Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I left Dubai 8 years ago and intended to return. However a job prospect fell through. I’d been there for 15 years. Anyway I decided to pay my credit card and the bank had frozen my account. There is no means to pay the CC so completely unable to pay when I wanted to other than the bank advising me to ask a friend in the UAE to pay it on my behalf!  fast forward bank informs there is a police case against me for non payment. Years later IDR chased me and after months/ years they stopped. Now Judge & Priestley are trying their luck. Now I have received an email in English and Arabic from JP saying the bank has authorised them to collect debts. Is this the same as IDR although I didn’t receive anything like this from them. Just says they are authorised?
    • The neighbour's house is built right on the boundary so the side of their house is effectively the 'wall' in our garden separating the two properties. It's a three storey house and so the mortar poses a potential danger to us. Because of the danger, we have put up an interior fence in our garden to ensure we don't risk mortar dropping on us. That reduces the garden by 25% which is not only an inconvenience, but it's the part of the garden where we had lined up contractors to install a patio and gazebo which we will use for our wedding reception in less than 2 months. We have spoken to the neighbour's caretaker who is on the case, has spoken with a roofer and possibly a scaffolding company, but there are several issues. They don't seem to understand the urgency. As long as there is a risk of falling mortar, we can't carry out any work in the garden, and unless they hurry up, we're looking at cancelling our wedding as it's not viable to book a venue because we can't use our own garden! Also, they want to put the scaffolding up in our garden which would be ok with us if it was a matter of a few days and they hurried up, but there is a tree (most likely protected by the conservation area), so most likely they can only reach part of the roof with the scaffolding if they put it up in our garden. We suggested a roofer with a cherry picker but they seem to want to use a company they've used before. Any and all comments, suggestions, advice is more than welcome.  PS. does it make any difference that the neighbour is a business (ltd) and not a private dwelling?
    • No apology needed, thank you for what you do I am glad to hear they paid. well done on getting back what is yours
    • Apologies all for the late reply and info, i have been away with the Army. They have paid I accepted the offer on the 5th of May, and they paid on the 17th of May.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

First victory to Lloyds


BankFodder
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6072 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

strictly speaking yes, as you can (as lloyds did in the case of berwick) submit a written defence in your absence. What happened though was a tragedy of justice as they were not there to be answerable and the claimant got completely overhauled with questions about breach of contract. The judge bullied him. Did anyone ever find out if he was found to be a member of lloyds TSB?

 

In summary though, mostly a judge will award in favour (or should in a case where you are fully prepared) if the bank has no representation there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 457
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I have just put a claim in at Birmingham and i am pretty worried now. I realise not that there are a lot of questions i need answering - i dont even know what the court process is and if i had to stand in court and defend my claim i wouldnt have a clue what i was talking about at the moment.

 

Augsta1

Link to post
Share on other sites

Augusta1 pls dont worry have a really good read of the FAQ's plus the link for "have u got a court date" just so u can see what happens.

 

going to court is a very scary thought but people r here to help u with any concerns u have, maybe look for a court buddy in the opening page of this website.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sorry i have to agree with Granby, i think there are alot of new people who come on this site, ask a question and then get there head bitten off or a sarcy comment left because the question is answered in the FAQ's....

EVERYONE on this site will have a different level of understanding and if someone feels unsure about something then they should feel free to ask until they are 100% sure, the not asking is what also puts peoples claims at risk,

so please give the new people a chance, cuz i'm very sure we were all uncertain and a little worried when we started are claims

 

I do agree with you.

And I have never directly had a dig at any individual, or made any sarky comments at any individual.

Instead, in exactly the same spirit is was offered to me as a new member, I have freely and politely given any help I possibly can to anyone asking. As we all try to do.

 

Posting and posing questions and opinions (no matter how wrong or dumb) is not the cause of any issues I have raised. It is what this self help site is all about, and long may it remain to be so.

 

I also agree that everyone has a different level of understanding, and I also agree that everyone should be free to ask questions until they are 100% sure. It is just that some just don't even try to wait until they are sure, they jump the gun, and only start asking the most rudimentary questions once matters have got really far advanced.

It is this that puts their own cases in peril. Nobody else.

 

It is the dangers of impatience and complacency, that I have been trying to highlight to new claimants with my comments.

All opinions and advice I offer are purely my own, and are offered without any liability. If unsure seek the help of a licensed professional

...just because something's in print doesn't mean its true.... just look at you Banks T&C's for example !

