Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Block and bounce back all emails.   Block any text messages  Ignore any letters unless it's: - a Statutory Demand - a Letter Of Claim - a Court Claimform via Northants bulk.  
    • Dave if I run you by a different analogy.  Imagine you are doing 45 mph down Park Lane and a police car has clocked you doing that. When you get the Notice of Intended Prosecution they claim you were speeding in Piccadilly. So although you were speeding you weren't speeding in Piccadilly. Result -case would be thrown out. Same thing here. The contract refers to an area in Ruislip with a postcode  of HA4 OFY. On every  pcn  they have put the car in HA4 OEY. I admit that they have the correct postcode on the claimform but the car cannot be in two places at once. By pursuing Rocky on the wrong postcode means they had no reasonable cause to ask the DVLA for his details.Met does not have a contract to issue PCNs in that postcode. It is not desperation though it would be embarrassing for Met in Court and the case should be thrown out. The NTD can say whatever it wants but the NTK fails to specify the parking period and fails to ask the driver to pay S9[2][b] so that PCN does not comply with the Act so only the driver liable. And times on the photographs on the PCN are just that. Times on a photograph not on the PCN as stated in the Act.   Your strongest point is the PCN [the NTK ] is not compliant and as you were not the driver you are not liable so should go first.  Not only is it not compliant but the postcode on the NTK is different from the one on the Claim form. If the one on the NTK was wrong then Met have breached Rocky's GDPR since they had no reasonable cause to contact the DVLA as they did not have a contract  that covered that postcode and so misled the DVLA. That should be sufficient to win.  With regards to their WS sometimes the rogues leave it till the last moment to send to prevent Defendants being able to respond to what has been said. So don't send your WS until the last day. If theirs hasn't arrived by then add to your WS that their WS not received and ask that it be ignored.If it does arrive in time, then you can still amend your WS to answer any of their spurious points. As a lay person you will be granted a days latitude at least. PS do not foret to include S9[2][b] in your WS
    • Quote of the day “Head in hands and reviewing how useful my contact book will be in five weeks' time.” a Tory lobbyist, who’s not doing so good - Marie Le Conte
    • Another email ( they are coming thick and fast now) - slightly more threatening, telling me how great they are for trying to help me find a solution and how bad i am for ignoring them.     
    • I also started getting OTPs to a mobile number that I since have had to change after 10 years in case it was compromised.  The only card that I had provided to Lyca was a virtual card that they had stored for payment processing.   TLDR - Lyca are claiming no breach, there is definitely a breach. ICO are useless and havent heard from Lyca.   
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Please help - list of common failures


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5350 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

We all know that all companies cock up - some more than most.

 

I am trying to collate the most common cockups.

 

Please add to this sticky, preferably in a one line statement, the cockups that you have experienced over the years.

 

e.g.

 

DVLA ignored SORN declaration and I was fined.

Company XXX refused to refund me when good were faulty from outset.

 

etc....

 

All will become apparent soon....

 

Thank you.

If you feel that we have helped you, or you would like to help keep this web site running so that others can continue to get their money back, please click the donate button at the top of the forum.

Advice & opinions of Dave, The Bank Action Group and The Consumer Action Group are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

 

------------

 

 

Add me as your friend on FaceBook - I need all the friends I can get :-(

 

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=577405151

 

------------

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

offering you a term and contract at a price on the phone. Only for this ot be wrong. They then deny what they have said on the phone. Your word against theres? Wheres the law?, will the law support you? You get the bill after the 14 day call of period so thats another thing the tell you.

 

ive been a customer of 3 for a few years and have not previously xperienced this.

 

Many thanks

stephen

 

ps, suppsoe you cn call that misleading customers on the phone and trying to claim more money than your expecting.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

AON has not sent me an insurance certifiacte for my car after 7 months!

 

AvRabbit has not refunded my money on return of an unsuitable item.

 

BT 'restricted' my phone line while debt was in dispute. Then charged me £10 reconnection fee.

 

IR are confused over whether I should be filing returns. I have a letter saying I no longer have to file a return (despite my doing so anyway) followed by a threat of dire consequences if I don't...

