Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Just a typo change that I'd make for the last line. Maybe also add something that says "I assume you will be fully aware that you cannot rely on a clause of a contract that you do not produce."
    • Hello, Firstly, and most importantly I am sorry for your loss. I would go back to the bank with the death certificate and ask them to step in. Remind them firmly but politely that there is no limit for DD claims   Please let us know how you get on.
    • My wife is the named person to his bank account with him having Dementia being his daughter (I say named person she still is but he recently passed away and the deputyship application has now being stopped by the solicitor as it's no longer needed) We've only just got the Death Certificate so the bank will be the next step informing them. She went to the bank and explained the situation but even being his named person the bank said she didn't have the power to stop DD without any legal documents (virgin money) was the bank. She could have copies of bank statements that was about it.
    • I see you said you tried to stop the DD but it seems that didn't work. May I please ask why that didn't work? You should be asking your bank to cancel the DD and I don't see why they would have objected, hopefully you can clarify this. I agree that you should be making a claim here against your bank and ask them for a DD refund. There is no timeframes for this.
    • JK: Yeah That's correct. We left rent payment coming out of his bank account from January 2023 - August 2023 until we could find somewhere to sort out his belongings which was fine. I tried to give notice a few times from August 2023 asking for advice from Sanctuary housing how we went about this explaining his condition and that he was in a Nursing home from December 2022. I explained we don't have any legal powers to his account like POT but were in the process of going for Deputyship and that I was the named person to act on his behalf to speak with Santuary housing. I said we could provide details of his condition and proof he was now in a nursing home with date he moved in. This went ignored despite repeated attempts to contact them until a housing manager contacted us end of February 2024 and notice was finally accepted with his tenancy coming to an end March 22 2024. Although they have continued to take rental payments for the flat despite someone else living in it from the 1st April. I wasn't aware payments were still being taken till I checked his May banks statements. I had asked them to back date rental payments to August 2023 when I gave notice rather than just giving notice in March 2024 but they've ignored that bit. I don't see why they shouldn't give it back they've taken money they shouldn't have. Thanks DX, I wasn't aware we could do that for that length of time. I'll ask my wife to check with the bank this week
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

OPS CCTV PCN - Fabrick Apartments, Cheadle Hulme, Stockport - already refused Appeal - parked in visitor bay whilst viewing an Apartment. **CANC'd by :Landowner**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1442 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Just want to say thankyou for all that have posted with advice - it’s very much appreciated.

I’ve rung the letting agent to be told to contact the apartment block as there’s nothing they can do

- I asked for land owners number (no answer on that number) so left a message and number.

 

I will at some point on Friday go there photo the signage and enquire.

I’ll keep this post up to speed - fingers crossed!

 

It’s now the principle and not the money they want that is bothering me!

Thanks all again 👍🏻

Link to post
Share on other sites

As a matter of interes who was the estate agent?  Might be something in the signage where you parked  that shoots the PPC  in the foot. You could tell whoever is mAnaging the block, that when you conme to view a property with a view to renting, buying or leasing, you don't expect to be charged  £60 or whatever by a parking contractoe for the privilege of viewing it, and you are minded to post your experience on social media, and local press

.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

now you mention a concierge at the block- now this can be  a deciding matter because if the concierce gave you permission or even failed to tell you that you couldnt park then that creates a new contract between you and the landowner that overrides the one the landowner has with the parking co. If they didnt intend to create now conditions the man on the door should have told you " you cant park there mate" and that would have been that so even silence is permissive.

 

I would also bet that the wording of the signage is very limited as to creating contract and big on prohibition so we need to see pictures of the signs so we are able to confirm y suspicion that this demand has no legs whatsoever..

 

Adding my tuppence worth on the merits of using other sites or not

- The advice given  on different sites will often clash and that can cause problems whe trying to follow a procedure.

 

I feel we do pretty well here and follow a path that suits most cases and our general advice on not appealing is correct in most cases and definitely true in all cases involving the IPC. If you want to shop around that is your choice but stick with one forum when you decide to ask for help or you will get confused as to what to do and when.

