point to start from? Alternatively, the gov.uk money claims service. But the big caveat is you need a "postal address in the UK". In practice, do I have to have my primary residence in the UK, or can I use e.g. a family member's address, presumably just as an address for service, where they can forward me any relevant mail? Do they check that the claimant genuinely lives in the UK? "Postal address" is not the same as "Residence" - anyone can get a postal address in the UK without living there. But I don't want to cheat the system or have a claim denied because of it. TIA for any help!  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Council tax arrears - court once a year?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5005 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello people, I wonder if you can help please?

 

First of all, I don't know if this is the right forum to post on and if anyone can tell me which one to move to, it would be great.

 

A member of the family is having £25 a month deducted from salary to pay to the local authority. Every year, the coucil send a new court summons and charge £60 which is added to the debt. From what we're told, when the wife went to court they said she didn't need to go, but the £60 was still charged.

 

We have only heard this second or third hand and are wondering if it's right. If anyone can help, we would be very grateful.

 

Thank you, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't understand why they would need to go back to court every year for the same council tax year they are chasing; they only need one liability order, unless there are multiple accounts over different tax years - as far as I am aware. I may be very wrong on that though.

 

I'll move you thread to the right forum so that people in the know can answer.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

A member of the family is having £25 a month deducted from salary to pay to the local authority. Every year, the coucil send a new court summons and charge £60 which is added to the debt. From what we're told, when the wife went to court they said she didn't need to go, but the £60 was still charged.

 

 

Each year the Council set what the COuncil Tax is for the year and advise all their "customers" accordingly usually from March onwards. This can be paid in a variety of ways and instalments are a possibility. The first payment is usually due on the 1st of April and if paying monthly then the 1st of each subsequent month - if paying by DD then that is usually taken later in the month. If you have elected to pay cash and fail to pay usually within 7 days of the due date then you should receive a "reminder" to bring it up to date, the majority of Councils say that failing to pay twice means you lose the right to pay in instalments and the whole sum for the rest of the year becomes payable immediately. As you can't afford to pay then a summons is issued to appear at the Magistrates Court.

 

At Court the Magistrates are faced with a simple question - is the person liable to pay the Tax yes or no - if yes then the Liability Order is granted and usuallthe Council will pass the debt to Bailiffs. Paying by AoE is another method but not common. I don't doubt your family member is content to pat this way but really are they being given a chance to pay normally. The Council are making a profit on the costs - average actual cost is £3 so they are paying £57 extra they wouldn't need to ordinarily.

 

What they should do is ring the Council and ask:

1 - how many Liability Orders the Council have against them

2 - what periods of time they cover

3 - how much each Order is for

4 - how much is still outstanding on each

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi PT

I have a question along similar lines...

Basically I own a house in yorkshire but I recently got a job in Lancashire. It wasnt practical to commute to work everyday so I found some accomodation in Lancs. I asked my sister to check my postal mail every now and again for my house in yorkshire. Anyway, she hadnt checked it for a couple of weeks. A council tax reminder had come and also a magistrates court summons. I contacted the council and explained the situation to them. I asked them to remove the court costs and cancel the court date as I had every intention of paying. I said that I felt I had a valid reason. I also stated that if they didnt cancel the costs and the court hearing then I would ask the judge for the council to pay my costs since it involved taking the day off work and also travelling to yorkshire. The council told me that they would not cancel the costs nor would they cancel the hearing.

I paid my council tax bill but not the costs a few days before the "hearing". I looked through the letters that the council had sent me and realised that they had had the court summons issued a couple of days earlier than they should have. I went to court expecting a judge to be present so that I could present my case. To my dismay, the court room had about ten council employees who were dealing with various non-payers. The council employee that dealt with me admitted that they had sent me out the summons early and therefore their costs could not be applied. I then demanded that they pay my costs. He claimed that they couldnt do that!!! He then claimed that I had been told in writing that I didnt have to attend the court therefore they were not liable for the costs. This was a blatant lie.

Basically, I want to know what the chances are of getting my costs.

I am angry because it looked like the council had just hired out this room in the court building and were charging people £50 per council tax bill for a so called "hearing" when actually no hearings were taking place. There were about 40 people there just for that one time slot!!!

I am sooo disgusted by the way things are going...every organisation (even the ones we think we can trust) are all about revenue collection and adding costs and increasing the little man's debt!

