Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi T911 and welcome to CAG. As you say, an interesting screw up. So much for quality control! Anyway, our regular advice is to ignore all of their increasingly threatening missives... UNLESS you get a letter of claim, then come back here and we'll help you write a "snotty letter" to help them decide whether to take it any further with their stoopid pics. If you get mail you're unsure of, just upload it for the team to have a look.
    • Thanks @lolerzthat's an extremely helpful post. There is no mention of a permit scheme in the lease and likewise, no variation was made to bring this system in. I recall seeing something like a quiet enjoyment clause, but will need to re-read it and confirm. VERY interesting point on the 1987 Act. There hasn't been an AGM in years and I've tried to get one to start to no avail. However, I'll aim to find out more about how the PPC was brought in and revert. Can I test with you and others on the logic of not parking for a few months? I'm ready to fight OPS, so if they go nuclear on me then surely it doesn't matter? I assume that I will keep getting PCNs as long as I live here, so it doesn't make sense for me to change the way that I park?  Unless... You are suggesting that having 5 or so outstanding PCNs, will negatively affect any court case e.g. through bad optics? Or are we trying to force their hand to go to court with only 2 outstanding PCNs?
    • That is so very tempting.   They are doing my annual review as we speak and I'm waiting for their response once I have it I will consider my next steps.    The debt camel website mentioned above is amzing and helping to. Education me alot    
    • Sending you a big hug. I’m sorry your going through this. The letters they send sound aweful, and the waiting game for them to stop. But these guys seem so knowledgable and these letters should stop. Hang in there, and keep in touch. Don’t feel alone 
    • In my time I've never seen a payout/commission from a PPC to a landlord/MA. Normally the installation of all the cameras/payment of warden patrols etc is free but PPCs keep 100% of the ticket revenue. Not saying it doesn't happen mind. I've done some more digging on this: Remember, what your lease doesn't say is just as important as what it does say. If your lease doesn't mention a parking scheme/employment of a PPC/Paying PCNs etc you're under no legal obligation to play along to the PPC's or the MA's "Terms and conditions". I highly doubt your lease had a variation in place to bring in this permit system. Your lease will likely have a "quiet enjoyment" clause for your demised space and the common areas and having to fight a PPC/MA just to park would breach that. Your lease has supremacy of contract, but I do agree it's worth keeping cool and not parking there (and hence getting PCNs) for a couple months just so that the PPC doesn't get blinded by greed and go nuclear on you if you have 4 or 5 PCNs outstanding. At your next AGM, bring it up that the parking controls need to be removed and mention the legal reasons why. One reason is that under S37(5b) Landlord and Tenant Act 1987,  more than 75% of leaseholders and/or the landlord would have needed to agree, and less than 10% opposed, for the variation to take place. I highly doubt a ballot even happened before the PPC was bought in so OPS even being there is unlawful, breaching the terms of your lease. In this legal sense,  the communal vote of the "directors" of the freehold company would have counted for ONE vote of however many flats there are (leases/tenants) + 1 (landlord). It's going to be interesting to see where this goes.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell claimform - old vanquis debt


SimpleMinds
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1978 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

You refer to section 77 within your defence...so this a loan agreement ?

 

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 182
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I think this is better now. Would someone just have a quick look over it. I'm away for work on Sunday for a week and a half so I don't want to leave everything last minute and potentially forget about filing it. I think I've matched it up to the original but I can't find an exact original / template (not that I expect a template defence).

 

1 - The defendant entered into a consumer crediticon Act 1974 regulated agreement with Vanquis under account reference xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (the agreement)

2 - The defendant failed to maintain the required payments and arrears began to accrue.

3 - The agreement was later assigned to the claimant on 04/08/2013 and notice given to the defendant.

4 - Despite repeated requests for payment the sum of £2463.43 remains due and outstanding.

And the claimant claims

a - the said sum of £2463.43

b - interest pursuant to s69 county courts act 1984 at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue, accruing at a daily rate of £0.540, but limited to one year, being £197.07

c - costs

 

"The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR 16.5(3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

(1) The Defendant notes the opening sentence referring to an agreement between him and Vanquis. The Defendant has in the past had financial dealings with Vanquis. The Defendant is unaware of what alleged debt the Claimant refers, having failed to adequately particularise its claim.

 

(2) The Claimant alleges that the Defendant failed to make the required payments due. This is denied.

 

(3) The Claimant alleges the agreement was later assigned to them on 04/08/2013 and notice has been given to the Defendant. This is denied. The Defendant is unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment from assignor or assignee pursuant to the Law of Property Act 1925 s136.

 

(4) The Claimant alleges “repeated requests for payment”. This is denied.

 

The Defendant is unaware of what account or contract the Claimant refers to, nor having received any default notice pursuant to the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

The defendant denies owing any monies to the Claimant and the Claimant is put to strict proof to:

(a) Show how the Defendant has entered into a legal signed agreement with the Claimant; and

(b) Show absolute proof of how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for by way of statements showing all amounts levied by the Defendant; and

© Show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim;

(d) To provide an original assignment in writing signed by the assignor at time of alleged assignment pursuant to the Law of Property Act 1925.

(e) On receipt of this claim the Defendant requested by way of CPR31.14 and a section 78 request for copies of any documents referred to within the Claimants particulars to establish what the claim is for within the 14 day period. To date they have failed to comply with the section 78 request and remain in default with regards to the CPR31.14 request.

