Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • In my experience (not with car payments) but with many other things, my partner has been ill and signed off in the past and we have been unable to meet various commitments.  Naturally if you ring the call centre they are going to fob you off and tell you you must pay, that's why that never ever works. I would obtain a note from her GP listing all her health issues plus medications plus side effects, then write to the finance company with a copy of it, explaining the situation, as you have here, asking for a payment holiday. Perhaps mention that the car is very much needed for hospital appointments etc. It's likely the finance company would rather you pay till term end than, chase you for money they will never see, and sell the car at auction for a loss,  You can search some of my threads going back years, advising people to do this for Council Tax, Tax Credits, HMRC, Even a solicitors company and it always works, because contrary to popular belief people are reasonable.
    • Sorry, I haven't ever seen one of these agreements. Read it all and look out for anything that says when she can withdraw and when she is committed to go ahead. If it isn't clear she may need to call the housing provider and simply say what you posted here, she doesn't want to go ahead and how does she withdraw her swap application?
    • Thank you! Your head is like a power bank of knowledge.  Her health issues are short term, due to a relationship breakdown she took it pretty hard and has been signed off work on medication for 3 months. She only started her job in February 24 so does not qualify for any occupational sick benefits, which is where the ssp only comes in. (You will see me posting a few things over the coming days, whilst I try and sort some things for her)  I sat with her last night relaying all this back and she does want to work out a plan, she was ready to propose £100 for the next 3 months and then an additional £70 per month onto of her contractual to "catch up" but Money247 rejecting the payment holiday and demanding £200 thew her, which is why I came on here.   
    • I've looked at your case specifically more.   Term 8bii reads " when, in accordance with instructions from the Customer or the Consignee, the Consignment is left in a safe place" Their terms choose to not define safe, so they are put to proof that the location is safe. If your property opens onto a street its a simple thing of putting a google earth image and pointing out that its not a safe place
    • New rules and higher rates resulted in a jump in the number of savers opening accounts at the start of this year's Isa season.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Me and Various Benefits


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2030 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have got into debt with my electricity as all my benefits are being eaten up by the shortfall in my rent each month and only leaving me with £100 per month for food!!

 

My electricity company has told me that they are applying to the DWP to have an amount taken from my ESA to pay back this debt...currently, the DWP are already taking about £7 a week for a loan, is there a specific amount they can take? I currently pay non-priority debts token payments of £1 per month.

 

I accept i owe this debt, as i have failed to meet the payment plans they set up for me, also due to disability i cannot have a PAYG meter and need to stick to a meter one (hence, i dont want them to force me into having a PAYG as they cost more and i simply cant afford i t as it is)...I have applied for a grant to help with this electricity debt but the creditor says they cannot wait for the outcome of that and asked me for my N.I. number to "get the ball rolling" with deductions to avoid court action, being dis-connected etc.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 319
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

The maximum they can take is three third party payments at any given time. Third party payments for fuel are a maximum of £3.55 per deduction so that's a total maximum of £10.65 per week.

 

However, you mention a loan that is currently being deducted. If this is for a Social Fund loan, this is not classified as a third party payment because the Social Fund is not a third party; they are all part of the Department for Work and Pensions.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi,

 

I am confused.....I have just been awarded DLA for the next 5 years.....I understand that DLA is being replaced with "personal independance allowance" next year and everyone has to be re-assessed again....what was the point in awarding me DLA for 5 years if it not going to be in force?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Out of interest I have been having a look at that new benefit and how it is supposed to work for those who already have DLA.

 

I've come to the conclusion that if they carry on having this dual benefit, it will be with us for as long as it takes for the last person to live that is on it and who is 65 or older in April 2103.

 

So for someone who is 65 by next year and lives to the ripe old age of 95, DLA will be with us until 2043!!

 

Then we have the promise that those who are not 65 by April 2013 will all be re-assessed by October 2016.

 

You could very well have one old guy who is 65 in May 2013 being assessed in October 2016 by which time he will be going on for 69! How are they going to distinguish where his needs have arisen due to old age (Attendance Allowance should be claimed) and where those needs existed before he was 65?

 

And they have said that PIP is benefit for the those of working age.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The 65 year old man won't be assessed. People between 16 & 64 will be.

 

That is exactly what I said! Those that reach 65 after April 2013 will be assessed - in my example, the guy who is 65 in May 2013 will be and there is the strong possibility that he could be assessed for PIP at any time up to October 2016 when he would be 68 going on 69!!

