Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • its not about the migrants .. Barrister Helena Kennedy warns that the Conservatives will use their victory over Rwanda to dismantle the law that protects our human rights here in the UK.   Angela Rayner made fun of Rishi Sunak’s height in a fiery exchange at Prime Minister’s Questions, which prompted Joe Murphy to ask: just how low will Labour go? .. well .. not as low as sunak 
    • From #38 where you wrote the following, all in the 3rd person so we don't know which party is you. When you sy it was your family home, was that before or after? " A FH split to create 2 Leasehold adjoining houses (terrace) FH remains under original ownership and 1 Leasehold house sold on 100y+ lease. . Freeholder resides in the other Leasehold house. The property was originally resided in as one house by Freeholder"
    • The property was our family home.  A fixed low rate btl/ development loan was given (last century!). It was derelict. Did it up/ was rented out for a while.  Then moved in/out over the years (mostly around school)  It was a mix of rental and family home. The ad-hoc rents covered the loan amply.  Nowadays  banks don't allow such a mix.  (I have written this before.) Problems started when the lease was extended and needed to re-mortgage to cover the expense.  Wanted another btl.  Got a tenant in situ. Was located elsewhere (work). A broker found a btl lender, they reneged.  Broker didn't find another btl loan.  The tenant was paying enough to cover the proposed annual btl mortgage in 4 months. The broker gave up trying to find another.  I ended up on a bridge and this disastrous path.  (I have raised previous issues about the broker) Not sure what you mean by 'split'.  The property was always leasehold with a separate freeholder  The freeholder eventually sold the fh to another entity by private agreement (the trust) but it's always been separate.  That's quite normal.  One can't merge titles - unless lease runs out/ is forfeited and new one is not created/ granted. The bridge lender had a special condition in loan offer - their own lawyer had to check title first.  Check that lease wasn't onerous and there was nothing that would affect good saleability.  The lawyer (that got sacked for dishonesty) signed off the loan on the basis the lease and title was good and clean.  The same law firm then tried to complain the lease clauses were onerous and the lease too short, even though the loan was to cover a 90y lease extension!! 
    • Northmonk forget what I said about your Notice to Hirer being the best I have seen . Though it  still may be  it is not good enough to comply with PoFA. Before looking at the NTH, we can look at the original Notice to Keeper. That is not compliant. First the period of parking as sated on their PCN is not actually the period of parking but a misstatement  since it is only the arrival and departure times of your vehicle. The parking period  is exactly that -ie the time youwere actually parked in a parking spot.  If you have to drive around to find a place to park the act of driving means that you couldn't have been parked at the same time. Likewise when you left the parking place and drove to the exit that could not be describes as parking either. So the first fail is  failing to specify the parking period. Section9 [2][a] In S9[2][f] the Act states  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN fails to mention the words in parentheses despite Section 9 [2]starting by saying "The notice must—..." As the Notice to Keeper fails to comply with the Act,  it follows that the Notice to Hirer cannot be pursued as they couldn't get the NTH compliant. Even if the the NTH was adjudged  as not  being affected by the non compliance of the NTK, the Notice to Hirer is itself not compliant with the Act. Once again the PCN fails to get the parking period correct. That alone is enough to have the claim dismissed as the PCN fails to comply with PoFA. Second S14 [5] states " (5)The notice to Hirer must— (a)inform the hirer that by virtue of this paragraph any unpaid parking charges (being parking charges specified in the notice to keeper) may be recovered from the hirer; ON their NTH , NPE claim "The driver of the above vehicle is liable ........" when the driver is not liable at all, only the hirer is liable. The driver and the hirer may be different people, but with a NTH, only the hirer is liable so to demand the driver pay the charge  fails to comply with PoFA and so the NPE claim must fail. I seem to remember that you have confirmed you received a copy of the original PCN sent to  the Hire company plus copies of the contract you have with the Hire company and the agreement that you are responsible for breaches of the Law etc. If not then you can add those fails too.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CapQuest chasing 1999 abbey Overdraft - Court Claim Received


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 358 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have been repaying an old debt through CapQuest since about January 2011,

paying £25 a month (which is quite a lot of money for me at the moment as I am in a just over minimum wage paid job)

 

I had to cancel some of my direct debits for May because I have had some time off

due to three deaths and having to move house,

 

my wages this month weren't very good and I would've gone over my overdraft

and incurred bank charges which I simply can not afford.

