Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • its not about the migrants .. Barrister Helena Kennedy warns that the Conservatives will use their victory over Rwanda to dismantle the law that protects our human rights here in the UK.   Angela Rayner made fun of Rishi Sunak’s height in a fiery exchange at Prime Minister’s Questions, which prompted Joe Murphy to ask: just how low will Labour go? .. well .. not as low as sunak 
    • From #38 where you wrote the following, all in the 3rd person so we don't know which party is you. When you sy it was your family home, was that before or after? " A FH split to create 2 Leasehold adjoining houses (terrace) FH remains under original ownership and 1 Leasehold house sold on 100y+ lease. . Freeholder resides in the other Leasehold house. The property was originally resided in as one house by Freeholder"
    • The property was our family home.  A fixed low rate btl/ development loan was given (last century!). It was derelict. Did it up/ was rented out for a while.  Then moved in/out over the years (mostly around school)  It was a mix of rental and family home. The ad-hoc rents covered the loan amply.  Nowadays  banks don't allow such a mix.  (I have written this before.) Problems started when the lease was extended and needed to re-mortgage to cover the expense.  Wanted another btl.  Got a tenant in situ. Was located elsewhere (work). A broker found a btl lender, they reneged.  Broker didn't find another btl loan.  The tenant was paying enough to cover the proposed annual btl mortgage in 4 months. The broker gave up trying to find another.  I ended up on a bridge and this disastrous path.  (I have raised previous issues about the broker) Not sure what you mean by 'split'.  The property was always leasehold with a separate freeholder  The freeholder eventually sold the fh to another entity by private agreement (the trust) but it's always been separate.  That's quite normal.  One can't merge titles - unless lease runs out/ is forfeited and new one is not created/ granted. The bridge lender had a special condition in loan offer - their own lawyer had to check title first.  Check that lease wasn't onerous and there was nothing that would affect good saleability.  The lawyer (that got sacked for dishonesty) signed off the loan on the basis the lease and title was good and clean.  The same law firm then tried to complain the lease clauses were onerous and the lease too short, even though the loan was to cover a 90y lease extension!! 
    • Northmonk forget what I said about your Notice to Hirer being the best I have seen . Though it  still may be  it is not good enough to comply with PoFA. Before looking at the NTH, we can look at the original Notice to Keeper. That is not compliant. First the period of parking as sated on their PCN is not actually the period of parking but a misstatement  since it is only the arrival and departure times of your vehicle. The parking period  is exactly that -ie the time youwere actually parked in a parking spot.  If you have to drive around to find a place to park the act of driving means that you couldn't have been parked at the same time. Likewise when you left the parking place and drove to the exit that could not be describes as parking either. So the first fail is  failing to specify the parking period. Section9 [2][a] In S9[2][f] the Act states  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN fails to mention the words in parentheses despite Section 9 [2]starting by saying "The notice must—..." As the Notice to Keeper fails to comply with the Act,  it follows that the Notice to Hirer cannot be pursued as they couldn't get the NTH compliant. Even if the the NTH was adjudged  as not  being affected by the non compliance of the NTK, the Notice to Hirer is itself not compliant with the Act. Once again the PCN fails to get the parking period correct. That alone is enough to have the claim dismissed as the PCN fails to comply with PoFA. Second S14 [5] states " (5)The notice to Hirer must— (a)inform the hirer that by virtue of this paragraph any unpaid parking charges (being parking charges specified in the notice to keeper) may be recovered from the hirer; ON their NTH , NPE claim "The driver of the above vehicle is liable ........" when the driver is not liable at all, only the hirer is liable. The driver and the hirer may be different people, but with a NTH, only the hirer is liable so to demand the driver pay the charge  fails to comply with PoFA and so the NPE claim must fail. I seem to remember that you have confirmed you received a copy of the original PCN sent to  the Hire company plus copies of the contract you have with the Hire company and the agreement that you are responsible for breaches of the Law etc. If not then you can add those fails too.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Leak from upstairs flat brought down ceiling


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 338 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I own a a pair of terraced flats. So the upstairs is rented out on a 5 year lease and managed by another company who rent it out. Its been leaking from their bathroom since November last year. I have informed them via email 5 times since then and the problem was never fully rectified. They would just send their handyman who would apply some silicone to the bath and the leak would start again a few weeks later. 