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

As a bit of reassurrance, this claimant has been to Court today and won, Lloyds didn't turn up (how surprising:rolleyes: ):

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloyds-bank/46712-toddle-lloyds-tsb.html#post835530

 

Barty:)

I WON!!!! :D :D :D

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloydstsb-successes/1774-barty-lloyds-tsb.html

 

IF I HAVE BEEN HELPFUL PLEASE CLICK THE SCALES:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the second success I've heard about today, one in court, one settled. Looking like it might be business as usual after all .....

 

Has anyone heard whether Kev is definitely going to appeal? Poor bugger must be utterly, utterly overwhelmed going from "one of us" to being the best known bank charges litigant in the country! I do hope the pressure isn't too much and that he fights for what's his ...

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

photoman, my post wasnt directed at u but i am sorry if u thought it was, all i was stipulating was the fact i agree with the points that the other user had raised i have had issues recently with someone else on this website being sarky against questions asked and i think that is totally unfair and very unhelpful.

 

Regardless of how long someone has been a member we should help each other and not be nasty.

 

peace & love 'n' all that (or however the saying goes) lol

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have had issues recently with someone else on this website being sarky against questions

 

Yes - that person was me and you still haven't had the good grace to reply to my question as to what prompted your tirade of abuse aimed at me both on the forum and by very abusive PM.

 

As far as I recall all I did was give you a link to this thread. I fail to see the sarcasm in that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Augusta hi

 

I read your post when it showed in my private e-mail because I have subscribed to this thread.....I felt for you as I would be feeling exactly the same - all a bit scary to me and I would not really have a clue either...I was going to post to tell you to try not to worry and to post all of your questions here as everybody on this site is `fab`.....but having arrived on the thread I see that everybody has come through for you - as I was going to say they would.

 

Good luck! Try not to worry - stick with the guys here and all will be fine!

 

Very best wishes

Link to post
Share on other sites

My Response To U Was Not Abusive In Any Shape Or Form, I Posted A Tread Here On The 15th Asking If Anyone Had Any Info On Teh Claim In Birmingham Your Response Was, Now Let Me Think Oh Yes Here It Is, If That Is Sarcastic Then I Dont Know What Is...

 

And If I Remember Rightly Someone Else Had Also Commented On The Same Day About Ur Sarcasm..

 

But Anyway I'm Not Going To Bother With It Anyone I'm Not Here To Argue With U I'm Here To Help People In Anyway I Can But In A Sensible Manor,

Ps I Did Repsond To Ur Message

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

My Response To U Was Not Abusive In Any Shape Or Form, I Posted A Tread Here On The 15th Asking If Anyone Had Any Info On Teh Claim In Birmingham Your Response Was, Now Let Me Think Oh Yes Here It Is, If That Is Sarcastic Then I Dont Know What Is...

 

And If I Remember Rightly Someone Else Had Also Commented On The Same Day About Ur Sarcasm..

 

But Anyway I'm Not Going To Bother With It Anyone I'm Not Here To Argue With U I'm Here To Help People In Anyway I Can But In A Sensible Manor,

Ps I Did Repsond To Ur Message

Is anyone else finding this boring ......Christina everyone is very sorry if they offended you - can we please move on ?

All comments are my personal views - if in doubt then seek professional advice. If you think i've helped then please tip my scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is anyone else finding this boring ......Christina everyone is very sorry if they offended you - can we please move on and concentrate on beating the banks ?

 

Hear ... Hear ... Couldnt have said it better myself.

Please, please everyone we are loosing sight of all the good this site offers with misunderstandings and bickering.

This thread has been hyjacked by all this for long enough.

:(

If I have been helpful, PLEASE click the scales

 

 

You may receive differing advice as people have had different experiences. Please use your own judgement in deciding whose advice to take. If in doubt seek advice from a qualified insured professional. Any advice I offer is done so informally, without prejudice & without liability.

 

 

I WON !!!!

 

 

HERE WE GO AGAIN .... BRING IT ON

 

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the Dark Forces of the Establishment to which the Queen refered in her statement concerning Diana and the Paul Burrell affair had wanted to attempt a divide and rule strategy against us, it seems that they will have succeded if we continue with this bickering.

 

Put a sock in it.

 

The Banks are the enemy. Go get 'em.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i think this site is amaising, i am a poor student, the banks have taken 700 in charges out of my student loan for missed dd ect that were caused by them taking charges , same story as every one else

without this site i would of given up ages ago at the first scairy letter that they send.

but coming on here i saw that this was a template letter. that in it self is a huge weight of my mind, as i would of been frightened off.

this is a wonderful supportive community.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

but coming on here i saw that this was a template letter. that in it self is a huge weight of my mind, as i would of been frightened off.

this is a wonderful supportive community.