 

As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected the Claimant prove the allegation the money is owed.

 

On the alternative, if the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act 1925 and Section 82a of the Consumer Credit Agreement Act 1974.

By reason of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.

"

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

did you copy to claimants sols too?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have received your Notice of Allocation with the courts directions...what do you mean you have filed with them to ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Directions form ?...you mean the Directions Questionnaire N180 ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

So now your awaiting your Notice of Allocation (N157) with the court directions that you must comply with by the dates set next.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I received some paperwork from Lowell. It has a copy of my details showing my sign up for the card, a letter that shows they purchased the debt from Vanquis and a notice of assignment (on plain paper - not letter head).

 

The notice of assignment reads;

 

Dated 11 April 2014

 

Dear

 

We hereby give notice of the assignment of the debt due to us from you in respect of the balance of £2463.43 outstanding on you Vanquis account.

 

On 8 April 2013 your account was sold to Lowell Portfolio 1 Ltd.

 

Any further communications and payments must therefore be addressed to Lowell Portfolio1 Ltd."

 

Then they have put the address and phone number at the bottom.

 

Another document in the pack shows that Lowell purchased the debt on "04/08/2013" but this letter is dated the same date as the notice of assignment they sent (I suspect it may be a forgery given date errors).

 

So the account was sold 12 months before the notice of assignment was even issued - is that not a bit odd?

 

Also, going back to the ROP thing, they have provided a breakdown of payments which also shows "Repayment Option Plan" and I've added up all the charges for it. It comes to £521.04 - I never asked for this.

 

Mediation setup for 30/04

Link to post
Share on other sites

scan it up to ONE multipage PDF please read upload

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm really sorry but I can't do that as I don't have access to a scanner and I am using a friends internet connection. I can photograph it with a phone but can't remove person info so don't want to upload my personal ID.

 

I can type it out I guess? There are about 20 sheets of paper. They have sent a copy of the Terms for the card, a breakdown of the charges and payments, the letter I have retyped out above and a couple of sheets that look like screen shots of my personal info and my agreement to the card.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well you can do it with a phone 1000's have

read the guide there are programs there listed that help you/

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Sorry for late response. I don't have a smart phone or camera type phone, I'm in my younger 80's.

I'm also relying on my friends computer and help with very little knowledge.

My friend has told me that I'm in the 90's with a phone with snake on it so I guess it is out of date.

 

I had a telephone conversation - mediation today.

Was told by the woman conducting the mediation that I was being "put to strict proof" and that I owed the money.

I thought that they were not supposed to give legal advice and to be impartial.

I guess that is not the case, I was awfully upset after it because of the pressure that was put on.

 

I told them I don't owe it and they must prove I do. End of phone conversation.

 

I am asking another friend to try and help me with the documents so I can post them up.

I only get chance to call in once a week or so which is why I am struggling so

 

with respect I would ask that you have a little more patience with me given I am recently only fully retired and your comment comes across as a little arrogant to assume I can do what 1000's have at my age.

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

If you could manage to just upload 1.the Agreement...2.the Notice of Assignment that will suffice for now SimpleMinds.

 

With regards to your mediation session ...a defendant cant be put to strict proof..thats for the claimant to prove its claim...so forget about it.

 

Next stage is Notice of Allocation and the court directions...post when you receive this (N157)

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you wish a secure email AD to send you unredacted photos too then please ask

i'll sort them for you and post them up.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am recently only fully retired ?? sorry but what has this to do with answers, many of us retired years ago and never used that as an excuse (senile maybe Lol) do not start feeling sorry for yourself as you will be vulnerable to the prey of debt collection, you are above that!

:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,

 

As Andyorch requested I have managed to get copies made of the agreement and introduction letter and notice of assignment. The personal info has been taken out.

 

The default notice was issued on the 1st Nov 2012.

 

Lowell mention the account was sold to them on the 04/08/2013 - their introduction letter is dated 11 april 2014 (seems a long time to introduce themselves).

 

The notice of assignment sent is also dated 11 april 2014 but that one mentions they were sold the account on "08 April, 2013".

 

I'm not all that clever with technology and I might be a little silly for burying my head in the sand at a difficult time but either the date is incorrect or that piece of paper has been typed up and someone has not made certain everything matches.

 

The way the notice of assignment reads is that it has been sent by lowell but should it not be from the original creditor?

 

Should it not read something along the lines of "We hereby give notice of the assignment of the debt owed to Vanquis Bank by you which has been transferred to lowell?" It reads as though someone has tried to make a document up but got the wording the wrong way around and the dates.

Agreement & Notice of Assignment.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Default notice anywhere?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no thats the notice they are going to send one

where is the default notice itself [PDF please!]

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is everything I have been sent.

 

I have the breakdown of charges which shows the rop thing on it but that wasn't copied.

 

I thought that was the default notice.

 

Obviously not but there is nothing else to send.

 

I have sent you everything now, except the rop breakdown.

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

well no DN is fatal to their claim

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hello

 

I received this yesterday from the court. I

 

've had a look at similar requests for a statement but could use some advice.

 

the order states that the claimant must send copies of the docs first, should i wait before sending them anything as i dont need to send anything til the 9th july?

Court Directions.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...