Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have just received a PCN from Euro Car Parks for exceeding allowed parking time. I have not replied, appealed or contacted anyone from Euro Car Parks but would appreciate any advice before deciding on my next course of action. I have attached letter of correspondence    Euro Car Parks PCN.docx
    • It's better to keep advice on the open forum for everyone's benefit. Maybe you could post up the correspondence in a single pdf document and cover up your personal details, reference numbers and so on? HB
    • Hi on the notice of disqualification it lists the 2 speed offences and marks offence withdrawn? This is for both offences and then the other 2 is the MS90s which I’m fined for and the additional costs. R
    • Hi,    It has taken a while, but I have received an email from Auxillis -  hello, we are not dealing with this claim all we do is log accident for you isnurance - the claim has been passed to your underwriter markerstudy 0344 873 8183 as they are deal with fault cliams ion behalf of adrian flux. thankyou auxillis   I have made repeated attempts to phone Markerstudy in between working from home, struggling for energy and trying to find a cheap car so that I can keep my job (community support worker). Thankfully I have a supportive team and I am being given phone calls to make but it cant last too long. I had a severe migraine over the weekend and also have quite bad whiplash in my neck and back.    I found this in my insurance policy booklet -    Protection and Recovery If the insured vehicle cannot be driven following an incident leading to a valid claim under this section, we will pay: • the cost of its protection and removal to the nearest approved repairer, competent repairer or nearest place of safety; and • the cost of re-delivery after repairs to your home address; and • the cost of storage of the insured vehicle incurred with our written consent. If the insured vehicle is damaged beyond economical repair we will arrange for it to be stored safely at premises of our choosing. You should remove your personal belongings from the insured vehicle before it is collected from you. In the event of a claim being made under the policy we have the right to remove the insured vehicle to an alternative repairer, place of safety or make our own arrangments for re-delivery at any time in order to keep the cost of the claim to a minimum     I do about 20-25000 miles a year with the work I do, I have been getting quotes and putting that I have now have one accident and no no claims bonus and the cheap quotes from similar companies to markerstudy are more than double what i paid last year at 8-900 and aviva is offering 2600 which is simply out of my price range and more than the car i am looking at.  I am starting to wonder if it is even worth going ahead with the claim as i have no one to claim from. I have had no information from any of the enquiries I have made.  I have a full tank of vpower diesel in the car in the impound, i can strip it for parts and probably make what I will be offered by the insurance payout and get the money quicker.  As I have made contact and started the process can I back out, still keep my NCB and a claim free history? Also what happens with my injuries? I don't think there is any permanent damage but my dr refused to see me and just gave me a boat load of naproxen and codeine. What happens in the future if things don't get better and I cancelled this claim? Can you claim injuries off your own insurance because the other guy ran and you cant find him? I have tried to ask these questions off markerstudy but they keep me waiting for nearly an hour then end the call.    Thank you for your time and help.  It is really appreciated.  I am quite honestly on the floor, I have been really ill, in hospital, had nearly 6 months off work and only been back full time a few weeks and now this.  The fact the company you pay large sums of money to look after you in a time of need is also behaving criminally just makes you want to give up.    
    • Thanks for the response. Am I able to send you the documents I’ve received or can you message via instant message and I’ll send these? Reece
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Mass complaint ;Add your name here if a dca has acted incorrectly with your account.


MARTIN3030
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4122 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Several DCA's on bahalf of Egg, including CSL. Threatening letters - bailiffs, ccjs etc will be obtained. Phonecalls from 7 in the morning till 9.30 at night. Ignoring my request for everything in writing.

Egg now sold debt to Hillesden who have tried the threatening bit. I've cca'd them and that went into default on 16th May, they have now supplied me with a copy of the agreement which appears that it may be invalid. They haven't supplied all documents referred to in the agreement which I believe falls under a s.77 request and they haven't supplied me with a statement of account or similar, again a requirement of a s.77 request.

Capital One - obscene. Constant phonecalls. Very threatening and aggresive. Told my wife they could do whatever they wanted even though I'd told them and everyone else to put things in writing. Letters were constant and also threatening action which they would have to get a court order to do but phrased as if it was a foregone conclusion.

Monument - even worse than Capital One.

