Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi all! I've now had a "final notification letter" through from ECP. I assume I should continue to ignore this, but is there likely any action I need to take? Do you need to see a copy of the letter? Thanks
    • Please will you upload the defence in a PDF format document
    • Afternoon All - after 3 weeks of silence, this morning I received an email from HMCTS advising that P2G have rejected my claim. Decide whether to proceed Parcel2Go.com has rejected your claim. You need to decide whether to proceed with the claim. You need to respond before 4pm on 25 June 2024. Your claim won’t continue if you don’t respond by then. This is their ‘defence’ Their defence Why they disagree with the claim When choosing a service on the Defendants website, the Claimant chose to book their order with Evri and selected to take out £20 parcel protection which comes with the service. On the first page of the booking process, the Claimant entered the value of £265 for the contents and was offered parcel protection for loss or damages against their goods for £13.99 + VAT. The Claimant selected no, which then produced a pop up which explained 'We strongly recommend that you protect the full value of your item(s).' however, the Claimant still did not take this protection out and instead continued with the booking process. At the end of the booking process, the Claimant was offered this again which was refused and the Claimant continued with the booking by accepting the terms and conditions which re-iterates the information provided in the booking process. The parcel was sent, however, seems to be delayed in transit. The parcel finally started to track again, however, when delivered the parcel was empty with no contents. As such, the claim was re-opened and attempted to be settled for the £20 protection taken out in the booking process. This was refused by the Claimant as they felt they should be paid the full amount of the value entered when booking. Unfortunately, due to the refusal of the parcel protection in the booking process the Defendant is not liable to settle the claim to the value and only to the parcel protection taken out. The Defendant shall rely on the Terms and Conditions of carriage in particular section 9. The Defendant understands that the contents have not be handled with due care and attention, which is not being disputed, however, they are disputing the amount they are liable to. They have requested mediation, I’m sure not least to drag the case out even longer, but I can see no benefit to me in this and so shall reject it. As ever, I’d welcome your thoughts guys. g59   
    • I doubt HMCTS holds any data on whether arrests by AEAs required police assistance.  They couldn't or wouldn't provide data on how many of warrants issued were successfully executed - just the number issued!  In my experience, arrest warrants whether with or without bail are [surprisingly] carried out with little or no fuss.  I think it's about how you treat people - a little respect and courtesy goes a long way. If you treat people badly they will react the same way. Occasions when police are called to assist are not common and, having undertaken or managed many thousands of these over the years, I can only recall a handful of occasions when police assistance was necessary. On one occasion, many years ago, I arrested and transported a man from Hampshire to Bristol prison on a committal warrant. It was just me and he was no problem. I didn't know the Bristol area (pre Sat Nav) and he was kind enough to provide directions - seems he knew the prison.  One young chap on another committal warrant jumped out of his back window and I had to chase him across several garden fences.  When he gave up (we were both knackered) I agreed to drive by his girlfriend's house to say farewell for a while.  I gave them a few moments and he was fine. The most difficult are breach warrants but mainly in locating the defendant as they don't want to go back to prison - can't blame them.  These were always dealt with by the police until the Access to Justice Act transferred responsibility from them to the magistrates' courts. The fact was the police did not actively pursue them and generally only executed them when they arrested someone for something else and found they had a breach warrant outstanding.  Hence the transfer of responsibility.
    • thats down to mcol making that option available for you to select, you cant force it. typically if there are known processing delays at northants bulk it will be atleast 14 days later if not more.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Backdoor CCJ OPS/DCB(L) 2017 Windscreen PCN - got set aside - awaiting hearing date- Outside lines - Vantage point , brighton ***Claim Dismissed***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 791 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi everyone, 

 

I hope you're well and thank you for reading! 

 

I got a charge from one parking solution in 2017. I had apparently parked in an marked bay , but at the time the car park was a dumping ground with fridges,  washing machines everywhere and the lines on the floor not really visible so I didn't even realise it wasn't a bay. Just looked like a messy car park. 

 

I contacted them with photos to appeal and got no response.  

 

A year later a letter from a debt collectors,  i followed advise online which  was to send two letters one with an offer to pay the original invoice as a good will gesture and not accept liability and the other to again to appeal. I got no response. 

 

2019 I got a letter from DCB but not legal. I ignored it. 

 

Fast forward to now with a letter with this letter of claim asking for a response within 30 days .

 

I have unfortunately mislaid all the photos and the proof of sending them letters. 

 

Is there anything I can do? 

Thanks!

Edited by dx100uk
numerous uses of the word FINE changed
Link to post
Share on other sites

First of all, it is NOT a FINE. Only a court has power to issue fines, the Police can issue Fixed Penalty Notices, a Council can issue Penalty Charge Notices, none of these is a fine. 

 

What you have received is a Parking Charge Notice - also known as a Speculative Invoice. Designed to mimic official penalties and referring to it as a FINE will not only give a specious piece of paper an appearance of legitimacy that it does not warrant, but will also give Site Team DX100uk apoplexy as it is his pet hate!

