Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Is the letter headed Letter of Claim/before Claim or similar? If not, it sounds like more of the threatogram chain. If you're not sure, post up an anonymised copy of the letter and we'll check. HB
    • So guess what, we have received a final demand letter for £100. It states if payment is not made by 11/06 they will have no option but to forward the case to their litigation dept with a view to commence County Court Proceedings. So just wondering if anyone has any advice. Do we ignore this? or do we need to take action? Thanks 
    • hi dx, thanks for helping just re-reading everything this morning and I must have missed this one from uncle in his thread "What you should not do, is not contact the Banks and simply default on payments. "  are you in disagreement with this based on your last sentence?
    • Thanks for the reply and clarification, that might just explain why in my case contact has pretty much ceased. Though with such companies it doesn't mean they won't ever threaten to return to court as a tool to force one's hand if they feel they are not self informed on their chances etc.  But concerning how last year they tried to use the CCJ to get a charging order and the court granted an intirum order on our mortgage using the CCJ that would have been a good 2-3 months beyond the 6 years, should the court not have checked the age of the CCJ in the first case or would they always grant an interim order simply off the back of a CCJ being produced without even checking the age of it?.  Had I not defended that action at the time they may well have got a default using a CCJ older than 6 years which could be a concern going forwards. At the time when I contacted the court to question the paperwork for a final order application the clerk suggested people don't get informed when companies apply for interim charging orders, they are automatic if a claimant has a CCJ and people only get contacted once a date for a final order application goes through. kind of begs the question if such companies can continue a seemingly backdoor method to attempt default action if un-defended if the initial application doesn't need to check the age of a CCJ?.
    • Hello!  Wondering if someone can help with this.  I suspect not but worth a go.  I appreciate the "contract is with the seller" line, which is what Evri has fed me but wanted to see if someone with experience in these things could suggest anything else I could do here.  I appreciate there are many topics about lost parcels - My parcels weren't lost, until the driver walked up to my door with them and then decided to make them lost/stolen... I'll summarise what has happened.  Wednesday of last week - Evri delivery driver stole / walked off with 3 of my parcels.  -  Arrived outside my properly, took photos (3 separate photos as its 3 separate deliveries) of the tops of the parcels (pointlessly zoomed in on just the labels, couldn't see anything else, other than a small piece of the pavement and a little weed, which doubly confirms it was outside my door as I can see the same plant), marked the order as delivered and walked off with them.  He's marked on the Evri GPS marked that he was outside.   -  3 different deliveries, from the same company (same boxes etc.), but 3 separate tracking numbers. -  Went through the Evri bot which opened a case on each tracking number.  I then phoned them and left a voicemail explaining what had happened. -  24 hours later had a canned response asking me if the packages had turned up and to check around etc..  I responded explaining again what happened and that they've definitely been taken. -  4 days later,  this morning, I get a response telling me to ask the merchant to refund me. I've responded to this message with a long email, repeating what I said, that I believe the driver has stolen these packages and that he took those suspicious top down shots of the packages, marked them as delivered without ringing or knocking etc.  I've said that I expect them to investigate further, but I gather they won't. In my several messages to them initially and later, I told them I don't care about a refund and wanted the parcels.  They contain some sentimental stuff, nothing of high monetary value, hence me going to this trouble.  I only paid £25 for the contents. I did contact the merchant when this first happened and they asked me to wait a few days.  They ended up refunding me despite me asking them not to and that I wanted them to escalate it with Evri because this appears to be a case of theft.  They didn't seem bothered - Refunded me and told me to go back to Evri and escalate it with them? So - Is there any way to compel Evri to conduct a proper investigation with this driver?  Search for my parcels? I have quite a lot of deliveries handled by Evri (not out of choice) - They used to have a fantastic chap and I rarely had any issues.  He has been replaced by a new guy and I believe the route is handled by this same guy who I believe has taken my packages.  Naturally, I fear this is going to happen again in the future if no investigation occurs. Appreciate any assistance - Thanks for reading. Al.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

UKPC/DCBL ANPR PCN - appealed PAPLOC Now Claimform - Mcdonalds Bristol Patchway, 562 BS34 5TQ ***Claim Discontinued***


Recommended Posts

The sooner the questionnaire done the better to see what they are saying.