Citicards - similar to monument.

Debts sold by some of these companies to cabot.

Cabot, tried themselves on some and have engaged dcas on others.

Cabot - monument debt - sent me a letter the day after receiving my cca request saying that interest was still accruing on my account! Then sent a letter saying it may take 8 weeks to get the information from monument.

Scotcall - on bahalf of cabot I think - completely ignored my cca request and on the day of default sent me a letter saying I had not responded to them - I have a recorded delivery slip that says otherwise.

Littlewoods. Have ignored my cca request. Letter from NDR dca (I think this is in house) dated the same day that they received my cca request (not suspicious at all). Trying to lay down the law to me. Sent another letter a few days later showing charges added to the account - in breach of the cca request. Sent a letter on the day of default saying I've ignored them and threatening all sorts of rubbish.

These are just the briefest of details.

One occasion springs to mind that best describes my fury with their behaviour. After sending a second letter to one of them because it was becoming increasingly tiresome I was upstairs trying to console my newborn daughter (born premature weighing only 1.5 kg) who was very collicky and to give my wife who was suffering post natal depression a bit of 'her time' alone - both of which had been detailed in the letters to said companies - and they rang up. I told them I wouldn't go through their security questions etc and their tone went very aggressive. I referenced my letters to them and the law on this type of communication and they started the normal diatribe. My daughter at this point was becoming increasingly distressed and the women just would not shut up so I rather impolitely had to tell her to f**k o*f and I put the phone down. Ten minutes later the phone rang again from the same company and a man spoke and he was very aggressive, coming out with rubbish about using obscenity on the phone. I explained to him that he was in breach of several laws and that he should also f**k o*f. They didn't ring back for over a week.

Anyway it got so bad and because of the stress at home with a newborn child who needed a lot of extra care and a wife with postnatal depression I decided that rather than spend money taking action againt them I would just change my phone number. It must have taken them a few weeks to suss it out because after about a month the threatening letters were arriving in bulk. Great for recycling.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Wescot and Equidebt chasing me for the same debt but Equidebt wanted £4k more than Wescot??? i fought this one and won :D i got a CCJ for it but i couldn't stop laughing because instead of paying them £40 a month the court has ordered me to pay £1 a month:p

 

Wescot premium rate 0870 contact numbers

Wescot phoning another company i worked next to too speak to me

told him to @@@@ off.

Transcom keep phoning, after telling them not to, and to deal with me by post.

Transcom phoning late at night.

just a few i can remember off hand loads more but cant remember the company names.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wescot - for sending me a letter regarding my mate's dad's debt with them! they have my details for a vodafone bill i didnt pay but don't know how they think he lives there. i sent them this response:

 

I write further to your letter dated 15 May 2007 to my address which was meant for John ........

This gentleman is a friend’s father. He has never, nor will ever live at my address and any financial problems he has are a confidential matter which he would not share with me.

Sending letters to my address regarding his private business are a breach of the acts which govern agencies such as yourselves and any future breach of Mr .......’s confidential business will result in me informing Mr ....... and the relevant bodies immediately.

Your actions have caused embarrassment to both me and Mr ........ This is also a massive breach of the data protection act. As far as I am aware, sending letters to your debtors’ daughter’s friends is not common practice.

Please remove all reference to my address from your records and provide me with written evidence that my address is now clear of any reference to Mr ....... residing here as a matter of urgency. I also require confirmation of any other company this information has been passed to and proof that they have been corrected.

I also require a sincere and genuine apology as well as reimbursement for the time and effort taken to write this letter.

Many thanks.

Me v NatWest £1.5k settled after Disc App

Jo v Barclaycard settled after Disc App

Jo v Cap 1 settled after Disc App

Jo v Abbey Disc App sent to court

Jo v Natwest cag3 let due

Nikkii v Barclays judgement in default against Barclays

Nikkii v B’card directions returned

Nikkii v Natwest settled

Laura v Lloyds – directions & aq sent

Luke v Lloyds – AQ & directions sent to court

Mark v Halifax – settled

Liam v A&L settled

Liam v Lloyds part settled - still going

Vanya v RBOS, CAG 3 let sent

Vanya v RBOS Awaiting statements

Vanya v Virgin issue on 30/03

Carl v Natwest settled

Dean v Barclays – disc app issued

Dean v B’card – disc app issued

Dean v Cap 1 – awaiting statements

(another 5 files that won't fit) busy me!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wescot - for sending me a letter regarding my mate's dad's debt with them! they have my details for a vodafone bill i didnt pay but don't know how they think he lives there. i sent them this response:

 

I write further to your letter dated 15 May 2007 to my address which was meant for John ........