 

Before you do anything, read other threads in this forum, you will then understand the processes and the way that these underlife pretend to have powers that they do not. Forget Channel 4's Can't pay we'll take it away', they are not acting as bailiffs merely Debt Collection Agents with no power.

 

 

Edited by Gick
punctuation
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2

My time as a Police Officer and subsequently time working within the Motor Trade gives me certain insights into the problems that consumers may encounter.

I have no legal qualifications.

If you have found my post helpful, please enhance my reputation by clicking on the Heart. Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

As Gick indicates not a FINE, if it is a genuine Letter Before Claim could you post it up as a PDF, with personal details and any reference number/barcodes hidden please

 

Also if you could answer the questions in this sticky, we can see where you are at.  If a LBA probably a snotty letter, but the Team can advise best response once we have full picture what PPC originally sent the Invoice?

 

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much for the replies already!

 

Just to add to the original post , I no longer live at the address that they've send the letter to (have changed my address with DvLa) not sure if it makes a difference 

 

For a windscreen ticket 

1 The date of infringement?

11th February 2017
 

2 Have you yet appealed to the parking company yet? Yes. I dont have any evidence of it as it was from 3 years ago. I sent photos of the car park and my parking ticket . I still have the paid parking ticket 

 

has there been a response?

No. 
 

 

have you received a Notice To Keeper? (NTK) [must be received by you between 29-56 days]

I can't recall this. But I believe I may have 

 

When I received debt collectors letters , I then sent the offer to pay letters and the PDA

 

5 Who is the parking company?

One parking solution 

 

6. where exactly [Carpark name and town] did you park?

Vantage point , brighton 

08-13-2020-11.24.33.pdf

Edited by FTMDave
Personal details showing
Link to post
Share on other sites

I've had to remove two of the letters as your personal details were showing.  Please redact your details and repost.

 

You need to reply, and you need to give them your new address as they might well issue a county court claim at your old address which you would then lose as you wouldn't know about it!

 

Well done on hanging on to the ticket to show you paid.

 

Is there no way of getting your hands on photos to show the lack of marked bays?

Edited by FTMDave
Typo
  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to OPS 2017 Windscreen PCN - Outside lines - Vantage point , brighton - Now Dcb legal letter of claim - i have moved too

I very much doubt that OPS will dare take you to Court having added on an unlawful  £60 to the PCN.

They have been savaged by several Judges in Court claiming the extra charge is an abuse of process and are currently discontinuing all cases just before they go to Court hoping that the pressure on the motorist for a Court hearing  will force a payment  and avoid going to Court.

 

It is a shame that you offered to pay them the reduced amount under cover of "without prejudice" since that would have shown your willingness top pay for something that probably isn't really owed.

 

In the meantime I would write a letter to the SRA complaining about  DCBL adding an unlawful amount when they have had their cases thrown out of Court for adding that £60 or sometimes £70.

OPS were in trouble with Judge Harvey  at Lewes Court back in February for adding that £60.

 

As  it's OPS as opposed to any other car parking crooked company, I would be inclined to write to Judge Harvey asking for his comments.

 

I cannot find the case online but it was reported in this Forum a couple of months ago.

I am sure that one of the Site members will be able to find it for you.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Make sure you write to OPS and inform them of your new address and let them know that you look forward to them continuing their pointless actions at your local county Court, which just happens to be Lewes (even if it isnt) You can tell them that they know how to get there by now.

No need to be polite, they have been called out as crooks by a judge so it is OK for you to remind them of this

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Reloaded those letters,  hopefully no personal data this time 🙈

 

I also found the photo I took of the bays , but i realise now they arent of my car in the carpark , just the car park with poor markings 

 

So points of action

- contact SRA 

- contact OPS rather than DCB with  my new address? So ignore DCb completely? 

-are there any example letters on here I can use ? 

 

Thanks so much , its SO appreciated!

 

 

 

I think i have done this now. Sorry not very technical .

 

Do you mean put everything i have attached in one document?

 

photos+LOC+Reply.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

dont bother with the SRA yet, that should be after the case is either dropped or you have won.

 

Your contact OPS directly, they pay the solicitors to do what they want so will be told what to do.

if they do try to lodge a claim via your old addy it will be OPS that are in trouble unless they can prove they told DCB legal to only write to new addy.

 

Lawyers are like taxi drivers, they go where their clients want them to go except when it is illegal to do so and the they are liable for their own mistakes

 

we would like to see the piccies of the car park.

It doesn't matter you car isn't in the pictures when you are arguing about whether an offer of a contractual consideration was clear enough.

 

If i ran a car park in Brighton and had a term that says no parking on the moon and ticketed you claiming you were there would a court expect you to produce a picture of your car on the moon to prove it wasn't there?

better to show the impossibility of the offer than trying to jump through their hoops

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is the case I talked about on an earlier post-

https://www.dropbox.com/s/ejv0ytejgnu4f57/One Parking Solution v Ms W 5 Feb 2020.pdf?dl=0

just ignore signing in  and read the whole case and then you will understand why OPS shouldn't take you to Court.

