Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Post #415 you said you were unable to sell it yourself. Earlier I believe you said there had been expressions of interest, but only if the buyer could acquire the freehold title. I wonder if the situation with the existing freeholders is such that the property is really unattractive, in ways possibly not obvious to someone who also has an interest in and acts for the freeholders.
    • i dont think the reason why the defendant lost the case means anything at all in that case. it was a classic judge lottery example.
    • Hello, I will try to outline everything clearly. I am a British citizen and I live in Luxembourg (I think this may be relevant for potential claims). I hired a car from Heathrow in March for a 3-day visit to family in the UK. I was "upgraded" to an EV (Polestar 2). I had a 250-mile journey to my family's address. Upon attempting to charge the vehicle, there was a red error message on the dashboard, saying "Charging error". I attempted to charge at roughly 10 different locations and got the same error message. Sometimes there was also an error message on the charging station screen. The Hertz 0800 assistance/breakdown number provided on the set of keys did not work with non-UK mobiles. I googled and found a bunch of other numbers, none of which were normal geographical ones, and none of which worked from my Luxembourg mobile. It was getting late and I was very short on charge. Also, there was no USB socket in the car, so my phone ran out of battery, so I was unable to look for further help online. It became clear that I would not reach my destination (rural Devon), so I had no choice but to find a roadside hotel in Exeter and then go to the nearest Hertz branch the following day on my remaining 10 miles of charge. Of course, as soon as the Hertz employee in Exeter plugged it into their own charger, the charging worked immediately. I have driven EVs before, I know how to charge them, and it definitely did not work at about 10 different chargers between London and Exeter. I took photos on each occasion. Luckily they had another vehicle available and transferred me onto it. It was an identical Polestar 2 to the original car. 2 minutes down the road, to test it, I went to a charger and it worked immediately. I also charged with zero issues at 2 other chargers before returning the vehicle. I think this shows that it was a charging fault with the first car and not my inability to do it properly. I wrote to Hertz, sending the hotel, dinner, breakfast and hotel parking receipt and asking for a refund of these expenses caused by the charging failure in the original car. They replied saying they "could not issue a refund" and they issued me with a voucher for 50 US dollars to use within the next year. Obviously I have no real proof that the charging didn't work. My guess is they will say that the photos don't prove that I was charging correctly, just that it shows an error message and a picture of a charger plugged into a car, without being able to see the detail. Could you advise whether I have a case to go further? I am not after a refund or compensation, I just want my £200 back that I had to spend on expenses. I think I have two possibilities (or maybe one - see below). It looks like the UK is still part of the European Consumer Centre scheme:  File a complaint with ECC Luxembourg | ECC-Net digital forms ECCWEBFORMS.EU   Would this be a good point to start from? Alternatively, the gov.uk money claims service. But the big caveat is you need a "postal address in the UK". In practice, do I have to have my primary residence in the UK, or can I use e.g. a family member's address, presumably just as an address for service, where they can forward me any relevant mail? Do they check that the claimant genuinely lives in the UK? "Postal address" is not the same as "Residence" - anyone can get a postal address in the UK without living there. But I don't want to cheat the system or have a claim denied because of it. TIA for any help!  
    • Sars request sent on 16th March and also sent a complaint separately to Studio. Have received no response. Both letters were received and signed for.  I was also told by the financial ombudsman that studio were investigating but I've also had no response to that either.  The only thing Studio have sent me is a default notice.  Any ideas of what I can do from here please 
    • Thanks Bank - I shall tweak my draft and repost. And here's today's ridiculous email from the P2G 'Claims Dept' Good Morning,  Thank you for you email. Unfortunately we would be unable to pay the amount advised in your previous email.  When you placed the order, you were asked for the value of your parcel, you stated that the value was £265.00. At this stage the booking advised that you were covered to £20.00 and to enhance this to £260.00 you could pay an extra £13.99 + VAT to fully cover your item for loss or damage during transit, you declined to fully cover your item.  Towards the end of your booking on the confirmation page, you were then offered to take cover again, to which you declined again.  Unfortunately, we would be unable to offer you an enhanced payment on this occasion.  If I can assist further, please do let me know.  Kindest Regards Claims Team and my response Good Afternoon  Do you not understand the court cases of PENCHEV v P2G (225MC852) and SMIRNOVS v P2G (27MC729)? In both cases it was held by the courts that there was no need for additional ‘cover’ or ‘protection’ (or whatever you wish to call it) on top of the standard delivery charge, and P2G were required to pay up in full for both cases, which by then also included court costs and interest. I shall be including copies of both those judgements in the bundle I submit to the court next Wednesday 1 May, unless you settle my claim (£274.10) in full before then. Tick tock…..    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Problems with VODAPHONE and debt collection PASTDUE


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2555 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone,

I'm hoping that you can help me with a problem that my daughter now has with Vodaphone.

 

In August 2012, she opened a new contract with Vodaphone, via their local store.