 

This gentleman is a friend’s father. He has never, nor will ever live at my address and any financial problems he has are a confidential matter which he would not share with me.

 

Sending letters to my address regarding his private business are a breach of the acts which govern agencies such as yourselves and any future breach of Mr .......’s confidential business will result in me informing Mr ....... and the relevant bodies immediately.

 

Your actions have caused embarrassment to both me and Mr ........ This is also a massive breach of the data protection act. As far as I am aware, sending letters to your debtors’ daughter’s friends is not common practice.

 

Please remove all reference to my address from your records and provide me with written evidence that my address is now clear of any reference to Mr ....... residing here as a matter of urgency. I also require confirmation of any other company this information has been passed to and proof that they have been corrected.

 

I also require a sincere and genuine apology as well as reimbursement for the time and effort taken to write this letter.

 

Many thanks.

 

Let us know if you get the apology, I could do with a giggle.

Link to post
Share on other sites

melanee - these companies are unbelievable ? This is really horrible isn't it? I sure hope you get some apology from them - but even an apology doesn't anywhere near cover this sort of behaviour does it? There are clearly no excuses for companies to behave in such a manner are there?

 

I would certainly go to the ICO, OFT, FOS anywhere you can complain to get this looked at.

Link to post
Share on other sites

UPDATE!

 

this is priceless... got home yesterday to find a letter from Wescot confirming they're investigating my complaint. At least they've acknowledged my letter.

 

However, they have also sent a red reminder letter for my friend's dad too (in the hope it'll scare iccle old me into paying my friend's dad's debt!)

 

sent the following letter:

 

Yet again I find myself receiving correspondence from you regarding John ..................... despite him NEVER having been a resident at my address.

To reiterate the contents of my previous letter (which you have received, acknowledged and totally ignored???) this gentleman is a friend’s father and sending me details of his financial problems is totally inappropriate and in breach of a large number of regulations governing agencies such as yourselves.

I am amazed that I am writing to you about this matter yet again. If I am corresponding in a language that is not understood please advise?

I am Melanie Bree of the aforementioned address and would like to know if there is a possibility of a gentleman (who is not a small man) having moved in to my home without my permission or knowledge or in fact me noticing at all! It is extraordinary that from your offices in Hull you have managed to decide that he resides with me when I am totally unaware of it.

As far as I am aware, in this particular situation (which is not unusual) I am not living with my friend’s father (nor ever will). Seeing as I have known this gentleman since I was five years of age and am good friends with his wife and three daughters, I doubt I ever will take up residence with him.

Since February 2007, I have been visited by one of your bailiffs and received two letters regarding this matter. I have been clear and honest each and every time about the current circumstances.

As no positive action has been taken by you, I am now of the opinion that I am dealing with dim-wits.

I find this situation highly frustrating and boring and having now realised that I am dealing with people of limited intelligence I will shortly be taking the matter further.

I have sent this letter via recorded delivery as I feel this situation has been neglected by you and from past experience, I can only assume that history will repeat itself and my requests will not be dealt with.

If you decide to take further action, please be advised that I shall defend the claim in full and will inform the relevant bodies as well as consumer organisations such as Watchdog (who I am sure will be very interested in your incompetence). They may even choose to embarrass you publicly (although you are quite competent at doing this all by yourselves). Please note the details of this matter have been posted on the Consumer Action Group Website and are already attracting attention and highlighting how dense the members of staff you employ actually are!

I look forward to hearing from you with the required information, a full apology for your failings to provide a decent and adequate service and compensation for the time, effort and inconvenience I have been put to as well as the full costs of every letter I have had to prepare to you.

Many thanks.

