Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • i see you are posting this all over the internet too. here you say it was returned by the safety camera dept UK, Wales Returned NIP Nov23 - Heard Nothing - Now It's been returned as refused and have SJPN Form. Help please? WWW.FTLA.UK UK, Wales Returned NIP Nov23 - Heard Nothing - Now It's been returned as refused and have SJPN Form. Help please?  
    • I see what you mean. I will wait till the 8 weeks is up and then take it up with FOS. Before I do will be on with some more details on the SAR. Thank you once again. 
    • Tagging @stu007 who's great with this. You should have at least 2 months notice with a Section 21 notice (Which Form 6A is used) For now, scan, redact and upload anything you think will be useful    
    • That's fine.  The important thing is to show Kev you're trouble and so best to drop you like a hot potato. Invest in a 2nd class stamp tomorrow - all Kev is worth - and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • Do not under any circumstances plead guilty until we know what we are dealing with. It's a sure way to 9 points. The tried and tested way to handle this is to plead not guilty to both charges and offer to plead guilty to speeding provided the "Fail to give information" charge is dropped. But I am concerned about this "ticket refused" sticker. I've never heard of this before. A "ticket" is not a term used in connection with speeding offences. There seems a distinct possibility that your response was received by the police but one thing worries me: I've never heard of a sticker being placed on a response and it being returned "Return to Sender". t's just not what ticket offices do. If you could post a picture of this document and the sticker it might help.  If you can show the response was received you may have a defence to the "Fail to Provide" charge (provided you completed your response properly). If the police are saying you did not respond they cannot succeed with a speeding charge (as they have no evidence you were driving). But if you did not respond, who put the sticker on the document and sent it back yo you?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

to procced or not.


enaid
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6221 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have now received some statements and letter about microfiche, with others to follow. Should I start the claim for the charges I have now, or would it be best to wait for the rest of the statements and do just one claim?

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are not estimated I have statements from June 2004, i just wondered if it would be ok to start a claim on these and then claim again on the other statements, that they say will take a while to arrive.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just do one claim

 

Have they said when they hope to get you them by?

 

If it were me, I'd send the prelimary letter now. You have around 28 days then to add the rest before starting the claim. You don't have to do an estimated claim, just add the rest on when you get them.

 

There is nothing to stop you doing this, and it will save a lot of time.

for FAQs & Step By Step

click here

for Templates Library

click here

for Court Bundle

click here

________________

 

WON 121o121 'vs' LloydsTSB

here

WON 121o121 'vs' Halifax C C

here

WON 121o121 'vs' Cahoot CC

here

WON 121o121 'vs' LloydsTSB (again)

here

 

________________

Link to post
Share on other sites

In the next 6 weeks or so! but I have read other threads and it seems to be taking longer than this to get the rest of the statements even through the legal route. So are you saying start claim now, and later alter figures and interest?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well the interest isn't an issue until you start the claim through the courts.

 

If you start the prelimary letter now, you can save alot of the waiting at a later date. You can add the later charges right up until you file your claim. Lots of claimants add the extra charges just before they submit their N1.

for FAQs & Step By Step

click here

for Templates Library

click here

for Court Bundle

click here

________________

 

WON 121o121 'vs' LloydsTSB

here

WON 121o121 'vs' Halifax C C

here

WON 121o121 'vs' Cahoot CC

here

WON 121o121 'vs' LloydsTSB (again)

here

 

________________

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi enaid :D

 

I would tend to agree with 121.... in that....

 

*personally I would not start an estimated claim yet (however)

 

(and I think you are right about waiting for the microfiche):rolleyes:

 

*there is nothing wrong now starting with the priliminary letter now :D to get the ball rolling. You can state you want to claim £x +£y interest + £microfiche info, which you are waiting on (from them).

 

In theory, and I know you are considering you should include the £z contractual now too :!: ; but I never included mine until the LBA stage. You could spend the time researching the yukky yukky £z too.

 

Incidentally, the more letters you write before you actually submit the claim to proove to the judge how hard you have tried to settle the claim.... not that your end up in court ;)

 

 

Hope this gives a fully answer; and thanks for visiting my thread :-)

 

Innocent

:D CLICK MY SCALES IF I HAVE BEEN USEFUL :D

*

BARCLAYCARD WON £307

*

CAPITAL ONE WON £2.1k

*

NATWEST WON £3.4k

*

LLOYDS TSB CURRENT

Start 26/4 LBA 7/6 conLBA 22/1 N1 12/3 AQ 3/5/07ONHOLD

MORE THAN/ LLOYDS MCARD

Start 2/11 CONTL LBA 15/1/07 NOW RE-RESEARCHING

MONUMENT VISA

Start 1/11 CONTL LBA 15/1/07 NOW RE-RESEARCHING

NATWEST BUSINESS

RESEARCHING

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it is tempting to get the ball rolling but Michael Browne knows what he is talking about. I sent letter to Mr Whalley threatening court action and got my statements a week later. They might be more anxious to play ball after 'Whistleblower' IMHO. Sally

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I have sent Request for Payment letter on 16th March, they received it 19th March, so I am giving them till 2nd April for response. Still not had earlier statements but I will add them on later as suggested.

Don't know if I am coming or going, I have Monument and Cap 1 on the go as well, all for my son mind you (bl88dy kids whou'ld ave em):confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I have sent Request for Payment letter on 16th March, they received it 19th March, so I am giving them till 2nd April for response. Still not had earlier statements but I will add them on later as suggested.

Don't know if I am coming or going, I have Monument and Cap 1 on the go as well, all for my son mind you (bl88dy kids whou'ld ave em):confused:

 

Hi enaid I had similar problem as you with Halifax so I started the prelim stage with 2005/2007 statements mentioning I would include further charges when they complied with SAR. Got my statements after 43 days so when I sent LBA amended Schedule of charges to include all charges.

starting court claim 31/3/2007 don't need to wish you good luck just be patient you will get paid.

 

dpick :razz:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks dpick,

I didn't tell them I would be adding on the older charges in my prelim, as I expect I will have to do an LBA, so I will include it in that letter. Did you do Contractual Int? I find that very daunting, but I would love to squeeze every bit out of them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks dpick,

I didn't tell them I would be adding on the older charges in my prelim, as I expect I will have to do an LBA, so I will include it in that letter. Did you do Contractual Int? I find that very daunting, but I would love to squeeze every bit out of them.

 

Hi, I am not going for contractual interest just 8% at court stage with halifax. I want to go through a standard claim where I get the money in my hot sticky hands first. I will be going for charges interest on charges and interest on that total. With Capital one if I get both PPI and charges etc back I will have something left after clearing card MBNA will just pay some of the balance of card.

 

dpick:razz:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did exactly the same thing with my first claims. I assume you are referring to 'debit interest - as notified last month' if yours is a current account? Quite right you will get it all back as long as you stick to your guns and refuse to be bullied either verbally or by letter. A very empowering experience.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hello Anedar

It wasn't an estimated claim as such, I only received statements from 04 with £312 on them so I requested that.Anyway as I heard nothing I sent LBA on 4/4. Yesterday I received offer of £120 the letter was dated 30/3 but no frank on envelope to say when it was posted. I said on LBA I will be reclaiming any charges on the earlier statements when they finally send them. If your 40 days are up there is a letter of non compliance DPA in the Template letters, giving another 7 days to comply, and I think you complain OFS (not sure if it is them but you will see when you look for the letter). Hope this helps.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...