Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • As with other posts here. IGNORE completely.  
    • Welcome to the forum. I have moved your topic to the appropriate forum please continue to post here.   Andy
    • Interesting. Thanks for that London.  That’s what I’m gathering.     iv no doubt they would send me fake documents but would they really dare present fake documents to a court of law?
    • Thank you very much for your letter in regard to the above mentioned shipment.  Due to the high volume of parcels coursing through the courier network each day, undergoing continuous processing and handling, certain packages may experience delays or even can get lost in the course of this journey. Please note that due to the time that has passed, this shipment has been declared as lost.  I have today processed the claim and made offers to the value of £75 as a goodwill gesture without prejudice. I do acknowledge that you have mentioned in your letter that the value was higher, however, you did not take out any protection to that amount. The protection for this shipment was £20 and we will not be increasing our goodwill offer any further.    Please log into your account online in order to accept our offer. Once accepted, our accounts department will process the claim accordingly. The claim payment will be processed and received within 7 working days.                                  In addition, a refund of the carriage fee will be processed as a separate payment and will be received within 3 working days.  If I can further assist, please feel free to contact me.   I have also just noticed that yesterday afternoon they sent me an email stating that "after my request" they have refunded the cost of shipping. I did not request the refund so will mention that in my letter as well.
    • Hi I had to leave Dubai back in 2011, during the financial crisis. And only now have I received a letter from IDRWW. Is this anything to worry about about as I have 2 years left until it’s been 15 years(statute barred in Dubai). Worried as just got a mortgage 2 years ago. Could they force me in to bankruptcy? Red lots of different threads on here. And unsure what true and what isn’t. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Refused boarding at Heathrow


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 582 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

Just writing to say that I've had an issue with an airline recently and filed a MCOL at the end of May this year which is still ongoing. In my case I had a connecting flight from Heathrow. The first flight departed late so we arrived at the connecting airport late and had to rush to the gate for our next flight, we get there as the flight is boarding, the airline scans our boarding pass and says that we won't be able to board. We ask why and are told that our luggage from the connecting flight won't arrive on time and it is illegal for our bags to fly unaccompanied on a later flight. We were told to go to the connection desk whilst they carried on boarding other passengers that were behind us.

 

While at the connection desk, I connected to wifi and saw I got an email from the airline sent before we had landed, saying that we had been moved to a later connecting flight. Basically the airline changed our flight because they thought we would not make our connection, but we did make it and they wouldn't put us back on the flight. We ended up arriving to our destination over 15 hours later than planned.

 

We filed a complaint through their website and they said the first flight was delayed due to extraordinary circumstances involving weather and air traffic control so no compensation was due. I replied saying that we made it to the gate on time, but we were not allowed to board because they changed our ticket. They offered us £200 worth of air miles each which we declined. After some back and forth via email, I sent a letter saying that if we do not get compensated the €600 (£520) per person we are entitled to under Regulation no. 261/2004 then we would be filing an MCOL. They stated that denying the claim was their final position, so I started an MCOL at the end of May.

 

The airline defended the case but said they would be open for mediation. A mediation call was booked for the beginning of July, but on the day when the mediator called the airline, they said that they were not aware of the mediation date. Mediation calls can't be rearranged, so the case progressed through the courts.

 

The airline got a solicitor to represent them and sent another defence paper with additional information two weeks after the defence claim deadline. I wrote to them advising that the airline has already submitted their defence and that it's too late to change their defence. They then wrote back asking for my consent to amend their defence as they were unaware that the legal defence document the airline rep sent to the court would be used as their full defence. I basically wrote back to them saying that I do not give them my consent...

 

At the beginning of August I got a letter from my local courts to say that a district judge had read through my claim and the airline's defence, and that I will need to submit all evidence I have to support my case and send it to the judge and airline no later than the end of the month, and that the airline will need to do the same. The letter said once everything is submitted, the court will be in contact with a hearing date.

 

I prepared my evidence (100+ pages worth) and sent it to all parties before the deadline. I received the airlines evidence a few days later. I've not heard anything from the courts since.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

std court practice

N180 exchange for mediation

mediation failed

on to allocation to local court via N157 etc

next - allocated for xxx date at local court with WS exchange by 14 days prior to hearing and hearing fee to be paid by the claimant by xxx date.

 

so what date is your hearing?
 

dx

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry am i jumping the gun?

can you scan up to PDF with the court directions 

read upload

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

just type no need to hit quote...

 

ah right you are using the new all online system and that runs dif  to MCOL im used too.

 

ok well you've simply got to await harlow to find a hearing slot.

 

hehe by a slight of fate i know that court very very well from a past life...:pound:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Forgive me if I'm being particularly slow, but I'm confused as to the basis of your claim?

 

13 hours ago, Right2Flight said:

...The first flight departed late so we arrived at the connecting airport late and had to rush to the gate for our next flight, we get there as the flight is boarding, the airline scans our boarding pass and says that we won't be able to board. We ask why and are told that our luggage from the connecting flight won't arrive on time and it is illegal for our bags to fly unaccompanied on a later flight. We were told to go to the connection desk whilst they carried on boarding other passengers that were behind us.

 

While at the connection desk, I connected to wifi and saw I got an email from the airline sent before we had landed, saying that we had been moved to a later connecting flight. Basically the airline changed our flight because they thought we would not make our connection, but we did make it and they wouldn't put us back on the flight.

 

 

Are you complaining (1) that they didn't let you board because your luggage wouldn't arrive on time and it is illegal for unaccompanied luggage to follow on a later flight, or are you complaining (2) that that wasn't the real reason they wouldn't let you board, and the real reason was that they had already moved you to a later connecting flight without your knowledge, or are you (3) just trying to claim for the original delay?  Or some combination of the above?

 

Is it not possible to contact the court to tell them you've not been advised of a hearing date yet?  (I'm not familiar with MCOL so don't know if that is possible or not...)

Link to post
Share on other sites

We ask why and are told that our luggage from the connecting flight won't arrive on time and it is illegal for our bags to fly unaccompanied on a later flight.

 

That is complete and utter bu****it. 

 

Can you guess what happens when they offload your baggage from a flight, or your baggage gets temporarily lost at an airport? That's right... it flies without you on a later flight. Otherwise you'd need to come back and get it.

However the opposite is true. You can't have your luggage fly before you in a plane that you've missed. That's when they either offload the luggage or wait for you.

 

It looks like you have already got your claim fully lined up, so good luck with it. I was wondering the following couple of things:
-Was your initial plane late, or did they sell you a ticket that did not respect the MCT (Minimum Connection Time) for Heathrow.

-Have they argued exceptional and unpredictable circumstances for the delay (other than the baggage excuse which doesn't make any sense)

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...