Me v NatWest £1.5k settled after Disc App

Jo v Barclaycard settled after Disc App

Jo v Cap 1 settled after Disc App

Jo v Abbey Disc App sent to court

Jo v Natwest cag3 let due

Nikkii v Barclays judgement in default against Barclays

Nikkii v B’card directions returned

Nikkii v Natwest settled

Laura v Lloyds – directions & aq sent

Luke v Lloyds – AQ & directions sent to court

Mark v Halifax – settled

Liam v A&L settled

Liam v Lloyds part settled - still going

Vanya v RBOS, CAG 3 let sent

Vanya v RBOS Awaiting statements

Vanya v Virgin issue on 30/03

Carl v Natwest settled

Dean v Barclays – disc app issued

Dean v B’card – disc app issued

Dean v Cap 1 – awaiting statements

(another 5 files that won't fit) busy me!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Credit Security Ltd - they ahve been after me for years and keep saying that a further £120 is added to account balance due to their field rep calling WHEN WHAT DATE AND TIME, never had them here

 

Bryan Carter & Co - again this debt is in the hand of 2 collectors for a catalogue around 4 years ago, never know who to deal with due to the 2 companies having an intrest in the debt.

 

GPB - geoffrey parker bourne - this is a new one after hubby for a 3G phone which we paid it now stands at £147.55 ???????

 

and the muppet who is after or car sent by Norrie Waite and Slater for OnLine Finance Ltd is name is ben lonsman, when i rang Norrie waite to complain and say that i was checking him out they panicked saying that they were very sorry and he will not be calling gain, hum.... why is this perhaps he's not reg with any company ? perhaps he's a mate who knows.... as long as the muppet won;t call again but when this case is over I WILL BE PERSUING THIS HE CALLED ME EVERYTHING AND USED FOUL LANGUAGE TO ME.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Where do i start......

Wescott, (UN)reliable, Capquest, Aktiv, Moorcroft to name but a few

 

 

ALL FOR SHEER INCOMPITANCE

FOR THE BENEFIT OF OUR FRIENDS IN THE NSA USING THE PRISM SYSTEM. HELLO FROM THE UK.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Every single one of them especally 1st Credit and DLC who don't know what is about to hit them.

Echo that completely. 1st Credit for telephone intimidation and letter harrassment. DLC, for intimidation by letter. Plus Buchanan Clark and Wells who know our situation, know that we're paying through Payplan, but still being oafs. LTSB's 'Collection Department', for passing us around, letter harrassment and sending the debt twice to BCW:!:

We will not be intimidated.

'The pen is mightier than the sword'.

Petition to Outlaw Debt Sale and Purchase

- can't read/post much as eye strain's v.bad.

VIVA CAG!!! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Regal Credit Consultants (RCC) for leaving multiple messages shouting "[firstname] [surname] call RCC NOW!" when returning my calls or arranging a review of payments. Also putting pressure on my by phone to pay more than I could afford even when it was obvious I couldn't afford more than I was offering.

Link to post
Share on other sites

CBS Transcom. For ringing my mobile (God knows how they got it) and leaving a message for "Joe Bloggs" using number withheld "I never answer with held numbers) when I rung them back, without realising who it was, to tell them they had left a message on my phone for some one else- thay used every trick in the book to get me to reveal my identity

Link to post
Share on other sites

Direct Legal & Collections (DLC) part of Hillesdon Securities, combined with APLINS solicitors, these are with reference to EGG Banking plc

 

Buchanon Clarke & Wells, plus shoosmiths, these are in relation to Morgan Stanley.

 

The above chosen agents of each lending institution actied inappropriately, whilst I am in Dispute!

 

However, once I put a 'shot across their bows' all has gone eerily silent.

 

Love AC

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll add RMA and NCO as they complately ignore everything that is being said to them and threaten all manner of legal action.

I'm working with TS about these "people".

 

I found TS very helpful and non-judgemental, I highly recomend everyone to try this route.

Just be honest and open with them and they treat you with professional respect.

Be VERY careful whose advice you listen too

Link to post
Share on other sites

Philips bailiffs - for turning up in my work place and shouting across a crowded reception despite my providing them with evidence from the court that my case had been reslisted

 

Ultimate Credit Services - for misquoting DPA with the intention of scaring into submission, for threats of intimidation

:p MY POSTS ARE MY OPINION ONLY...IF IN DOUBT TAKE PROPER ADVICE...I'M JUST CLAIMING TOO !

