Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello, firstly thank you for reading this. I know no one wants a long winded back story. So I’ll be breif. I entered a local store to buy some paint (which I did pay for) I am honestly not a bad person or a theif.   Didn’t have a basket or trolly as was on my lunch break. Whilst picking up the three tubs of paint placed some masking tape in my pocket (it was hanging out of so I had every intention to pay) just didn’t have a hand free. Paid for my goods (forgot about the £4.39 masking tape) I’ve got so much going on and im not well at all (like I say no one cares I get that) also have autism so wasn’t thinking particularly like others do maybe (who knows my minds going around and around) I left the store after paying, was pulled back in by security. Asked for the tape which I gave immediately  shook up. Gave them my ID and details. I was given some paper and told to expect a large fine in the post for their time and the tape and sent on my way. my questions are: I hardly ever go out without support so the ban I guess I can’t go there now for anything (their loss) - ok but is my photo going to be all over with my name? how much am I expecting in the post as a fine? I have sent them cash in the post recorded signed for delivery to arrive tomorrow (incident happened today) for my error. Their Address was on the bit of paper. i have read two posts on this page but they were from many many years ago so I hoped for updated advise please? 
    • V important you read lots of BMW threads too !  
    • So should I send them a new SAR and put my date of birth on it? Or do I need to send them some proof? Driving license? 
    • Thanks so much for your help!! I've emailed them, and when they reply saying they can't do it I'll reply and state my rights. I'm so glad I found this forum, and will read all of the posts I can find and help guides available for the future. Really can't thank you enough.
    • utter BS, doesn't matter you signed it. pers i'd be writing as per the other threads here rejecting the car as not as described under CRA etc and be done with it. as its a debit card you could also do a full chargeback within 120 days to your bank and simply dump the car back to BMW. 100's of like threads to read here. get your ducks inline. make sure you know what you are doing and off you go. dont take any BS from BMW, no matter what you sign it does NOT remove your consumer rights. p'haps it might be on the off chance you are a good manager , a quick phonecall tomorrow saying you dont want it because (no bla bla fitted) it might be resolved in 5 mins..i will guess to date you not tried
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Gumtree buyer demanding refund


concernedseller
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2191 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all!

 

I’ll try make this as concise as possible!

 

A friend of mine sold an item (an old instrument) on gumtree valued at £3000.

A buyer came forward asking various questions about the instrument all of which were answered honestly and to the best of her and my own knowledge.

None of the information contained within the article was misleading or mis-informative.

 

After answering all the questions the buyer said he would need to come and view the item prior to purchase to which he was explicitly told no problem come whenever you like. Then he sent another message later that evening saying he would like to make an offer of 2750 which was fine and my friend accepted. He then said he would like the item dropped off at his father in laws work which was also done straight away.

 

After he eventually got the item (3 weeks has now passed) he has come saying he’d like a refund as he believes the instrument was over priced for what it is and he isn’t happy with it claiming some parts of it have been replaced or refurbished. As a professional musician I tried the instrument prior to selling and it was in full working order.

 

As the instrument was very old and neither myself or my friend were the original owner we did not make comment on the originality of the pieces or their history as it is often impossible to tell. All we did was provide a surplus of photographs as part of the ad and answer all questions honestly without misrepresenting any information about the item.

 

The buyer has repeatedly messaged threatening involvement from his solicitors should I be worried?

He was given the right to come and view the item but he chose not to and I have proof of this in text messages.

None of the information was false and no details of the instrument were misrepresented.

 

My friend has since spent the money on a trip to go travelling hence the reason for me writing this message, the buyer only has my contact details.

 

The buyer also messaged claiming he had the instrument valued at £2250 would I be willing to refund the difference, something I’m also not keen on doing as I’m starting to believe he only bought the item to sell on for a larger profit and thus the question of originality is the source of his frustration.

 

Any advice or help would be greatly appreciated

should I entertain a refund or the threat of legal action?

 

Cheers

Concernedseller

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

seems like you are doing the right thing....

 

like the sols wave their arms..

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

He's stuffed.

You put something up for sale, he made an offer, you accepted, money and goods were exchanged, end of transaction.

If he's so stupid to spend almost £3k on something he hasn't seen, it's not your problem as you haven't lied in the advert.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would everyone advise ignoring any further communication, I agree with you, king12345, he’s realised his stupidity of buying something without inspecting it for himself however his communication is verging on herasment and threatening in the sense he’s using intimidation to try and get a refund. Would everyone advise ignoring any further communication?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would wait for either an lba or a letter from a solicitor and reply accordingly including the original gum tree advert and all communication highlighting that you described the item to the best of your knowledge and without lying and he refused your offer to inspect the item before purchasing it.

Then if he wants to take you to court he will lose.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If he is simply complaining about the quality of the item rather than some flaw or defect in it then I don't think there is much you can say. If he is simply saying that some earlier repairs to it made it less valuable than he thought, then I don't think he has got any basis for bringing any action. If he is saying that any earlier work or replacement parts have made it unusable or are preventing it from playing correctly then he might have a basis for a claim

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all!

 

I’ll try make this as concise as possible!

 

A friend of mine sold an item (an old instrument) on gumtree valued at £3000.

A buyer came forward asking various questions about the instrument all of which were answered honestly and to the best of her and my own knowledge.

None of the information contained within the article was misleading or mis-informative.

 

After answering all the questions the buyer said he would need to come and view the item prior to purchase to which he was explicitly told no problem come whenever you like. Then he sent another message later that evening saying he would like to make an offer of 2750 which was fine and my friend accepted. He then said he would like the item dropped off at his father in laws work which was also done straight away.

 

After he eventually got the item (3 weeks has now passed) he has come saying he’d like a refund as he believes the instrument was over priced for what it is and he isn’t happy with it claiming some parts of it have been replaced or refurbished. As a professional musician I tried the instrument prior to selling and it was in full working order.

 

As the instrument was very old and neither myself or my friend were the original owner we did not make comment on the originality of the pieces or their history as it is often impossible to tell. All we did was provide a surplus of photographs as part of the ad and answer all questions honestly without misrepresenting any information about the item.

 

The buyer has repeatedly messaged threatening involvement from his solicitors should I be worried?

He was given the right to come and view the item but he chose not to and I have proof of this in text messages.

None of the information was false and no details of the instrument were misrepresented.

 

My friend has since spent the money on a trip to go travelling hence the reason for me writing this message, the buyer only has my contact details.

 

The buyer also messaged claiming he had the instrument valued at £2250 would I be willing to refund the difference, something I’m also not keen on doing as I’m starting to believe he only bought the item to sell on for a larger profit and thus the question of originality is the source of his frustration.

 

Any advice or help would be greatly appreciated

should I entertain a refund or the threat of legal action?

 

Cheers

Concernedseller

 

He had to chance to inspect and he refused, that’s the whole point of an inspection...to inspect before buying. I would replying pointing this out and that you are happy,after taking advice, that there is no liability on the seller’s part.

 

Otherwise I feel he will continue to issue these threats up to the point before issuing court papers, which would be tiresome for you.His failure to carry out due diligence is of no concern or consequence to you or your friend.

Link to post
Share on other sites

buyer remorse rather than any real problem. Offer and counteroffer, acceptance after inspecting the goods=

no refund. Block email and telephone and stop corresponding. To continue to trya dn bargin with buyer will only cause more grief for both sides.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...