And why you shouldn't even think of paying them a penny.

Edited by lookinforinfo
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I am sending this to them. Any feedback appreciated!

 

To whom it may concern, 

Your agent DCb  have been sending letter to my old address.  Please note my new address which has been changed with DVLA for at least two years is : xxxxxxx

I dispute the Parking charge notice that was issued originally and have contacted your agents previously of such and have not received any correspondence back. 
The car park is a disgrace and more like a dumping tip . 

Furthermore,  your agent has added on an unlawful fee to the PCN which several judges in court have said is an abuse of the process and have discontinued  the the cases. Your particular company have been called crooks by the judge at the local country Court in Lewes, so you're more than welcome to continue this unlawful case. 

I will be also writing to the SRA to advise them of your agents abuse of adding unlawful charges.  

Yours sincerely, 

ARRIENI

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would just send the details about the address, don't  mention the other stuff it will only encourage them, just hang fire until a couple more CAGGER's have responded.

  • Thanks 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

yep simply ref their PCN NUMBER or their ref number

 

please note my new address.

 

thank you.

 

dx

 

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

Hi everyone, I hope you're safe!

I wanted to update as a you never what can happen and to see if anyone can help!

 

I have had difficult year and moved address again!  sent to my old address which was unoccupied,  was a county claim form which went to court in my absence and then a CCJ was issued.  (I found out two month later when my landlord forwarded me the mail) .

 

So ya , anyone got any experience of this?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

When someone moves they really should inform anyone they're in legal dispute with of the new address, to avoid getting a backdoor CCJ.

 

Yes, we do have experience, this has happened to a lot of people over the years.

 

You can apply to a court to get the judgement set aside.  Even in normal times the hearing is painless, and due to COVID it'll just be a 15-minute phone call to a judge.  But the judge will need to hear evidence that (a) you never received the court papers and (b) that you have a realistic chance of defending the claim.  A set aside will cost you £255.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to OPS/DCB(L) 2017 Windscreen PCN - Outside lines - Vantage point , brighton - i have moved too

oh dear how silly

you'd moved and you informed them of it....then you did the same thing again, but didn't inform them...

 

i will expect the CCJ is for about £250 and the cost of a set aside, if had any real reason to do so, would be the same £255.

if the CCJ is now outside of 1 month, paying it won't remove it sadly, and a paid CCJ is just as bad as one thats not.

 

dx

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Backdoor CCJ OPS/DCB(L) 2017 Windscreen PCN - Outside lines - Vantage point , brighton - i moved - told of new address but ui moved again an didn't!!

Yes, I can't remember a single case where a judge refused a set aside application.

 

I've just read through the thread and the photos you took are superb, and will be your ace in beating these crooks.

 

Just for clarity.  When you parked, you lived at Address A.  You then moved to Address B and informed the fleecers.  Later you moved to Address C but didn't tell OPS.  The court papers went to Address B.  Is this right?

 

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello yes you are correct with the addresses (and thank you for putting so clearly!)

 

Yea it was just my luck the letters were posted to me after a month or I would've paid it just to not have it on my record:( 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know it's possible to get a case set aside with the consent of the other party.  I've just done some reading up and I think the cost is £100, obviously better than £255.  But how on earth to get the fleecers, the enemy, to agree to this?  I'm just wondering if it's worth sending them something like -

 

 

Dear OPS,

 

Re: PCN no. XXXXX

 

please note that I have recently moved from XXXXX (Address B) to XXXXX (Address C).

 

The PCN is completely without merit and should never have been issued.  It is for "Failure to park within a marked bay".  There were no marked bays to park in!  I have taken numerous photos of the car park, one of which I enclose.

 

I understand that you have a CCJ by default against me for this matter, as the court papers were sent to my previous address.  I am going to apply to the court to have the CCJ set aside, afterwards I will vigorously defend the claim and apply for full costs. 

 

I suggest it would be mutually beneficial if court costs were reduced to a minimum and I therefore invite you to consent to have the CCJ set aside.  I look forward to receiving your reply within 14 days.  In the absence of a reply I will apply for set aside myself.

 

 

It'll probably get you nowhere but may be worth a try.  There are other regulars here who know a hell of a lot more than me about set asides, so see what they say.   

 

We are here to help, not to criticise, but as other motorists will read this thread, it is a bad idea to appeal as the fleecers never accept appeals, it is a bad idea to throw away the paperwork when you're in legal dispute, and it is a bad idea to move without informing parties you are in dispute with as you risk ending up with a backdoor CCJ like this.

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Backdoor CCJ OPS/DCB(L) 2017 Windscreen PCN - Outside lines - Vantage point , brighton - i moved - told of new address but i moved again and didn't!!

£100 by consent.

£255 for a hearing.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...