Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks all. Think I have come to a plan dx please correct me if I am getting you wrong but I am going to go down the route you suggest. simply stop payments for now until I receive a DN and it gets marked on my file. Then contact each lender and start making token payments to each one. i then assume most like they will then at some point sell to DCA. Once they are sold I’ll be coming back to see how best I deal with it.  Let me know if I am making some error in judgment or missing anything with my plan 
    • while politicians trough at subsidised bars and canteens, claim thousaands in expenses while letting out their properties and tories vote to leave UK children hungry That ALL needs to stop
    • J&P Credit Solutions are specialists on debt recovery. Either way they seem to be swapping between the JandP and IDR whatever their exact definitions are.
    • Primary and secondary teachers are supporting pupils with their own money, buying food and warm clothing. Eight in 10 primary teachers in England spending own money to help pupils | Education | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Increasing numbers of children hungry and lack adequate clothing, with two-thirds of secondary teachers also supporting pupils  
    • I googled "prescribed disability" to see where it is defined for the purposes of S.92. I found HMRC's definition, which included deafness. I don't  think anyone is saying deaf people cant drive, though! digging deeper,  Is it that “prescribed disability” (for the purposes of S.88 and S.92) is defined at: The Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) Regulations 1999 WWW.LEGISLATION.GOV.UK These Regulations consolidate with amendments the Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) Regulations 1996...   ….. and sleep apnoea / increased daytime sleepiness is NOT included there directly as a condition but only becomes prescribed under “liability to sudden attacks of disabling giddiness or fainting” (but falling asleep isn't fainting!), so it isn’t defined there as a “prescribed disability”  Yet, under S.92(2)(b) RTA 1988 “ any other disability likely to cause the driving of a vehicle by him in pursuance of a licence to be a source of danger to the public" So (IMHO) sleep apnea / daytime sleepiness MIGHT be a prescribed disability, but only if it causes likelihood of "driving being a source of danger to the public" : which is where meeting / not meeting the medical standard of fitness to drive comes into play?  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Tanzarelli V's Barclaycard


TANZARELLI
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6186 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 312
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Bill

 

would say this week, prob since Monday. i am sure it was a letter that they confirmed the y held dated for six years post account closure and i was certain it was related to Barclay's/Barclaycard.

 

i might even have posted something on it, but right now i am subscribed to over 100 threads and i delete loads of subscriptions every few days because otherwise i cant keep tabs on the ones that are current.

 

Now i cant find the damn thread, ahhh.

 

Glenn

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tanz

 

my thought was it was barclaycard but i cannot be certain i have posted something but have not had a response yet.

 

glenn

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

Still on hold with this as pc playing up. Engineer supposed to be coming today but when I phoned at 11am they told me that the parts were on back order. Got to wait a few more days to get mine back up and running as cant access files due to motherboard or memory packed up. Went to pc world to try and get them to get file from pc and there was a 2 week diary backlog.

 

So all me stuff is in limbo. Next real deadline is LTSB AQ which should be ok if this old knackered pc doesnt totally pack up. Fingers crossed.

 

Will update soon

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there Tanz,after MUCH hassle from B'card i recieved the "as i gesture of goodwill we will send you your statements within 28 days" from Carl Nuttall,now i wrote to them with my original SAR on the 5th of November,what do i do now?Just wait my 28days or is there a way of speeding things up?Pleease try and help me,all the best-Craig

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there Tanz,after MUCH hassle from B'card i recieved the "as i gesture of goodwill we will send you your statements within 28 days" from Carl Nuttall,now i wrote to them with my original S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) on the 5th of November,what do i do now?Just wait my 28days or is there a way of speeding things up?Pleease try and help me,all the best-Craig

 

Hi craig,

 

You have already given them over 40 days so they have not complied, you can either send a non-compliance letter see here: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/6986-data-protection-act-non.html

 

then after 7 days file for non-compliance see here: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/6971-data-protection-act-non.html

 

Or you could ring Adrian Whally head of Barclaycard Date Protection Unit, his mobile is 07920267281

 

Hope that helps.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again,iv just spoke to Carl Nuttal who told me that due to a ruling on the 1st of December,Barclayacrd were given a further 28days to respond to customers SAR,i asked when they recieved my second letter asking for this and they tolod me it was the 4th of Feb so he told me that they have 28days from that date to send them! Does that make sense?-Craig

Link to post
Share on other sites

THere is no provision in the Act as far as i am aware for extension to the statutory period allowed for complaince with a SAR.

