Jump to content

 

BankFodder BankFodder

Chimichanga

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Content Count

    103
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

1 Neutral

About Chimichanga

  • Rank
    Basic Account Holder
  1. It’s not my PCN unfortunately I’m not decision maker only advisor. But will make your advice known and leave it to them to decide. Thank you for your help as always.
  2. They likely will refuse. But think there may be a shot with POPLA. Worth a try at least? I have a few legitimate arguments to put forward. Driver not identified in drafted appeal letter. I’ve learned enough from all of you on this site not to make that mistake . If it wasn’t for the help here Gladstone’s may have got the better of me the last time.
  3. I thought appealing when they were members of the BPA was an attempt worth making? If no good to the parking company itself then to POPLA afterwards for an independent review?
  4. Hello again, It's been a while. This is for a friend in need. I have battled Gladstone's before so I'm better equipped now than I was before, but I'm still no expert and wondered if you could advise please. 1 Date of the infringement 31-07-19 2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 02-07-19 3 Date received 06-07-19 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] Yes 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes ANPR 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No but about to draft one Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up 7 Who is the parking company? Civil Enforcement Ltd 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Snow Island, Kings Mill Lane , Huddersfield, HD1 3AU For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. No but it mentions POPLA so I'm assuming BPA. Am I right in thinking the appeal letter should read along the lines: 1. Doesn't meet POFA - not clear if the are pursuing the driver or the keeper, cannot assume keeper is driver. PCN does not mention the keeper of the vehicle anywhere. 2. Show evidence they have the right to issue PCN - agreement/contract from landowner. 3. Permit holders only - can only claim trespass, no contract entered into as no offer made I haven't seen the signs yet, I'm going today to take a look/pic with said 'friend'. It's the grounds for Huddersfield Halls of Residence. Have uploaded front of PCN the rest of the details are on the back but I can't upload as file too big and I havent quite figured out how to resize.......will keep trying! Thanks in advance!
  5. Ha ha EB you crack me up. Yes wish I'd seen the above post but it was too late by then we went in at 2.20. Anyway, never mind, I'll know for next time Thanks again. Donation made
  6. Thanks EB. Have just got out after a 4 minute hearing. They allowed me in as the defendants lay rep. Gladys did a no show. Judge was satisfied with the defendants evidence showing he could not have been the driver and also agreed that there was no obligation for him to name the driver. She awarded £50 in costs. Not massive but we don't care tbh Glad it's o er and we can get on with our lives!! CANNOT THANK YOU ALL ENOUGH!!!!! Really, you all have been a massive support and your patience knows no bounds. Will make a donation as soon as my adrenaline comes back down to a normal level
  7. Thanks EB, will do along with the second one they sent a week ago! Have demolished a small forest in wood what with all the printing that we've done. Just sorting Costs now (in case we get chance to reclaim them if we win). Looking at other threads am I right in claiming costs for: printing - is this per page and how much per page? postage travel - per mile? at what cost per mile? parking loss of earnings Am i on the right lines? Thanks, your help has been invaluable, I just hope everyones hard work pays off tomorrow!!
  8. Thanks DX. Will do. I suspect this is a final attempt at scaremongering.....What they don't realise is that we're at a point where we might be shaken, but definitely not stirred ))
  9. Hi DX, They sent it by post. Post-mark yesterdays date. Honestly....We get to a point when we think we understand it all and then something like this happens and it throws us! lol
  10. Thanks EB Have today received yet another WS, different to the last, which 'challenges' the points in the one we sent to them. I thought they had to send everything they wanted to send 14 days before the court....talk about last minute Just getting all documents and paperwork finalised and ready for D-Day tomorrow!
  11. Hi EB Thanks for that. .they're both 'signed' by Kenneth Marland himself but not physically. ..it's a printed copy of his signature, so he hasn't physically signed it in person. Have attached pics Digital Signature.pdf
×
×
  • Create New...