Under the lease they are responsible for the repairs to the property. 

Yesterday morning the plasterboard ceiling in the bathroom below fell and caused damage to the ceiling light too. Now my tenant doesn't have a ceiling light or half the ceiling. To makes matter worse they still haven't sent anyone out to fix the leak so water is still falling from the bathroom above. 

They have advised me that I am not allowed to do any work upstairs and if I want to they will not compensate me for it. In regards to the damage done below they want me to go via my Insurance company and are refusing to pay for the repairs. 

Would this be a valid insurance claim as its not accidental rather negligence on their part for not doing the job correctly over months. Plus I will have to pay the excess and loose my no claims? 

What are my rights?

Edited by axil23
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not quite clear as to what you are saying.

I understand that the upstairs flat belongs to you as well as the one which has been affected by the leak?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah.  Upstairs belongs to me but is rented out to a company for 5 years. They use it for their tenants. The lease states that they are responsible for all repairs to that flat. 
 

I am unable to get access to that flat. 

Edited by axil23
Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't you have keys to the flat?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately I don't. Its a part of the agreement that I am not allowed access. They use the flat to house vulnerable tenants and I am only allowed access by giving them 24hrs notice and then too I am not allowed to do any work in the house due to health and safety reasons. Their own workmen have to do the job. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The continuous leak amounts to a nuisance.

The tort of nuisance is the wrongful interference with the enjoyment of property.
Clearly, the continuous/recurring leak fits in with that definition.

It is entirely reasonable to expect you to take whatever steps are necessary in order to abate the nuisance in order to prevent further damage.

Is there nothing in the agreement which obliges them to maintain the property to a reasonable standard? Is there nothing in the agreement which allows you to enter in the event of some emergency?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah there is. I can gain access to the property for emergencies. Yesterday I asked them to give me access as it was a persistent leak which they allowed but said they would not pay for any repairs. 

I gave them the property at a cheaper rent as it was a full repair lease which stated that besides the roof everything else they need to pay for. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, in that case it seems to me that the way forward is fairly obvious.
Gain access to the flat and get the work done. Get it done properly.
Get two independent quotations for the work and choose the cheapest. Three independent quotations will be better.

While you have access to the flat, I would suggest that you check it out generally as to its condition, smoke alarms, and eventually you want to know if it has an electricity certificate and also a gas safety certificate.
 

At the same time, get three independent quotations for the damage which has been caused by the persistent leak in which they have failed to address correctly.

You can put that work in hand as quickly as possible.

Do make sure that all of your quotations are all in writing and that you have everything properly receipted. No cash deals.

When everything has been made good and you are satisfied with the quality of the repair upstairs then come here and we will help you claim from them for all of your expenses reasonably incurred plus interest.

 

 

Don't discuss the question of cost of the repairs with them. Just go in and get the work done

 
Link to post
Share on other sites

And incidentally, if it comes down to a question of claiming against the insurance, it is for them to claim against their own insurance.

Are they insured? They certainly should be. I believe it is a legal requirement for the property to be insured

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok thanks. I assume this would be through the small claims court? If they lawyer up and come back at me can I be liable for their costs? These big multi nationals always have something in their lease that they can bring up. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If we can keep the claims to less than £10,000 then they would be in the small claims court. That means that even if you lost the case – most unlikely – you would only be liable for your own costs which would be extremely small.

I would suggest that you claim separately for the repair of the leak and for the damage caused to the downstairs flat.

In any event, you would win. It is clear that a leak which recurs after every attempt at repair, has not been properly repaired and so therefore they are in breach of their contractual duty.