One of the direct debits I cancelled was the CapQuest one

 

this morning at 8.01am I received a phone call from this number 01252 576 422.

I didn't answer it but Google'd it instead and found that it is something to do with CapQuest

obviously miffed at me for cancelling the direct debit and trying to get hold of me.

 

I cannot cope with constant phone calls off these people at the moment,

I am fighting hard to NOT have a breakdown with all the stress I have had this year :sad:

 

If I phone CapQuest can I say to them that £25 is just too much money for me at the moment

and as that they take a smaller amount until I am in a position to pay more?

 

 

The debt I owed was from years ago and was bank charges

that, at the time, I disputed and refused to pay.

 

I don't even know how much the debt was for

(I had a brain haemorrhage in 2007 and my memory of events

before that date is shockingly bad, as is my short term memory).

 

I am at a very very low point right now, there has been a lot of death

and upset just in the first five months of this year a

nd I really do feel that anything else which could add to the stress

will simply tip me over the edge.

 

I know it's my own fault for cancelling the direct debit and I am not saying I am refusing to pay it,

I just need some help on paying it a bit less than £25 a month until I'm better placed financially to pay more.

 

Please can anyone give me any advice on what I can do next?

 

CAB maybe? x

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 258
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi lil

 

Welcome to CAG

 

Paragraphs created.

 

The guys will be happy to advise as soon as they are available.

 

Please let us know how your problem has been resolved, it could help fellow Caggers.

 

Thread has been moved to the correct forum.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the debt was for about £1,700 or around about there.

 

If possible I don't want CapQuest to have my new address either

 

(this flat is my only sanctuary at the moment), phone number should be enough.

Will I have to give them my new address? x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Rebel :-)

Am going to have a proper read of them now.

 

 

Quick question though, does it make a difference that I have already been paying the old bank charges back?

 

Also,

if I start writing to them asking them for information etc,

I will have to give them my address won't I?

 

Would I be better asking the CAB to do this and see if they can find out if I even have to pay this debt back

as it was so long ago (it was easily over 6 years ago)

 

or let them come to a reasonable amount I can actually afford each month?

Or is there a way I can do all of what needs to be done myself

without letting CapQuest know my new address?

 

I've just been reading some other threads about bailiffs and debt collectors turning up at people's doors

and I'm horrified at some of the things they will do.

 

I couldn't cope with something like that, not right now :sad: x

Edited by LilMissM
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

My immediate thinking is to WRITE to Capquest with your new address (you don't want them getting a CCJ by the back door do you!) and demanding they remove your phone number from their system. So long as you communicate with them in writing and don't avoid them, they must comply. With phone calls, they can say what they like as most mortals don't think to record their drivel. In writing, they can only speak the truth (or their version of it).

 

As you say in your first post you are not sure what the debt is, ask them to supply the proof of this debt. You will be surprised how many people we see who are being hounded for debts that aren't theirs.

 

Once you have ascertained the facts and it IS your debt, offer £5 a month (or less). What can they do? NOTHING without going to court.

 

Your home, your ESSENTIAL bills take priority over any DCA

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

My concern with this is if they send people round to my house, I could really just do without the stress of that at the moment.

 

 I will write to them asking them to provide me with proof of this debt.

What letter from the templates database should I use as my initial communication with them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

As your situation is slightly different from the norm, I would use the 'prove it' letter which is in the library (top left) but only as a starter. I feel you would have to personalise it to your particular situation.

If we had template letters for every scenario, the forum would be just letters :-)

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

My concern with this is if they send people round to my house, I could really just do without the stress of that at the moment.

 

They won't send anyone round your house! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you everyone for all your advice so far.

 

I was tempted to just contact CapQuest by telephone and make new arrangements to pay the debt,

 

I think I would like to try and get more information on the debt, amount, etc.

 

This is the letter I am going to send to CapQuest (amended before sending of course).

Is this the correct letter to send?