 

 

"Hear Hear",

 

I only discovered this website when I realised my claim was going to go all the way to the court state (maybe a bit naive I know!) - but I agree it is fantastic and everybody is helpful and gave me the kick up the bum to do it right and carry on regardless whatever I got from Lloyds and solicitors.

Still scared stiff about going to court but getting prepared and doing all that is advised on here.

 

So thanks all

Bev :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

remember not to imagine court as portrayed in the movies, this is small claims, more then likely a small room with a table, you, the judge and the defence (oh no hang on , they never turn up). read read and read, as long as you do your homework and know what your talking about theres nothing to worry about.

 

This is a great website with lots of answers and support from very knowlegable people, use it, and in turn you may be the one helping someone else out in the future.

Barclays Bank - WON :-D

Virgin - Sent N1 form

Lloyds TSB - waiting for court case to end

Egg - WON :grin:

Barclaycard - statements sent for

Halifax - statements sent for

Link to post
Share on other sites

im not as scaired of going to court as i would be if i had been going through thison my own.

i have had two small clames paid out but i am sure the RBOS will go all the way to court as a way to intimadate me.

i watched the gmtv with martin lewis, the woman who representated the banks said that banks never ask people to leave or reduce the amount of banking available to them. martin lewis dissagreaded.

the letter i recieved with the check for the small amount of money, said if i pursued this matter any further, they would reduse my account to a basic account, at that moment i really saw what the banks really thought about people, its all spin, people shouldnt be scaired to take action banks are nothing excapt gready bullies, who (hopfully) days of robbing people are numbered

Link to post
Share on other sites

My Response To U Was Not Abusive In Any Shape Or Form, I Posted A Tread Here On The 15th Asking If Anyone Had Any Info On Teh Claim In Birmingham Your Response Was, Now Let Me Think Oh Yes Here It Is, If That Is Sarcastic Then I Dont Know What Is...

 

And If I Remember Rightly Someone Else Had Also Commented On The Same Day About Ur Sarcasm..

 

But Anyway I'm Not Going To Bother With It Anyone I'm Not Here To Argue With U I'm Here To Help People In Anyway I Can But In A Sensible Manor,

Ps I Did Repsond To Ur Message

 

This will be my last post on this matter - for the record I refute your claim that your thread was not abusive - you are quite right in your statement of the facts - although I am still at loss to see quite what I did to provoke such a torrent of abuse.

 

You claim that someone else had also commented on my sarcasm on the same day - I am not aware of this and have no evidence that this is the case.

 

You did not respond to my message - unless you are referring to the abusive PM that you sent to me.

 

I fully appreciate your statement that you are here to help people that is the only reason that any of us are here - but I have to say that I have also noticed that many of your posts have been deliberately antogonistic.

 

It really does nobody any favours to react in the way that you have and only serves to distract people from the 'bigger picture'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

come one peeps!! put it in perspective wether ur in brum or not... this is one case in thousands!!!!

 

KEEP AT EM!!

 

your'e right, probably a shareholder - with a little bit of power! this judge might be a cleaner (i'm not knocking cleaners here) but he's just one judge - please don't let him stop you from doing what's right here ok.

 

lets be positive - keep going please

If i've been helpful in any way....then tip my scales over there!

Link to post
Share on other sites

nic sussex,

 

i really cant be bothered to reply to your essays anymore but i will say

ur message was sarcastic towards me and the thread that i posted. i dont care if anyone else on here doesnt think so, that was my opinion.

 

END OF

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do not know what the casue of the original dispute between you pair was, nor do I really care to get involved.

 

This may all just simply be down to the fact that the tone or manner that the written word is meant in can often be misinterpreted. In actual conversations you have the benefit of hearing the tone of someone's voice and seeing facial expressions.

 

Anyhow, regardless of whether any offence or affront was meant or taken or not, let this just be the end of the matter.

 

Let's just get this thread back onto topic.

All opinions and advice I offer are purely my own, and are offered without any liability. If unsure seek the help of a licensed professional

...just because something's in print doesn't mean its true.... just look at you Banks T&C's for example !

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can I ask something?

 

I have juyst looked back over th thread and had a read of Lloyds service chargesetc.

It clearly says that they can chrges £30 for honouring a cheque when there are no funds available.

I wa under the impression that all of these charges can be claimed back??

 

any help??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Max, these AREN'T service fees at all !!!

LTSB has a habit of "cloaking" its unlawful charges as legit fees for a service.

 

Please make sure you read up on this issue as you WILL come unstuck if you have difficulty with this concept.

Be VERY careful whose advice you listen too

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...