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to UKPC/DCBLegal, ANPR PCN Letter Of Claim

Hi Guys many thanks for your patience. It took me a while to go through everything and provide you will the correct information.

Here is my questionnaire.

1 Date of the infringement 09-12-22

 2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 13-12-22
  

3 Date received 11-01-23 BUT!!..

– This was during the xmas period and there was also the mail strikes going on.

It was originally sent to my old address in South Wales, it was then redirected to my daughter in Glasgow, Scotland because I had been living in a hotel for a short period of time and i had no address.

My daughter is young and she was not opening my mail very frequently so she had no idea that there was anything urgent there.

had a redirection set up from Nov 2022 to Apr 2023 (6 months).

I did email UKPC all this information and tried to appeal but they told me I missed the deadline to appeal this PCN.
 

4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] Yes
 

5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? yes
 

6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] yes but i was told I had waited too long before appealing, I explained the reason why I missed the deadline but they did not seem to care. I don’t have the email or ref number sadly.
 

Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up yes but im sorry I cant find the email
 

7 Who is the parking company? ukpc

 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Mcdonalds Bristol Patchway, Bristol.
 

For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. POPLA
 

If you have received any other correspondence, please mention it – PCN+letter of claim from dcblegal included in pdf

 

 

PCN+PAPLOC.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to UKPC/DCBLegal, ANPR PCN - appealed by email - Letter Of Claim - Mcdonalds Bristol Patchway, 562 BS34 5TQ

how many speculative invoices have you had now...and you STILL BLINDLY APPEAL...:noidea:

 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, if the OP had kept the evidence of the fleecers refusing to accept the appeal, it would have been good ammunition down the line. 

I'm constantly amazed by people who lose important documents whilst in a legal dispute. 

Still, they might get lucky and get hold of it during a SAR...

  • Like 2

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, so you need to reply with a snotty letter.

Just to check something first.  Have you notified them in writing of your new address?

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

@dx100uk

to be clear after the second one as soon as i received it from my daughter. Why is it 'blindingly' are you mocking me for some reason?

You used to be very helpful but now you take every opportunity to have a dig at me. What has changed. If you cant post anything positive please ignore my posts and do me a favour.

I have donated many times to this forum and this is the thanks i get for it.

have very serious mental health problems and i will refrain from saying what i really think about your crappy posts.

If you have a problem with me please let me know as i have no idea. You are like a troll. You went from hero to zero.

@FTMDave - The recent letter from DCBlegal was sent to my new address so maybe they got it from the voters reg. 

@Nicky Boy - Thanks for your reply, it is easy to lose an old email i think everyone can relate to that.

IM from Scotland so im not used to bombardment of parking charges in England, i guess its wishful think that they will all go away but this one has come back to bite in the bum.

How will a SAR affect the letter of claim?

Link to post
Share on other sites

be careful. sorry but you must be a realist here - mental health issues are not an excuse. the fleecers couldn't careless and WILL exploit any mistakes to their advantage regardless and a court most certainly dont care. 

im keeping you on your toes and will continue to do so. you dont want later schoolboy mistakes creeping in and destroying your chances in court should things ever escalate that far and if they do - those mistakes cannot be undone.

donations are not bribes

we dont get paid anything. 

you should know by now, i will use any tool in my toolbox to help members.

 

47 minutes ago, mystic_bertie said:

The recent letter from DCBlegal was sent to my new address so maybe they got it from the voters reg. 

you need to get the snotty letter off as that will kill 2 birds.

hopefully deter them from escalation. legally inform of correct and current address

 

47 minutes ago, mystic_bertie said:

How will a SAR affect the letter of claim?

it doesnt its a separate issue.

but by sending UKPC an sar you might get a copy of what you put in your appeal, as that could be useful later on if we need to paper over any mistakes like admitting you were the driver by use i or me rather than 'the driver' did etc.

  • Like 1
  • I agree 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just in case you missed it among DX's lengthy post,  you should include an unambiguous statement of your change of address in your snotty letter. 