 

I have never received anything from CapQuest with any information on the debt

and only had dealings with a man called Alaistar McCloud on the telephone,

which was only to discuss HOW much I would be allowed to repay each month.

 

I don't even know the account or reference number. God I'm stupid :sad:

This is what shows on my bank statement, should I use this reference number?

 

DIRECT DEBIT PAYMENT TO CAPQUEST INVESTMEN REF [EDIT]

 

The debt was for bank charges which at the time I argued and disputed and, subsequently refused to pay. It wasn't a loan or credit card, just unfair (in my opinion) bank charges x

 

I'm not even sure if that is the correct amount

 

I have no paperwork relating to this debt (I am only really guessing that it's bank charges

as that's the only thing I can remember accruing from years ago

 

 

since my brain haemorrhage I can't remember about 70% of my life prior to the brain haemorrhage)

 

really I just wanna ask CapQuest to provide me with details of it but I don't know how to word the letter. x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now, this is just my opinion. Others with say different (the joys of a forum), sending a CCA request is tantamount to saying, 'yes this is my debt but I want you to prove it'

 

There is a 'fair' chance this is your debt but as you say, you have no real memory of it so your letter would include something along the lines of

 

'It has come to my attention that there may be a discrepancy with this debt therefore, I would like you to supply me the proof that this is my debt. It matters not that I have been making payments but because of a brain injury, I wasn't sure' -- you get my drift?

 

I think something like that informs them of your situation and allows you a get out if it turns this isn't your debt. Once they have 'proved' beyond doubt that this is your debt, we can help get charges (if any and what type) returned or reduced from the debt itself

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah there is definitely a good chance that this IS my debt and I am not trying to shirk out of paying it back, but at the moment I just cannot afford £25 a month and now curiosity has gotten the better of me and I'd like to know more details of what the debt actually is. Thanks for the advice on wording my letter Silverfox :-) x

 

Who is Miss A. Simms? Is this the person I should address my letter to? x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes there's the prove-it letter in the debt collection library but the OP has been paying so it's not an unknown debt.

 

That is true but the OP accepted CQs word that the debt was hers as she couldn't actually remember it due to the brain injury which is why I put the sentence above.

 

If this debts turns out to be hers then no harm done BUT if it transpires that this isn't her debt then we can move forward

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not strictly true. They might not come under ss 77-78 regarding requesting an agreement, but they do come under the CCA 1974. And they only get exemption from falling under a properly executed agreement if the creditor can show they have complied with the conditions laid out in the 'Determination' made by the Director of Fair Trading as per Coutts v Sebestyen.

 

Rob

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you everyone for all your advice so far.

 

 

Here is the letter I am going to print and send to CapQuest,

let me know what you think and if there is anything I should change or add:

 

 

template removed - dx

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been going through some old paperwork and have found the only written correspondence

I've ever received from CapQuest which is confirmation of setting up the direct debit.

 

It says "Debt Purchased from: Abbey" and "Amount o/s £1483.20"

and I keep getting phone calls (several times a day sometimes) from the same number,

which I believe is CapQuest or someone acting on their behalf.

 

This is the only information I have on the debt, don't know when the debt is from or when CapQuest took it over.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's OK, I just wanted to make sure.

 

The letter looks OK but I would note that they are unlikely to send a DEED of assignment as that is the deal done with the Original Creditor and them. What they would send (IF they have a copy) is the NOTICE of Assignment but it does no harm asking for the deed.

 

What you also need is the terms and conditions from inception of this account plus ALL variations during the life of the agreement.

 

I wouldn't hold your breath expecting them to supply within 12 WORKING days. There is now no penalty for them being late.

 

I would also put in your letter that you want them to place a hold on collections activity until the query is resolved. As they are ringing you I would state that you want to deal with this matter in writing only. You will maintain contact by this method so they then have to stop ringing you. If they continue rining once thy have received the letter, they are then in breach of the Office of Fair Tradings Debt Collection Guidance and should be reported if they do.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you SilverFox, your advice is greatly appreciated. I'll get the letter sorted as soon as I'm home and will repost it one final time just to make sure it's good to go :) x

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...