This contract was then closed (in store) 2 days later as the sim card didn't work

 

 

she was told by the staff, that there was an issue with that particular sim card and that they would have to close the account and open a new one with a new sim card and new phone number.

She was never given a new contract paperwork with the new sim card.

 

Her first bill arrived and it was £80.00 instead of £39.00.

she went back to the local store and the staff had no clue what to do,

 

 

they rang someone whilst she was in the store, and the person on the other end of the phone had no clue either. Some excuse was made, but nothing was made clear.

 

She also told them that she couldn't access her online account, as she wanted to check why her first bill was so high, and they told her that she would have to wait a couple of days for all her information to be transferred from that first (cancelled) contract to this new one. An easy transfer they said!!

 

She was never able to access her online account, however the phone was working and she was billed erratically for the next 18 months. The bills were always more than they should have been and she was never billed on the same day each month. All the bills were paid by DD.

 

In May 2014, having had enough of the poor (non existant) coverage, she went into the store and asked to cancel her contract. only to be told that she had no contract with Vodoaphone and they had no record of her ever having had a Vodaphone account.

(the person who opened the account in 2012 no longer worked there either)

 

The last bill was sent in May 2014, which was paid, and after that the phone no longer worked. The contract ran out in August 2014.

 

Nothing was heard until the end of 2016 when a letter arrived from Vodaphone demanding £400.00. There was no account number or phone number on this letter that applied to my daughter, so we could not track this on their website.

 

 

They tried to take money from a new bank account (which was not connected ever to the Vodaphone account).

 

now they have passed the account to PASTDUE who are demanding £753.66 or they MAY go to court (blah blah blah).

 

today we found out from my ex husband of 15 years (her dad), that he has been receiving texts from this debt collector on his mobile, asking for my daughter to contact them.

 

 

He has not lived with his daughter for 15 years, his phone number has changed numerous times in this time, he has never had any kind of joint contract or account with her, and these texts started on 22 Feb this year. So far they haven't rung his number and he hasn't replied to any texts.

 

Sorry for the long explanation, but I hope someone can help me with this ridulous mess.

 

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you need to start off by sending an SAR to Vodafone. Do this straightaway because it takes 40 days to return the disclosure.

 

Keep a note of everything that happens and keep a note of all of the text that are being sent to anybody including your ex-husband.

 

Check your credit file and see if there are any entries placed on it in relation to this problem.

 

Frankly it would be extremely helpful if they did take you to court because that will be a cheap way to get Vodafone into court and to bring a counterclaim at the same time for all the aggravation that they are causing you.

 

Frankly it is unlikely they will take the court – and generally speaking Vodafone never bother. They just get things wrong, wreck your credit file, harass you, bully you – you get the picture.

 

Vodafone are the worst of them all. They are the most complained about mobile phone operator and I have no idea why anybody bothers to risk their peace of mind in credit history with Vodafone.

 

For the moment, I'm not sure if there is anything else you should do until either the DCA really escalate things or you get the SAR from Vodafone. Getting the SAR is extremely important because then you can start to get an idea of what they have got on you and the whole story. Also the credit file entries.

 

Come back here when you get more information. If you have any telephone contact with them then don't do it without having read our customer services guide and implementing the advice there. You've been here since 2007 so you should know that anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your quick response.

 

I did think we might need to SAR them, but as we have no account numbers or phone number for this account I wasn't sure how to go about it. There is a customer ID on the debt coll letter, can I use that for their reference??

 

There has been no phone contact whatsoever, from eith Vodaphone or the debt coll, just the texts to my ex, which seems really odd.

 

I will get onto the SAR immediately and let you know what happens.

Thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't use the customer ID and anyway it probably is not a Vodafone reference number. Giving them a particular ID is likely simply to limit their search for details relating to your account.

 

Best thing to do is simply give them your name, the address at which you were at when the account was entered into and the name of the branch where you set up the account. Accompany the SAR by a cheque in preference to a postal order as it will be easier to keep tabs on the progress of your SAR. After a few days you can check with your bank to see if it has been cashed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to call your attention to the history of Vodafone on this forum, for a few years we used to have a Vodafone company rep on this forum. Eventually we realised that all he was doing was leading people away from the forum and we would eventually get no idea as to whether some kind of solution had been achieved or on what terms. One thing you can be certain of is that Vodafone would have limited themselves to pretty derisory gestures of goodwill – in the event that they had actually found that they were in the wrong.

 

We also eventually realised that the Vodafone rep was disappearing for long periods of time so that people would come onto the forum expecting to have some contact with the Vodafone customer service desk only to find that they were hanging around wasting their time and nothing was being done.

 

We challenge Vodafone on this and we said to them that we wanted better feedback as to what was happening. Vodafone seem to be saying that it was simply a matter of their resources. We are talking here about a huge international company with enormous resources for this kind of thing and also with an extremely poor reputation for its customer service and its level of complaints. In fact as you may know, Vodafone has been heavily fined by the communications regulator and also features regularly on BBC consumer programmes which investigate regular complaints against it for the way that it treats its customers.

