Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If it doesn’t sell easily : what they can get at an auction becomes fair market price, which may not realise what you are hoping.
    • Thank you. The receiver issue is a rabbit hole I don't think I'm going to enjoy going down. These people seem so protected. And I don't understand how or why?  Fair market value seems to be ever shifting and contentious.
    • You can't, but you can (and really should) bring up the point that the lender isn't meeting their legal obligations in selling the property for fair market value. You'll have to do this in court, though.     A receiver is bought in by the lender, not you. If they're a registered insolvency practitioner, you may be able to raise a complaint to the insolvency service but there are no guarantees here. Many receivers are also registered with the RICS and self-regulate so if you know the name of the receiver you can check there, again no guarantees.   https://www.rics.org/surveyor-careers/career-development/accreditations/registered-property-receivership-scheme
    • China green-lights mass production of autonomous flying taxis — with commercial flights set for 2025 | Live Science WWW.LIVESCIENCE.COM The EHang EH216-S autonomous flying taxi is the first eVTOL ready for mass production and could lead the way for flying cars around...  
    • Lolerz - I don't understand you.  Rebuked you?   No. I simply replied to your orange comments with legal facts as I know them.  I've already worked through the s42 and s146 issues - over the last 3-4y - and these issues are (mostly) resolved legally.  In terms of posting evidence.  Sure I can post some.  But my most recent questions have been a) how can I enforce a sale before trial?  And b) how can I make a complaint and/or a claim v receiver? (E.g. to which body do I complain?).  At the mo I'm asking for some helpful pointers on those specific questions??  I'm not asking for help with how to prove or present evidence. Fwiw - all evidence for trial has been disclosed (although additions are poss). The lender sent me like 10,000 emails and docs.  There's also 000s of emails, docs, photos, videos, recordings and texts that relate to freeholders/ me.   I read, filed and categorised everything for ease of future reference.  Witness statements and evidence were prepared for trial in the 42 and 146 matters. (now joined with current claim to save duplication).  I've lived the process before.  My current statement and linked evidence has taken like 6 months to draft/ write - to ensure I can succinctly prove my defence and counterclaim points.   Whether I can convince a judge at trial w/o lawyer / barrister is debatable 🙄   But I've prepared.  And continue to try better prepare - which is why I visit this site (and clinics).  This is NOT my business or expertise at all.  I'm just trying.  Not that anyone should ever have to justify why they need help if they ask politely! 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Permission required - leasehold fence replacement


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1027 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hiya,

 

Could someone please clarify if the following lease term applies to our neighbours fence? 

 

The property is a leasehold ground floor maisonette.  We've tried to urge caution that the landlord may not be able to consent to his new fence after the fact, if the work qualifies.  He should check first, but he's started today.

 

Rather than repair the fence (standard 6ft, panels) like everyone else in like for like manner, he has opted to replace the fence entirely in a completely different style, made it a foot taller and moved the gate to the other end of the garden (on same access path, but further down than before).

 

Not to erect any wall, fence or gate or other boundary feature which exceeds the height of 1 metre without first obtaining the consent in writing from the Landlord.

 

The problem is that he has a very bad temper and the landlord could make him take it down potentially and we don't want him to get himself in more trouble if we can help it.  I can't stomach any more shouting matches outside my door... can anyone put my worries to rest?

 

Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

well the existing fence is already more than 1metre if it's 6ft, so that rather defeats the fact of non allowance of anything above 1mtr high?

is another 1ft really going to cause other residents any issues? 

and is the matter of an access gate being moved a few feet along the same path access again seriously going to upset other residents?

 

its a new fence so is most probably improving things overall......

 

just musing.

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

It's a bit late now after they have gone and pulled the old fence down and erected their own one higher than the original one in place.

 

If that clause is the exact same in their Lease Agreement then it is as it states.

 

If they have exceeded the 1 metre height restriction and not obtained written consent from the Landlord then the Landlord could actually take this as a breach of the lease agreement and could enforce this neighbour to remove this new fence and replace the original fence at the neighbours cost.
 

On the other hand the Landlord may be happy with the new fence as it has cost them nothing irrespective of the above clause

  • Like 1

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

The wildcardoe elephant in all this is the Council, and a nosey Council Official could report it to Planning and they might decide it breaches Planning Guidelines and order its removal.

 

WWW.PLANNINGPORTAL.CO.UK

Details of the planning permission and building regulation regimes for Fences, gates and garden walls in England

 If its significantly different, neighbour might need Planning Permission for it.

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you all for your thoughts.