 

NatWest SETTLED IN FULL 25/08/06

Capital One settled in full 12/10/06

LTSB prelim letter sent 25/08/06

LTSB standard prelim response received 02/09/06

LBA sent 15/09/06

DONATE TO THIS SITE BY CLICKING THE LINK AT THE TOP OF THIS PAGE

Link to post
Share on other sites

chrissielr, I'm gob smacked:eek: Philips bailiffs - for turning up in my work place and shouting across a crowded reception.

LTSB court date 25/7/07

17/7/07 I WON I WON I WON!!!!:p :grin:

HSBC court date 11/9/07 (stayed)

CapOne lba 7/1/08-15/3/08 WON.

Citicards lba 14/1/08

 

Read Read and Read Some:razz: More

 

If I've been helpful in anyway please tip my scales:rolleyes:

 

Please note that this advice is given informally, without liability and without prejudice. Seek the advice of an insured qualified professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Philips bailiffs - for turning up in my work place and shouting across a crowded reception despite my providing them with evidence from the court that my case had been reslisted

 

Ultimate Credit Services - for misquoting Data Protection Act with the intention of scaring into submission, for threats of intimidation

 

 

That is so BAD !!! Is there a code of conduct these idiots should follow where they are supposed to use descretion? Surely they aren't supposed to do stuff like this?

 

Surely they aren't allowed to go to a work place and do this? I'm thinking maybe there is room to report this idiot to court for his conduct?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well when I went to court (it was to defend a parking fine) the respresentative from the City Council said they had a duty to inform the bailiffs of my whereabouts and that Philips had the right to deliver a letter to me there.

 

The District Judge didn't pass comment, but he did seem very slanted in my direction and I won the day.

 

At the time I was working in the global headquarters of a large plc and, thankfully, there were no clients in the area. One of the lovely receptionionists threw him out, but needless to say it reacahed my bosses who weren't impressed. I was going to make a formal complaint, but I was just so fed up with the whole thing at the time - I suppose I still should.

:p MY POSTS ARE MY OPINION ONLY...IF IN DOUBT TAKE PROPER ADVICE...I'M JUST CLAIMING TOO !

 

NatWest SETTLED IN FULL 25/08/06

Capital One settled in full 12/10/06

LTSB prelim letter sent 25/08/06

LTSB standard prelim response received 02/09/06

LBA sent 15/09/06

DONATE TO THIS SITE BY CLICKING THE LINK AT THE TOP OF THIS PAGE

Link to post
Share on other sites

RMA - Barclays have passed my overdraft debt to them.

I have sent them a CCA request, which they have yet to comply. They sent me a letter just stating that unless I pay up they will have to send the debt back to Barclays - no mention of my CCA request.

I have also sent them a letter to ask them to stop harrassing me, but they still ring me 5 times a day, and as I don't answer the phone to them because I asked them to put everything in writing, they then ring my parents house, even though my mother who is 64 and has a broken hip has told them to stop ringing as I do not live there anymore!! They ring her at least once a day.

POPPY07

Link to post
Share on other sites

Poppy07, put a complaint into TS OFT etc about what they are doing, and cc RMA that you have done so.

The more people complain and give solid evidence of the despicable way these dca's are acting, the sooner it can be stopped.:)

LTSB court date 25/7/07

17/7/07 I WON I WON I WON!!!!:p :grin:

HSBC court date 11/9/07 (stayed)

CapOne lba 7/1/08-15/3/08 WON.

Citicards lba 14/1/08

 

Read Read and Read Some:razz: More

 

If I've been helpful in anyway please tip my scales:rolleyes:

 

Please note that this advice is given informally, without liability and without prejudice. Seek the advice of an insured qualified professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

LTSB court date 25/7/07

17/7/07 I WON I WON I WON!!!!:p :grin:

HSBC court date 11/9/07 (stayed)

CapOne lba 7/1/08-15/3/08 WON.

Citicards lba 14/1/08

 

Read Read and Read Some:razz: More

 

If I've been helpful in anyway please tip my scales:rolleyes:

 

Please note that this advice is given informally, without liability and without prejudice. Seek the advice of an insured qualified professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...