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

Link to post
Share on other sites

dx and Nicky Boy are spot on.  The fleecers may be writing to the correct address now, but there's nothing stopping them having another go in three months' time say, deliberately sending the court papers to the wrong address, and you'll have a backdoor CCJ.  We've seen it happen.

So invest in two 2nd class stamps on Monday and send off the following.  Make sure you get two free Certificates of Posting from the post office.  Once that's done we can move on to the SAR.

 

Dear DCB Legal,

Re: PCN no.XXXXX

firstly, would both you and your client kindly note that I no longer live at XXXXX but instead now at XXXXX.

Next.  Cheers for your Letter of Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in mirth at the idea you actually thought I'd take such tripe seriously and cough up!

As usual you'll have been too bone idle to carry out any due diligence.  Had you done so, you would have seen how your client has broken every trade association rule in the book in my case.

Your client can either stop this madness now or else get a hell of a thrashing in court, where I will be sure to request an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.1(1)(b).

I look forward to your deafening silence.

Yours, XXXXX

COPIED TO UK PARKING CONTROL LTD

  • Like 5

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've had a look at their PCN and it is not compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012.

Schedule 4 S9[2][a] states  (2)The notice must—

(a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates;

There is no period of parking mentioned on the PCN at all. What it does show  is when you arrived and when you left. That is not the period of parking since you have to drive from the entrance to the parking spot and later, leaving the parking space and driving to the exit which cannot be described as parking.  But by using the arrival and leaving times as the parking criteria it makes it look as if you stayed  longer than you should because of the driving involved.  Because It also ignores the five  minute consideration period and the ten minute grace period  the extra driving time inclusion makes the over age time look worse than it is. 

And around Christmas shopping times there is often much more traffic than usual which could have added to your time. And that does not take into consideration what the individual circumstances of each motorist actually involve. Were there any children with you  possibly requiring them to have been strapped in chairs. Or perhaps there was a disabled person that required a wheel chair to be set up . All these delays would have been included in the parking period so would not have impinged on the time allowed in the car park. So you may have to think what happened on that day to further stretch out the actual parking period.

The second reason for the non compliance is under Schedule 4 S9 [2][f]  

he creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid;

UKPC have not included he words within the brackets  and they have not met the applicable conditions since they got the parking period wrong.

There is one other matter on their PCN. They state that they can charge extra if the charge is not paid within a certain time. This is something  not mentioned in  PoFA at all. Indeed the maximum that can be charged is the amount on the signage so it may well be that the inclusion of an extra charge renders the PCN unlawful..

All this means that the charge cannot be transferred from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is responsible for the charge and every person with a valid motor insurance policy is able to drive your car. How can they know who was driving if the keeper does not tell them and the Courts do not accept that the keeper and the driver are the same person.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

@dx100uk thank you for your help and i am sorry for taking your advice the wrong way, i struggle to do day to day tasks and i find it harder to deal with matters like this and write letters. I would happily pay someone to do it on my behalf but i have to force myself to do it sometimes. Thankfully Dave has written a template letter for me which is a massive help. I have written the letter and done 2 copies. 1 to DCBlegal and the other to UKPC and i will post them tomorrow.and get proof of postage. Re the sar, we can leave that for later if needed.  Many thanks. ;) 

 

@Nicky Boy Many thanks for you help. Thanks to Dave he has helped me with the template letter, i have done 2 letters and it tackles the snotty letter and the change of address. ;) 

 

@FTMDave Many thanks for your help, i cant thank you enough for doing the template letter for me. I did find it hilarious when i read it too, well done indeed. I struggle to write letters now so i am very grateful that you did this for me. I have done the 2 copies of the letter and i will post them tomorrow, i will get proof of postage too. Thanks again. ;)

 

@lookinforinfo many thanks for your help, i read your post thoroughly with great interest and im very impressed at your legal  attention to detail. It just goes to show what a bunch of morons they really are. Dave has kindly done a letter template for me, i have done 2 copies and i will post them tomorrow. ;) 

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

:cheer2:

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

yours is not the next move

i can instruct my dog to sit, if it does is a totally different matter

dx

 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

claimform or letter of claim?

get your description correct please!!

 

dx

 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...