 

I presumed that the rule was worded in that way for the landlord to retain control over the fences.  They could not reasonably object to like for like replacements in my mind but it allows some leeway.

 

13 hours ago, stu007 said:

Hi

 

It's a bit late now after they have gone and pulled the old fence down and erected their own one higher than the original one in place.

 

If that clause is the exact same in their Lease Agreement then it is as it states.

 

If they have exceeded the 1 metre height restriction and not obtained written consent from the Landlord then the Landlord could actually take this as a breach of the lease agreement and could enforce this neighbour to remove this new fence and replace the original fence at the neighbours cost.
 

On the other hand the Landlord may be happy with the new fence as it has cost them nothing irrespective of the above clause

 

Yes, very late as he's pretty much finished.  All our leases are the same, the wording is from my copy and is exact.

 

We might have a saving grace though (I probably should have mentioned this), our landlord is a management company with all of us owning a share.  If I can get enough support, could we vote to allow the fence despite the lease term?  Would it have to be unanimous to have everyone accept the breach?  I've talked with the director regarding pets in the past and he stated that to allow pets in contravention of the lease would put the landlord in breach of all the other leases and it was easier long term to enforce the covenant than to not.  I'm not entirely sure that our man has paid his service charge either, well he claims he hasn't on grounds of poverty.  Although, if he has money for fences yet cannot afford the service charge... it is not looking favourable for peace.

 

I think we're OK on the planning wild card, just read through that.  I think I might go look at holidays just in case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

@Ethel StreetYes, I tend to agree but I'm hopeful that he is just being a lad and saying it to be outrageous or something.  At the end of the day it will only delay the inevitable as it is in the lease and must be paid at some point.  I'm just trying to play devil's advocate at the moment, I don't understand him sometimes.  A couple of the tenants who have experienced the bad temper would revel in glory at getting the fence pulled down... I'm keeping as quiet as a mouse.

Edited by cosmic88
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

You mention in post#5 your chat with the Director and they mentioned a covenant if there is a covenant in place for these properties what does the covenant say as that changes things and is this Covenant mentioned in any clause in your Lease Agreements?

 

You also mention the Landlord is a Management Company with you alll owning a share and whether you could vote to allow the fence.

 

As you hold a share whe do not have the information on what that entitles you to so that question would be difficult to answer.

 

Do you have a Residents Association set up for Lease Holders at all? 

 

If not have you and the other Lease Holders considered setting one up?

 

Couples of links:

 

WWW.LEASE-ADVICE.ORG

The Federation of Private Residents’ Associations (FPRA) provide guidance on their website as to how to form a residents’ association. They...

 

 

WWW.FPRA.ORG.UK

The Federation of Private Residents' Associations are a not-for-profit lease advice residential leaseholders, tenants’ , residents’ associations, and RMCs

 

 

  • Like 1

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, stu007 said:

You mention in post#5 your chat with the Director and they mentioned a covenant if there is a covenant in place for these properties what does the covenant say as that changes things and is this Covenant mentioned in any clause in your Lease Agreements?

 

You also mention the Landlord is a Management Company with you alll owning a share and whether you could vote to allow the fence.

 

As you hold a share whe do not have the information on what that entitles you to so that question would be difficult to answer.

 

Do you have a Residents Association set up for Lease Holders at all? 

 

If not have you and the other Lease Holders considered setting one up?

 

 

Hi Stu, thank you for your reply.  I've not got files on me right now but I'll try to answer without:

 

I'm not sure if I'm using the terms correctly, the leases explicitly state we are 'not to have or knowingly permit pets (animals, birds and reptiles - it is a list) on the Premises'.  The director/landlord mentioned a high court case from last year (apologies as I can not remember the name) and said it looked like if we gave permission for pets then the company would possibly breech all leases.

 

We were given paperwork with voting rights in it that came with lease.  I will take a look as it might have the answers thanks for jogging my memory.

 

I thought that we were some kind of residents association.  We all have an equal share and one of us is the director and does the accounts and pays the bills.  The director is heartless and the covenants will be followed, that and our neighbour is very headstrong and this could end up in court and cost a fortune really.  I'll put forwards the residents association to neighbours if anyone agrees on that.

 

Thankyou

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I wonder from your last post and specifically your last paragraph if you have Right to Manage in place (I may be wrong as I don't fully know the setup of you leases/Management Company).

 

Have a wee look at this link:

 

WWW.GOV.UK

Leasehold property - leasehold disputes, buying the freehold, service charges, lease extensions and Right to Manage

 

  • Like 1

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...