 

If carl works for Barclays then ask him which bit of law is being applied?

 

THe 40 days is set out in the law its your right to get your data. Barlcyas problems are a matter for themselves and no one else. The ICO doesnt have the authroity to change the law or give extensions of time to the statutory period unless you know of a section of the DPA that gives them that power.

 

HTH

 

Glenn

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again,iv just spoke to Carl Nuttal who told me that due to a ruling on the 1st of December,Barclayacrd were given a further 28days to respond to customers S.A.R - (Subject Access Request),i asked when they recieved my second letter asking for this and they tolod me it was the 4th of Feb so he told me that they have 28days from that date to send them! Does that make sense?-Craig

 

Following on from what Glenn said (and excuse me for taking your thread of track Tanz), there's a bit you put in here that's been bugging me all day...."Barclaycard were given a further 28 days to response to customers".

 

Now if my memory serves me, I received a letter in repsonse back in December to a letter I wrote to them (stating that they now had to supply me with my statements) that basically implied that they were being given some leeway whilst they got their house in order due to the Information Commissioners Office's decision. They also included all the rubbish about lack of resources etc.

 

Well that was all it was....a temporary agreement AFAIK. So they can't now use this as a permanent excuse for not keeping within in the 40 days. This is dirty delaying tactics by Barclaycard if you ask me and I agree with what Glenn has said.

 

Craig, I would do what Glenn suggest but also raise this issue with the Information Commissioners Office. How long should the consumer expect Barclaycard to continue to use this as an excuse? Every other financial company (to the best of my knowledge) being targeted on this site manages to get the majority of it's S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) responses in on time, why should Barclaycard - THE UK'S LARGEST CREDIT CARD COMPANY LET US NOT FORGET - be allowed to get away with not having enough resources?

If my post has been useful, tip my scales and let me know

 

Always start with the User guide!

Stuck with RBS charges? Click here!!

 

RBS CA1 £2794 SETTLED!!! RBS CA2 £503 SETTLED!!! HBOS CC £498 SETTLED!!! Barclaycard £705 (with CCI) ONGOING!!! NATWEST CA ONGOING!!! LLOYDS CA x 2, CC, LOAN ONGOING!!! HFC LOAN ONGOING!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

My prob is that I thought my Bcard was issued in 2000 but since doing a SAR with Barclays i have received a copy of my Credit application and it says 1996. However they seem to think that the charges were introduced in mid 2001. Also that the statements for 2000 and before were destroyed.

 

I cant really be bothered to keep on discussing this with them any more so have decided to claim for what I have got and then also claim my partners, as well as doing a second claim for barclays current account which is pre 2000 gonna get all this ready and send it on the same day so they get 3 prelims all from the same address on the same day.

 

This is my hit them hard campaign. lol

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again people, just a quick update: I just spoke to Cral Nuttal and asked him which bit of law he is quoting when he says that Barclaycard have been given a further 28 days to send statements, he got quite angry and just quoted that the Infomation Commisioner have given them 28days from my 2nd letter asking for my data! I told him that i will be going to the I.C about this further delay unless i recieve my statements and he said something along the lines of 'Fine'! What do i do now people? I dont like the idea of going to court to get the info when they will probably be here within 3 weeks? Please help me with your advice...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Tanz,this is what i sent on the 29th of Jan:

Dear Adrian Whalley

 

Account: 4929 **********

 

I am in receipt of the documents that you have supplied in response to my Data Protection Act information request dated 5th NOVEMBER 2006. The disclosure of personal data is incomplete in that at least the following documents are missing.

 

1) You have failed to provide a complete list of transactions and charges from December 1999 to May 2004

This is not an exhaustive list by any means, it is just an example of some of the information I am missing.

 

Accordingly, I have to tell you that you have not yet complied with your obligations under the Data Protection Act 1998.

 

The time for compliance with my request has now expired. If you do not comply fully with my Subject Access Request within 7 days, I shall apply to the County Court for an order to enforce compliance, together with damages at the discretion of the court.

 

Yours faithfully,

And a couple of days ago i got the letter from Carl Nuttal telling me that they will be with me in 28days!! What do you suggest next? Thankyou for your help-Craig:-(

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its up to you really, and I know hwat you mean about not going to court but it may be something you need to do if you wish to hurry things up. Then again you only have about 12 days and they may be here before that. If they then send incomplete stuff I would file as you have sent non compliance letter.

 

But again it is up to you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...