 

Coupon-mad is an excellent  poster and is a good lay rep to boot but I find the rest of the forum where she posts is a bit slower on the uptake. Some of the facebook groups deal with POPLA appeals only and others try and get you to buy the services of their star posters to write for you when that shouldnt be necessary.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

The estate agent who managing the letting is Jullian Wadden but i do know Bridgfords are managing lets there too.

I wonder if they let views know about the parking beforehand? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

doesnt matter, by the concierge not moving you on they agreed to vary the terms of the parking licence.

An estate agent showing you round is a disinterested third party and has no say in the matter.

 

You could argue that they should have forewarned the block manager that you were visiting but still no obligation or liability or any event on their part so forget about them.

 

If I were a taxi driver and you were my fare I couldnt tell the police that you told me to drive the wrong way down a one way street, you arent in control of anything

Link to post
Share on other sites

As there is a desk in the entrance with someone there ericsbrother's post above #28 is relevant, desk jockey at entrance not warning of the PPC invoicing viewees of properties is remiss and does alter the situation.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

There was a concierge he gave the keys to the agent

- he was watching us on cctv all the time

- I know this because on the way out he mentioned to the agent that he shouldn’t of let us walk around the community space and should just stood at the door and looked due to measurements they had in place for covid.

 

I've got pictures of all correspondence but it won’t let me attach them 😢

Link to post
Share on other sites

Convert images to a single PDF then upl;oad, thats the way only Registered and logged in Caggers can view them, if uploaded directly as jpeg, everyone browsing can see, nit a good idea.

 

 

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok , that means the concierge has mitigated your actions by allowing you to park.

He is a direct employee of the place so has the right to make such contracts or conversely tell you to get out.

 

OPS's contract is trumped by this direct offer of parking (or at least by not telling you that you cant or warning you that there are conditions attached to viewing the flat that will cost you £100.

 

Now to the NTK.

They rely on numberplate recognition and this is not by ANPR but by CCTV so the wording of the letter is critical and are the timings.

 

The wording of the law is a bit loose here and the parking bandits then abuse the process to get ther money faster and at less expense to themselves.

 

For my money the use of CCTV doesnt fit in with para 6 an 9 of the POFA but there is no legal case that has decided on this either way

 

They fail to say who the ultimate creditor is and that means that NO liability can be created, let alone a keeper liability so appealing has caused you problems because they will think that you have accepted that a contract has been formed.

 

They also say current UK address for the driver, this isnt what the law says, it says current servicable address and that can be anywhere in the EU plus a few other places so if you have a holiday home in Spain use that address for all future correspondence.

 

Zoopla googleview shows the block to eb derelict offices so capture that picture as well as your new shiny building ones.

This throws doubt on some claims about what was there at the time of a supposed breach and also how long a company has been managing a place

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they are silly the Lewes CC case where they were tolchocked by D J harvey could well come into play as part of any defence.  They would be very silly to try court.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Managed to leave a message on landowners number - anyway they rang me  and I told them the Problem.

I’ve just received an email to say they have cancelled the parking charge


so many thanks to you all for taking the time to advise because until you guys responded I was just going to pay it to have it over with - glad I stood my ground with your advice.

 

Thank you Caggers 👍🏻

 

One happy lady here today xx
 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Brillianty, keep that email safe and print a hard copy, the PPC should tell you its dead, but keep that email, as its not unknown for a PPC to revive it 6 months or a year later.

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to OPS CCTV PCN - Fabrick Apartments, Cheadle Hulme, Stockport - already refused Appeal - parked in visitor bay whilst viewing an Apartment. **CANC'd by :Landowner**

well done CAG

 

please consider a donation to keep us here

 

dx

 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes, keep copy of communication as parking co's sometime forget they have been told to drop things or on some rare occasions refuse to do so becasue they have already cancelled a number of demands due to their cock-ups and now want soemone to pay for their inconvenience ( Parking Eye)

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...