 

What I was also trying to point out is that DLA, under present legislation will have to continue, in my example, for another 30 years - 2043 if someone is 65 by April 2013 and dies at age 95 - I cannot see that happening! PIP will have to be introduced for everyone when the 16 - 64 claimants have all been assessed by October 2016.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is exactly what I said! Those that reach 65 after April 2013 will be assessed - in my example, the guy who is 65 in May 2013 will be and there is the strong possibility that he could be assessed for PIP at any time up to October 2016 when he would be 68 going on 69!!

 

What I was also trying to point out is that DLA, under present legislation will have to continue, in my example, for another 30 years - 2043 if someone is 65 by April 2013 and dies at age 95 - I cannot see that happening! PIP will have to be introduced for everyone when the 16 - 64 claimants have all been assessed by October 2016.

 

 

 

Let's not forget...

 

When PIP starts ? next year over a 3 or 4 year period people who on DLA now between 16 and 64.

 

When it's your turn you will be given a date when your DLA will Stop and your be invited to claim PIP from the date your DLA is stopped.

 

When you claim PIP you will not be paid or not until you had a medical.

 

Basically you will not get any money from date when your DLA is stopped until your medical with you know who !

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's people who are over 65 between April 2013 and 2016 who will not be assessed, Andy. (yes, I have just worked out who you are, again)

 

Who's Who ?

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's people who are over 65 between April 2013 and 2016 who will not be assessed, Andy. (yes, I have just worked out who you are, again)

 

 

http://www.dwp.gov.uk/docs/personal-independence-payment-faqs.pdf

 

 

 

Personal Independence Payment will replace Disability Living Allowance (DLA) for people of working age (by this we mean people over the age of 16 and under the age of 65 on 8 April 2013 when it will be introduced.)

 

Thanks, I'm sorry but you are wrong there.

 

The fixed criteria is that you have to be 65 on the day of introduction - 8th April 2013 for not to be assessed.

 

Where did you get your information from that it was if you were 65 at any time between April 2013 and 2016?

 

Hence the reason for my comments - that you could very well be 68 at least in 2016 yet only be 64 in April 2013 and have to be assessed for PIP!! Not all things come neatly wrapped up in paper and ribbon.

 

Who's Andy? Besides which I am female not male!

Link to post
Share on other sites

So if they stop one's DLA before PIP is awarded, they will have to do home assessments for all those at the moment on HRM.

 

Also as well as having to pay JSA for all the auto industry workers who will lose their jobs, they'll have to pay JSA for all those on DLA who work as they will not be able to work until they get PIP (which most will not get anyway).

 

This is going to cost more money than leaving it as is.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So if they stop one's DLA before PIP is awarded, they will have to do home assessments for all those at the moment on HRM.

 

Also as well as having to pay JSA for all the auto industry workers who will lose their jobs, they'll have to pay JSA for all those on DLA who work as they will not be able to work until they get PIP (which most will not get anyway).

 

This is going to cost more money than leaving it as is.

 

I don't understand that.

 

The DLA award will not be stopped before PIP is awarded - the PIP payment would just take over where the DLA left off. The only time that DLA will cease is if you fail the PIP assessment.

 

What has JSA got to do with it?

 

And why the car manufacturers?

 

Those that work who currently receive DLA will still be able to work even if they lose out in the PIP assessment process.

 

Are you suggesting that the only thing that keeps people in work is if they receive DLA/PIP?

 

The extra money that DLA/PIP pays is probably helpful, but I doubt not being able to work isn't something most people will find that happens in the grand scheme of things.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't understand that.

 

The DLA award will not be stopped before PIP is awarded - the PIP payment would just take over where the DLA left off. The only time that DLA will cease is if you fail the PIP assessment.

 

What has JSA got to do with it?

 

And why the car manufacturers?

 

Those that work who currently receive DLA will still be able to work even if they lose out in the PIP assessment process.

 

Are you suggesting that the only thing that keeps people in work is if they receive DLA/PIP?

 

The extra money that DLA/PIP pays is probably helpful, but I doubt not being able to work isn't something most people will find that happens in the grand scheme of things.

 

Incorrect DLA will stop before PIP.