 

CAG offered to help with harrassment, then didn't respond to my postings or emails... :confused:

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

IR - I had 2 letters yesterday, 1 saying I have not sent in my tax return for 2001/2002 and the other a bill for £3000 for that year.

 

I rang them to ask why they had taken six years to write to me, when it was them who lost it in the first place. now I have to fill in another for that year but I no longer have records for that period - Totally useless b*&^%$£ds

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
  • 5 months later...
  • 2 months later...

Virgin Media failed to connect me onto phone line, still sent me a bill for the £30 connection fee!

Complained using their own complaints email system, all 16 complaints ignored.

Sent three letters 14 days apart, 1st to customer service department, no reply, 2nd to customer service manager, no reply, third to MD of customers services department, no reply.

Currently in the hands of CISAS to investigate.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

B.T. Automated Texts and Phone Calls

 

Over a 6-7 month period, BT kept sending automated texts and phone calls about 'non-payment of our last bill'- up to 4 or 5 times every day, and sometimes starting on the actual day we received our monthly phone bill by post.

 

What was most annoying was that we received these texts and phone calls, anything up to 2 1/2 weeks before the 'Payment is due by xxxx' date shown on the actual bill.

 

Despite making 2 Formal Complaints in writing to the Correspondence Centre at BT, Durham, and demanding that they respond in writing to these, BT ignored everything and didn't even acknowledge receiving the Complaints.

 

As we have NEVER been in arrears with any of our monthly bills, in the many years we have been with BT, eventually I had to complain to 'Otelo' who accepted we had a valid Complaint.

 

Currently 'Otelo' has been investigating our Complaint for 8 weeks, but they say BT has been 'difficult' in responding to their enquiries.

 

'Otelo' tells me that they intend to ask for compensation on my behalf.

 

I will keep you all informed as to the final outcome.

 

BT - "It's good to talk......" ???? :lol::lol::lol:

 

Border Collie of Scotland.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm surprised at this, as I have no idea what the compensation would be for. I complained about BT supposedly printing/posting bills that took 2 weeks to arrive - as you found, these annoying calls coming even before the bills arrived. There is no mechanism to opt out (I asked). In the end, I left BT.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Kwik Fit insurance keep sending my renewal notice with only 1 years no claims when it should be 2. They even tell me on the phone that its 2 years and on the new schedule from them it says 2yrs, But the part that says this is proof of your no claims if you opt to go with another insurer it only says 1 yrs.. Arrrrrrrrrrrrrgh

The views expressed on this website are mine alone and don't reflect the views of my employer!

Link to post
Share on other sites

A lot of people seem to be having problems with dongles/mobile internet not working as expected - they're signing up to contracts and being stuck with them because of the small print.

 

Which makes you ask yourself, 'Why?'

 

They can BUY the dongle and get servce on PAYG totry out and assess for £40 or so, giving them the opportunity to verify it does what it is supposed to do.... yet they would rather get the dongle 'free' and commit themselves for 18 months or two years.

 

Madness, utter madness.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Which makes you ask yourself, 'Why?'

 

They can BUY the dongle and get servce on PAYG totry out and assess for £40 or so, giving them the opportunity to verify it does what it is supposed to do.... yet they would rather get the dongle 'free' and commit themselves for 18 months or two years.

 

Madness, utter madness.

Even a PAYG I'd buy online to return it if not satisfactory!

If in doubt, contact a qualified insured legal professional (or my wife... she knows EVERYTHING)

 

Or send a cheque or postal order payable to Reclaim the Right Ltd.

to

923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE

 

 

Click here if you fancy an email address that shows you mean business! (only £6 and that will really help CAG)

 

If you can't donate, please use the Internet Search boxes on the CAG pages - these will generate a small but regular income for the site

 

Please also consider using the

C.A.G. Toolbar

Link to post
Share on other sites

I (personally) never commit myself if I can help it. My mobile PAYG ('cos I only use about a fiver a month) Missus is a £10 Sim only. Broadband and home phone are both in contract, and at the end of the min term I'll be leaving for Sky (as the kids are harassing for the TV and the broadband comes at a very cheep price!) so will get locked into another minimum term there I guess :/

 

I can almost understand the attraction of a mobile contract where you get a shiny new phone, but a dongle? I don't see why anyone would commit themselves.

