Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Post #415 you said you were unable to sell it yourself. Earlier I believe you said there had been expressions of interest, but only if the buyer could acquire the freehold title. I wonder if the situation with the existing freeholders is such that the property is really unattractive, in ways possibly not obvious to someone who also has an interest in and acts for the freeholders.
    • i dont think the reason why the defendant lost the case means anything at all in that case. it was a classic judge lottery example.
    • Hello, I will try to outline everything clearly. I am a British citizen and I live in Luxembourg (I think this may be relevant for potential claims). I hired a car from Heathrow in March for a 3-day visit to family in the UK. I was "upgraded" to an EV (Polestar 2). I had a 250-mile journey to my family's address. Upon attempting to charge the vehicle, there was a red error message on the dashboard, saying "Charging error". I attempted to charge at roughly 10 different locations and got the same error message. Sometimes there was also an error message on the charging station screen. The Hertz 0800 assistance/breakdown number provided on the set of keys did not work with non-UK mobiles. I googled and found a bunch of other numbers, none of which were normal geographical ones, and none of which worked from my Luxembourg mobile. It was getting late and I was very short on charge. Also, there was no USB socket in the car, so my phone ran out of battery, so I was unable to look for further help online. It became clear that I would not reach my destination (rural Devon), so I had no choice but to find a roadside hotel in Exeter and then go to the nearest Hertz branch the following day on my remaining 10 miles of charge. Of course, as soon as the Hertz employee in Exeter plugged it into their own charger, the charging worked immediately. I have driven EVs before, I know how to charge them, and it definitely did not work at about 10 different chargers between London and Exeter. I took photos on each occasion. Luckily they had another vehicle available and transferred me onto it. It was an identical Polestar 2 to the original car. 2 minutes down the road, to test it, I went to a charger and it worked immediately. I also charged with zero issues at 2 other chargers before returning the vehicle. I think this shows that it was a charging fault with the first car and not my inability to do it properly. I wrote to Hertz, sending the hotel, dinner, breakfast and hotel parking receipt and asking for a refund of these expenses caused by the charging failure in the original car. They replied saying they "could not issue a refund" and they issued me with a voucher for 50 US dollars to use within the next year. Obviously I have no real proof that the charging didn't work. My guess is they will say that the photos don't prove that I was charging correctly, just that it shows an error message and a picture of a charger plugged into a car, without being able to see the detail. Could you advise whether I have a case to go further? I am not after a refund or compensation, I just want my £200 back that I had to spend on expenses. I think I have two possibilities (or maybe one - see below). It looks like the UK is still part of the European Consumer Centre scheme:  File a complaint with ECC Luxembourg | ECC-Net digital forms ECCWEBFORMS.EU   Would this be a good point to start from? Alternatively, the gov.uk money claims service. But the big caveat is you need a "postal address in the UK". In practice, do I have to have my primary residence in the UK, or can I use e.g. a family member's address, presumably just as an address for service, where they can forward me any relevant mail? Do they check that the claimant genuinely lives in the UK? "Postal address" is not the same as "Residence" - anyone can get a postal address in the UK without living there. But I don't want to cheat the system or have a claim denied because of it. TIA for any help!  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Mutating Corona Virus


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 449 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

NEWS.SKY.COM

Sixty percent of people being admitted to hospital with COVID-19 have had two doses of a coronavirus vaccine, according to the government's chief...

 

there are now 3,813 patients in hospital with COVID-19 - the highest number since 24 March.

Edited by tobyjugg2

The Tory Legacy

Record high Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

 

10 years to save the Vest

After Truss lost the shirt off the UKs back in 49 days

Link to post
Share on other sites

The US has told its citizens not to travel to the UK because of the covid situation.

 

Meanwhile, someone has noticed that Reunion Island seems to not count as France for people coming in to the UK and they won't have to quarantine. Reunion and Mayotte have the majority of French cases of the Beta variant.

  • Thanks 1

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

That really does tell the story

#

... although to be of more value in the UK, sadly it does need the credits removing

Edited by tobyjugg2

The Tory Legacy

Record high Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

 

10 years to save the Vest

After Truss lost the shirt off the UKs back in 49 days

Link to post
Share on other sites

and a reminder of the utter cobblers spouted by some supposedly reputable UK scientists (and no hindsight - my opinion is here to see)

 

NEWS.SKY.COM

Real-time modelling indicates the nation is at a point where enough resistance is built up to combat the spread of infection.

 

 

Edited by tobyjugg2

The Tory Legacy

Record high Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

 

10 years to save the Vest

After Truss lost the shirt off the UKs back in 49 days

Link to post
Share on other sites

So the CSO gave out the wrong info at the presser yesterday. No wonder I was confused by the figures. An apology might have been nice, for worrying people unnecessarily. But I suppose he has at least corrected it.

 

'Correcting a statistic I gave at the press conference today, 19 July. About 60% of hospitalisations from covid are not from double vaccinated people, rather 60% of hospitalisations from covid are currently from unvaccinated people.'

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a quote from Downing Street when they were asked about the Dominic Cummings interview that I've put on the Boris Johnson, PM thread.

 

"The government he leads has delivered the fastest vaccination rollout in Europe, saved millions of jobs through the furlough scheme and prevented the NHS from being overwhelmed through three national lockdowns.

"The government is entirely focused on emerging cautiously from the pandemic and building back better."

 

The NHS has done supremely well with the vaccine rollout, no denying that. I'm not sure that the fastest in Europe part is still true, but I suppose it depends how you calculate that.

I have a problem with the 'emerging cautiously' comment. They've turned everyone loose, but particularly with young people in clubs there won't be any need to be covid safe until September some time?

