Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well we can't predict what the judge will believe. PE will say that they responded in the deadline and you will say they don't. Nobody can tell what a random DJ will decide. However if you go for an OOC settlement you should still be able to get some money
    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

VCS ANPR PCN Claimform - overstay - St Marys Gate Retail Park sheffield


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1614 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

might be worth finding the original council planning permission as bet parking is not limited to one hour when granted originally and no-one can change that

least of all a powerless PPC.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the time limit isn't in the original planning documents, does that mean that they can't enforce the 1hr time limit?

 

Could someone point me to some reading that I could inform myself with?

 

I've been searching the Sheffield planning portal with the search terms of "vcs", "excel" and "marys gate" and I can't find any application in relation to signage in the car park

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

BT please post proof of what you state

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dx100

This was many years ago. The planning documenta for this site are not online but they are available at sheffield city council offices by appointment

 

However none of the above has any effect on signage acceptance, offer, performance in this case so i would not personally waste your time but you are of course free to go to the council offices.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

HB sorry i did type out a reply on my phone earlier but it didnt post

 

Well given the situation D is in, i would initially get in contact with the land agent/business/land owner and see what their initial response is to see if they can get the claim withdrawn.

Social media can help

 

If that didnt work then i have very successfully got Court Claims withdrawn from the likes of Parking Eye To CarFlow Ltd by threatening to involve the landowner.  

 

Now this takes a large amount of outrageous bluff, but (and this is case specific)  threatening the use of a witness summons (ok would need a witness summary on application, but again this is just bluff) to force the attendant of a site employee etc  to appear at a county court hearing works wonders on many occasions (if the case warrants it)

Link to post
Share on other sites

so an even bigger gamble than sticking to the 2 or 3 line defence used here then...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay I have the document, not sure I should shared publicly(?), so what's the best way for me to share

 

ok to publish here 

use pdf

 

Seems to have very new owners

 

 

For reference, I believe the carpark to be within the red outline on the document, outside the front of the pink shaded building, kind of where it shows a wide Ellin Street. 

 

Here is the carpark from google maps (https://www.google.com/maps/@53.3734665,-1.4745247,127m/data=!3m1!1e3)

 

 

the same view without satellite view on:

 

pixs +RegisterPlanSYK352880 (1).pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

phone the Nottingham office of the Lnad Registry and ask them who the previous owners were as this is normally on the docs so you are entitled to ask.

The company that owns it now is just a front co for someone else, like the 25 others with a similar name, usually overseas investors but it i listed as non trading so VCS cant have a legal contract with them

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will do that today when I get into work and report back here

 

Just spoke to them on the phone, they said that any documents requested online will show the title deeds as they currently stand. to find historic documents/previous owners I need to fill out the £7 postal application. Should I proceed with that?

 

I'm aware that the request for this document will probably take quite a long time between sending of the form and actually receiving it, so is this a path worth pursuing?

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes do it tomorrow

disclosure stage could be weeks away yet.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

part of the form says:


 

Quote

 

Indicate how many copies of each [document] are required and insert the required date:

 

I apply for:

 

<QUANTITY> copy(ies) of the last historical edition of the register for <DATE>

<QUANTITY> copy(ies) of the last historical edition of the title plan for <DATE>

<QUANTITY> copy(ies) of every historical edition of the register for <DATE>

<QUANTITY> copy(ies) of every historical edition of the title plan for <DATE>

 

 

what do I fill in?

 

figured it out, form is posted

Link to post
Share on other sites

dot forget to print off your receipts so you can bill VCS for them . If they drop the clai yu ask the court for a costs order cos of their unreasonable behaviour and include thsi along with your research time costs of 5 hours @£19.50 an hour. More of that later

Link to post
Share on other sites

also, you can pay for stuff over the phone and get it posted. I have never suffered a delay when doing so and I am also surprised that the person taking your call wasnt more helpful. Perhaps times ahve changed and it is all about the money money money

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hoping to happen?

 

This WILL 99.9% go to a hearing, this being VCS it doesnt matter where in the country they will send reps to attend a hearing. (unlike certainly companies if you use an address for service many miles away they will discontinue)  So you will certainly end up at a hearing (if Sheffield is your local court your are looking at December at the earliest looking at how cases are being booked at the moment

 

Defence wise, keep it concise.  your defence points will (as you outed yourself as the driver) will rest on landowner/contractual authority and signage, although knowing this site thats not really a strong argument

 

Also the £60 add on charge can be argued as an abuse of process.  claims have started to be kicked out because of this, although this is now subject to an appeal in the coming months

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote

Hoping to happen?

Was meaning are we hoping to have VCS withdraw it before it reaches a hearing.

 

Could you explain the £60 add on thing? Have just been reading about the case you mentioned before however I don't see anything about addons.

 

I know live in London, so Sheffield is not my local court. Do I have to attend, or do I just submit my defence and it'll get decided on the day and I'll be notified?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No you MUST attend, it will get allocated to your local london court, if you work, it may or may not be easier to select the county court to your work place, when you get an "allocation questionnaire"  (if you want it by your work place, then put the court name down and why, if your home court then just state the closest court to your home

 

London courts you will be looking end of January at the earliest

 

VCS will NOT withdraw this case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...