 

Grrrrrrr

 

honey b

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Honey b

It was very informative reading your post - I am attending court this afternoon for 'non payment' of council tax - the council will not accept our offers of any kind - want the outstanding amount paid in full. Explained that a standing order has been set up to clear the account by Feb 2011. This I have been told is not good enough - they will only accept a direct debit if it is to be cleared in installments - told them I am in control of my payments - not my bank (they previously decided they would bounce my council tax dd and of course charged me £38.00 for the privelage) Explained to the council that my partner is still out of work and I am working full time so not entitled to benefits of any kind etc.... His JSA has now run out - cant claim that anymore. Anyhow, they have already recieved and accepted the first of my standing order payment!

I was told I dont have to attend court either - not sure why councils seem to discourage attendance!!! It will be interesting to see if my court hearing is with a judge or a room of of these council workers - thanks for the posting - it has given me the heads up to be prepared for that!

Totally agree with your last statement especially even the ones we think we can trust... the person I saw at the CAB was horrendous - so bad that he made me cry and told him he was making me feel tiny and I did not appreciate his attitude...how dare he look down on me as though I was something stuck to his shoe! Yep, seems like it's all about revenue collection and adding costs and increasing the little mans debt!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Blue

I think an offer of payment by standing order is still an offer of payment so the council cant really turn it down.

What sort of "hearing" was it in the end? Was there a judge?

Perhaps you could dispute the costs. Even ask them to prove that their costs are £50 (or whatever it is they claim they are).

I think the council discourage people attending so that they can get things wrapped up faster. When I was outside the court room, the Council Tax Manager was basically going over to people and telling them to go and visit the council tax offices and make arrangements to pay rather than stick around for an imaginary "hearing". Obviously these people already had the council tax costs added to their accounts :mad:

As for the CAB, I am sure they try to be helpful but in my experience, they are just random people who are volunteering to provide a service. I have found that individuals dont tend to know all that much about any particular subject. In addition, the last time I visited them, they wanted all sorts of personal details like date of birth, NI number, etc. All I went there for was to get access to a book relating to debt law. I am concerned that generally people give up information about themselves too readily. Then this information ends up falling into the hands of all sorts of organisations. We basically seem to have lost all privacy and anybody can find out anything about us.

 

Sigh

 

hb

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi PT

I have a question along similar lines...

Basically I own a house in yorkshire but I recently got a job in Lancashire. It wasnt practical to commute to work everyday so I found some accomodation in Lancs. I asked my sister to check my postal mail every now and again for my house in yorkshire. Anyway, she hadnt checked it for a couple of weeks. A council tax reminder had come and also a magistrates court summons. I contacted the council and explained the situation to them. I asked them to remove the court costs and cancel the court date as I had every intention of paying. I said that I felt I had a valid reason. I also stated that if they didnt cancel the costs and the court hearing then I would ask the judge for the council to pay my costs since it involved taking the day off work and also travelling to yorkshire. The council told me that they would not cancel the costs nor would they cancel the hearing.

I paid my council tax bill but not the costs a few days before the "hearing". I looked through the letters that the council had sent me and realised that they had had the court summons issued a couple of days earlier than they should have. I went to court expecting a judge to be present so that I could present my case. To my dismay, the court room had about ten council employees who were dealing with various non-payers. The council employee that dealt with me admitted that they had sent me out the summons early and therefore their costs could not be applied. I then demanded that they pay my costs. He claimed that they couldnt do that!!! He then claimed that I had been told in writing that I didnt have to attend the court therefore they were not liable for the costs. This was a blatant lie.

Basically, I want to know what the chances are of getting my costs.

I am angry because it looked like the council had just hired out this room in the court building and were charging people £50 per council tax bill for a so called "hearing" when actually no hearings were taking place. There were about 40 people there just for that one time slot!!!

I am sooo disgusted by the way things are going...every organisation (even the ones we think we can trust) are all about revenue collection and adding costs and increasing the little man's debt!

 

Grrrrrrr

 

honey b

 

The Council's £50 costs are cheap compared with others - I believe the average is around the £90 mark. As for the costs themselves the Council will tell you it covers the admin work of drawing up, serving, follow up etc of the Liabilty Order - very similar to you paying a set charge of £75 to have your washing machine looked at. The staff are there for the very few that can argue successfully they are not Liable to pay and the remainder then go on a list and are submitted to a Magistrate for rubber stamping.

 

If the Council have admitted they have made a gaffe then in my opinion they should pay your reasonable costs. After all if you hadn't turned up they would just have steam rollered ahead and the chances are you would not have known.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...