Once again, the detail is important. Make sure you are scrupulous about getting quotations in writing from completely independent sources.

Make sure that the upstairs leaseholder fully informed as to visits for quotations and also the commencement of the work.

At some point it would be a good idea to furnish them with copies of the various quotations.

Once again, while you are in the flat, check for any breaches of regulations which apply to landlords – because that's what they are.

Also, you say that they are housing vulnerable tenants. Presumably they are doing this for the local council something. Be prepared at some point to complain to the local council that the tenants interests are not being properly looked after. Especially if you find that things like smoke alarms et cetera, monoxide alarms, safety certificates are properly in place.

Does your agreement give you any right to inspect safety certificates?

 

Who drew up the lease/agreement?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, you should get each one of the people who do the quotations to give a comment on the quality of the work that has been carried out so far and which has failed giving rise to the leak.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't get into an arguement about who is going to pay the money .

Your objective at the moment is to get the independent quotations and then to put the work in hand.

Don't rock the boat

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you also putting in hand quotations for the repair of the damage to the downstairs flat?

These quotations could be obtained as quickly as possible and should be completely independent of the leak repair upstairs.

Let us know when you have got these. We are talking about at least four quotations – two up and two down. Six if possible.

I might suggest a slight change in strategy once you have got this

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, you need to know how long they will need access to the upstairs flat. Can they do the job in a single day – meaning a single entry's – or would they need more than one day – multiple entries.
You will need to stress that the job must be of the very highest quality. You will be a good idea if photographs can be taken before and after – and even while you are escorting them for their quotations.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am organising the 2 x upstairs and 2 x Downstairs quotations by tomorrow. Will be in touch as soon as I have these. 

Honestly thank you once again. You guys are so helpful. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't start getting too excited. It is quite likely to start getting bloody at some point.

Have they agreed to allow you to enter for the quotations?

Link to post
Share on other sites

We are on the verge of the weekend. I suggest that you leave it until Monday lunchtime.

Meanwhile, please could you post up the message which you received from them in which they said that they would permit you to carry out works but they would have to be at your expense

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also a copy of any reply that you made to it and anything else in the exchange

Link to post
Share on other sites

My original email to ask them to pay if I do the repairs

Quote

We wouldn’t be paying for this work to be done if the LL is completing the work – it’s the LL responsibility to complete the works.

When I asked them if they will repair the ceiling

Quote

That is correct we would not repair the damage on a property that is not on the contract, the only thing I can advise you do at this stage is raise a complaint and you would do the by contacting the AIRE team.

 

Reply to my email for access yesterday

Quote

Good Afternoon,

 

Thank you for your email, in order to provide access please complete and return the attached H&S form.

Please ensure a specific date and time is provided, allowing a 48 hour notice for access.

This is not acceptable as its an emergency and 48hrs will take us into the bank holiday weekend. Do I need to fill in a H&S or can I get access today as its urgent and the electrics are wet. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

What do you have to say about them saying that it is your responsibility to carry out the works? You said that the agreement make them responsible.

What is the AIRE team?

What is H & S? It would be helpful if you would give us the meaning of these acronyms without being asked.

You could certainly get access today – but that will then lead you into a confrontation which could be unhelpful.

I suggest that you start by completing the form – whatever it is – but then probably write to them in parallel. At least you have things moving along.

What are the wet electrics? I don't think you have mentioned this before

Link to post
Share on other sites

AIRE Team is there point of contact for tenant and LL to report repairs. 

H&S = Health & Safety

I am guessing he is saying my responsibility as they won't carry out any work on my flat downstairs due to it being company policy. 

Quote

We are not permitted to carry out ANY works on properties that are not part of the contract, it would need to be an insurance claim situation.

Wet electrics are the ceiling light directly below the bath and 4ft away in the pantry is a fridge freezer which is also wet. The electric fusebox is tripping due to this. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...