 

http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/MoneyTaxAndBenefits/BenefitsTaxCreditsAndOtherSupport/Disabledpeople/DG_201317

 

Aged 16 to 64

 

From 2013 to 2016, Personal Independence Payment will replace Disability Living Allowance for everyone of working age even if you've an indefinite or lifetime award. Working age means anyone aged 16 to 64 on the day that Personal Independence Payment is introduced. You'll need to make a claim for Personal Independence Payment instead. The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) will write to you between 2013 and 2016 to let you know when you can claim Personal Independence Payment.

You don't need to do anything now, DWP will contact you to let you know when your Disability Living Allowance will stop. They will tell you when and how you should make a claim for Personal Independence Payment.

 

There's no automatic entitlement to Personal Independence Payment. Entitlement is based on your personal circumstances and the impact that your condition or disability has on your ability to live independently. Entitlement will not depend on what health condition or disability you have.

 

The only exception is for people who are terminally ill and who are not expected to live for more than six months.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

 

So if they stop one's DLA before PIP is awarded, they will have to do home assessments for all those at the moment on HRM.

 

Also as well as having to pay JSA for all the auto industry workers who will lose their jobs, they'll have to pay JSA for all those on DLA who work as they will not be able to work until they get PIP (which most will not get anyway).

 

This is going to cost more money than leaving it as is.

 

The whole point of DLA Mobility component what ever rate you get is to pay for help when your out about about Taxi fare,Petrol,Mobility car on HRM.

 

If your are Permanent house bound you should be receiving DLA Care component.

 

If your getting DLA Mobility component you should be able to attend ATSO medical to claim PIP unless you got something to hide !

 

2 main reason for PIP is to save money and weed out those who Never should have been entitled DLA Mobility component in the 1st place.

 

A medical or No PIP....

Edited by 45002

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The who point of DLA Mobility component what ever rate you get is to pay for help when your out about about Taxi fare,Petrol,Mobility car on HRM.

 

If your are Permanent house bound you should be receiving DLA Care component.

 

If your getting DLA Mobility component you should be able to attend ATSO medical to claim PIP unless you got something to hide !

 

2 main reason for PIP is to save money and weed out those who Never should have been entitled DLA Mobility component in the 1st place.

 

A medical or No PIP....

 

Well said.

 

I know too many that openly challenge the DLA system.

 

One in particular was a guy who had AgeUK to help to fill out the claim form. He was awarded DLA. A few months later he turned up at the same AgeUK office offering to clean their windows!!!!

 

To say the least AgeUK informed the DWP of this individual who was subsequently filmed cleaning their office windows on the ground and first floors courtesy of an invitation to come along on the appointed day.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My goodness, della2, you seem to know a lot of people who've done dodgy things on benefits. Come to think of it, we've had quite a few new members passing through recently who also knew a lot of people who ... etc ... :???:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Incorrect DLA will stop before PIP.

 

http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/MoneyTaxAndBenefits/BenefitsTaxCreditsAndOtherSupport/Disabledpeople/DG_201317

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 

 

The whole point of DLA Mobility component what ever rate you get is to pay for help when your out about about Taxi fare,Petrol,Mobility car on HRM.

 

If your are Permanent house bound you should be receiving DLA Care component.

 

If your getting DLA Mobility component you should be able to attend ATSO medical to claim PIP unless you got something to hide !

 

2 main reason for PIP is to save money and weed out those who Never should have been entitled DLA Mobility component in the 1st place.

 

A medical or No PIP....

 

As you say, if you get DLA Mobility component you should (WOULD) be able to attend the ATOS medical to claim PIP, but when your DLA is stopped before you can claim PIP you won't be able to. It has nothing to do with having something to hide, it is to do with not being able to get there.

 

When I lose my DLA I will not be able to get out; I cannot afford Taxis, and can't walk to the bus stop. After 20 years of independance I'm not going to start asking for lifts all the time, I'll just stay at home.

Edited by count orlok
Link to post
Share on other sites

The car manufacturers because; The UK car industry WILL suffer the lose of 500,000+ cars and the dumping of the same number of nearly new cars on the second hand market. I don't thikg the lose of sales and maintenance work will help allot either.

 

The JSA is for all the people that will lose their jobs and the disabled who will be unable to work because of the lose of their DLA.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My goodness, della2, you seem to know a lot of people who've done dodgy things on benefits. Come to think of it, we've had quite a few new members passing through recently who also knew a lot of people who ... etc ... :???:

 

And if all these people who know all these people who are doing dodgy thing on benefits had reported them, millions would have been saved, and there would have been no need to cut the benefits of genuine people like they are (supposedly) having to.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...