Jump to content

craigten

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Posts

    1,161
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by craigten

  1. Absolute garbage that is, absolute garbage. Nothing to do with diet whatsoever, people like you who make assumptions, I'm sick of you. He developed blood clots, not thickening of the arteries due to poor diet. He may even want to leave constructive feedback. You know nothing of this. Moron.
  2. Understood. It might have helped if you had mentioned this. To be honest, he is a very level headed and sensible chap so this is not a concern for me. Others, it would be.
  3. And this is why some forums get a bad name. You are effectively saying 'Before I give you the information, I will determine whether or not I judge your friend deserves it'. Not your call, I'm afraid.
  4. I would like to stick to the original question rather than the specifics or what did or did not happen, please. As it happens, it was remote, yes. I don't feel that saying what would happen helps here, I am telling you what did happen (or not). So please can I ask how he can gain access to these records / notes, if at all?
  5. He did survive but is frustrated that the delay to getting the paramedics to attend (three hours) to him getting seen by the paramedics and them immediately recognising that he had had a heart attack and needed action immediately (stents put in) has caused damage to his heart (the lack of blood flow due to the clots).
  6. Hi all, Bit of a strange one - a friend of mine recently suffered a heart attack whilst on holiday in Devon. He believes that there was a mistake and extra long delay that the first responders made before summoning paramedics in that they notices empty cans of beer in his caravan and were advising him that his chest pains were perhaps indigestion and were, in his opinion, insinuating that he had a drink problem (they were actually celebrating his son in law's birthday). Is there a way that my friend could use a DSAR to see if this was the case?
  7. I never did anything about them. I wanted to resolve this one first, learn how the court claim process works* and do it again without having to trouble everyone on here. That is the plan, anyway.... *I did a few small claims courts years ago with the bank charges but that was a long, long time ago.
  8. To clarify, this is the drone thread. You are quite right though, the confusion is all my fault. I used to be very organised and on top of my game in all areas but since I have had children, I have lost the ability to be so organised and prepared. Never thought it would happen. Sorry to all.
  9. Worth mentioning that, after having checked my emails, I asked via email to which Amazon entity I should name in legal proceedings and was advised: With reference to your other concerns, you may direct any future correspondence regarding this matter to our Legal Department at the following address: AEUc/o Amazon UK Services Ltd Doubt this changes things?
  10. I will learn bit by bit!! I believe they could claim costs?
  11. It's OK, I will discontinue the claim, learn from it, and make a fresh claim to the correct defendant!!
  12. Hmmm.....it seems that the N244 form costs £255.....is this reclaimable?
  13. OK, thank you, I have asked both. However, two questions: 1. Re my response to their defence - as the courier has been paid by Amazon, isn't the contract between Amazon and Hermes? ie, so as long as I have proof of collection by Hermes it is up to Amazon to sort out any problems with their appointed courier? 2. If Amazon come back with the correct entity to make the claim against as 'Amazon EU Sarl', I will still need to get the correct address too, right?
  14. Just a question, Andy! OK, I will change the defendant name, just so I don't c**k up yet again, are you in agreement that the correct entity should be Amazon EU SARL?
  15. Wow. Thank you. Is there a chance that the court and / or defendant could refuse it?
  16. Thank you. I do not have one being as it seems that I have named the wrong Amazon dept?
  17. Update: Just spoken to the court and although today is the deadline for completing the N180, there is such a thing as a 'final deadline' so they are |OK with me emailing it. Phew!
  18. Hello all. Amazon have filed their defence and I have scanned it, taken out the personal info and uploaded as one PDF. It appears that their main crux is that the claim has 'incorrectly been issued against the Defendant' as I apparently do not have a contractual relationship and they, in my opinion, trying to muddy the water with regards to Amazon and how they are 'third party selling partners' registered in Luxembourg. They also sent all their Ts and Cs, I have scanned the first of them, please let me know if the rest are needed? Please could I trouble one of you to take a peek at their defence and let me know your thoughts? They have checked the 'No' box when asked if they would like it referred to the small claims mediation service. Edit: CRAP, just seen on that I must complete the small claims directions questionnaire by 23d July. Gulp! Defence_compressed.pdf
  19. My friend has an LPG tank with Calor Gas. He had a gas leak on 24th June, confirmed by a Calor Gas engineer. Being as he has a 'Homecare' agreement with British Gas, he got them to come out the next day, since then they have failed to find the leak and he has been without gas (hot water, electric cooker disconnected too) since. Is there a rule of thumb re compensation for the failure to find the leak, do you think?
  20. So what is your opinion on this - they have served their acknowledgment of service and the letter says that they intend to defend all of the claim. What are Amazon like in these circumstances, do they often go the 'whole hog', or do they usually settle for little claims like these before this stage?
  21. Update; just received this; Thank you, I can confirm receipt. Please see attached our Acknowledgment of Service, a copy of which has been filed at Court today. Thank you, I can confirm receipt. Please see attached our Acknowledgment of Service, a copy of which has been filed at Court today. Thank you, I can confirm receipt. Please see attached our Acknowledgment of Service, a copy of which has been filed at Court today. t. Please see attached our Acknowledgment of Service, a copy of which has been filed at Court today.
  22. @[email protected] quick one - just about to complete and email the N215.....where it says 'What documents did you serve? Please attach copies of the documents you have not already filed with the court', what does this mean, please? It's OK, I included the additional POC. However, worth noting that I received this bounce back email: Thank you for emailing the County Court Business Centre's (CCBC) MCOLAOS inbox. This inbox is now closed - any emails should be redirected to the below email addresses: IMPORTANT You will need to send any ‘claim response’ which includes the acknowledgment of service, part admission or defence/counterclaim forms as well as directions questionnaires (DQs) directly to [email protected] to ensure that they are filed correctly. Your email has not been forwarded. N244 and N245 applications should be sent to [email protected] All Other Correspondence should be sent to [email protected] The deadline for documents to be received is 4pm, any documents received after this time will be classed as received on the next working day. The office will be closed on all bank holidays. So I did and got this rather frustrating reply: Your message to [email protected] couldn't be delivered. ccbc wasn't found at justice.gsi.gov.uk.
  23. An interesting letter arrived today. What shall I do re the extra info they want? BRWE86F389C045F_000065.pdf
  24. Apologies, I just thought that technically it needed to include at least a few extra words to make it an ‘additional’ POC.
×
×
  • Create New...