If in doubt, contact a qualified insured legal professional (or my wife... she knows EVERYTHING)

 

Or send a cheque or postal order payable to Reclaim the Right Ltd.

to

923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE

 

 

Click here if you fancy an email address that shows you mean business! (only £6 and that will really help CAG)

 

If you can't donate, please use the Internet Search boxes on the CAG pages - these will generate a small but regular income for the site

 

Please also consider using the

C.A.G. Toolbar

Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted by 'Buzby'

I'm surprised at this, as I have no idea what the compensation would be for. I complained about BT supposedly printing/posting bills that took 2 weeks to arrive - as you found, these annoying calls coming even before the bills arrived. There is no mechanism to opt out (I asked). In the end, I left BT.

 

"Otelo" have sent me a provisional decision, upholding my Complaint, and suggesting that I accept an apology plus £100 Compensation from BT, to cover "my out-of-pocket expenses involved with making my complaint, an estimated 4 hours involved with trying to get BT to resolve my Complaint over the 6-7 month period"

 

PLUS formal directive advice to BT to ensure monthly bills are received by customers at least 12 days prior to the 'Payment Due by..' date shown on the bill, and that BT's computer system is adjusted to make sure no automated texts or phone calls are sent out until at least 5 days have elapsed since the red "Reminder" late payment bill has been sent.

 

By the way, BT has admitted in their Response to "Otelo" that every customer's computer account stored on their main system, HAS a check box which can be ticked by Supervisors in order that the customer does not receive any automated texts or phone calls in respect of late payments.

 

Apparently, my customer account had a glitch that meant that although every time I phoned BT to complain, and the advisor ticked this box, as soon as the window was closed by the advisor, the ticked box cleared itself... Hhmmm...yeah, right !!

 

This is the "Otelo" rule that allows compensation to be made -

 

When the Ombudsman makes a decision which requires your company to do something to put things right for you, your company will abide by this decision. We may ask your company to offer you:

A product, service or some practical action that will benefit you

An apology or explanation

Up to £5000.00 including VAT.

The Ombudsman may also make a recommendation to your company that they change their policies or procedures. If, after investigation, we decide that your company is not at fault, we will clearly explain our reasons for this in writing.

 

Will keep you informed,

 

Border Collie of Scotland.

Edited by bordercollie
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanx Buzby,

 

New Executive Complaints Contact details for B.T.

 

Everyone might like to know of a change to the contact details thread for BT Executive Complaints.

 

I did try to P.M. Martin3030 direct, so he could change the 'sticky topic' thread himself, but his private messages Inbox isn't accepting new PM's until he empties it! perhaps he will read this post and change it himself.

 

All emails for John Williams, CEO Executive, are now being dealt with the person listed below, a Mr Pip Nicholls.

 

Pip Nicholls (Mr)

Assistant to the Chairman

& Chief Executive

( 01277 326107/ 0800 023 2067

* [email protected]

Fax 01925 712 853

*[email protected]

+ PP8, BT Contact Centre, 110 Europa Boulevard, Warrington WA5 7FZ

 

He seemed quite helpful with my contact with him, although he does take a few days to get back to you. ;)

 

Border Collie of Scotland

Link to post
Share on other sites

Which makes you ask yourself, 'Why?'

 

They can BUY the dongle and get servce on PAYG totry out and assess for £40 or so, giving them the opportunity to verify it does what it is supposed to do.... yet they would rather get the dongle 'free' and commit themselves for 18 months or two years.

 

Madness, utter madness.

 

Totally agree with you and I wouldn't do it. I do have a dongle but on PAYG and the signal is brilliant but I wouldn't sign up in case it changed in the future. But a lot do without doing any research whatsoever and from what I've seen it seems to be people who either don't know anything at all about the internet or youngsters who manage to talk their parents into it.

 

And I know that T Mobile for one are giving them "free" laptops which is probably the big attraction for a lot of people.

Edited by Jan4a
added a bit
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...