 

Eventually we pointed out to Vodafone that we make no money here and that we were fed up with offering Vodafone a free customer helpdesk when in fact we were getting nothing in return – not even feedback. We proposed that they would pay a fee for using this forum and that this fee might even be returned depending on their performance. Vodafone walked away from us.

 

Vodafone is a serial customer abuser. People should be extremely careful about dealing with this company and certainly on this forum, we see only confirmation of the regular BBC reports and communication ombudsman criticisms.

 

Poor customer service and wrecked credit files seems to be fairly standard for many Vodafone customers. Of course, I suppose that there are lots of Vodafone customers that managed to get through their contracts without any difficulty and in fact go back to Vodafone for a second helping. However, they have been singled out by the BBC and the ombudsman as being the worst of the bunch and frankly when things go wrong Vodafone seem unable to deal with it and that is our experience here.

 

We think that it is important to keep disputes with Vodafone – and any other company – in the public gaze so that people understand what is really going on and also onlookers can understand what the way forward is when they find themselves in the same boat.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi. Sorry to BF for jumping in here but I have a bit to add to his excellent advice.

 

Vodafone do not have their own debt collection arm so they farm them out to a debt collection company. The DCA are usually acting on behalf of VF and haven't purchased the debt. This can be ascertained by looking at the letter from PastDue and see whether it says 'our client'

 

When VF sell the account it normally goes to Lowells who try to issue court claims and from the ones I have seen, they back out nearer the court date due to a lack of paperwork.

 

Basically what this means is that you deal with VF and not PastDue except maybe to tell them that the account is in dispute and not to bother you until the dispute is concluded.

 

As well as sending the SAR as BF recommended, I would be starting a separate complaint. I suggest sending them individually and by Signed For delivery.

 

VF may ask you to fill in their dedicated form. This is not required. You can use a template (modified by you) to ask for ALL data they hold.

 

The address for the SAR is:

Privacy Team (Data Protection)

Vodafone Limited

Level 2, Vodafone House

The Connection

Newbury

Berkshire

RG14 2FN

 

For complaints just write to the Customer Relations Manager at the same address.

 

Vodafone Limited

The Connection

Newbury

Berkshire

RG14 2FN

 

Hope that helps

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Good Afternoon all...

 

After your good advice a SAR was sent to Vodaphone

 

Today we recieved a letter from them......

 

Basically, they have told us that they cannot supply my daughter with the information that she requested as they say that she has not sent them proof of her identity, and that they cannot ensure that the information is being disclosed to the correct individual! They have returned the £10 payment and have assured her that they will respond with the information as soon as she sentds proof of her ID..

 

Odd that they had no problem passing her information on to Past Due who have still been contacting her and her father via text and email, (an email address that Vodaphone have never been contacted on!)

 

So, my question is, what are the next steps? Do we send them proof of ID?

 

Thanks in advance for your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm afraid this is standard practice for VF. They hope by discouraging her she won't bother getting the data. They did this with me even though I supplied two forms of ID (driving licence and passport) which should have been plenty.

 

You will have to send them more proof than already sent. Photocopies of important items. Driving Licence, Passport, Bills in her name (council tax is a good one)

 

While companies have to be very careful of disclosing data to the wrong person, Vodafone go into overkill mode. They have already communicated with her at the address she lives at so why need more proof. Delaying tactic?

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like Vodafone applying the data protection game. Quite happy to abuse data protection obligations when it suits them – but all of a sudden very interested in becoming superefficient when they think that otherwise it will put them at some kind of disadvantage.

 

You can play it two ways. You can challenge them and think about bringing an action into the courts or you can provide them with some proof.

 

If you challenge them in the courts, it would delay everything and of course you will end up paying a court fee and you will probably six months down the line before they start to be sensible.

 

If you supply them with the proof of identity then at least you can move on to the next step. You can then store this up as an extra piece of anger when you get the information you want and hopefully it will add to your sense of vengeance and ambition to get a proper settlement out of them.

 

Once again, this is another reason to avoid Vodafone. Vodafone are a poisonous company and basically run by pretty stupid people who seem to think that as long as they carry out the company's wishes then everything is all right.

 

They have lost sight of customer care.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks to you both....

 

Right, they've sent a very nice form for her to fill out, asking for her name, address, Vodafone account number etc. So, we'll fill this out and send them the ID they are asking for. I'm quite happy to drag this out if they want to play silly games.

 

As it took them nearly a month to respond, it seems like delaying tactics to me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suggest that you include a letter with the form pointing out that you are doing this only in the interest of expediency that you consider that their request is unlawful and that there is no provision for it under the Data Protection Act. Tell them that you will be making this part of your general complaint once the data you need has been received.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...