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont trust him either way

 

In either case the 80-85% effective against severe illness and 90% effective against hospitalisations they've banged on about for so long would seem to be definitively horsesh*t,

let alone allowing half/un-vaccinated into pubs/clubs and wherever, let alone without mask, is even smellier

Let alone - you can go wild now spreading the virus in pubs and clubs, but in October you will need to be vaccinated .....

 

In fact statistically (rough figures)

60+% of the population vaccinated, and even if it is 40% of those hospitalised vaccinated not the other way around ...

Less than inspiring - surely that should be at most (20% in-effectiveness)*(40% not-vaccinated) of the hospitalised vaccinated ........

.... Unless the claimed vaccine effectiveness is less than half that stated in the real world.

 

Edited by tobyjugg2

The Tory Legacy

Record high Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

 

10 years to save the Vest

After Truss lost the shirt off the UKs back in 49 days

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 16/07/2021 at 21:08, honeybee13 said:

But the UK is happy to send people to France or a lot of other places, who might carry the more infectious Delta variant to those countries.

Anything I'm reading suggests the Beta variant is more likely than the Delta to get around vaccines.  I've seen reports that even the AZ is reasonably effective against severe disease with the Delta.

Edited by hightail
Link to post
Share on other sites

As noted above, the AZ vaccine seems to have especially poor effectiveness against the beta (SA) variant

 

I'd be interested to see the breakdown of which vaccine was used for those hospitalised, with which variant causing the hospitalisation

The Tory Legacy

Record high Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

 

10 years to save the Vest

After Truss lost the shirt off the UKs back in 49 days

Link to post
Share on other sites

About a week ago there was a TV news report, that out of about 300 people in hospital about 90 had received 2 vaccination. Most of the 300 were over 50 years old and had health conditions which weakened effectiveness of vaccines.

 

Those with diabetes appear to be at significant risk and should be shielded as they were previously. Surprised Government is not considering shielding those with certain health conditions.

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, unclebulgaria67 said:

Surprised Government is not considering shielding those with certain health conditions.

 

 

They are - by telling them to shop at less busy times

The Tory Legacy

Record high Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

 

10 years to save the Vest

After Truss lost the shirt off the UKs back in 49 days

Link to post
Share on other sites

It does appear that the policy now is to shift blame.  How on earth they think mandatory vaccination for entry into certain venues/events is workable I really can't work out.  Best guess is that it's a ploy to 'encourage' greater take up and he can then announce later it won't be necessary.

 

If it goes ahead I will be interested to see the going rate for forged documents.

Edited by hightail
  • I agree 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, hightail said:

If it goes ahead I will be interested to see the going rate for forged documents.

 

As little as 40 quid last I heard some time ago

- and it aint a criminal offence to flash a bit of whatever at a club entrance is it?

or will it have to be the electronic one where you have to give all your info  for resale (with no passes) to get one?

The Tory Legacy

Record high Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

 

10 years to save the Vest

After Truss lost the shirt off the UKs back in 49 days

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, tobyjugg2 said:

or will it have to be the electronic one where you have to give all your info  for resale (with no passes) to get one?

All you need is NHS login details for somebody who is vaccinated.  I'm sure there will be plenty happy to rent that out - everything has a price.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, hightail said:

Anything I'm reading suggests the Beta variant is more likely than the Delta to get around vaccines.  I've seen reports that even the AZ is reasonably effective against severe disease with the Delta.

 

I've read that too. My point was that most of the French Beta cases are 6,000 miles from Paris. That's starting to come out in the media now.

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Two different ministers have now said that the NHS app is only 'advisory' and people can choose whether to self-isolate.

 

So what's the point of having it? This is going to lead to chaos, they've sent the libertarians out.

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

??

From Sept 2020

 

WWW.GOV.UK

From today, people in England will be required by law to self-isolate if they test positive or are contacted by NHS Test and Trace.

 

The Tory Legacy

Record high Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

 

10 years to save the Vest

After Truss lost the shirt off the UKs back in 49 days

Link to post
Share on other sites

I work for a Government department and you would think the world had returned to normal, with managers expecting people to behave as if  we were currently enjoying July 2019 conditions.

 

I can understand wanting to return to 'normal' ASAP, but expecting most people to be fully operational, when there are many self-isolating, people enjoying first holidays they have had in a long time and many finding it difficult to live without fear of getting Covid etc, it is wishful thinking.

 

 

  • Sad 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think now is the time for a full return to the office. But unless offices have been adapted to accommodate fewer people, screens installed and adequate ventilation, I don't think it's safe.

 

I feel very sorry for people who will be forced unwillingly onto public transport with others who may not wish to wear masks.

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, tobyjugg2 said:

 

??

From Sept 2020

 

WWW.GOV.UK

From today, people in England will be required by law to self-isolate if they test positive or are contacted by NHS Test and Trace.

 

Correct.  If you are contacted by text or phone you must self-isolate.  Not the case if you are pinged by the app, that's advisory.

Link to post
Share on other sites

HMG is dropping the need for checks by Border Control on passengers arriving from green and amber list countries.

 

WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM

Exclusive: officers in England no longer have to verify whether new arrivals have received a negative Covid test

 

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Covid data not very good today, with 96 deaths, 46,588 new cases, 4,567 people in hospital

 

Boris has taken such a risky gamble, that numbers will start to go down during the next few weeks. If the data gets to the level, where Vallance and Whitty feel they have to request Government reintroduces measures including a lockdown, it is going to be difficult for Boris to stay as PM. If the information provided by Cummings in the BBC interview is accurate, I am not sure many people would be happy that it is acceptable to Boris for older people to die from Covid.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think Boris may have said something similar about older people before. And his father is how old?

 

After Paul Scully on the media round this morning over being pinged by the NHS app.

 

WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM

Firms and staff told to follow app’s instructions even though they are not legally enforceable

 

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 449 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...