Jump to content


Arrow/Drydens PAPLOC Now Claimform - old MBNA Card debt


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 415 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

On 09/02/2023 at 20:01, dx100uk said:

you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count]

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Morning all

 

£10 donated.  

 

 

I have only recieved a letter from drydens stating that they ' acknowledge receipt of your request CPR blah blah blah.......

 

So since sending off CPR and new CCA since claimform I have not recieved any relevant paperwork, so,  at this present time - just doing standard - not holding defence as follows : - this could change should postie turn up something tomorrow ( and have suitable response prepared for that outcome )

 

***************** FINAL DEFENCE EDIT ****************

 

Particulars Of Claim ( for reference purposes only )

 

1 ) The claim is for the sum of £4000.00 in respect of monies owing by the defendant on a credit agreement held by the defendant with MBNA under account number **************** upon which the defendant failed to maintain payments 

 

2 ) a default notice was served upon the defendant and has not been complied with

 

3 ) the balance owed was assigned by MBNA to the claimant, and the defendant has been notified of the assignment by letter

 

 

 

 

************************* FINAL Defence *********************************************

 

 

 

1. The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

 

2. Paragraph 1 is noted. I have in the past had financial dealings with MBNA.  I am unaware of what alleged debt the claimant refers to having failed to adequately particularise its claim, and have therefore sought clarity from the claimant by way of a Section 78 request and a CPR 31.14 request.

 

3 Paragraph 2 is denied. I am unaware of any service of a Default Notice (s) pursuant to section 87 of the consumer credit

Act 1974. I have sought verification from the claimant regarding this matter and they have been unable to comply.

 

Paragraph 3 is denied .  I am unaware of any Notice of Assignment pursuant to the Law and Property Act 1925 Section 136(1) and therefore requested a further copy from the claimant which they have yet to provide.

 

5 It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, the Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of assignment/balance/breach requested by CPR 31. 14, therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to:

 

(a) show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement with the Claimant; and

(b) show and evidence the nature of any breach and Default Notice;

(c) show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for; and

(d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim;

 

6 As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.

 

7 On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the consumer credit

Act 1974.

 

8 By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.

 

 

I know two days premature.  Just getting ducks in line.

 

Thanks 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks perfect to me.

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote

(a) show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement with the Claimant; and

 

The claim does not state you entered into an agreement with them...change to :-

 

(a) show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement;  and

 

 

Rest is fine.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...